Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2. 1 | their major impact on health outcomes, have become more and more
2 I, 2. 1 | largely contribute to economic outcomes in high-income countries
3 I, 2. 4 | at successful educational outcomes for each child, is necessary
4 I, 2. 8 | WHO (2004)~ ~Many health outcomes depend on the technology
5 I, 2. 10. 1| risk stratification shows outcomes which lead to the description
6 II, 5. 2. 6| evaluating progress and outcomes.~ ~Plasma cholesterol levels
7 II, 5. 3. 1| indications that cancer outcomes are related to macro-social
8 II, 5. 3. 2| factors on cancer risk and outcomes, and supporting investigations
9 II, 5. 3. 2| about treatment patterns and outcomes, access to treatment between
10 II, 5. 3. 6| generally had good cancer outcomes, but those with conspicuously
11 II, 5. 3. 6| with conspicuously worse outcomes than those with similar
12 II, 5. 3. 6| the differences noticed in outcomes.~ ~
13 II, 5. 3. 7| services and improve cancer outcomes with clinical services is
14 II, 5. 4.Acr| Information Through Regional Outcomes~DDD~Defined Daily Dose~DRG~
15 II, 5. 4.Acr| Information Through Regional Outcomes in Diabetes~EUCID~European
16 II, 5. 4. 1| quality of life and patients' outcomes on an everyday basis. The
17 II, 5. 4. 2| of care, and population outcomes.~In the year 1989, increasing
18 II, 5. 4. 2| measurements, procedures, and outcomes are accurately recorded.~
19 II, 5. 4. 2| likely to experience bad outcomes.~ ~
20 II, 5. 4. 2| a range of processes and outcomes indicators.~The OECD basic
21 II, 5. 4. 2| Audit and the Quality and Outcomes Framework.~ ~Table 5.4.2.
22 II, 5. 4. 2| Annual eye exam~Proximal outcomes~ ~HbA1c control ~LDL-C control~
23 II, 5. 4. 2| control ~LDL-C control~Distal outcomes~Lower extremity amputation
24 II, 5. 4. 2| information on procedures and outcomes experienced by patients
25 II, 5. 4. 2| management causing intermediate outcomes that can lead to severe
26 II, 5. 4. 4| possible scenarios.~Among core outcomes, blindness is one of the
27 II, 5. 4. 4| as those above.~Secondary outcomes, including renal failure,
28 II, 5. 4. 6| targets to track health outcomes and cost-effectiveness,
29 II, 5. 4. 7| strategic approach – measuring outcomes continuously and not just
30 II, 5. 4. 7| Information through Regional Outcomes” (BIRO) project is worth
31 II, 5. 4. 7| Information through Regional Outcomes in Diabetes” (EUBIROD),
32 II, 5. 4. 7| intermediate and terminal outcomes).~While, the question about
33 II, 5. 5. 3| abuse and eating-related outcomes for men and women separately
34 II, 5. 5. 3| N.; Bulik, C. M. (2007): Outcomes of Eating Disorders: A Systematic
35 II, 5. 5. 3| the Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) Client
36 II, 5. 5. 3| Lessons from the Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) Project.
37 II, 5. 5. 3| Priebe S (2007): Social outcomes in schizophrenia. British
38 II, 5. 5. 3| maintain employment. The outcomes of the study will be published
39 II, 5. 6. 3| studies (Brooks, 1997) but outcomes have improved over recent
40 II, 5. 6. 6| LJ, III (2003): Adverse outcomes of osteoporotic fractures
41 II, 5. 7.Acr| Disease Improving Global Outcomes~MDRD~Modification of Diet
42 II, 5. 7.Acr| Population~QOF~Quality and Outcomes Framework~RRT~Renal Replacement
43 II, 5. 7. 1| aimed at improving clinical outcomes. Proteinuria and microalbuminuria (
44 II, 5. 7. 1| amplifies the risk for adverse outcomes and the resulting costs
45 II, 5. 7. 1| Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) initiative (Tables
46 II, 5. 7. 3| the reasons for different outcomes in haemodialysis patients
47 II, 5. 7. 5| will be based on patient outcomes, referral patterns and hospital
48 II, 5. 7. 5| CKD into the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF), which rewards
49 II, 5. 9. 1| result in poorer asthma outcomes. As a result, asthma-related
50 II, 5. 11. 3| could be a part of future outcomes.~ ~In addition. gaining
51 II, 5. 14. 2| dental fillings, but not the outcomes, i.e. whether interventions
52 II, 5. 14. 2| assure quality and favourable outcomes, and extend more affordable
53 II, 5. 14. 5| health delivery models and outcomes, and oral health related
54 II, 7. 3. 1| comparison of major injury outcomes per injury sector, providing
55 II, 7. 4 | measurability of intermediate outcomes of actions and impacts in
