Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2. 2 | stable tourist destination compared to other large regions in
2 I, 2. 3 | more low skilled immigrants compared to the USA, Australia and
3 I, 2. 4 | Eastern European countries, as compared to between 25 and 41 per
4 I, 2. 4 | magnitude in the Eastern compared to the Western countries.
5 I, 2. 5 | the third quarter of 2008, compared with the previous quarter,
6 I, 2. 5 | the accession countries compared to 40% in the EU. Although
7 I, 2. 5 | more low skilled immigrants compared to the USA, Australia and
8 I, 2. 6 | ISCED level 6 programmes compared to men increased in nearly
9 I, 2. 9 | has increased by 0.8 °C compared with pre-industrial times
10 I, 2. 9 | year in the past 15 years (compared with a global average of
11 I, 2. 10. 5| different countries should be compared looking both at the methods
12 I, 3. 2 | specific years since 1990.~ ~Compared to 2000, the 2006 population
13 I, 3. 3 | years per one person of 65+ (compared to the current four). Therefore,
14 I, 3. 3 | similar across Member States. Compared to the 2005 values, all
15 II, 4. 1 | expectancy was around 70 years as compared to the current rate of about
16 II, 4. 1 | year higher in the EU27 compared to the USA but three years
17 II, 5. 1. 1| cigarettes per day was about 8, compared to non-smokers. Prevalence
18 II, 5. 1. 1| Excessive food intake as compared to needs deriving from physical activity
19 II, 5. 2. 2| mortality rates are higher compared to those of the Mediterranean
20 II, 5. 2. 2| mortality rates are higher compared to those of Mediterranean
21 II, 5. 2. 3| validated and cannot be compared among countries. Their interpretation
22 II, 5. 2. 4| the risk of heart attack compared to those who have never
23 II, 5. 3. 4| historical patterns of smoking compared to men (Parkin et al, 2005).
24 II, 5. 3. 5| lower male incidence rate compared to other countries with
25 II, 5. 3. 5| lower male incidence rate compared to other countries with
26 II, 5. 4. 3| people and in people above 85 compared to other age bands. OECD
27 II, 5. 4. 6| become somewhat stronger compared to the last review, because
28 II, 5. 4. 6| here is not really an issue compared to other areas: for most
29 II, 5. 5.Int| diagnose depression in women compared to men, even when before
30 II, 5. 5. 1| suicide mortality rates compared to men.~ ~Mortality rates
31 II, 5. 5. 3| significantly increased for migrants compared to native-born individuals (
32 II, 5. 5. 3| 2005b)~Burden of disease~Compared to other psychiatric disorders
33 II, 5. 5. 3| increased mortality risk compared to the general community
34 II, 5. 5. 3| or psychiatric conditions compared to controls. Co-morbidity
35 II, 5. 5. 3| and men with schizophrenia compared to controls.~Schizophrenia
36 II, 5. 5. 3| cannabis (Regier et al, 1990). Compared to typical community prevalence
37 II, 5. 5. 3| patients with schizophrenia as compared to 2 – 3% in the general
38 II, 5. 5. 3| to 4 times increased rate compared to community rates (Coodin,
39 II, 5. 5. 3| findings suggest higher rates compared to many other countries (
40 II, 5. 5. 3| usage of antipsychotics compared to other EU countries.~With
41 II, 5. 5. 3| averted by optimal treatment compared to 13% with current intervention
42 II, 5. 5. 3| 1924 and 1994-1998 cohorts compared. British Journal of Psychiatry
43 II, 5. 5. 3| been observed in autism compared with the general population,
44 II, 5. 5. 3| different populations are compared. Reference figures from
45 II, 5. 5. 3| death (95% CI 3.8-22.7) compared with patients in 5-year
46 II, 5. 5. 3| and without epilepsy were compared. Several somatic disorders
47 II, 5. 5. 3| reported in some regions compared with the respective national
