Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2. 6 | countries but Denmark and the Netherlands, and the strongest expected
2 I, 2. 10. 4 | Ziekenhuizen in Maastricht, the Netherlands, resulted in a reduction
3 I, 3. 1 | Cyprus, Ireland, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal and the Slovak
4 I, 3. 1 | and 1994 (1.85), in the Netherlands between 1964 (3.17) and
5 I, 3. 1 | rise. An example is the Netherlands, where in the 1970s the
6 I, 3. 1 | decades, at least in the Netherlands (Beets et al, 2001).~ ~The
7 I, 3. 1 | 12-13% in Italy and the Netherlands; in Ireland and Portugal
8 I, 3. 1 | about 18% in Finland, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom,
9 I, 3. 2 | Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Slovenia, the Slovak
10 I, 3. 2 | 10 and 15%, France, the Netherlands and the UK between 5 and
11 I, 3. 2 | Finland, France and the Netherlands the rates of natural population
12 I, 3. 2 | Ireland, Luxembourg and the Netherlands (still) have a high natural
13 I, 3. 2 | Poland ( 5%), Italy (3%) and Netherlands (10%) all have more than
14 I, 3. 3 | Luxembourg, Germany, and the Netherlands, while Cyprus, Ireland,
15 II, 4. 1 | disability, whilst Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom
16 II, 4. 1 | whilst Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands and Portugal experienced
17 II, 4. 1 | for men and women and the Netherlands and Portugal showing expansion
18 II, 4. 1 | trends in Norway and the Netherlands diverged from the mid-1980s
19 II, 5. 2. 2 | Germany, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Austria, Slovenia) and
20 II, 5. 2. 3(5) | Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Austria, Slovenia.~
21 II, 5. 3. 2 | Catalunia), Switzerland, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.
22 II, 5. 3. 3 | Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Switzerland).~- The basic
23 II, 5. 3. 6 | Austria, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, Switzerland and
24 II, 5. 3. 6 | Italy, Switzerland, the Netherlands and Spain); but was lower -
25 II, 5. 3. 7 | Yes~MALTA~Planning stage~NETHERLANDS~Yes (2004)~AUSTRIA~Yes (
26 II, 5. 4. 1 | France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and the UK (
27 II, 5. 4. 1 | ranged from 1.6% in the Netherlands to 6.6 % in Italy. Hospitalisations
28 II, 5. 4. 3 | between 45% (Ireland) and 99% (Netherlands), with a median value of
29 II, 5. 4. 3 | of 59%, corresponding to Netherlands and France. Apart from children
30 II, 5. 4. 3 | between 44% (Ireland) and 99% (Netherlands), with a median value of
31 II, 5. 4. 3 | between 45% (Ireland) and 99% (Netherlands), with a median value of
32 II, 5. 4. 3 | from 25% (Finland) to 97% (Netherlands), with a median of 64.5%.
33 II, 5. 4. 3 | between 12% (Ireland) and 84% (Netherlands). The median is 57%. Only
34 II, 5. 4. 3 | between 42% (Finland) and 99% (Netherlands), with a median of 92%,
35 II, 5. 4. 3 | with figures between 0.1% (Netherlands, Sweden) and 4% (Cyprus).
36 II, 5. 4. 4 | Europe ranges between 12% (Netherlands) and 25% (UK), with a median
37 II, 5. 5. 1 | France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Spain.~ ~Lifetime prevalence
38 II, 5. 5. 1 | Portugal, Rumania, Austria, Netherlands and Poland) young people
39 II, 5. 5. 1 | Denmark, Great Britain, and Netherlands), the oldest age range (
40 II, 5. 5. 2 | Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden
41 II, 5. 5. 2 | 2007). Switzerland, the Netherlands and France have signed but
42 II, 5. 5. 3 | and Wales, Switzerland, Netherlands) emphasise the upward trend
43 II, 5. 5. 3 | Ireland, USA, Macedonia, Netherlands, Italy, Croatia, Malta,
44 II, 5. 5. 3 | Luxembourg, Macedonia, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania,
45 II, 5. 5. 3 | X~ ~Macedonia~ ~X~ ~The Netherlands~ ~X~Several centres and
46 II, 5. 5. 3 | and Wales, Switzerland, Netherlands) emphasise the upward trend