56 II, 8. 2. 1| characteristics, health outcomes and use of health services
57 II, 8. 2. 1| thus compare their health outcomes and service utilization
58 II, 8. 2. 1| sustained benefits in health outcomes following a clinical health
59 II, 8. 2. 1| physical and mental health outcomes and typically have limited
60 II, 8. 2. 1| recommended to improve health outcomes for people with intellectual
61 II, 8. 2. 1| and also to compare health outcomes, determinants and systems
62 II, 8. 2. 1| intellectual disabilities: outcomes of a health screening programme
63 II, 8. 2. 2| 2005): Prevalence and outcomes of childhood visual disorders.
64 II, 9 | age and perinatal health outcomes is U-shaped and it is thus
65 II, 9 | The risk of many adverse outcomes begins to increase at approximately
66 II, 9 | of smoking on perinatal outcomes, in particular their birthweight
67 II, 9 | Finally, perinatal health outcomes are linked to social factors (
68 II, 9 | of smoking on perinatal outcomes, however, because many women
69 II, 9 | with poorer reproductive outcomes.~ ~Our knowledge of the
70 II, 9. 1. 1| evaluating perinatal health outcomes. Very preterm babies have
71 II, 9. 1. 1| factors associated with poor outcomes. For a synthesis of available
72 II, 9. 1. 1| 2003): Maternal health outcomes in Europe. Eur J Obstet
73 II, 9. 1. 1| 2002): Parity and pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;
74 II, 9. 1. 1| characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes. Nicotine Tob Res 2004;6
75 II, 9. 1. 1| Greene JD (2006): Short-term outcomes of infants born at 35 and
76 II, 9. 1. 1| Croughan MS (2004): Perinatal outcomes in singletons following
77 II, 9. 1. 1| complications and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal
78 II, 9. 1. 1| maternal morbidity and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal
79 II, 9. 1. 1| Determinants of poor pregnancy outcomes among teenagers in Sweden.
80 II, 9. 1. 2| age and perinatal health outcomes is U-shaped and it is thus
81 II, 9. 1. 2| The risk of many adverse outcomes begins to increase at approximately
82 II, 9. 1. 2| of smoking on perinatal outcomes, in particular their birthweight
83 II, 9. 1. 2| Finally, perinatal health outcomes are linked to social factors (
84 II, 9. 1. 2| of smoking on perinatal outcomes, however, because many women
85 II, 9. 1. 2| with poorer reproductive outcomes.~ ~Our knowledge of the
86 II, 9. 1. 2| information on improvement of outcomes over time tends to come
87 II, 9. 1. 2| anomalies as part of a range of outcomes including birth weight and
88 II, 9. 1. 2| and neuro-developmental outcomes. However, for congenital
89 II, 9. 2. 3| physical and psychological outcomes. Those who diet are more
90 II, 9. 3. 1| contribute to poorer short-term outcomes after coronary events or
91 II, 9. 3. 2| factors associated with poor outcomes. For a synthesis of available
92 II, 9. 3. 2| poorer perinatal health outcomes for migrant women. Of these
93 II, 9. 3. 2| these may have an effect on outcomes (Alran et al, 2002; Langer
94 II, 9. 3. 2| large improvements in health outcomes for mothers and their babies.
95 II, 9. 3. 2| 2003): Maternal health outcomes in Europe. Eur J Obstet
96 II, 9. 3. 2| 2002): Parity and pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;
97 II, 9. 3. 2| characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes. Nicotine Tob Res 2004;6
98 II, 9. 3. 2| Greene JD (2006): Short-term outcomes of infants born at 35 and
99 II, 9. 3. 2| Croughan MS (2004): Perinatal outcomes in singletons following
100 II, 9. 3. 2| complications and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal
101 II, 9. 3. 2| maternal morbidity and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal
102 II, 9. 3. 2| 2007): Neonatal and 5-year outcomes after birth at 30-34 weeks
103 II, 9. 3. 2| Determinants of poor pregnancy outcomes among teenagers in Sweden.
104 II, 9. 3. 3| sexual behaviour and health outcomes in comparison to age or
105 II, 9. 3. 3| behaviour and adverse health outcomes for both genders.~ ~Results
106 II, 9. 3. 3| against a host of adverse outcomes. There needs to be reassurance
107 II, 9. 3. 3| against a host of adverse outcomes and let people have a responsible,
108 II, 9. 3. 3| and reproductive health outcomes for monitoring trends and
109 II, 9. 3. 3| indicators are directly linked to outcomes of unsafe sex rather than
