Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

  1    I,     3.  1        |         Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy,
  2    I,     3.  1        |               00) and 1993 (1.51). In Germany fertility also dropped by
  3    I,     3.  2        |           early 1970s, in Austria and Germany in the late 1970s and early
  4    I,     3.  2        |              of 4-10% is foreseen for Germany, Greece, Italy, Portugal
  5    I,     3.  2        |          statistics, within the EU25, Germany stands out with over 7 million
  6    I,     3.  3        |             value (28.9), followed by Germany (26.8), Sweden (26.4) and
  7    I,     3.  3        |     observation period (2000-2004) is Germany. Whereas the annual growth
  8    I,     3.  3        |           Italy, Denmark, Luxembourg, Germany, and the Netherlands, while
  9    I,     3.  3        |            Slovenia, Poland, Finland, Germany and Croatia. Small shares
 10    I,     3.  3        |           reported in Turkey, Cyprus, Germany, Slovakia and Spain.~ ~The
 11    I,     3.  3        |          Italy, Croatia, Bulgaria and Germany have the highest.~ ~Finally,
 12    I,     3.  3        |         largest changes are in Italy, Germany, Spain, Austria, and Slovenia.
 13    I,     3.  3        |             Italy, France, the UK and Germany are currently the ‘most
 14   II,     4.  1        |            Austria, Belgium, Finland, Germany and Italy appeared to experience
 15   II,     4.  1        |      compression of disability whilst Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands
 16   II,     5.  2.  2    |       Slovakia and former GDR-Eastern Germany) and Balkan Eastern European
 17   II,     5.  2.  2    |          European countries (Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, The Netherlands,
 18   II,     5.  2.  3(5) |           countries include: Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, Netherlands,
 19   II,     5.  3.  2    |            down as in the former West Germany (1991), in the former East
 20   II,     5.  3.  2    |             1991), in the former East Germany (1991), in Hungary (1992);
 21   II,     5.  3.  3    |             Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands,
 22   II,     5.  3.  6    |      estimated for five regions (West Germany, the United Kingdom, Eastern
 23   II,     5.  3.  6    |             Norway), Austria, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy,
 24   II,     5.  3.  6    |           European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, the
 25   II,     5.  3.  6    |            another . Austria, France, Germany and Iceland had the highest
 26   II,     5.  3.  7    | CZECH REPUBLIC~Yes (2003)~DENMARK~Yes~GERMANY~No~ESTONIA~Yes~IRELAND~Yes (
 27   II,     5.  4.  1    |               8 million, USA, Russia, Germany, Japan, Pakistan, Brazil,
 28   II,     5.  4.  1    |           different EU Member States. Germany and Austria have the largest
 29   II,     5.  4.  1    |           countries: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands,
 30   II,     5.  4.  2    |               1000 (UK) and 118/1000 (Germany), and a median of 87.5/1000.
 31   II,     5.  4.  2    |              from 2% (Turkey) to 15% (Germany) amongst the four countries
 32   II,     5.  4.  2    |         months. The median is 95% for Germany. This clinical parameter
 33   II,     5.  4.  3    |              from 2% (Turkey) to 15% (Germany) amongst the four countries
 34   II,     5.  4.  3    |                in fact, in EUCID only Germany provided a figure of 52%.~
 35   II,     5.  4.  3    |        between 37 (Cyprus) and 2,675 (Germany), with a median of 669 per
 36   II,     5.  4.  6    |             with no plan, six, namely Germany, Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary,
 37   II,     5.  5.  1    |         million from Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands,