48 II, 5. 5. 3| prevalence up to 119 in 1999 compared with 1950 was related to
49 II, 5. 5. 3| carried out so far for MS as compared to other neurological disorders.
50 II, 5. 5. 3| system (CNS) inflammation compared to placebo.~Five disease-modifying
51 II, 5. 5. 3| SMR: 2.9) was reported compared to the non-diseased population (
52 II, 5. 5. 3| in advanced stages of PD compared to the early stages of the
53 II, 5. 5. 3| in the old Member States compared to the new EU members. One
54 II, 5. 5. 3| patients were still at work compared to 81.5% of the healthy
55 II, 5. 5. 3| a mean age of 50.5 years compared to a mean of 57.9 years
56 II, 5. 5. 3| trends have been observed compared to data from 1973 (Singer
57 II, 5. 6. 3| poorest quality of life if compared to other chronic conditions (
58 II, 5. 6. 3| total health care costs compared to 8.1% for mental retardation.
59 II, 5. 6. 3| symptomatic knee OA was 2.3% compared to 17% based on radiologically
60 II, 5. 6. 3| farming ten years or more when compared to sedentary occupations (
61 II, 5. 6. 3| as high in people with RA compared to controls (Birnbaum et
62 II, 5. 6. 6| noninflammatory joint pain compared to rheumatoid arthritis:
63 II, 5. 7. 3| higher in the United States compared to Norway. In a recent comparative
64 II, 5. 7. 3| ESRD in US white patients compared to Norwegian patients was
65 II, 5. 7. 3| than 50% higher in males compared to females (Table 5.7.7).
66 II, 5. 7. 3| on RRT is lower in Europe compared to the US (Sixth Annual
67 II, 5. 7. 3| analyses have shown that compared to patients starting dialysis
68 II, 5. 7. 6| in transplant recipients compared to dialysis patients, whereas
69 II, 5. 8. 3| 52, 95%CI 2.04 to 6.07) compared to non smokers..~ ~COPD
70 II, 5. 8. 3| Netherlands, Italy) were compared (Chapman et al 2006). It
71 II, 5. 8. 4| in continuous smokers, compared to 1% in never smokers,
72 II, 5. 8. 4| cigarettes per day was about 8, compared to non-smokers. Prevalence
73 II, 5. 8. 4| phlegm (odds ratio 1.22 compared to males) (Cerveri et al,
74 II, 5. 8. 5| increase of 47 ml FEV1, compared with a decrease of 49 ml
75 II, 5. 8. 7| population study of COPD patients compared with non-COPD controls.
76 II, 5. 9. FB| living in Western Europe compared to those living in Eastern
77 II, 5. 9. FB| found among obese women compared to normal weight women.
78 II, 5. 9. FB| dermatitis in infancy when compared to standard infant formulas.~ ~
79 II, 5. 9. 1| asthma and concomitant AR compared to those with asthma alone (
80 II, 5. 9. 3| These first results can be compared with those obtained in another
81 II, 5. 9. 3| The prevalence data were compared with the results from the
82 II, 5. 9. 4| 0.67) for farm children compared to their references.~ ~Allergen
83 II, 5. 9. 4| were present in the fine compared to coarse PM fractions.
84 II, 5. 11. 3| Afro-Caribbean children when compared to their white counterparts.
85 II, 5. 11. 3| piercing posts released nickel compared to a percentage of 25% in
86 II, 5. 11. 4| economically active people when compared to other cancers (melanoma
87 II, 5. 12. 3| pattern had totally changed as compared to only two decades earlier.
88 II, 5. 13 | intake of excessive (as compared to physiological needs)
89 II, 5. 14. 3| countries with 2% to 28% when compared to the Eastern European
90 II, 6. 3. 2| whereby individual rates are compared to those of other participating
91 II, 6. 3. 4| not especially high when compared with historical data. The
92 II, 7. 6 | more and more important compared to those of other political
93 II, 8. 1. 3| the age group 16-24 years compared with older age groups. Among
94 II, 8. 1. 3| women with limitations, compared with their male counterpart,
95 II, 8. 1. 3| limited to some extent, compared to 43% for those with no