47 II, 5. 5. 3 | available only from Finland, the Netherlands and the UK. The prevalence
48 II, 5. 5. 3 | survey Finland 14.3%~NEMESIS Netherlands 53.3%~ONS United Kingdom
49 II, 5. 5. 3 | France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Spain and Ukraine (WHO,
50 II, 5. 5. 3 | from Italy, Denmark, the Netherlands, Spain, and the United Kingdom.
51 II, 5. 5. 3 | countries such as Belgium, the Netherlands, and Denmark) and the implementation
52 II, 5. 5. 3 | five countries: Sweden, The Netherlands, England, France and Denmark.
53 II, 5. 5. 3 | 1996/Bronson, 1970 (*)~The Netherlands~Adults and elderly~Door-to-door
54 II, 5. 5. 3 | months -~ II - Prohibited~Netherlands I 12 months First unprovoked
55 II, 5. 5. 3 | rates were found in the Netherlands, Belgium, Slovenia, Switzerland
56 II, 5. 5. 3 | RR-MS ranged from 24% (The Netherlands) to 88% (Greece) of prevalent
57 II, 5. 5. 3 | 4% (Austria) to 35% (The Netherlands).~ ~Table 5.5.3.5.5. Proportion
58 II, 5. 5. 3 | Austria) and 39% (The Netherlands) for severe MS (EDSS 7-9.
59 II, 5. 5. 3 | for Denmark, Scotland, The Netherlands, Switzerland, Germany, Austria
60 II, 5. 5. 3 | province of Groningen, The Netherlands. In: Firnhaber W, Lauer
61 II, 5. 6. 3 | diseases per age group in the Netherlands~ ~Figure 5.6.2.b Prevalence
62 II, 5. 6. 3 | diseases per age group in the Netherlands (different group of diseases)~ ~
63 II, 5. 6. 3 | Medical Care, 2001).~ ~In the Netherlands, musculoskeletal conditions
64 II, 5. 6. 3 | but a large study from the Netherlands reported an incidence of
65 II, 5. 6. 4 | healthcare costs in the Netherlands (Meerding, 1998). The total
66 II, 5. 6. 6 | determinants of healthcare costs in Netherlands: cost of illness study.
67 II, 5. 7. 2 | Greece, Sweden and The Netherlands) were able to provide complete
68 II, 5. 7. 2 | Greece, Spain, Sweden, The Netherlands, UK) plus Iceland and Norway.~ ~ ~ ~
69 II, 5. 7. 3 | based studies in Belgium, Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Iceland,
70 II, 5. 7. 3 | 7..1 and 5.7..2) in The Netherlands (De Zeeuw et al, 2005) and
71 II, 5. 7. 3 | based studies in Belgium, Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Iceland,
72 II, 5. 7. 5 | investigators in Groningen (The Netherlands) and a cost-effectiveness
73 II, 5. 7. 5 | defined limits.~· In The Netherlands, quality assurance is a
74 II, 5. 7. 7 | Informatics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 2007.~Esbjorner E,
75 II, 5. 7. 7 | end-stage renal failure in The Netherlands: hope for the future? Kidney
76 II, 5. 8. 3 | population) reported for the Netherlands was 6.5. for mild, 13.3
77 II, 5. 8. 3 | patients) was performed in the Netherlands (Vermeeren et al, 2006).
78 II, 5. 8. 3 | Spain, USA, Sweden, The Netherlands, Italy) were compared (Chapman
79 II, 5. 8. 4 | involving US, Finland, Netherlands, Italy, Greece, Japan and
80 II, 5. 8. 4 | Italy, Norway, China, the Netherlands and Spain, it was concluded
81 II, 5. 9. 3 | Spain, United Kingdom, Netherlands and Germany). The epidemiological
82 II, 5. 9. 3 | decreasing over time, but for the Netherlands, no decrease in mortality
83 II, 5. 9. 4 | Italy, Norway, Spain, Swedem Netherlands, United Kingdom); The addition
84 II, 5. 9. 4 | High~High~ND~–~ND~The Netherlands~ Bergen op Zoom~–~Low~Low~–~–~
85 II, 5. 11. 7 | atopic dermatitis in the Netherlands: an international comparison.
86 II, 5. 12. 3 | Ireland (3.4), Norway and the Netherlands (around 5.5). In the subsequent
87 II, 5. 12. 3 | 2000-02, together with the Netherlands and Norway, whose rates
88 II, 5. 14. 3 | United Kingdom, 65.4% in Netherlands). These differences are
89 II, 5. 14. 3 | Finland (0.4%) and the Netherlands (0.3%) have the smallest
90 II, 6. 3. 1 | Also, a recent study in the Netherlands has estimated annual costs
91 II, 6. 3. 1 | study showed that for the Netherlands (population of 16 million)
92 II, 6. 3. 2 | Europe (Scandinavia and the Netherlands), and more serious in the
