Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 II, 9. 5. 4| to counter the effects of inequity. The life quality of carers,
2 III, 10. 4. 5| groups) and appreciation of inequity in the distribution of exposure
3 IV, 11. 1. 4| which is indicative of inequity and barriers to access for
4 IV, 11. 1. 4| countries, and reveals that inequity exists even among countries
5 IV, 11. 1. 4| there is little evidence of inequity in GP visits in most countries,
6 IV, 11. 1. 4| of significant pro-rich inequity in the use of specialist
7 IV, 11. 1. 4| countries with pro-rich inequity in primary care are Finland
8 IV, 11. 1. 4| countries showing pro-poor inequity: Spain, Greece, Austria,
9 IV, 11. 1. 4| countries show pro-rich inequity, with the highest levels
10 IV, 11. 1. 4| with the highest levels of inequity favouring the wealthy population
11 IV, 11. 1. 4| highest level of pro-rich inequity in the probability of hospital
12 IV, 11. 1. 4| with little evidence of inequity in the other countries) (
13 IV, 11. 1. 4| 2004). A recent study of inequity among the over-50 population
14 IV, 11. 1. 4| with a consistent pro-rich inequity found in dental care (Allin
15 IV, 11. 1. 4| Though there is evidence of inequity in access and utilization
16 IV, 11. 3. 1| Countries that experience inequity in the distribution of physicians,
17 IV, 11. 6. 3| private funding increases inequity because it shifts the funding
18 IV, 11. 6. 4| systems to minimize regional inequity, and the latter with social
19 IV, 11. 6. 5| costs and they increase inequity [editorial]." British Medical
20 IV, 12. 10 | High priority, reduction of inequity in health is an important
21 Key, Ap5. 0. 0| inequalities~inequality~inequities~inequity~infancy~infant~infants~infarction~
