Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

  1    I,     2. 10.  3   |          i2010 programme include:~ ~A review of e-Business policies and
  2    I,     2. 10.  3   |        take-up of ICT and e-Business.~Review of standardisation for ICT.~
  3    I,     2. 10.  3   |        initiatives under i2010 is the review of the competitiveness of
  4    I,     2. 10.  3   |               on Health Telematics to review the introduction of information
  5    I,     2. 10.  3(7)|      technology. International Labour Review. Geneva, ILO; 134(4-5),587-
  6    I,     2. 11       |      technology. International Labour Review. Geneva, ILO; 134(4-5),587-
  7    I,     2. 11       |            barriers to health care: a review of disparities in health
  8   II,     4.  1       |               estimates for the EU25, review the trends in life expectancy
  9   II,     4.  3       |            Population and Development Review 16(3): 403-432.~ ~Robine,
 10   II,     4.  3       |         Healthy People 2010 Midcourse Review: Executive summary. Washington,
 11   II,     5.  2.  6   |             necrosis and brought to a review in the definition of AMI,
 12   II,     5.  3.  7   |      identified:~· Further reduce the review time for the marketing authorization
 13   II,     5.  4.  6   |         stronger compared to the last review, because of the greater
 14   II,     5.  4.  8   |           type 2 diabetes: literature review and economic modelling Health
 15   II,     5.  5.  1   |               systems.~o The European Review of Suicide and Violence
 16   II,     5.  5.  1   |           providers before suicide: a review of the evidence. Am J Psychiatry
 17   II,     5.  5.  1   |              of self-harm. Systematic review. Bri J Psychiatry 181:193-
 18   II,     5.  5.  1   |              depression: a systematic review. Am J Med 118(4):330-41.~ ~
 19   II,     5.  5.  2   |        experts conducted a systematic review of published studies on
 20   II,     5.  5.  2   |              of writing a descriptive review of risk factors for dementia
 21   II,     5.  5.  2   |        preventively about dementia: a review, International Journal of
 22   II,     5.  5.  2   |      population-based context. Annual Review of Public Health 25: 1-24.~ ~
 23   II,     5.  5.  3   |           data basis, is a systematic review of literature that can base
 24   II,     5.  5.  3   |           studies) were reviewed. The review analysed indicators such
 25   II,     5.  5.  3   |               makers should regularly review the effectiveness of programmes
 26   II,     5.  5.  3   |               Disorders: A Systematic review of the Literature. International
 27   II,     5.  5.  3   |              W, van Hoeken D, (2003): Review of the Prevalence and Incidence
 28   II,     5.  5.  3   |             According to a systematic review (Saha et al, 2005) of prevalence
 29   II,     5.  5.  3   |          available most comprehensive review on prevalence data identified
 30   II,     5.  5.  3   |         recently published systematic review. Based on population-based
 31   II,     5.  5.  3   |        suicide. According to a recent review of the literature on physical
 32   II,     5.  5.  3   |             According to a literature review on the treatment gap in
 33   II,     5.  5.  3   |        schizophrenia: A comprehensive review of recent literature. J
 34   II,     5.  5.  3   |          illness and schizophrenia: a review of the literature. Acta
 35   II,     5.  5.  3   |        McGrath J (2005): A systematic review of the prevalence of schizophrenia
 36   II,     5.  5.  3   |       McGrrath J (2007): A systematic review of mortality in schizophrenia:
 37   II,     5.  5.  3   |         factors for ASD.~A systematic review of prevalence studies has
