Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     5.  5.  3|               representing a plausible hypothesis (Nashef et al, 1996).~In
 2   II,     5.  7.  4|             that support or refute the hypothesis of restriction of RRT, at
 3   II,     5.  9.  4|       environmental factors. Different hypothesis have been formulated, among
 4   II,     5.  9.  4|                support for the hygiene hypothesis. Prevalence of atopy, but
 5   II,     5.  9.  4|              to the so calledHygiene Hypothesis” (Wang, 2006; von Mutius,
 6   II,     5.  9.  4|         project (htt f) is testing the hypothesis that PAHs carried by airborne
 7   II,     5.  9.  7|                allergy and the hygiene hypothesis: historical perspective.
 8   II,     9.  3.  1|               available to support the hypothesis that menopause is a major
 9   II,     9.  5.  4|               chain of research’, i.e. hypothesis, diagnostic tools, therapies,
10  III,    10.  2.  1| epidemiological data do not enable the hypothesis of a reduction in periodontal
11  III,    10.  3.  2|          another relevant source. This hypothesis is supported by measurements
12   IV,    11.  6.  5|                   Is the target income hypothesis an economic heresy?" Medical