| | 
Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2. 4 | by level of education in Finland, Norway, Italy, Hungary,
2 I, 2. 6 | The only exceptions are Finland and Lithuania, marginally,
3 I, 2. 6 | Baltic States, Luxembourg, Finland, Bulgaria and Romania as
4 I, 2. 7 | Slovenia, Slovakia, Latvia, Finland, Ireland and Greece (WHO
5 I, 3. 1 | example, up to about 18% in Finland, the Netherlands and the
6 I, 3. 1 | marriage in Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Latvia, Slovenia,
7 I, 3. 2 | Austria, Belgium and Denmark, Finland, and Spain. A decline of
8 I, 3. 2 | structure of the Union. Only in Finland, France and the Netherlands
9 I, 3. 3 | have the highest shares; Finland, Malta, Sweden, Estonia
10 I, 3. 3 | prominent in Slovenia, Poland, Finland, Germany and Croatia. Small
11 I, 3. 3 | Sweden, the Czech Republic, Finland and Bulgaria.~ ~The shares
12 II, 4. 1 | for men, Austria, Belgium, Finland, Germany and Italy appeared
13 II, 5. 2. 2 | countries (Denmark, Ireland, Finland, Sweden, United Kingdom),
14 II, 5. 2. 3(2) | include: Denmark, Ireland, Finland, Sweden and United Kingdom.~
15 II, 5. 2. 3 | Northern Europe (Lithuania, Finland, Northern Sweden); for those
16 II, 5. 2. 5 | cooperation and action.~Finland provides one of the best-documented
17 II, 5. 2. 5 | community intervention. In 1972, Finland had the world’s highest
18 II, 5. 2. 7 | Changes in premature deaths in Finland: successful long-term prevention
19 II, 5. 3. 3 | Europe: Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Ireland, Latvia,
20 II, 5. 3. 5 | new cases per 100,000). Finland had lower male incidence
21 II, 5. 3. 6 | were Northern countries (Finland, Sweden, Iceland and Norway),
22 II, 5. 3. 6 | men and 50% for women in Finland, Norway and Sweden and in
23 II, 5. 3. 6 | countries of Western Europe. In Finland, Sweden, France, Italy and
24 II, 5. 3. 6 | countries with similar TNEH; Finland had high all-cancer survival,
25 II, 5. 3. 7 | Planning stage~SLOVAKIA~No~FINLAND~No~SWEDEN~Planning stage~
26 II, 5. 4. 3 | between 6 (Luxembourg) and 60 (Finland) cases per 100,000 per year.
27 II, 5. 4. 3 | EUCID range between 26/1000 (Finland) and 76/1000 (Cyprus), with
28 II, 5. 4. 3 | between 77.4% (Spain) and 98% (Finland).~Level of HbA1c>7.0%. According
29 II, 5. 4. 3 | corresponding to Sweden and Finland. The percentage is lower
30 II, 5. 4. 3 | by 10 countries from 25% (Finland) to 97% (Netherlands), with
31 II, 5. 4. 3 | in the urine between 9%(Finland) and 41% (England), with
32 II, 5. 4. 3 | percentage varying between 32% (Finland) and 100% (Cyprus).~Level
33 II, 5. 4. 3 | above 25 is between 59% (Finland) and 83% (Ireland). The
34 II, 5. 4. 3 | figures, ranging between 42% (Finland) and 99% (Netherlands),
35 II, 5. 5. 1 | general population survey in Finland using 15D and EQ-5D. Qual
36 II, 5. 5. 2 | uses the statistics for Finland to show how the number of
37 II, 5. 5. 2 | people with dementia in Finland as a % of the total population~ ~
38 II, 5. 5. 2 | people with dementia in Finland more than tripled. As a
39 II, 5. 5. 3 | and Canada participated (Finland, Norway, Austria, Belgium (
40 II, 5. 5. 3 | Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece,
41 II, 5. 5. 3 | separately in age group 0-14).~Finland~ ~X~ ~France~ ~X~ ~Germany~ ~
42 II, 5. 5. 3 | Hungary and especially in Finland, while for Finnish women
43 II, 5. 5. 3 | the value reported from Finland of about 20.506 is more
44 II, 5. 5. 3 | psychiatric hospitals between Finland and Norway. Although in
