Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     5.  7.  4|           survival from so-called competing risks (e.g. cardiovascular
 2   II,     9.  4.  5|    fragmentation of delivery into competing health and social care organisations
 3  III,    10.  2.  1|         environment in which many competing messages are received in
 4   IV,    11.  1.  6|    provision of insurance through competing private insurance funds
 5   IV,    11.  6.  2|   statutory health insurance with competing private insurance funds.~ ~
 6   IV,    11.  6.  2| separating the health budget from competing national priorities. However,
 7   IV,    11.  6.  2|          Where there are multiple competing funds, as in the Czech Republic,
 8   IV,    11.  6.  2| competition, with health insurers competing on community-rated premiums,
 9   IV,    11.  6.  2|     another. And while the aim of competing funds and choice of insurer
10   IV,    11.  6.  4|    prevent risk selection amongst competing sickness funds in social
11   IV,    12.  2    |         environment in which many competing messages are received in
12   IV,    13.  7.  3|   individually or in partnership, competing at European level, in all