 38   II,     5.  5.  3   |                 Denmark ~All ages ~MR review~333 ~7.6 ~Joensen, 1986 (*)~
 39   II,     5.  5.  3   |              1999~Estonia ~Adults ~MR review and examination~396 ~5.3 ~
 40   II,     5.  5.  3   |           2003 (*)~Finland~Adults ~MR review and examination~1233 ~6.
 41   II,     5.  5.  3   |            Children ~Retrospective/MR review and examination ~329/348 ~
 42   II,     5.  5.  3   |                 Iceland ~All ages ~MR review~428 ~4.8 ~Olafsson and Hauser,
 43   II,     5.  5.  3   |                   Italy ~All ages ~MR review and examination MR review/
 44   II,     5.  5.  3   |             review and examination MR review/MR review and Examination/
 45   II,     5.  5.  3   |              examination MR review/MR review and Examination/AED consumption
 46   II,     5.  5.  3   |    consumption door-to-door survey/MR review and examination~278/51~ ~
 47   II,     5.  5.  3   |              2005~Italy ~Children ~MR review~? ~4.5 + ~Cavazzuti, 1986 (*)~
 48   II,     5.  5.  3   |                Lithuania~Children ~MR review~378 ~4.3 ~Endziniene et
 49   II,     5.  5.  3   |             1997~Norway ~Children ~MR review and examination~198 ~5.3 -~
 50   II,     5.  5.  3   |                 Norway ~All ages? ~MR review and GP contacts~245 ~2.3 ~
 51   II,     5.  5.  3   |                   Poland~All ages ~MR review~337.8 ~ ~Zielinski, 1974 (*)~
 52   II,     5.  5.  3   |          Multisource medical register review~713 ~5.5 ~Forsgren, 1992 (*)~
 53   II,     5.  5.  3   |               and GP and P inquiry/MR review? ~155/195 ~4.2/3.5~Sidenvall
 54   II,     5.  5.  3   |               Children 4-20 years ~MR review ~69 ~4.3 ~Tidman et al.,
 55   II,     5.  5.  3   |               seizure: a quantitative review. Neurology 41:965-972.~Berg
 56   II,     5.  5.  3   |            the patient’s perspective: review of results of a community-based
 57   II,     5.  5.  3   |              in Europe – a systematic review. Eur J Neurol 12:245-253.~
 58   II,     5.  5.  3   |              et al (2002): Systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence
 59   II,     5.  5.  3   |            sudden unexpected death: a review. Epilepsia 38(suppl 11):
 60   II,     5.  5.  3   |            and employment: literature review. Epilepsy Behav 10:354-362.~
 61   II,     5.  5.  3   |          Medical risks in epilepsy: a review with focus on physical injuries,
 62   II,     5.  5.  3   |              in Europe; good practice review of MS treatments and therapies,
 63   II,     5.  5.  3   |              to the society. A recent review estimated costs due to PD
 64   II,     5.  5.  3   |       EUROSTAT, 2002). Several recent review articles are available (
 65   II,     5.  5.  3   |             by disease severity~ ~The review has revealed that: i) PD
 66   II,     5.  5.  3   |        Shenton CL, Salek SS (2006): A review of the health-related quality
 67   II,     5.  5.  3   |           Rascol O, Sampaio C (2006): Review of the therapeutic management
 68   II,     5.  5.  3   |         Counsell C (2003): Systematic review of incidence studies of
 69   II,     5.  6.  3   |              Health).~ ~Incidence~ ~A review of European studies using
 70   II,     5.  6.  5   |             strategies are based on a review of the evidence from existing
 71   II,     5.  6.  6   |             arthritis register with a review of the literature. I. Risk
 72   II,     5.  7.  2   |               sources~ ~ ~The present review is based on a compilation
 73   II,     5.  7.  3   |            the data collected in this review. Indeed the prevalence of
 74   II,     5.  7.  3   |            the data collected in this review. Indeed, the prevalence
 75   II,     5.  7.  7   |          mortality risk: a systematic review. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006 Jul;