96 II, 8. 1. 3| limitations to some extent, as compared with 68% in those with no
97 II, 8. 1. 3| such proportion was 27%, compared with 45% in people with
98 II, 8. 1. 3| proportion was reduced to 15% as compared to 45% in unrestricted people
99 II, 8. 2. 1| of health services may be compared with those of their peers
100 II, 8. 2. 1| intellectual disabilities when compared with those who received
101 II, 8. 2. 1| lack of physical exercise compared with the general population.
102 II, 9 | mortality in young men (as compared to 10% in women). It has
103 II, 9. 1. 1| growth on neonatal outcome compared with singleton infants.
104 II, 9. 2. 2| produce results that can be compared within, and across, countries
105 II, 9. 2. 3| weight control behaviours, compared with 8.8% of girls who reported
106 II, 9. 2. 6| children differ significantly compared to adults. The impact of
107 II, 9. 3. 1| gap in life expectancy, as compared to women, is much smaller
108 II, 9. 3. 1| provided in chapter 9.5.~ ~As compared to women, men have a reduced
109 II, 9. 3. 1| premature mortality in men, as compared to women, underlying motivations
110 II, 9. 3. 1| produce results that can be compared within, and across, countries
111 II, 9. 3. 1| gap in life expectancy, as compared to women, is much smaller
112 II, 9. 3. 1| a result of accidents as compared to women (see Chapter on
113 II, 9. 3. 1| diagnose depression in women compared to men, even when they have
114 II, 9. 3. 1| various countries must be compared with extreme caution. Across
115 II, 9. 3. 1| systolic blood pressure compared to men (Duggirala et al,
116 II, 9. 3. 1| mortality in young men (as compared to 10% in women). It has
117 II, 9. 3. 2| growth on neonatal outcome compared with singleton infants.
118 II, 9. 3. 3| much higher among women compared to men, especially in Southern
119 II, 9. 3. 3| partners in their life so far, compared to 21% of the general male
120 II, 9. 3. 3| status are an improvement compared to conventional targeting
121 II, 9. 4. 1| is currently 81.2 years compared to 75.1 years for men. The
122 II, 9. 4. 3| death rates for men are compared with those for women it
123 II, 9. 4. 5| greater risk of ill-health compared to others. These include
124 II, 9. 5. 1| clear survival advantages compared to men (UN, 2005). Much
125 II, 9. 5. 3| deaths in the 15-44 age group compared to total deaths for men
126 II, 9. 5. 3| diagnose depression in women compared to men, even when they have
127 II, 9. 5. 3| education in 2005: 80% of women compared to 75% of men. Only in the
128 II, 9. 5. 3| older who are living alone compared to men. Poverty is highest
129 II, 9. 5. 3| when selecting their diet compared to women, but the pressures
130 II, 9. 5. 3| 6% in 2006 in the EU27, compared to 8.1% for men. This period
131 II, 9. 5. 4| most commonly that of women compared to that of men.~ ~The diversity
132 III, 10. 1. 1| exercise is more influential compared to low-intensity physical activity (
133 III, 10. 1. 1| lower percentage as fat compared to children with a low activity
134 III, 10. 1. 1| stronger in steady drinkers compared to binge drinkers (Jacobs
135 III, 10. 2. 1| the past 30 days in 2006 compared to 61% in 2003, the actual
136 III, 10. 2. 1| for women) in the EU10, compared to the EU15 (Anderson and
137 III, 10. 2. 1| had gingival inflammation compared to almost two thirds (63%
138 III, 10. 2. 1| boys had some gingivitis, compared to 48 per cent of girls (
139 III, 10. 2. 1| inexpensive and easy to administer compared to objective measures. It
140 III, 10. 2. 1| intake of excessive (as compared to physiological needs)
141 III, 10. 2. 1| national level can often not be compared directly. In addition to