 38   II,     5.  5.  1    |             between countries, taking Germany as the reference. Three
 39   II,     5.  5.  1    |            than the reference country Germany: the Nordic countries and
 40   II,     5.  5.  1    |              to the reference country Germany: France, Belgium, Luxemburg,
 41   II,     5.  5.  1    |            than the reference country Germany : Most Mediterranean countries (
 42   II,     5.  5.  2    |             covered in the study were Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands,
 43   II,     5.  5.  2    |             was the case for Austria, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Luxembourg,
 44   II,     5.  5.  2    |        countries (e.g. Luxembourg and Germany), there is a separate obligatory
 45   II,     5.  5.  2    |           into force and so far, only Germany and Scotland (as part of
 46   II,     5.  5.  2    |              has already been seen in Germany and Luxembourg with the
 47   II,     5.  5.  3    |      Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Germany, Greenland, Lithuania, Russia,
 48   II,     5.  5.  3    |             Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Liechtenstein,
 49   II,     5.  5.  3    |            Finland~ ~X~ ~France~ ~X~ ~Germany~ ~X~There are no representative
 50   II,     5.  5.  3    |             Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy,
 51   II,     5.  5.  3    |               Sweden, United Kingdom, Germany, Norway and Denmark). Thus,
 52   II,     5.  5.  3    |             countries like France and Germany are classified according
 53   II,     5.  5.  3    |                Prescription data from Germany from the 12-months period
 54   II,     5.  5.  3    |               per head of population; Germany displaying the next highest
 55   II,     5.  5.  3    |                34% in Hungary, 26% in Germany, 23% in France, 16% in Czech Republic,
 56   II,     5.  5.  3    |              such as Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands,
 57   II,     5.  5.  3    |        programmes to fight stigma. In Germany, the German Society of Psychiatry,
 58   II,     5.  5.  3    |                Open the Doors” as did Germany; also Slovakia has a programme
 59   II,     5.  5.  3    |        schizophrenia research e.g. in Germany. Establishing research alliances
 60   II,     5.  5.  3    |           programmes is necessary. In Germany this issue is one of the
 61   II,     5.  5.  3    |              Diagnosis in Denmark and Germany. Psychopathology 35:36-47~
 62   II,     5.  5.  3    |            European countries (Italy, Germany, Holland, UK, Portugal,
 63   II,     5.  5.  3    |          seizures in previous 3 years~Germany I 12 months Single seizures
 64   II,     5.  5.  3    |             their social situation in Germany. To date, standardised data
 65   II,     5.  5.  3    |       countries.~The MS prevalence in Germany has been rather homogeneously
 66   II,     5.  5.  3    |             Netherlands, Switzerland, Germany, Austria and Portugal (Pugliatti
 67   II,     5.  5.  3    |               The MSTCG from Austria, Germany and Switzerland developed
 68   II,     5.  5.  3    |                2005): [MS registry in Germanydesign and first results
 69   II,     5.  5.  3    |             al (2007): MS Register in Germanyresults of the extension
 70   II,     5.  5.  3    |        multiple sclerosis patients in germany]. Nervenartz 71:288-294.~
 71   II,     5.  5.  3    |      sclerosis in South Lower Saxony, Germany. Neuroepidemiology 8:207-
 72   II,     5.  5.  3    |         institutionalised patients in Germany (Evers and Obladen, 1994).
 73   II,     5.  5.  3    |            for Parkinson’s disease in Germany. Pharmacoeconomics 23(8):
 74   II,     5.  7.  2    |          their whole country (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Portugal).
 75   II,     5.  7.  2    |          EU-15 Member States (France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Spain
