Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

  1    -,     1            |    Ministries of Health (or by the Scientific Institutions appointed by
  2    -,     1            |      manuscripts with high-quality scientific analyses and comments on
  3    -,     1            |            Iacontino for different scientific and administrative aspects.
  4    I,     2.  1        |     socio-economic, environmental, scientific, technological and institutional
  5    I,     2. 10.  4    | identification in the San Raffaele Scientific Institute in Italy resulted
  6    I,     2. 10.  4(20)|        Chain “, Dr. Alberto Sanna, Scientific Institute Hospital San Raffaele
  7    I,     2. 11        |            al. (2007): Ethical and Scientific Issues of Nanotechnology
  8   II,     4.  1        |            these expectations, the scientific community should work on
  9   II,     5.  3.  2    |         gave voice to the European scientific community in a document
 10   II,     5.  3.  2    |     carcinogenesis, and to develop scientific strategies for cancer control.
 11   II,     5.  3.  2    |          research and disseminates scientific information through publications,
 12   II,     5.  3.  7    |        cancer.~ ~The international scientific community indicates that
 13   II,     5.  3.  7    |   importance of NCP is stressed by scientific research and patient community (
 14   II,     5.  3.  9    |            Code Against Cancer and scientific justification: third version.
 15   II,     5.  4.  4    |           gaining credibility from scientific evidence, i.e. the measuring
 16   II,     5.  4.  4    |          Governments: we know from scientific literature that the current
 17   II,     5.  4.  4    |          alarming, as we know from scientific evidence that the rise of
 18   II,     5.  4.  6    |         the direct contribution of scientific associations.~One important
 19   II,     5.  5.  3    |            is well accepted in the scientific community that early and
 20   II,     5.  5.  3    |          20 years have alerted the scientific community and public health
 21   II,     5.  5.  3    |            summarizing the current scientific position on epilepsy and
 22   II,     5.  5.  3    |         national and international scientific associations (ILAE, IBE.
 23   II,     5.  5.  3    |     published in the international scientific peer-reviewed literature (
 24   II,     5.  5.  3    |            reported in non-English scientific literature or from local
 25   II,     5.  5.  3    |            000 are reported in the scientific literature. An overview
 26   II,     5.  5.  3    |          will be made available in scientific literature.~Early published
 27   II,     5.  5.  3    |      international, peer-reviewed, scientific journal reporting the results.
 28   II,     5.  5.  3    |          there is a vast amount of scientific literature dealing with
 29   II,     5.  5.  3    |         national and international scientific associations or by national
 30   II,     5.  6.  6    |         Millenium. Report of a WHO Scientific Group. TRS 919. Geneva,
 31   II,     5.  9. FB    |          introduced, together with scientific and evidence-based preventive
 32   II,     5.  9.  5    |          introduced, together with scientific and evidence-based preventive
 33   II,     5.  9.  5    |         moment there is not enough scientific evidence of the effectiveness
 34   II,     5. 10.Acr    |           IgE~Immunoglobulin E~SCF~Scientific Committee for Food~
 35   II,     5. 10.  2    |          includes the common name, scientific name, occurrence, allergy
 36   II,     5. 10.  2    |     exhibit adverse reactions, the Scientific Committee for Food (SCF)
 37   II,     5. 10.  2    |            from the Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products,
 38   II,     5. 10.  5    |            the industry to provide scientific justification for that,
 39   II,     5. 10.  5    |           at any time based on new scientific evidence.~ ~
 40   II,     5. 10.  7    |              2004): Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products,
 41   II,     5. 10.  7    |           EU SCOOP (European Union Scientific Cooperation) (1998): Report
 42   II,     5. 10.  7    |        experts participating in EU Scientific Cooperation. Task 7.2 entitled “
 43   II,     5. 10.  7    |            Immunol 120, 638-646.~ ~Scientific Committee for Foods (SCF) (
 44   II,     5. 10.  7    |        ingredients. Reports of the Scientific Committee for Foods, Thirty-seventh
 45   II,     5. 11.  3    |          with the aim of providing scientific information necessary for
 46   II,     5. 14.  2    |           ministries of health and scientific reports from population
 47   II,     5. 15.  1    |           approach in the areas of scientific and biomedical research,