93 II, 6. 3. 3 | seen in the UK and in the Netherlands.~ ~ ~Figure 6.2. HIV cases
94 II, 6. 3. 3 | Germany, Greece, Hungary, the Netherlands, Slovenia), and IDU the
95 II, 6. 3. 4 | countries like Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden and United Kingdom,
96 II, 6. 3. 5 | increase was observed in the Netherlands, Ireland and the UK. In
97 II, 6. 3. 5 | countries: Estonia, Finland, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden. A dramatic
98 II, 6. 3. 5 | far was reported in the Netherlands (40.17 per 100 000), with
99 II, 6. 3. 5 | measles was observed in the Netherlands (1999–2000), Spain (2003),
100 II, 6. 3. 5 | 44 per 100 000) and the Netherlands (2.23 per 100 000) reporting
101 II, 6. 3. 5 | unvaccinated community in the Netherlands. Polio eradication has implications
102 II, 6. 3. 6 | countries, notably Sweden, the Netherlands and Norway had a very high
103 II, 6. 3. 6 | each in Estonia and in the Netherlands make up the remainder of
104 II, 6. 3. 7 | and 2003), one case in the Netherlands in 2000, also from Sierra
105 II, 7. 2. 6 | regional), Italy, Latvia, Netherlands, Malta, Portugal, Sweden
106 II, 7. 2. 6 | Denmark, Ireland, Latvia, Netherlands, Malta, UK/Wales and Sweden –
107 II, 7. 3. 2 | times higher than in the Netherlands, the country which has the
108 II, 7. 3. 2 | the same level as in the Netherlands (Figure 7.1).~ ~Figure 7.
109 II, 8. 1. 2 | apart from Germany, the Netherlands and the UK plus Estonia,
110 II, 8. 1. 3 | exception of Belgium and the Netherlands, which provided support
111 II, 8. 2. 1 | notable exception is the Netherlands, where GPs (primary care
112 II, 8. 2. 1 | two universities in the Netherlands, for instance – have been
113 II, 8. 2. 1 | primary care practices) in the Netherlands required more consultation
114 II, 8. 2. 2 | Finland, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Bulgaria,
115 II, 8. 2. 2 | Finland, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Bulgaria,
116 II, 9 | especially high in Denmark, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom,
117 II, 9 | Ireland, and Lithuania. The Netherlands have the highest rates of
118 II, 9. 1. 1 | prospective regional study in The Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod
119 II, 9. 1. 1 | indigenous maternal deaths in The Netherlands. Bjog 2002;109(2):212-3.~ ~
120 II, 9. 1. 2 | anomalies beyond this limit (Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Denmark).~ ~
121 II, 9. 1. 2 | for example Germany, the Netherlands and Denmark had rates between
122 II, 9. 1. 2 | level of education in the Netherlands. Community Genetics 2007;
123 II, 9. 2. 4 | especially high in Denmark, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom,
124 II, 9. 2. 4 | Ireland, and Lithuania. The Netherlands have the highest rates of
125 II, 9. 3. 1 | also in Belgium and the Netherlands (Knapp, 2007).~ ~Women are
126 II, 9. 3. 1 | of Denmark, Greece, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom are
127 II, 9. 3. 1 | European Commission, 2003). The Netherlands report one of the lowest
128 II, 9. 3. 1 | Hungary, Malta and the Netherlands, and a more significant
129 II, 9. 3. 2 | Philibert et al, 2006) or the Netherlands (van Roosmalen et al, 2002).~ ~
130 II, 9. 3. 2 | Denmark, Iceland, Finland, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain and Switzerland -
131 II, 9. 3. 2 | prospective regional study in The Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod
132 II, 9. 3. 2 | into maternal deaths in The Netherlands 1983-1992. Eur J Obstet
133 II, 9. 3. 2 | indigenous maternal deaths in The Netherlands. Bjog 2002;109(2):212-3.~ ~
134 II, 9. 3. 3 | Great Britain, Italy, the Netherlands and Switzerland) have been
135 II, 9. 5. 3 | highest prevalence in the Netherlands (33.5 per 100 000) and Latvia (
136 II, 9. 5. 3 | in Poland (32.0) and the Netherlands (30.8 per 100.000). (WHO