 76   II,     5.  7.  3    |          Hallan et al, 2006) to 7.2% (Germany) (Meisinger et al, 2006)
 77   II,     5.  7.  3    |         similar in males and females (Germany, Italy) or higher in females (
 78   II,     5.  7.  3    |               to 1057 patients pmp in Germany (Tables 5.7.6 A and B).
 79   II,     5.  9. FB    |              hay fever in former East Germany only 6 to 8 years after
 80   II,     5.  9. FB    |           only 6 to 8 years after the Germany reunification. It has been
 81   II,     5.  9.  3    |              Kingdom, Netherlands and Germany). The epidemiological results
 82   II,     5.  9.  3    |         Greece (5.6%), Poland (5.4%), Germany (2.5%), Hungary (4%), Macedonia (
 83   II,     5.  9.  3    |             10.6% and Poland 8.5% and Germany 3%. These results show that
 84   II,     5.  9.  3    |               asthma prevalence (East Germany, Australia).~ ~Table 5.9.
 85   II,     5.  9.  4    |             Paris~–~–~ ~–~Low~–~–~–~–~Germany~ Erfurt~Low~Low~ND~–~–~High~
 86   II,     5.  9.  7    |             Epidemiology, Neuherberg, Germany~ ~Holgate ST, Price D, Valovirta
 87   II,     5. 11.  3    |         Decrease in nickel allergy in Germany and regulatory interventions,
 88   II,     5. 11.  3    |              high as 6% in France and Germany (Fouere et al, 2005). The
 89   II,     5. 12.  3    |              were smaller in Austria, Germany and the Czech Republic,
 90   II,     5. 13        |        obesity ranges between US$ 17 (Germany, 2001) and US$ 202 (France,
 91   II,     5. 14.  2    |     questionnaire schemes. In France, Germany, Spain, a series of surveys
 92   II,     5. 14.  3    |             health care expenditures. Germany spent proportionally the
 93   II,     6.  3.  3    |              Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, the Netherlands,
 94   II,     6.  3.  4    |               Five countries (France, Germany, Poland, Spain and United
 95   II,     6.  3.  5    |         coverage is not uniform, with Germany reporting almost three quarters
 96   II,     6.  3.  5    |              been observed in France, Germany and Italy. The incidence
 97   II,     6.  3.  5    |               50% of cases (776) from Germany. The overall incidence in
 98   II,     6.  3.  5    |        reported by Ireland (2.26) and Germany (0.94). Elimination has
 99   II,     6.  3.  6    |            outbreak of shigellosis in Germany was described linking the
100   II,     6.  3.  6    |                These were reported by Germany (56 cases), France (37 cases)
101   II,     6.  3.  7    |               also noticed in France, Germany, Belgium, Austria, and Luxembourg.~ ~
102   II,     6.  3.  7    |             reported by 21 countries. Germany and France reported the
103   II,     6.  3.  7    |          countries; four of them from Germany and one from the UK. There
104   II,     6.  3.  7    |         uncommon, and in recent years Germany has reported annually some
105   II,     6.  3.  7    |               Leone, and two cases in Germany in 2000 from Ghana or Côte
106   II,     6.  3.  7    |              one case was reported by Germany in 1999 (imported from Côte
107   II,     7.  2.  6    |              Cyprus, Denmark, France, Germany (regional), Italy, Latvia,
108   II,     8.  1.  2    |             EU15 countries apart from Germany, the Netherlands and the
109   II,     9            |            drugs also brings Estonia, Germany, and the United Kingdom
110   II,     9            |             the same age. Belgium and Germany are characterised by a comparatively
111   II,     9            |                and lowest in Finland, Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom.
112   II,     9.  1.  1    |         countries, including Austria, Germany and Portugal, add a minimum
113   II,     9.  1.  2    |      countries participating from 3% (Germany) to 100% (Norway, Sweden,
114   II,     9.  1.  2    |              England & Wales, France, Germany). Others have an upper gestational
115   II,     9.  1.  2    |             higher rates, for example Germany, the Netherlands and Denmark
116   II,     9.  2.  3    |             both Flemish and French), Germany and Slovenia thinking they
117   II,     9.  2.  4    |            drugs also brings Estonia, Germany, and the United Kingdom
118   II,     9.  2.  4    |             the same age. Belgium and Germany are characterised by a comparatively
119   II,     9.  2.  4    |                and lowest in Finland, Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom.