 48   II,     6.  2        |         and relevant articles from scientific journals2.~ ~However, the
 49   II,     6.  3.  1    |           more and better data and scientific studies are needed to clearly
 50   II,     6.  4.  2    |          is in charge of providing scientific advice and risk assessment
 51   II,     6.  4.  4    |        activities on surveillance, scientific advice and risk assessment,
 52   II,     6.  4.  4    |            a key role in providing scientific and technical support to
 53   II,     6.  4.  4    |           to develop authoritative scientific opinions about the risks
 54   II,     6.  4.  4    |           new Centre also provides scientific co-operation within the
 55   II,     7.  3.  5    |       approach involving different scientific disciplines.~ ~Interpersonal
 56   II,     7.  5        |       sector. This offers a unique scientific and prevention-driven approach
 57   II,     7.  5        |            quarterly newsletter, a scientific journal (Injury Control
 58   II,     8.  2.  1    |  International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual Disabilities.
 59   II,     8.  2.  2    |           the report of a 1999 WHO scientific meeting (WHO, 2000), as
 60   II,     8.  2.  2    |     children. Report of a WHO/IAPB scientific meeting Hyderabad, India
 61   II,     9            |         are well documented in the scientific literature (Stillman et
 62   II,     9.  1.  1    |      DELPHI consensus process with scientific committees composed of clinicians,
 63   II,     9.  1.  1    |           reflects a solid base of scientific evidence, as well as the
 64   II,     9.  1.  2    |         are well documented in the scientific literature (Stillman et
 65   II,     9.  1.  2    |   different interpretations of the scientific evidence in the design and
 66   II,     9.  1.  2    |      protecting the foetus despite scientific uncertainty, particularly
 67   II,     9.  2.  3    |     rubella) vaccine. The apparent scientific evidence brought into this
 68   II,     9.  2.  5    |      Commission is able to provide scientific support to Member States
 69   II,     9.  2.  6    |            DG SANCO, including the Scientific Platform on behavioural
 70   II,     9.  3.  1    |           joint statement of three Scientific Societies - the International
 71   II,     9.  3.  3    |      European studies published in scientific journals.~· Data from national
 72   II,     9.  5.  4    |   programmes, and to reinforce the scientific evidence on the effectiveness
 73   II,     9.  5.  6    |          medicine: a vital part of scientific rationality. A useful model
 74  III,    10.  1.  3    |            what we need to know. A scientific statement from the American
 75  III,    10.  2.  1    |            and Development~SCENIHR~Scientific Committee on Emerging and
 76  III,    10.  2.  1    |          reviewing the ban and its Scientific Committee on Emerging and
 77  III,    10.  2.  1    |         that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support the
 78  III,    10.  2.  1    |            Code Against Cancer and scientific justification: third version (
 79  III,    10.  2.  1    |           in a context in which no scientific or methodological guarantees
 80  III,    10.  2.  1    |            1,000 ppm. Although the scientific literature does not evaluate
 81  III,    10.  2.  1    |      context specific questions. A scientific analysis of this survey
 82  III,    10.  2.  1    |         estimates for Switzerland. Scientific position statement of the
 83  III,    10.  2.  1    |            School Fruit Scheme~SCF~Scientific Committee on Food~UNECE~
 84  III,    10.  2.  1    |            assessments by the EFSA Scientific Panels and Member States.
 85  III,    10.  2.  1    |          the recommendation of the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF)
 86  III,    10.  2.  1    |           published in a number of scientific papers. In particular, the
 87  III,    10.  2.  1    |       dietary guidelines(FBDG)~ ~A Scientific Colloquium was organized
 88  III,    10.  2.  1    |         the above-mentioned EFSA’s scientific colloquium. One approach
 89  III,    10.  2.  1    |   depending on aims and underlying scientific data (Figure 10.2.1.7.7).~ ~
 90  III,    10.  2.  1    |         2007).~ ~There are several scientific approaches to collect information
 91  III,    10.  2.  1    |       evaluation of an appropriate scientific dossier concerning the safety
 92  III,    10.  2.  1    |       evaluation of an appropriate scientific dossier concerning the safety
 93  III,    10.  2.  1    |         2004 - results]. Brussels, Scientific Institute of Public Health,
 94  III,    10.  2.  1    |  Guidelines - SUMMARY REPORT. EFSA SCIENTIFIC COLLOQUIUM, Parma, Italy,
 95  III,    10.  2.  1    |            www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/Scientific_Document/sc_colloque5_fbdg_