45 II, 5. 5. 3 | are available only from Finland, the Netherlands and the
46 II, 5. 5. 3 | as follows:~Mini survey Finland 14.3%~NEMESIS Netherlands
47 II, 5. 5. 3 | widely in European countries. Finland has by far the highest level
48 II, 5. 5. 3 | sales of antipsychotics in Finland is 50% higher than in Sweden,
49 II, 5. 5. 3 | atypical antipsychotics Finland is in the lead, too, while
50 II, 5. 5. 3 | estimates on schizophrenia for Finland are contradictory; some
51 II, 5. 5. 3 | Britain, 43% in Spain, 41% in Finland, 37% in Italy, 35% in Denmark,
52 II, 5. 5. 3 | in the gentic isolate of Finland. American Journal of Medical
53 II, 5. 5. 3 | 3 ~Oun et al., 2003 (*)~Finland~Adults ~MR review and examination~
54 II, 5. 5. 3 | Keranen et al., 1989 (*)~Finland~Children ~Retrospective/
55 II, 5. 5. 3 | 54% of cases from Sweden, Finland and Norway, followed by
56 II, 5. 5. 3 | 1995). Studies made in Finland showed that 27% of children
57 II, 5. 5. 3 | months -~ II - Prohibited~Finland I 12 months First unprovoked
58 II, 5. 5. 3 | southern Sweden, southwestern Finland and back to northeastern
59 II, 5. 5. 3 | rate of 5.2 in 1988–97.~In Finland, regional differences in
60 II, 5. 5. 3 | intermediate rates in central Finland and coastal Vaasa and relatively
61 II, 5. 5. 3 | registered registered in Finland, Scotland, Norway and Sardinia,
62 II, 5. 5. 3 | Rapporteur Uma Aaltonen from Finland -herself a person with MS -
63 II, 5. 5. 3 | multiple sclerosis in central Finland: a regional and temporal
64 II, 5. 5. 3 | of multiple sclerosis in Finland 1979-1993. Neuroepidemiology
65 II, 5. 5. 3 | of multiple sclerosis in Finland. Acta Neurol Scand 103:153-
66 II, 5. 5. 3 | Multiple sclerosis in Finland: incidence trends and differences
67 II, 5. 6. 3 | prevalence of RA in men in Finland is reported as 0.6%, France
68 II, 5. 7. 2 | Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Sweden and The
69 II, 5. 7. 2 | Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Spain, Sweden,
70 II, 5. 7. 5 | public health policy in Finland is that all patients should
71 II, 5. 8. 3 | increased prevalence in Finland, Slovakia, Romania, Hungary (
72 II, 5. 8. 4 | Countries Study, involving US, Finland, Netherlands, Italy, Greece,
73 II, 5. 9. FB | 7% in Greece, to 16% in Finland and up to 32% in UK. Secondly,
74 II, 5. 11. 3 | Dotterud and E Falk, 1994). In Finland, the occurrence of nickel
75 II, 5. 11. 3 | al, 2007). Similarly, in Finland, in the years 1995–97 and
76 II, 5. 11. 3 | 1995–1997 and 2000–2002 in Finland – a multicentre study, Contact
77 II, 5. 12. 3 | 15/100,000 in 2000-2002, Finland from 7.4 to 13.6, Ireland
78 II, 5. 12. 3 | Nordic countries (Denmark and Finland), the UK, central and Eastern
79 II, 5. 14. 3 | reserved for dental care. Finland (0.4%) and the Netherlands (
80 II, 6. 3. 5 | Northern countries: Estonia, Finland, the Netherlands, Norway
81 II, 6. 3. 6 | Slovakia, whereas in Sweden and Finland, respectively 61% and 52%
82 II, 6. 3. 6 | Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Latvia and Lithuania -
83 II, 6. 3. 6 | per 100 000) followed by Finland (12.2 per 100 000) reporting
84 II, 6. 3. 6 | per 100 000), followed by Finland (0.69 per 100 000) reported
85 II, 6. 3. 7 | trend appears to be stable. Finland and Sweden were the countries
86 II, 6. 3. 7 | 2 500 cases reported by Finland and 330 from Sweden. Higher
87 II, 8. 2. 1 | individuals) in Northern Finland, who were followed up to
88 II, 8. 2. 1 | the age of 14 in Northern Finland. It showed a prevalence
89 II, 8. 2. 1 | intellectual disability (SPID) in Finland was 0.13% based on the register