 76   II,     5.  8.  3   |              WHO’s Large Analysis and Review of Housing and Health Status
 77   II,     5.  8.  3   |            the WHO Large Analysis and Review of European Housing and
 78   II,     5.  8.  4   |            Marco et al, 2004).~ ~In a review of community or general
 79   II,     5.  8.  7   |            burden of COPD: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir
 80   II,     5.  8.  7   |           pulmonary disease (COPD). A review. Nord J Psychiatry 2004;
 81   II,     5.  9.  2   |           data have been published; a review by von Hertzen and Haahtela
 82   II,     5.  9.  3   |              since the early 60s. The review by von Hertzen and Haahtela (
 83   II,     5.  9.  3   |              in Europe, 2003).~ ~In a review of nine studies carried
 84   II,     5.  9.  7   |              of control? A structured review of recent patient surveys,
 85   II,     5. 10.  2   |             which is the most updated review of available data on FA
 86   II,     5. 10.  7   |              food allergy research: a review. Allergy 61,1336-1343.~ ~
 87   II,     5. 10.  7   |             56: 91-102.~Tay L (2006): Review of the development of methodology
 88   II,     5. 11.  2   |              has been integrated by a review of more recent literature
 89   II,     5. 11.  7   |              Hay R (2005): Literature review. Onychomycosis. J Eur Acad
 90   II,     5. 12.  7   |               infection: a systematic review. Int J Cancer 111:1-8.~ ~
 91   II,     5. 13       |                Moreover, a systematic review shows that childhood obesity
 92   II,     5. 14.  2   |           survey data, and literature review. Major sources of information
 93   II,     5. 15.  4   |            Medicines Agency (EMEA) to review designation applications
 94   II,     5. 15.  6   |            for a national orphan drug review policy. CMAJ. 2006 Jan 17;
 95   II,     8.  2.  2   |               as from a comprehensive review of available data (Gilbert
 96   II,     8.  2.  2   |          blindness and low vision~ ~A review and selection, based on
 97   II,     8.  2.  2   |               3. Data Description~ ~A review and selection, based on
 98   II,     8.  2.  2   |             impairment in children: a review of available data. Ophthalmic
 99   II,     9.  1.  1   |          developed after an extensive review of existing perinatal health
100   II,     9.  1.  2   |             EUROCAT Special Report: A Review of Environmental Risk Factors
101   II,     9.  1.  2   |            and newborns: a systematic review. HTA Assessment 2004; Vol
102   II,     9.  1.  2   |          birth defects – a systematic review. Hum Reprod 2005; 20:328-
103   II,     9.  3.  1   |               than in women. A recent review made for the American College
104   II,     9.  3.  1   |              in Europe – a systematic review. European Journal of Neurology,
105   II,     9.  3.  1   |             to help-seeking by men: a review of sociocultural and clinical
106   II,     9.  3.  1   |            sensitivity. Mental Health Review Journal, 11(4), 3-6.~ ~White
107   II,     9.  3.  3   |         database, 2007).~· Systematic review conducted by REPROSTAT 2
108   II,     9.  3.  3   |               countries: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health. 0:
109   II,     9.  4.  3   |          therapy input and outpatient review (Bhalla et al, 2004).~ ~
110   II,     9.  4.  7   |              Older People: A European Review. Journal of Integrated Care
111   II,     9.  4.  7   |               people across Europe: a review of the longitudinal results
112   II,     9.  5.  4   |             for gender balance;~· The review and amendment of pre-2006
113   II,     9.  5.  6   |              in safety and health - A review. Luxembourg: Office for
114   II,     9.  5.  6   |            health – an evidence based review. Geneva. Available at: http://
115  III,    10.  1.  3   |            family factors. A critical review. Recent Dev Alcohol 7:147-
116  III,    10.  1.  3   |         Intergenerational effects – a review of environmentally oriented
117  III,    10.  1.  3   |         Intergenerational effects – a review of environmentally oriented
118  III,    10.  2.  1   |              future. Drug and Alcohol Review, 2006; 25: 59-71~ ~Janson
119  III,    10.  2.  1   |               concentration levels. A review of 112 studies provided
120  III,    10.  2.  1   | alcohol-impaired driving a systematic review Am J Prev Med Jun;28(5 Suppl):