 96  III,    10.  2.  1    |          Am J Clin Nutr 22: 1-8.~ ~Scientific Committee for Food (SCF):
 97  III,    10.  2.  1    |          Food (SCF): Report of the Scientific Committee for Food. Nutrition
 98  III,    10.  2.  4    |        United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural~ ~Organization~
 99  III,    10.  2.  4    |     globally, that will enable the scientific advances to be effectively,
100  III,    10.  2.  4    |     globally, that will enable the scientific advances to be effectively,
101  III,    10.  2.  4    |       Human Genome Epidemiology. A Scientific Foundation for Using Genetic
102  III,    10.  2.  5    |        present section is built on scientific papers published in the
103  III,    10.  2.  5    |            An increasing number of scientific studies indicate the role
104  III,    10.  3.  1    |          Resonance Imaging~SCENIHR~Scientific Committee on Emerging and
105  III,    10.  3.  1    |         public concern and several scientific studies, there is still
106  III,    10.  3.  1    |             and the European Union Scientific Committee on Emerging and
107  III,    10.  3.  1    |      frequency. The European Union Scientific Committee on Emerging and
108  III,    10.  3.  1    |      opinion is primarily based on scientific articles, published in English
109  III,    10.  3.  1    |     English language peer-reviewed scientific journals. The opinion is
110  III,    10.  3.  1    |     concern than based on a strict scientific and social cost-benefit
111  III,    10.  3.  1    |         taking into account recent scientific and technical evidence.~ ~
112  III,    10.  3.  1    |           the incorporation of new scientific findings and more informed
113  III,    10.  3.  1    |    directive (htt )~European Union Scientific Committee on Emerging and
114  III,    10.  3.  2    |          in the light of increased scientific knowledge and new uses.
115  III,    10.  3.  2    |    reviewed and quality checked by scientific experts and policymakers
116  III,    10.  3.  2    |            An increasing number of scientific studies indicate the role
117  III,    10.  3.  4    |           or vulnerable to heat.~ ~Scientific methodologies and data gaps
118  III,    10.  4.  1    |    reviewed and quality checked by scientific experts and policymakers
119  III,    10.  4.  1    |           indicators and mainly on scientific knowledge, assessments and
120  III,    10.  4.  2    |         stricter separation of the scientific and political elements of
121  III,    10.  4.  2    |            relentless evolution of scientific knowledge, constantly push
122  III,    10.  4.  2    |           the Commission providing scientific support to underpin food
123  III,    10.  4.  2    |  structures and mechanisms for the scientific and technical evaluations
124  III,    10.  4.  2    |     information in addition to the scientific risk assessment. These include,
125  III,    10.  4.  2    |            are not just based on a scientific assessment of risk but also
126  III,    10.  4.  2    |            protect health although scientific information concerning the
127  III,    10.  4.  2    |        while seeking more complete scientific evidence and other data.
128  III,    10.  4.  2    |          Safety Authority (EFSA)~ ~Scientific assessment of risk must
129  III,    10.  4.  2    |            levels of independence, scientific excellence and transparency.
130  III,    10.  4.  2    |            hold responsibility for scientific risk assessment and risk
131  III,    10.  4.  2    |        collaboration with national scientific agencies and institutions.
132  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Authority would provide scientific advice, collate and analyse