137 III, 10. 2. 1 | developed markets. In the Netherlands, for example, Euromonitor'
138 III, 10. 2. 1 | Cosmetics and toiletries in the Netherlands. Oral hygiene in Netherlands.
139 III, 10. 2. 1 | Netherlands. Oral hygiene in Netherlands. London, United Kingdom.~ ~
140 III, 10. 2. 1 | Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal,
141 III, 10. 2. 1 | sufficiently active in the Netherlands and Germany to less than
142 III, 10. 2. 1 | three countries (Belgium, Netherlands Sweden) (Bayingana et al,
143 III, 10. 2. 1 | Enghardt-Barbieri, 2004; Statistics Netherlands, 2006). These three countries
144 III, 10. 2. 1 | Kautiainen, 2005; Statistics Netherlands, 2006).~ ~The Pro Children
145 III, 10. 2. 1 | Austria, 2007; Statistics Netherlands, 2007; Zaletel-Kragelj et
146 III, 10. 2. 1 | not available~ ~ ~ ~ ~The Netherlands~Dutch National Food Consumption
147 III, 10. 2. 1 | Italy, Spain, Greece, The Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Germany,
148 III, 10. 2. 1(24)| Malta (Asciak et al, 2003), Netherlands (Statistics Netherlands,
149 III, 10. 2. 1(24)| Netherlands (Statistics Netherlands, 2007), Romania (Statistical
150 III, 10. 2. 1 | 2004) and of 14.5% in the Netherlands (2-9 years old) (Statistics
151 III, 10. 2. 1 | 9 years old) (Statistics Netherlands, 2006) (Figure 10.2.1.7.
152 III, 10. 2. 1 | 9.4%: girls: 10.9%), the Netherlands (boys: 11.6%; girls: 8.6%)
153 III, 10. 2. 1 | countries as for example the Netherlands, Belgium, Great Britain,
154 III, 10. 2. 1 | and the Environment, The Netherlands, October 2006 [http://ec.
155 III, 10. 2. 1 | October 2007).~ ~Statistics Netherlands (2006): Module “health and
156 III, 10. 2. 1 | conditions. Heerlen, Statistics Netherlands.~ ~Statistics Netherlands (
157 III, 10. 2. 1 | Netherlands.~ ~Statistics Netherlands (2007): Statline. Heerlen,
158 III, 10. 2. 1 | Statline. Heerlen, Statistics Netherlands (in Dutch).~[h ] (database
159 III, 10. 2. 5 | studies from Finland, the Netherlands and UK have linked low birth weight
160 III, 10. 3. 1 | has estimated that in the Netherlands, exposure to radon in dwellings
161 III, 10. 3. 1 | environmental disease burden in the Netherlands (based on Knol et al., 2005).
162 III, 10. 3. 1 | burden of disease in the Netherlands, 1980-2020. Bilthoven: RIVM,
163 III, 10. 3. 2 | Hungary to ca. 40 pg/g in the Netherlands. The decrease of concentrations
164 III, 10. 3. 2 | Belgium, Norway or the Netherlands for the same period are
165 III, 10. 4. 2 | 2,900 samples~3.5% (the Netherlands) and~13% (import) involving~
166 III, 10. 4. 2 | Current oral exposure in~ the Netherlands to PAHs, ~about 100-200
167 III, 10. 4. 2 | of cancer per~year in the Netherlands~ ~ ~Research into conditions~
168 III, 10. 4. 2 | intake of aflatoxin B1 in the~Netherlands is approx.~0.03 ng/kg body weight
169 III, 10. 4. 2 | Episode in 2001 in the~Netherlands: star aniseed~species not
170 III, 10. 4. 2 | en Waren Autoriteit~The Netherlands~Food Standards Agency~United
171 III, 10. 4. 2 | diet and safe food in the Netherlands. [on-line publication available
172 III, 10. 5. 1 | for below 10 percent (The Netherlands) to above 25% (Portugal,
173 III, 10. 5. 2 | study showed that in the Netherlands, the urban population shows
174 III, 10. 5. 2 | urbanization level in the Netherlands, which may result in much
175 III, 10. 5. 2 | data available from the Netherlands compares the prevalence
176 III, 10. 5. 2 | and rural citizens in the Netherlands~ ~For male residents, the
177 III, 10. 5. 2 | rural male citizens in the Netherlands~ ~A rural health profile
178 III, 10. 5. 2 | Italy, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom~
179 III, 10. 5. 2 | accessed on 12 April 2007)~ ~Netherlands Institute of Health Services
180 III, 10. 5. 2 | Jouke van der Zee et al. (Netherlands Institute of Health Services
181 III, 10. 5. 2 | variations in health in The Netherlands: does selective migration
182 III, 10. 5. 2 | General Practitioner~NIVEL~Netherlands Institute of Health Services