90 II, 8. 2. 1 | Mentally Retarded (Lammi, Finland). The aetiology of their
91 II, 8. 2. 2 | countries in this area (Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands,
92 II, 8. 2. 2 | countries in this area (Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands,
93 II, 8. 2. 3 | population samples of Denmark, Finland, Italy, Sweden and United
94 II, 8. 2. 3 | exposure. In Denmark and Finland, the prevalence of slight
95 II, 9 | countries, and lowest in Finland, Germany, Sweden and the
96 II, 9 | was highest in Sweden and Finland, where more than 85 % of
97 II, 9. 1. 1 | Czech Republic, Norway and Finland, but over 5 per 1 000 in
98 II, 9. 1. 2 | to 100% (Norway, Sweden, Finland, Malta, Hungary). Although
99 II, 9. 1. 2 | upper gestational age limit (Finland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
100 II, 9. 2. 3 | all Member States except Finland (European Commission, 2003),
101 II, 9. 2. 4 | countries, and lowest in Finland, Germany, Sweden and the
102 II, 9. 3. 1 | Social Affairs and Health, Finland, ISSN 1236-2050, 2007:2)
103 II, 9. 3. 2 | countries - Denmark, Iceland, Finland, the Netherlands, Slovenia,
104 II, 9. 3. 3 | series of surveys in England, Finland, France, Germany, Greece,
105 II, 9. 3. 3 | Gremy and Beltzer, 2004), Finland (Haavio-Mannila and Kontula,
106 II, 9. 3. 3 | sexual intercourse (England, Finland, Germany, Scotland, Sweden,
107 II, 9. 3. 3 | difference of 20% or more) in Finland, Greece (Athens), Great
108 II, 9. 3. 3 | occasions.~ ~Recent surveys in Finland notice a higher prevalence
109 II, 9. 3. 3 | 2004). Another study in Finland reported that both genders
110 II, 9. 3. 3 | Trends in sexual behaviour in Finland and neighbouring countries).
111 II, 9. 3. 3 | Helsinki: Family federation of Finland.~Herlitz C, Ramstedt K (
112 II, 9. 3. 3 | health among young adults in Finland: Assessing risk and protective
113 II, 9. 4. 3 | difference between that of Finland and Portugal (European Health
114 II, 9. 4. 4 | was highest in Sweden and Finland, where more than 85 % of
115 II, 9. 5. 3 | relatively high poverty rates; Finland and Sweden now register
116 II, 9. 5. 3 | the victim (WHO, 2007). In Finland, it has been established
117 II, 9. 5. 3 | have the most free time in Finland (5h:30) and Germany (5h:
118 II, 9. 5. 4 | while others like Denmark, Finland, Norway and Portugal are
119 III, 10. 2. 1 | e.g. Denmark, Germany, Finland and the UK. In central and
120 III, 10. 2. 1 | 1994 and 2000 and 17% in Finland between 2000 and 2005, while
121 III, 10. 2. 1 | being much higher than in Finland (17%) and Sweden (11%).
122 III, 10. 2. 1 | aged 45-59 are France and Finland, but while the former finds
123 III, 10. 2. 1 | al, 1998). Research from Finland further suggests that socioeconomic
124 III, 10. 2. 1 | Czech Republic, Slovakia and Finland) provided an estimate of
125 III, 10. 2. 1 | Adolescent~Lifestyle Study in Finland 2007. Unpublished document.~ ~
126 III, 10. 2. 1 | Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece,
127 III, 10. 2. 1 | physical activity among adults in Finland (since 1978) and the Baltic
128 III, 10. 2. 1 | example from Europe was Finland, where physical activity
129 III, 10. 2. 1 | measured in annual surveys in Finland since 1979 (Helakorpi et
130 III, 10. 2. 1 | late 1970s to mid-1990s, Finland saw an overall increase
131 III, 10. 2. 1 | 10 May 2007 in Helsinki, Finland, at the celebration of the
132 III, 10. 2. 1 | well-being: a population study in Finland. Preventive Medicine, 30:
133 III, 10. 2. 1 | three countries as well as Finland also carried out national
134 III, 10. 2. 1(23)| Finland (prevalence of obesity available
135 III, 10. 2. 1 | surveys vary between every two(Finland) to seven years(Switzerland).
136 III, 10. 2. 1 | information at: www.lshtm.ac.uk~Finland~The National FINDIET 2002
137 III, 10. 2. 1(24)| Health Development, 2005), Finland (Helakorpi et al, 2007),
138 III, 10. 2. 5 | research was conducted in Finland, Great Britain, Greece,
139 III, 10. 2. 5 | Longitudinal cohort studies from Finland, the Netherlands and UK
140 III, 10. 2. 5 | based on men from Sweden and Finland hinting at that environmental
141 III, 10. 2. 5 | caregivers and toddler. In Finland, a nationwide training programme
142 III, 10. 3. 2 | based on men from Sweden and Finland hinting that environmental
143 III, 10. 3. 2 | reported from Sweden and Finland. The trend reversal however
144 III, 10. 4. 2 | Elintarviketurvallisuusvirasto EVIRA~Finland~Agence française de sécurité
145 III, 10. 4. 5 | 61 %), Italy (52 %) and Finland (51 %). In Austria and Belgium (
146 III, 10. 5. 1 | Portugal) to under 5% (Finland), with an average of 16% (
147 III, 10. 5. 1 | underestimated. For example, in Finland, food and waterborne outbreaks
148 III, 10. 5. 1 | FSAFood poisonings in Finland in 2005. Helsinki, Finnish
149 III, 10. 5. 2 | Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland,
150 III, 10. 5. 3 | Netherlands, Austria, Portugal, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom,
151 III, 10. 5. 3 | 10% in Poland, Slovakia, Finland and Sweden).~· 163.3 million
152 III, 10. 5. 3 | countries, ranging from 17% in Finland and 12% in the Netherlands
153 III, 10. 5. 3 | legislation. However, Denmark, Finland and Sweden had adopted and
154 III, 10. 5. 3 | Kingdom, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Germany
155 III, 10. 6. 1 | North Carelia region in Finland shows that individuals with
156 III, 10. 6. 1 | in four EU Member States (Finland, France, Germany, Greece)
157 III, 10. 6. 1 | prospective evidence from Eastern Finland. Am J Epidemiol 128(2):370-
158 III, 10. 6. 2 | per level of education in Finland, Norway, Italy, Hungary,
159 III, 10. 6. 2 | natural continuation of Finland’s long term horizontal health
160 III, 10. 6. 2 | across societal sectors. Finland devoted a conference and
161 III, 10. 6. 3 | countries, notably Spain, Finland, Estonia, Poland and France
162 IV, 11. 1. 4 | times problems as: Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands,
163 IV, 11. 1. 4 | inequity in primary care are Finland and Portugal, with many
164 IV, 11. 1. 4 | groups again in Portugal and Finland, but also in Ireland, Italy,
165 IV, 11. 1. 5 | screened) can be found in Finland, Sweden, the Netherlands
166 IV, 11. 1. 5 | e.g. the Czech Republic, Finland, France, Spain, the Netherlands
167 IV, 11. 1. 5 | are not legislated, as in Finland, they may not be as successful
168 IV, 11. 1. 5 | from 97% in Italy to 48% in Finland. When asked if they are
169 IV, 11. 1. 5 | can be seen in Belgium, Finland, Austria and Switzerland (
170 IV, 11. 1. 5 | Among these 15 countries, Finland and Austria had the highest
171 IV, 11. 1. 6 | Denmark, England, France, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Ireland,
172 IV, 11. 1. 6 | increased its market share. In Finland, transparency and productivity
173 IV, 11. 2. 1 | available year~ ~Austria, Finland, Hungary and Romania apparently
174 IV, 11. 2. 2 | Netherlands and 3.9% in Finland. Spending on prevention
