Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     5.  5.Int|       even when before similar scores on standardised measures
 2   II,     5.  5.  3|        The distribution of the scores over the functional systems
 3   II,     5.  5.  3|      often needed when precise scores cannot be assessed in historical
 4   II,     5. 11.  4|    Indeed, the quality of life scores for people with skin disease
 5   II,     9        |      neighbourhood deprivation scores. The rate of smoking among
 6   II,     9.  1.  2|      neighbourhood deprivation scores. The rate of smoking among
 7   II,     9.  3.  1|    even when they have similar scores on standardised measures
 8   II,     9.  5.  3|    even when they have similar scores on standardised measures
 9  III,    10.  2.  1|         No increase in average scores for pricing, health warnings
10  III,    10.  5.  3|  construction follow with high scores on musculoskeletal disorders.
11  III,    10.  6.  1|      score range from 3 to 14. Scores 3-8 are considered to reflect
12  III,    10.  6.  1|   reflect poor social support, scores 9-11 moderate social support
13  III,    10.  6.  1|    moderate social support and scores 12-14 strong social support.~ ~
14   IV,    11.  1.  5| practice of 1,050 points, with scores of individual practices
15   IV,    11.  1.  5|        countries having higher scores than the new Member States