120   II,     9.  3.  1    |            adults aged 20 or over. In Germany the prevalence of people
121   II,     9.  3.  1    |         marginal increase in Austria, Germany, Hungary, Malta and the
122   II,     9.  3.  1    |               Kingdom) or increasing (Germany and France). Some sources,
123   II,     9.  3.  2    |         largest old EU Member States (Germany, France and United Kingdom).
124   II,     9.  3.  3    |             England, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Norway,
125   II,     9.  3.  3    |               carried out recently in Germany (Hessling, 2006), Italy (
126   II,     9.  3.  3    |              have been carried out in Germany (results from 1980 are based
127   II,     9.  3.  3    |               based on data from West Germany only, all studies since
128   II,     9.  3.  3    |               since 1994 include East Germany) and present detailed information
129   II,     9.  3.  3    |        intercourse (England, Finland, Germany, Scotland, Sweden, Wales);
130   II,     9.  3.  3    |             Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, the
131   II,     9.  3.  3    |               ranged from 1/3 in East Germany to 1/6 in the UK (Bochow
132   II,     9.  4.  3    |               EU country, followed by Germany and Greece. There are more
133   II,     9.  4.  3    |               Kingdom) or increasing (Germany and France). The data also
134   II,     9.  4.  7    |           Cancer Conference, Hamburg, Germany, Breast Cancer Res. 2004,
135   II,     9.  5.  3    |       Rowntree, Foundation, 2006). In Germany it is calculated that 80%
136   II,     9.  5.  3    |               a day) and the least in Germany and Belgium (around 6h:30
137   II,     9.  5.  3    |           time in Finland (5h:30) and Germany (5h:24), and the least in
138  III,    10.  1.  3    |           tale of two Germanies: East Germany’s health system provides
139  III,    10.  1.  3    |              of evaluated projects in Germany. J Public Health 13(6):291-
140  III,    10.  2.  1    |              epidemic - e.g. Denmark, Germany, Finland and the UK. In
141  III,    10.  2.  1    |            increasing (ASPECT, 2004). Germany, for example, showed a decrease
142  III,    10.  2.  1    |          all-cause mortality in south Germany. Results from the MONICA
143  III,    10.  2.  1    |               of their smaller heads. Germany accounts for 18.5% of the
144  III,    10.  2.  1    |             Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland,
145  III,    10.  2.  1    |         active in the Netherlands and Germany to less than a quarter in
146  III,    10.  2.  1    |        obesity ranges between US$ 17 (Germany, 2001) and US$ 202 (France,
147  III,    10.  2.  1    |              Lavoisier ed. Paris 2000~Germany~German Nutrition Survey~ ~
148  III,    10.  2.  1    |      Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Germany, Denmark, Sweden, Norway,
149  III,    10.  2.  1(24)|            Roche de lObésité, 2006), Germany (Federal Statistical Office,
150  III,    10.  3.  1    |             myocardial infarctions in Germany might be attributable to
151  III,    10.  3.  4    |             Million US $ damage each, Germany 1650 Million US $ and Spain
152  III,    10.  4.  1    |               made in the former East Germany, an association was found
153  III,    10.  4.  1    |              and towns in former East Germany are typical examples. When
154  III,    10.  4.  1    |           case study, the former East Germany and the Atlanta case. There
155  III,    10.  4.  1    |              years in the former East Germany.~One of the best examples
156  III,    10.  4.  1    |          working group meeting, Bonn, Germany 15-16 January 2004. Available
157  III,    10.  4.  1    |          Working Group meeting, Bonn, Germany 18-20 October 2005. Available
158  III,    10.  4.  2    |               Norway, United Kingdom, Germany, USA, Canada). The public
159  III,    10.  4.  2    |               für Risikobewertung BfR~Germany~ΕΝΙΑΙΟΣ ΦΟΡΕΑΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΥ ΤΡΟΦΙΜΩΝ
160  III,    10.  4.  5    |       following the re-unification of Germany.~ ~Figure 10.4.5.2.2a. Total
161  III,    10.  5.  1    |           Working Group Meeting Bonn, Germany 23-24 October 2006. WHO
162  III,    10.  5.  2    |         settlement category, while in Germany the mortality increase and
163  III,    10.  5.  2    |         Powles et al, 2002).~ ~Within Germany, data from children health
164  III,    10.  5.  2    |          lifestyle factors, data from Germany suggests that smoking is
165  III,    10.  5.  2    |             Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg,
166  III,    10.  5.  2    |           conditions in East and West Germany. BMC Public Health 2006,
167  III,    10.  5.  2    |               in smoking behaviour in Germany. BMC Public Health 2006,
168  III,    10.  5.  3    |       activities. E.g. in Belgium and Germany compensation is still caused
