Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     5.  5.  3|     et al, 2000; 2003).~ ~The Norwegian National Multiple Sclerosis
 2   II,     5.  5.  3|    established in 2001 at the Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis National
 3   II,     5.  5.  3|      JH, Nyland H (2006): The Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis National
 4   II,     5.  6.  4|  validity of diagnosis, but a Norwegian study found that 33% of
 5   II,     5.  7.  3|    white patients compared to Norwegian patients was 2.5. This was
 6   II,     5. 10.  7|      and Namork N (2004): The Norwegian reporting system and register
 7   II,     5. 11.  3|        Metal allergy in north Norwegian schoolchildren and its relationship
 8   II,     5. 11.  3|     With the exception of the Norwegian questionnaire study, the
 9   II,     9.  1.  1|         Perinatal deaths in a Norwegian county 1986-96 classified
10   II,     9.  3.  1|     age, and according to one Norwegian study it can reach an incidence
11   II,     9.  3.  2|         Perinatal deaths in a Norwegian county 1986-96 classified
12  III,    10.  4.  2|    for Norway communicated by Norwegian EUGLOREH partner)~ ~Österreichische
13  III,    10.  4.  2|  United Kingdom~Mattilsynet – Norwegian Food Safety Authority~Norway~ ~ ~ ~
14  III,    10.  6.  2|  Environment Task Force’ is a Norwegian low barrier method to provide
15   IV,    11.  6.  4|       cost adjustment)~Norway~Norwegian Tax Administration in Ministry
16   IV,    12.  8    | together with the EEA and the Norwegian Financial mechanisms, can