183 III, 10. 5. 3 | than 25% in Ireland, the Netherlands and the UK. Every second
184 III, 10. 5. 3 | In Denmark, Estonia, the Netherlands, Austria, Portugal, Finland,
185 III, 10. 5. 3 | Slovakia to 49.8% in the Netherlands.~· 164.8 million workers
186 III, 10. 5. 3 | in Finland and 12% in the Netherlands to 3% in Cyprus, Estonia
187 III, 10. 5. 3 | Germany, United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Belgium, the directives
188 III, 10. 5. 3 | Sweden, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Germany and Belgium are
189 III, 10. 6. 1 | Ireland, Spain, Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden declared low
190 III, 10. 6. 1 | girls, in Slovenia and the Netherlands, 92% of 13 year old girls,
191 III, 10. 6. 1 | Nijhoff Publishers, the Netherlands, 1985.~ ~Kohb M, Künemund
192 III, 10. 6. 3 | Denmark (1.9%) and in the Netherlands (1.4%). On average, 1.7%
193 III, 10. 6. 3 | Kingdom, Ireland and the Netherlands reported higher than average
194 IV, 11. 1. 3 | funds e.g. Germany and the Netherlands;~3) devolved tax funded
195 IV, 11. 1. 3 | Cultural Planning Office of the Netherlands, 2004; The Conference Board
196 IV, 11. 1. 4 | Finland, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and
197 IV, 11. 1. 4 | Greece, Austria, Germany, the Netherlands for the probability of a
198 IV, 11. 1. 5 | in Finland, Sweden, the Netherlands and Norway, with lowest
199 IV, 11. 1. 5 | Finland, France, Spain, the Netherlands and the UK - others are
200 IV, 11. 1. 5 | in prescriptions in the Netherlands, compared to 94.5% in Italy.
201 IV, 11. 1. 5 | most significantly in the Netherlands (from 70% to 45%) and Denmark (
202 IV, 11. 1. 6 | Salary.~Fee-for-service.~Netherlands~Fee-for-service if higher
203 IV, 11. 1. 6 | Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain,
204 IV, 11. 1. 6 | Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland and Spain) reveals
205 IV, 11. 1. 6 | new system (e.g. in the Netherlands and Austria) (Schreyogg
206 IV, 11. 1. 6 | costs (300 hospitals), the Netherlands chooses hospitals that are
207 IV, 11. 1. 6 | Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands), with costs in Austria
208 IV, 11. 1. 6 | In spite of this, the Netherlands in 2006 generalized the
209 IV, 11. 1. 6 | Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and France are about 10%
210 IV, 11. 2. 1 | seen in Malta (34%), the Netherlands (33%), Belgium (28%), Ireland (
211 IV, 11. 2. 1 | Germany, Greece and the Netherlands, where a slight increase
212 IV, 11. 2. 2 | and at local level in the Netherlands (Judge et al 2006). The
213 IV, 11. 2. 2 | to 2% in 2005), and the Netherlands (from 3.5% to 4.7%) (OECD
214 IV, 11. 2. 2 | in Italy, to 4.7% in the Netherlands and 3.9% in Finland. Spending
215 IV, 11. 3. 1 | Slovakia, Slovenia and the Netherlands. A greater range of specialist
216 IV, 11. 3. 1 | point of contact e.g. the Netherlands, while in others, patients
217 IV, 11. 3. 1 | of nurses are seen in the Netherlands (1,454 nurses per 100,000
218 IV, 11. 3. 2 | Finland, Iceland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland and Portugal (
219 IV, 11. 3. 2 | Czech Republic, Hungary, Iceland, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal and Sweden (
220 IV, 11. 3. 2 | effects (as in Germany and the Netherlands) or at a proportion lower
221 IV, 11. 3. 2 | Switzerland, Sweden, the Netherlands, Italy, Portugal, Norway,
222 IV, 11. 3. 2 | countries such as Belgium, the Netherlands and Sweden (Mossialos et
223 IV, 11. 3. 2 | equivalent (e.g. in France, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain and the UK).
224 IV, 11. 3. 2 | Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, the Uk and in
225 IV, 11. 5. 1 | Germany, Austria, Belgium, The Netherlands, Luxembourg, Slovenia, and
226 IV, 11. 5. 2 | Germany , Luxemburg, the Netherlands , Slovenia and Croatia : ~ ~
