Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     5.  6.  4|     from sick leave or worker’s compensation claims. A hindrance to these
 2  III,    10.  3.  2|         corporate liability and compensation;~· the precautionary principle.~ ~
 3  III,    10.  5.  3|        study of EUROGIP (2004), compensation for occupational disease
 4  III,    10.  5.  3|   heterogeneity of the national compensation schemes, the rate per 100,
 5  III,    10.  5.  3|      countries, over 75% of the compensation was due to only 5 disease
 6  III,    10.  5.  3|     E.g. in Belgium and Germany compensation is still caused by exposures
 7  III,    10.  5.  3|         declined. In France 48% compensation is caused by exposures to
 8  III,    10.  5.  3|        An updated comparison of compensation schemes in selected EU Countries
 9  III,    10.  5.  3|        perception of inadequate compensation and/or bullying and harassment.
10  III,    10.  5.  3| Occupational Disease and Injury Compensation Schemes. [on-line publication
11   IV,    12. 10    |        Financial old age policy~Compensation for work incapacity policy~