Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 II, 4. 1 | sides of the North Atlantic governmental authorities request these
2 II, 5. 4. 2| where representatives of Governmental Health Departments and Patients’
3 II, 7. 1 | prepared (Working Group of Governmental Experts on Injury Prevention
4 II, 7. 3. 4| distributed among several governmental units, e.g. health sector,
5 II, 7. 4. 1| each year (Working Group of Governmental Experts on Injury Prevention
6 II, 7. 4. 1| countries (Working Party of Governmental Experts on Accidents and
7 II, 7. 4. 2| the EU27 (Working Group of Governmental Experts on Injury Prevention
8 II, 7. 4. 3| in 2004 (Working Group of Governmental Experts on Injury Prevention
9 II, 7. 4. 4| injuries (Working Group of Governmental Experts on Injury Prevention
10 II, 7. 4. 4| services (Working Group of Governmental Experts on Injury Prevention
11 II, 7. 5 | by DG Sanco together with governmental and nongovernmental experts
12 II, 7. 5 | implementation. (Working Group of Governmental Experts on Injury Prevention
13 II, 7. 6 | strong political demand for governmental prevention in the sphere
14 II, 7. 7 | Europe.~ ~Working Group of Governmental Experts on Injury Prevention
15 II, 9. 5. 4| clearly showing an interest at governmental level in this new field.
16 II, 9. 5. 4| National Health Board (a governmental institution) for improving
17 III, 10. 2. 1| associated to substantial governmental tax receipt. Europe can
18 III, 10. 2. 1| can enhance efforts across governmental sectors to tackle obesity,
19 IV, 11. 6. 2| be collected by a central governmental agency such as in Belgium,
20 IV, 11. 6. 4| institutes, in academic units or governmental and non-governmental entities.
21 IV, 12. 2 | associated with substantial governmental tax receipt and Europe can
22 IV, 12. 10 | mellitus (see above).~National governmental and federal state institution,
23 IV, 12. 10 | themselves as well as by Governmental actions. Risk awareness/
24 IV, 12. 10 | under civil law supported by Governmental grants~Concerning aspects
