Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     5.  3.  2| population incidence, number of interval cases, follow-up of cases
 2   II,     5.  3.  7|   lesions (with 3 or 5 years of interval); women aged 50 to 69 for
 3   II,     5.  3.  7| screening (with 2 or 3 years of interval) and men and women aged
 4   II,     5.  3.  7|    cancer (with 1 or 2 years of interval).~ ~It has been shown that
 5   II,     5.  5.  1|      ratio (with 95% confidence interval) for a score of MH<55 by
 6   II,     5.  5.  1|      ratio (with 95% confidence interval) for a score MH<55 in women
 7   II,     5.  5.  1|      ratio (with 95% confidence interval) for a score MH<55 in elderly (
 8   II,     5.  6.  6|        prevalence surveys at an interval of 10 years. BMJ 320:1577-
 9   II,     5.  9.  4|        was 0.50 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.65) and 0.53
10   II,     5. 15.  3|   inhabitants with a confidence interval of 1-9. This estimation
11  III,    10.  3.  1|        duration of a given time interval T (e.g. 24 hour period,
12  III,    10.  3.  1|     measured in dB(A)) over the interval in question.~Lden~The Day-Evening
13   IV,    12.  2    |   lesions (with 3 or 5 years of interval); women aged 50 to 69 for
14   IV,    12.  2    | screening (with 2 or 3 years of interval) and men and women aged
15   IV,    12.  2    |    cancer (with 1 or 2 years of interval). The ultimate purpose of