121  III,    10.  2.  1   |           Witty K, Bellis M (2007): A review of the effectiveness and
122  III,    10.  2.  1   |              old Alcohol and schools: Review of effectiveness and cost
123  III,    10.  2.  1   |              1995) Drug prevention: a review of legislation, regulation
124  III,    10.  2.  1   |           survey data, and literature review. Data are obtainable from
125  III,    10.  2.  1   |              teachers to plan, do and review activities.~ ~Individuals
126  III,    10.  2.  1   |              toothpaste: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand 2003;
127  III,    10.  2.  1   |            physical activity~A recent review of instruments currently
128  III,    10.  2.  1   |  physical activity (WHO, 2006g). This review aims at inspiring policy-makers
129  III,    10.  2.  1   |         Exercise and mental health: a review. Journal of the Royal Society
130  III,    10.  2.  1   |   Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature. Psychological
131  III,    10.  2.  1   |            self-esteem. Sport Science Review, 12:123-155.~ ~TNS Opinion
132  III,    10.  2.  1   |                Moreover, a systematic review shows that childhood obesity
133  III,    10.  2.  1   |              unbalances~ ~The present review builds upon the compilation
134  III,    10.  2.  1   |         country were identified, this review only presents the objective
135  III,    10.  2.  1   |           Lobstein et al, 2004). This review uses the definition based
136  III,    10.  2.  1   |               a systematic literature review of the effectiveness of (
137  III,    10.  2.  1   |             individual needs. Another review looking at the effectiveness
138  III,    10.  2.  1   |           Commission will carry out a review of progress in 2010 to review
139  III,    10.  2.  1   |         review of progress in 2010 to review obesity status, to observe
140  III,    10.  2.  1   |              in women: an integrative review of the literature. Journal
141  III,    10.  2.  1   |               developing countries: a review. Bulletin of the World Health
142  III,    10.  2.  1   |   Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature. Psychological
143  III,    10.  2.  1   |         children aged 1 to 5 years: a review. London, Health Education
144  III,    10.  2.  1   |    selenoproteins and human health: a review Public Health Nutr. 4: 593-
145  III,    10.  3.  1   |              and cardiovascular risk. Review and synthesis of epidemiological
146  III,    10.  3.  2   |               Norway (htt ). The EPER review report 2004 reveals that
147  III,    10.  3.  2   |             Health and Environment: a Review of Evidence. A Joint Report
148  III,    10.  3.  4   |           adaptation during 2007. The review of the EU-ETS has started
149  III,    10.  3.  4   |           investigated . A systematic review of post-traumatic stress
150  III,    10.  4.  1   |             fully developed yet, this review is only partly based on
151  III,    10.  4.  1   |               WHO ProjectSystematic Review of Health Aspects of Air
152  III,    10.  4.  2   |        Pesticide Risk Assessment Peer Review Unit is responsible for
153  III,    10.  4.  2   |              responsible for the peer review of active substances used
154  III,    10.  4.  2   |       pesticides, the Commission will review the temporary MRLs established
155  III,    10.  4.  2   |           would modify the JECFA 2002 review and derived ADI values for
156  III,    10.  4.  2   |               EFSA provided a summary review of the biological processes
157  III,    10.  4.  2   |              all active substances;~· Review programme for all MRLs~·
158  III,    10.  4.  2   |          consumes Article 32 ;~· peer review of active substances.~ ~
159  III,    10.  4.  2   |            framework of the EFSA peer review for the risk assessment
160  III,    10.  4.  2   |            SCPHAW).~ ~Pesticides peer review phases are as indicated
161  III,    10.  4.  2   |     contentious) issues;~· joint peer review of the risk assessment by
162  III,    10.  4.  2   |               cornerstone of the peer review occurs thorugh the meetings
163  III,    10.  4.  2   |             10.4.2.2. Pesticides Peer reviewstatus: evaluation of
164  III,    10.  4.  2   |             main goals of PRAPeR peer review in the future include:~·
165  III,    10.  4.  2   |            asked by the Commission to review the latest draft Annexes
166  III,    10.  4.  3   |              3.2. Data sources~ ~This review is based on the first outcomes