110 II, 9. 4. 3| can affect after stroke outcomes. It is likely that elderly
111 II, 9. 4. 3| still showing benefit in outcomes more than 20 years later (
112 II, 9. 4. 5| barriers in access, quality and outcomes of care that different vulnerable
113 II, 9. 5. 2| gender inequalities in health outcomes.~ ~
114 II, 9. 5. 3| to treatments and their outcomes. Female gender is a significant
115 III, 10. 1. 1| health determinants and outcomes may be causal or non-causal,
116 III, 10. 1. 3| Group on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Circulation 114:
117 III, 10. 2. 1| timely manner, achieve better outcomes than those not receiving
118 III, 10. 2. 1| users, long-term treatment outcomes and other subjects could
119 III, 10. 2. 4| risk stratification shows outcomes which lead to the description
120 III, 10. 2. 4| disease syndromes” and “health outcomes”;~· the potential of individual
121 III, 10. 3. 4| to prevent adverse health outcomes .~ ~With regard to flooding,
122 III, 10. 4. 1| secondary particles).~The main outcomes of the CAFE Programme were
123 III, 10. 4. 3| review is based on the first outcomes of the Environment and Health
124 III, 10. 4. 5| mortality and reproductive outcomes such as birth defects and
125 III, 10. 4. 5| stronger for reproductive outcomes than cancer, is, however,
126 III, 10. 5. 2| associated to better health outcomes (e.g. all-cause mortality
127 III, 10. 5. 2| also with poorer health outcomes from other diseases such
128 IV, 11. 1. 3| the contribution to health outcomes, disaggregating access to
129 IV, 11. 1. 3| better population health outcomes; a consensus supported and
130 IV, 11. 1. 3| market orientation; and by outcomes in terms of health attainment.
131 IV, 11. 1. 3| are used to attain wanted outcomes – and, ultimately, to support
132 IV, 11. 1. 3| practice of comparing hospital outcomes data in order to better
133 IV, 11. 1. 4| the goal of equal health outcomes. Though there is evidence
134 IV, 11. 1. 5| care, processes of care and outcomes of care (Donabedian, 1980).
135 IV, 11. 1. 5| poor technical performance. Outcomes represent changes in health
136 IV, 11. 1. 5| assessment, two types of outcomes are generally measured:
137 IV, 11. 1. 5| self-assessed and objective/clinical outcomes.~ ~Moreover, distinctions
138 IV, 11. 1. 5| between strategies of care and outcomes~ ~Evidence that reporting
139 IV, 11. 1. 5| seek to monitor patient outcomes through specific protocols
140 IV, 11. 1. 5| of services. Similarly, outcomes targets make use of guidelines,
141 IV, 11. 1. 5| financial incentives to outcomes is highly complex. For example,
142 IV, 11. 1. 6| features or expenditure and outcomes.~ ~Health system productivity
143 IV, 11. 1. 6| efficiency, equity and quality outcomes of health system financing.
144 IV, 11. 1. 6| services, improve clinical outcomes and enhance patient safety
145 IV, 11. 2. 1| healthcare and improved health outcomes (Macinko et al, 2003). Using
146 IV, 11. 6. 2| drugs leads to worse health outcomes, therefore undermining any
147 IV, 11. 6. 4| population health needs and outcomes, along with evaluation abilities
148 IV, 11. 6. 4| costs, rather than assessing outcomes. However, Decision no. 1350/
149 IV, 11. 6. 4| measures of changes in patient outcomes, that is, patient health
150 IV, 11. 6. 4| Attributing changes in outcomes to medical care requires
151 IV, 11. 6. 4| for benchmarking health outcomes. The first phase of the
152 IV, 11. 6. 5| primary care systems to health outcomes within Organization for
153 IV, 11. 6. 5| Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 5(1): 81-93.~ ~
154 IV, 11. 6. 5| New Approaches for New Outcomes. P. Cox.~ ~Spooner A, Chapple
155 IV, 11. 6. 5| Understanding Health Care Outcomes Research. Aspen Publishers,
156 IV, 12. 1 | Treaty. However, the negative outcomes of the popular referenda
157 IV, 12. 2 | services, and to improve cancer outcomes with clinical services.
158 IV, 12. 2 | timely manner, achieve better outcomes than those not receiving
159 IV, 12. 10 | in 2005 to achieve better outcomes for children by:~· Setting
160 IV, 12. 10 | deliver the best possible outcomes for patients in line with
161 IV, 13. 7. 3| infrequent problems and outcomes such as certain metabolic
162 Key, Ap5. 0. 0| outbreak~outbreaks~outcome~outcomes~outdoor~out-of-pocket~out-patient~