227 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Hungary, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Macedonia, Poland, Romania,
228 IV, 11. 6. 2 | e.g. France, Germany, the Netherlands) and also taxation (e.g.
229 IV, 11. 6. 2 | financing was also seen in the Netherlands, which moved from a dual
230 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and Switzerland (Saltman
231 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Estonia, France, Latvia, the Netherlands, Poland and Romania, or
232 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Czech Republic, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, and Slovakia risk adjustment
233 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Health Insurance Law of the Netherlands also introduced significant
234 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Spain and the UK) (Mossialos
235 IV, 11. 6. 2 | available in Germany and the Netherlands (until 2006) for individuals
236 IV, 11. 6. 2 | or, as in the case of the Netherlands, are excluded from) the
237 IV, 11. 6. 2 | in Germany (40%) and the Netherlands (50%), mostly in the form
238 IV, 11. 6. 2 | the 2006 reforms in the Netherlands), and France (57%) and Slovenia (
239 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Sweden or the UK. In Austria,
240 IV, 11. 6. 3 | in France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and the UK appears
241 IV, 11. 6. 3 | private insurance like the Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland and
242 IV, 11. 6. 3 | not allowed - as in the Netherlands up to 2006 - or are not
243 IV, 11. 6. 3 | systems in Germany and the Netherlands have been found to be regressive (
244 IV, 11. 6. 3 | Denmark, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and the UK (Wagstaff
245 IV, 11. 6. 4 | Slovakia, Germany and the Netherlands). For example, redistribution
246 IV, 11. 6. 4 | such as Germany and the Netherlands, and in systems with regional
247 IV, 11. 6. 4 | Belgium, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands and Switzerland) in 2000
248 IV, 11. 6. 4 | Finance~Ministry of Health~ ~ ~Netherlands~Ministry of Finance. Sickness
249 IV, 11. 6. 4 | France in 2000 and the Netherlands in 2006 (Thomson, Foubister,
250 IV, 11. 6. 4 | with the exception of the Netherlands (which uses a negative list
251 IV, 11. 6. 4 | benefits package; in the Netherlands they also use negative list,
252 IV, 11. 6. 4 | courts in Belgium and the Netherlands (Gibis et al, 2004). Unlike
253 IV, 11. 6. 4 | some countries, such as the Netherlands and Denmark, require the
254 IV, 11. 6. 5 | insurance reform in the Netherlands." Euro Health 12(2): 7-9.~ ~
255 IV, 11. 6. 5 | Health Insurance in the Netherlands: the new health insurance
256 IV, 12. 1 | referenda in France and the Netherlands put on hold any discussion
257 IV, 12. 5 | disability, and Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom
258 IV, 12. 5 | whilst Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands and Portugal experienced
259 IV, 12. 5 | for men and women and the Netherlands and Portugal showing expansion
260 IV, 12. 8 | Sweden (1995)~Spain (1986)~Netherlands (1957)~United Kingdom (1973)~ ~
261 IV, 13.Acr | to 2% in 2004), and the Netherlands (from 2.8% in 1990 to 5%
262 IV, 13.Acr | in Italy, to 4.9% in the Netherlands and 3.9% in Finland. However,
263 IV, 13.Acr | Austria, Finland, France, the Netherlands, Slovakia and Spain. It
264 IV, 13. 2. 3 | for 4 % of DALYs.~ ~In the Netherlands, lost DALYs have been calculated
265 IV, 13. 2. 3 | most common diseases in the Netherlands, including coronary heart
266 IV, 13. 2. 3 | disease categories in the Netherlands.~ ~Source: Van Kreil et
267 IV, 13. 7. 2 | followed by the UK, France, Netherlands, Belgium, Austria and Ireland,
268 IV, 13. 9 | diet and safe food in the Netherlands. – RIVM-2006~ ~WHO (2003):
269 Key, Ap5. 0. 0 | nephropathy~nerve~nerves~Netherlands~neural~neuroblastoma~neurologists~