167  III,    10.  4.  5   |        aereosols.~ ~Data sources~This review is based on the WHO Guidelines
168  III,    10.  4.  5   |    environment.~ ~Data sources~ ~This review is primarily based on the
169  III,    10.  4.  5   |             WHO Europe has produced a reviewPopulation health and waste
170  III,    10.  4.  5   |               waste landfill sites: A review of the Epidemiological literature.
171  III,    10.  5.  1   |              13:53-64.~ DEFRA (2004): Review of environmental and health
172  III,    10.  5.  1   |               performance? A critical review of the literature. Indoor
173  III,    10.  5.  1   |           Indoor Air. 2005, 15:27-52. Review. Erratum in: Indoor Air. (
174  III,    10.  5.  1   |        related to asthma?: literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing
175  III,    10.  5.  1   |             in settled school dust: a review of findings and significant
176  III,    10.  5.  2   |              a number of research and review articles which will be referenced
177  III,    10.  5.  2   |                A valid and consistent review of rural and urban health
178  III,    10.  5.  3   |                2001): A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. American
179  III,    10.  5.  3   |        retention and mental health: a review of the literature. London,
180   IV,    11.  1.  3   |       measurement. Their findings and review of the literature demonstrate
181   IV,    11.  1.  5   |               approaches such as peer review/visitation, clinical audit,
182   IV,    11.  1.  6   |         systems vary across Europe. A review of the methodology used
183   IV,    11.  2.  1   |  cardiovascular disease and cancer. A review of DMPs found they improve
184   IV,    11.  4       |             epidemiologySystematic review of published evidence~·
185   IV,    11.  4       |              of systematic search and review of published evidence on
186   IV,    11.  4       |             economic evaluation and a review of manufacturerssubmissions.
187   IV,    11.  6.  2   |               Thomson et al, 2003). A review of the literature shows
188   IV,    11.  6.  4   |       independent assessments.~ ~Most review bodies can be categorized
189   IV,    11.  6.  4   |            greater reliance on HTA to review existing and new services
190   IV,    11.  6.  5   |             results from a systematic review of the literature and methodological
191   IV,    11.  6.  5   |         health financing in Europe: a review. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing
192   IV,    11.  6.  5   |           medical care." Medical Care Review 37(7): 653-98.~ ~Dovey SM,
193   IV,    11.  6.  5   |             Theory: An Assessment and Review." Academy of Management
194   IV,    11.  6.  5   |                 Academy of Management Review 14 ,(4): 57-74.~ ~Epstein
195   IV,    11.  6.  5   |           forthcoming): "A literature review of cost sharing for prescription
196   IV,    11.  6.  5   |               et al. (2006): Cochrane Review: Capitation, salary, fee-for-service
197   IV,    11.  6.  5   |       mortality and health services:a review of aggregate data studies.
198   IV,    11.  6.  5   |         International Social Security Review 59(3): 3-25.~ ~Mossialos
199   IV,    11.  6.  5   |        prescribing in Europe." Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes
200   IV,    11.  6.  5   |                 The American Economic Review 58: 531-537.~ ~Perleth M,
201   IV,    11.  6.  5   |               health problem." Annual Review of Public Health 23: 135-
202   IV,    11.  6.  5   |             Medical Care Research and Review 53: 243-66.~ ~Robinson JC,
203   IV,    11.  6.  5   |             Medical Care Research and Review 63(2): 135-57.~ ~Rutstein
204   IV,    12.  2       |              Strategy to 2013, when a review will take place to support
205   IV,    12.  6       |             give it an opportunity to review issues as appropriate. The
206   IV,    12. 10       |            2001).~Tobacco Free Policy Review Group established (1998 –
207   IV,    12. 10       |              Hygiene~Services Quality Review~(last review published Nov
208   IV,    12. 10       |         Services Quality Review~(last review published Nov 2007)~ ~The
209   IV,    12. 10       |             automatic and independent~review of involuntary detentions
210   IV,    12. 10       |              of health inequities, 3) review of policies on alcohol and
211   IV,    13.  8       |             Organisations (CSOs).~ ~A review of the NGO status in Europe