175 IV, 11. 3. 1 | seen in Austria, Belgium, Finland and France, with the lowest
176 IV, 11. 3. 2 | Belgium, 4 in Sweden, 6.9 in Finland and 9% in the Czech Republic (
177 IV, 11. 3. 2 | Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Italy, the Netherlands,
178 IV, 11. 3. 2 | Austria, Belgium, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece,
179 IV, 11. 3. 2 | reimbursement decisions, e.g. in Finland and the UK. However, there
180 IV, 11. 3. 2 | is not always clear. In Finland a product’s price and reimbursement
181 IV, 11. 3. 2 | prescribe by generic name, as in Finland, France, Germany, Ireland,
182 IV, 11. 3. 2 | countries (e.g. Denmark, Finland, France, Norway, Spain,
183 IV, 11. 5. 1 | Scandiatransplant (Denmark, Sweden, Finland, and Norway). Even among
184 IV, 11. 5. 6 | Europe member states and Finland and results of European
185 IV, 11. 6. 1 | spent on healthcare. In Finland, healthcare expenditure
186 IV, 11. 6. 2 | to the 1990s, and also in Finland, France, Germany and Portugal (
187 IV, 11. 6. 2 | systems include Sweden, Finland, Portugal, Italy, Ireland,
188 IV, 11. 6. 2 | tax-funded systems (e.g. Sweden, Finland, Italy and Spain). A significant
189 IV, 11. 6. 2 | collected locally, as seen in Finland, Norway, Spain, Sweden and
190 IV, 11. 6. 2 | funds (in Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland,
191 IV, 11. 6. 2 | kind of PHI in Denmark, Finland, Spain or England (since
192 IV, 11. 6. 2 | PHI for their employees in Finland, France, Germany, Greece,
193 IV, 11. 6. 2 | care only Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Ireland (higher
194 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Sweden to about €600 in Finland (Jemiai et al, 2004). Exemptions
195 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Luxembourg, to €26-65 in Finland, Ireland (Category II patients)
196 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Pregnancy services:~- Estonia~- Finland~- Italy~- Latvia~- Malta~-
197 IV, 11. 6. 2 | children:~- Belgium~- Estonia~- Finland~- France~- Germany~- Italy~-
198 IV, 11. 6. 2 | serious diseases:~- Belgium~- Finland~- Greece~- Malta~- Portugal~-
199 IV, 11. 6. 3 | taxation. For example, in Finland, an increase in the average
200 IV, 11. 6. 3 | proportional to income in Finland and even progressive in
201 IV, 11. 6. 4 | only for primary care: Age~Finland~State, municipalities, and
202 IV, 11. 6. 4 | Pharmaceuticals Pricing Boards in Finland, Norway, and Sweden, and
203 IV, 11. 6. 5 | health care financing in Finland." Journal of Health Services
204 IV, 12. 2 | drugs must be considered.~ ~Finland provides one of the best-documented
205 IV, 12. 2 | community intervention. In 1972, Finland had the world’s highest
206 IV, 12. 4 | Chemicals Agency (Helsinki, Finland) – Established in 2007~http u/~
207 IV, 12. 5 | for men Austria, Belgium, Finland, Germany and Italy appeared
208 IV, 12. 8 | 2004)~Luxemb0urg (1957)~Finland (1995)~Ireland (1973)~Hungary (
209 IV, 12. 10 | Media campaign~ ~ ~COUNTRY: FINLAND~ ~An Amended Act on Measures
210 IV, 12. 10 | the public health work in Finland.~ ~National screening programmes
211 IV, 12. 10 | those at health centres) Finland will be divided into joint
212 IV, 13.Acr | Netherlands and 3.9% in Finland. However, where data exist,
213 IV, 13.Acr | public health e.g. Austria, Finland, France, the Netherlands,
214 IV, 13. 7. 2 | first group contains Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Germany. These
215 Key, Ap5. 0. 0 | filariasis~filoviridae~financing~Finland~fish~flavourings~fleas~flood~
|
|
| |