133  III,    10.  4.  2    |        EFSA acts as an independent scientific source of advice, information
134  III,    10.  4.  2    |           to specific requests for scientific advice mainly coming from
135  III,    10.  4.  2    |            delivered more than 500 scientific opinions on a wide variety
136  III,    10.  4.  2    |           collecting and analysing scientific data to ensure European
137  III,    10.  4.  2    |     supported by the most complete scientific information available. This
138  III,    10.  4.  2    |         and (10) plant health. The Scientific Committee supports and coordinates
139  III,    10.  4.  2    |       supports and coordinates the scientific panels to ensure consistency
140  III,    10.  4.  2    |          ensure consistency in the scientific opinions they produce.~ ~
141  III,    10.  4.  2    |           measures, based on sound scientific opinions, include:~ ~· A
142  III,    10.  4.  2    |           procedure based on sound scientific evaluation and taking into
143  III,    10.  4.  2    |           contaminants is based on scientific advice and the principle
144  III,    10.  4.  2    |         pesticides) provides for a scientific evaluation before the products
145  III,    10.  4.  2    |            compounds~ ~In 2002 the Scientific Committee on Food assessed
146  III,    10.  4.  2    |        animals. While there are no scientific reasons to doubt this risk
147  III,    10.  4.  2    |            therefore it undertakes scientific work on its own initiative.
148  III,    10.  4.  2    |            as emerging risks where scientific knowledge and approaches
149  III,    10.  4.  2    |             including all relevant scientific information relating to
150  III,    10.  4.  2    |  maintained as a transparent sound scientific process separated from risk
151  III,    10.  4.  2    |               provides independent scientific opinions and guidance for
152  III,    10.  4.  2    |          91/414 EEC);~· deals with scientific questions related to the
153  III,    10.  4.  2    |   enviroment.~ ~The main fields of scientific activities are:~· Providing
154  III,    10.  4.  2    |        activities are:~· Providing scientific opinions on generic opinions,
155  III,    10.  4.  2    |       promoting new and harmonized scientific approaches and methodologies:
156  III,    10.  4.  2    |       early 2008.~ ~EFSA organises scientific colloquia aimed at achieving
157  III,    10.  4.  2    |            some of the fundamental scientific issues related to risk assessment
158  III,    10.  4.  2    |             endorsed by the EFSA’s Scientific Committee to assess safety
159  III,    10.  4.  2    |       safety assessment, available scientific papers do not indicate any
160  III,    10.  4.  2    |      chemicals in food is a purely scientific process consisting of the
161  III,    10.  4.  2    |        such internationally agreed scientific approach is available for
162  III,    10.  4.  2    |            measurements. An ad hoc scientific Colloquium on this subject
163  III,    10.  4.  2    |     Agencies(e.g. ECDL and EEA). A scientific Committee has undertaken
164  III,    10.  4.  2    |          most current, independent scientific advice. By communicating
165  III,    10.  4.  2    |            of assessments from its scientific panels by:~ ~· analysing
166  III,    10.  4.  2    |            relentless evolution of scientific knowledge, constantly push
167  III,    10.  4.  2    |        2004): Summa Report of EFSA Scientific Colluquium on “Dioxins,
168  III,    10.  4.  2    |             Summary Report of EFSA Scientific colloquium on “Risk-benefits
169  III,    10.  4.  2    |              Summary Report of the Scientific Colloquium on “Cumulative
170  III,    10.  4.  2    |              Summary Report of the Scientific Colloquium on “ Food producing
171  III,    10.  4.  2    |              Summary Report of the Scientific Colloquium on “Qualified
172  III,    10.  4.  3    |        However, in the view of new scientific findings, the health consequences
173  III,    10.  4.  5    |       health and waste management: scientific data and policy options”
174  III,    10.  4.  5    |         limitations, the available scientific literature on health effects
175  III,    10.  4.  5    |       health and waste management: scientific data and policy options.
176  III,    10.  5.  1    |       chapter is mostly taken from scientific publications and reports
177  III,    10.  5.  1    |            Network is based on the scientific awareness that good urban
178  III,    10.  5.  1    |  government. They compile and edit scientific awareness and turn the results
179  III,    10.  5.  2    |       chapter is mostly taken from scientific publications and reports
180  III,    10.  5.  3    |           and health as a field of scientific study in its own right,
181  III,    10.  5.  3    |       position of enterprises. The scientific consensus is that preventive
182  III,    10.  5.  3    |         prevention: Summary of the scientific evidence. IGA_Report 3.
183   IV,    11.  1.  5    |           selected on the basis of scientific validity and reliability
184   IV,    11.  4        |         rooted in research and the scientific method (EUnetHTA).~ ~The
185   IV,    11.  4        |        make use of expert opinion, scientific advice, health statistics
186   IV,    11.  4        |            HTA (HTAi) (ww g) and a scientific journal, International Journal
187   IV,    11.  4        |            to controversy over the scientific soundness of HTA, as was
188   IV,    11.  4        |      England between assessment (a scientific process and the role of
189   IV,    11.  5.  2    |       transplant organizations and scientific societies operate in Europe~
190   IV,    11.  5.  4    |      cancers has been described in scientific literature. The transmission
191   IV,    11.  5.  5    |   coordinator and president of the scientific committee of the project
192   IV,    12.  4        |         data~concerning health~JRC~Scientific and Technical Support in
193   IV,    12.  4        |            safety.~ ~ ~Independent scientific advice plays an important
194   IV,    12.  4        |     decision-making process. Three Scientific Committees have been established
195   IV,    12.  4        | established by DG SANCO to provide scientific advice on non-food related
196   IV,    12.  4        |          what concerms independent scientific advise on border-crossing
197   IV,    12.  4        |           and carry out technical, scientific and administrative aspects
198   IV,    12.  4        |   Community with the best possible scientific and technical advice on
199   IV,    12.  4        |               To provide objective scientific advice on all matters with
200   IV,    12.  4        |          in 1995~http eu~To foster scientific excellence in the evaluation
201   IV,    12.  5        |           2.1. Support and enhance scientific advice and risk assessment
202   IV,    12.  8        |       health’.~ ~Given the complex scientific and technical issues to
203   IV,    12. 10        |  concerning the establishment of a Scientific Committee for monitoring
204   IV,    12. 10        |           It is a non-governmental scientific association, operating on
205   IV,    12. 10        |         its aim is to promote "the scientific research and study of obesity
206   IV,    12. 10        |            Greece" as well as "the scientific research in the field of
207   IV,    13.  7.  3    |          at European level, in all scientific and technological fields
208   IV,    13.  7.  3    |      issues to be addressed by the scientific community. In addition to
209   IV,    13.  7.  3    |      practical applications of new scientific knowledge.~ ~