142 III, 10. 2. 1| shown for these subjects compared to omnivores. Considering
143 III, 10. 2. 1| soils are poor in selenium compared to other parts of the World
144 III, 10. 2. 1| have been described and compared in cohorts included in the
145 III, 10. 2. 1| different food categories. As compared to WHO/FAO goals (table
146 III, 10. 3. 1| Health Report, 2005).~ ~Compared to noise from neighbours
147 III, 10. 3. 1| al., 2005; Torfs, 2003). Compared to environmental factors
148 III, 10. 3. 4| increase to a maximum of 2°C compared to pre-industrial levels.
149 III, 10. 4. 1| only some glimpses of data, compared to current European guidelines,
150 III, 10. 4. 1| of non-action has to be compared with cost of action focused
151 III, 10. 4. 2| in 2005 increased by 7.8% compared to the previous year, rising
152 III, 10. 4. 2| number of human cases when compared to 2004, salmonellosis remains
153 III, 10. 4. 2| and content in products compared to a 2000 baseline and to
154 III, 10. 4. 5| contaminants in groundwater compared to soil.~ ~An assessment
155 III, 10. 4. 5| this is relatively small compared to the total estimated costs.
156 III, 10. 5. 1| of homeless people when compared to the general population,
157 III, 10. 5. 2| for rural settings when compared to cities. The data were
158 III, 10. 5. 2| rural settings, reaching 48% compared to the 35% of urban places (
159 III, 10. 5. 2| substantially disadvantaged compared to their rural counterparts.
160 III, 10. 5. 2| a considerable advantage compared to urban residents. A meta-review
161 III, 10. 5. 2| provision of health services compared to the urban settlers. This
162 III, 10. 5. 3| in men (80 per 1000,000) compared to women. In both sexes
163 III, 10. 5. 3| accidents at work took place compared to 1998 in EU 25 as well
164 III, 10. 5. 3| job in the next six months compared to every tenth in the EU15.
165 III, 10. 5. 3| safety at increased risk, compared to other workers in similar
166 III, 10. 6. 1| about the people they help compared to men (Kessler et al.,
167 III, 10. 6. 1| in North and West Europe compared to South Europe and East
168 III, 10. 6. 2| Eastern European countries, as compared to between 25 and 41 per
169 III, 10. 6. 2| magnitude in the Eastern as compared to the Western countries.
170 III, 10. 6. 3| decreases in sexual incidents compared to previous years.~ ~Assaults
171 IV, 11. 1. 4| need differences has been compared across countries, and reveals
172 IV, 11. 1. 5| decline in cardiac mortality compared to the states without public
173 IV, 11. 1. 5| prescriptions in the Netherlands, compared to 94.5% in Italy. Various
174 IV, 11. 2. 1| reduction of 0.72 hospitals), compared to a reduction in 0.89 hospitals
175 IV, 11. 2. 1| systems in Western Europe compared to those funded largely
176 IV, 11. 4 | The role of HTA has been compared with that of a bridge between
177 IV, 11. 6. 2| out-of-pocket payments, compared to 66% in EU Member States
178 IV, 13. 2. 2| in low-income countries compared to developed countries.
179 IV, 13. 2. 2| carried out so far for MS as compared to other neurological disorders.
180 IV, 13. 2. 3| cardiovascular diseases, as compared to total abstinence. The
181 IV, 13. 3 | the EU Member States are compared. This is also the case when
182 IV, 13. 3 | prevalence and incidence are compared. In 2006, the European Commission,
183 IV, 13. 5 | performing daily life activities compared to the younger population.
184 IV, 13. 7. 2| 20-29 year olds in Europe compared to 10 in the US. The EU
185 IV, 13. 7. 2| goods (7% of total workforce compared to 4% in the US).~However,
186 IV, 13. 7. 3| budget more than doubled compared to that of FP6. According
187 IV, 13. 7. 3| currently covers a broader scope compared to the previous programmes
