Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1    I,     2. 10.  4(13)| OrganizationFact sheet N 275Revised 14 November 2006~
 2    I,     2. 10.  4(15)| OrganizationFact sheet N 275Revised 14 November 2006~
 3   II,     5.  4.  8    |   Diabetes: the cost of diabetes. Revised September 2002.~WHO/IDF
 4   II,     5.  5.  3    | allocation of budgets needs to be revised with respect to the increasing
 5   II,     5.  5.  3    |     Epilepsy (1989): Proposal for revised classification of epilepsies
 6   II,     5.  5.  3    |           of MS Consensus Paper , Revised version 2007~Murray CJL,
 7   II,     5.  5.  3    |       Organization (WHO) (2004a). Revised Global Burden of Disease (
 8   II,     5.  6.  6    |       Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification
 9   II,     5.  6.  6    |      College of Rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification
10   II,     5.  9.  7    |        management and prevention. Revised 2006~ ~Masoli M, Fabian
11   II,     9.  3.  3    |           2001/2002 protocol were revised, but reliability testing
12  III,    10.  2.  1    |           the questions have been revised and the data has been analysed
13  III,    10.  2.  4    |          rooted in Art 152 of the revised EC Treaty. The Commission
14  III,    10.  4.  1    |           State. A proposal for a revised directive that will require
15  III,    10.  4.  2    |         Commission each year. The revised Community legislation was
16  III,    10.  4.  2    |          PPR Panel considered the revised Annexes which had been prepared
17  III,    10.  4.  3    |        being reviewed, although a revised version will probably not
18  III,    10.  6.  1    |  countries. The survey included a revised version of the OSS-3 measure