169  III,    10.  5.  3(43)|            Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Switzerland~
170  III,    10.  5.  3    |         Slovenia, Slovak Republic and Germany, which are experiencing
171  III,    10.  5.  3    |           safety. In Austria, France, Germany, United Kingdom, the Netherlands
172  III,    10.  5.  3    |           Many Member States, such as Germany, Belgium and France, have
173  III,    10.  5.  3    |             Finland, the Netherlands, Germany and Belgium are among the
174  III,    10.  6.  1    |              States (Finland, France, Germany, Greece) and Norway. Social
175   IV,    11.  1.  3    |       competitive sickness funds e.g. Germany and the Netherlands;~3)
176   IV,    11.  1.  3    |    prescription drug budgets (e.g. in Germany).~ ~Despite some success
177   IV,    11.  1.  4    |             Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg and Switzerland (
178   IV,    11.  1.  4    |               Spain, Greece, Austria, Germany, the Netherlands for the
179   IV,    11.  1.  5    |           mechanisms (Shaw, 2003). In Germany, health insurance funds
180   IV,    11.  1.  5    |            e.g. in Slovakia, Hungary, Germany).~ ~Eurobarometer surveys
181   IV,    11.  1.  6    |              Salary.~Fee-for-service.~Germany~100% by fee-for-service.~
182   IV,    11.  1.  6    |             England, France, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy,
183   IV,    11.  1.  6    |             Denmark, England, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands,
184   IV,    11.  1.  6    |         hospitals using DRGs), Italy, Germany and Spain include those
185   IV,    11.  1.  6    |            administrative costs (i.e. Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands),
186   IV,    11.  1.  6    |        administrative costs of PHI in Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands
187   IV,    11.  2.  1    |        Portugal, France, Scotland and Germany (Castoro et al, 2007).~ ~
188   IV,    11.  2.  1    |           with the highest supply are Germany (829), the Czech Republic (
189   IV,    11.  2.  1    |             11.5). The exceptions are Germany, Greece and the Netherlands,
190   IV,    11.  3.  1    |               Greece, Norway, Poland, Germany and Slovakia. There seems
191   IV,    11.  3.  1    |         countries in Europe, Austria, Germany, Switzerland, and to some
192   IV,    11.  3.  1    |        students graduating in France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain and
193   IV,    11.  3.  1    |            are present in Austria and Germany. Financial incentives linked
194   IV,    11.  3.  1    |              nine countries - France, Germany, Lithuania, Malta, Norway,
195   IV,    11.  3.  2    |             Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy,
196   IV,    11.  3.  2    |              in Western Europe except Germany and the UK.~ ~Reference
197   IV,    11.  3.  2    |    pharmacotherapeutic effects (as in Germany and the Netherlands) or
198   IV,    11.  3.  2    |       Czech Republic and Slovakia. In Germany and France cost-effectiveness
199   IV,    11.  3.  2    |                as in Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg,
200   IV,    11.  3.  2    |     prescribing budgets in the UK and Germany, or prescribing guidelines
201   IV,    11.  3.  2    |              to society is highest in Germany, followed by Denmark, Ireland
202   IV,    11.  5.  1    |               such as Eurotransplant (Germany, Austria, Belgium, The Netherlands,
203   IV,    11.  5.  2    |   Eurotransplant: Austria , Belgium , Germany , Luxemburg, the Netherlands ,
204   IV,    11.  6.  1    |         Iceland and Portugal to match Germany’s at over 10% of GDP. Meanwhile,
205   IV,    11.  6.  1    |            countries, such as France, Germany and Switzerland do not come
206   IV,    11.  6.  2    |              also in Finland, France, Germany and Portugal (OECD Health
207   IV,    11.  6.  2    |          Belgium, the Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Luxembourg, the
208   IV,    11.  6.  2    |               insurance (e.g. France, Germany, the Netherlands) and also
209   IV,    11.  6.  2    |                For example France and Germany increased their reliance
210   IV,    11.  6.  2    |             Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands,
211   IV,    11.  6.  2    |          Austria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Lithuania, Slovakia
212   IV,    11.  6.  2    |          Austria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece and Slovakia, though
213   IV,    11.  6.  2    |              Czech Republic, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, and Slovakia
214   IV,    11.  6.  2    |      efficiency. All countries except Germany and Greece set contribution
215   IV,    11.  6.  2    |           centrally, though from 2009 Germany will also have a centrally
216   IV,    11.  6.  2    |       collected did not increase). In Germany it has similarly been argued
217   IV,    11.  6.  2    |             Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg,
218   IV,    11.  6.  2    |            state, and is available in Germany and the Netherlands (until
219   IV,    11.  6.  2    |             of private expenditure in Germany (40%) and the Netherlands (
220   IV,    11.  6.  2    |         employees in Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg,
221   IV,    11.  6.  2    |          Thomson et al, 2003), and in Germany a co-payment was introduced
222   IV,    11.  6.  2    |          stays longer than 14 days in Germany or 28 days in Austria. For
223   IV,    11.  6.  2    |              5-10 in Austria, France, Germany and Luxembourg, to €26-65
224   IV,    11.  6.  2    |               of utilization, e.g. in Germany and France where co-payments
225   IV,    11.  6.  2    |        chronic conditions:~- France~- Germany~- Ireland~- Italy~- Latvia~-
226   IV,    11.  6.  2    |           Belgium~- Cyprus~- France~- Germany~- Greece~- Hungary~- Ireland~-
227   IV,    11.  6.  2    |          Estonia~- Finland~- France~- Germany~- Italy~- Latvia~- Lithuania~-
228   IV,    11.  6.  3    |         system. Income tax in France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden
229   IV,    11.  6.  3    |       insurance like the Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland and the US (
230   IV,    11.  6.  3    |               are not obliged - as in Germany - to stay in the public
231   IV,    11.  6.  3    |              and Van Ourti, 2003). In Germany, about 21% of the population
232   IV,    11.  6.  3    |           health insurance systems in Germany and the Netherlands have
233   IV,    11.  6.  3    |               followed by Denmark and Germany, reducing inequalities by
234   IV,    11.  6.  3    |           studied in greater depth in Germany. Three types of interpersonal
235   IV,    11.  6.  3    |            redistribution are seen in Germany: (1) due to varying health
236   IV,    11.  6.  3    |               progressive in Denmark, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands,
237   IV,    11.  6.  4    |       Mossialos 2008). In Austria and Germany (with 21 and about 290 insurance
238   IV,    11.  6.  4    |             Czech Republic, Slovakia, Germany and the Netherlands). For
239   IV,    11.  6.  4    |            insurance systems, such as Germany and the Netherlands, and
240   IV,    11.  6.  4    |              five countries (Belgium, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands
241   IV,    11.  6.  4    |       Sécurité Sociale~25 regions~age~Germany~355 sickness funds~Federal
242   IV,    11.  6.  4    |             particular in the case of Germany. The situation is complex
243   IV,    11.  6.  4    |              no regulation in France, Germany and Switzerland (Gibis et
244   IV,    11.  6.  4    |          medical devices, and all but Germany (implicit) do so for pharmaceuticals.
245   IV,    11.  6.  4    |         social courts’ in Austria and Germany, or civil courts in Belgium
246   IV,    11.  6.  5    |           Income redistribution under Germany's statutory health insurance
247   IV,    12.  5        |            Austria, Belgium, Finland, Germany and Italy appeared to experience
248   IV,    12.  5        |      compression of disability whilst Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands
249   IV,    12.  8        |          Latvia (2004)~Romania (2007)~Germany (1957)~Lithuania (2004)~
250   IV,    12. 10        |         determinants~ ~ ~ ~ ~COUNTRY: Germany~ ~ ~A) Prevention and control
251   IV,    12. 10        |            NAP, national action planGermany fit for children”), masterminded
252   IV,    12. 10        |          workplaces or sports clubs.~“Germany is moving” (Deutschland
253   IV,    12. 10        |              have a long tradition in Germany. Several laws and acts support
254   IV,    12. 10        |            waste management policy in Germany. Through this the conditions
255   IV,    12. 10        |  industrialised countries - including Germany - the production and use
256   IV,    12. 10        |            and environmental dangers. Germany has ratified the Stockholm
257   IV,    12. 10        |         contamination of foodstuff in Germany is low. The results of the
258   IV,    12. 10        |        safeguarding of Food safety in Germany is under the shared responsibility
259   IV,    12. 10        |      monitored by different bodies in Germany. The Federal Agency for
260   IV,    12. 10        |            National Action Plan for a Germany suitable for children (Nationaler
261   IV,    12. 10        |          people.~Forum health targets Germany (Forum Gesundheitsziele
262   IV,    13.  7.  2    |          Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Germany. These are followed by the
263  Key,   Ap5.  0.  0    |             genders~genital~geriatric~Germany~gestation~giardia~giardiasis~