Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

  1    -,     1            |         Health gap”;~b) in 1996, “The State of Health in the European
  2    -,     1            |               at Community and Member State level. The adopted approach
  3    I,     2. 10.  3    |           treatment in another Member State. The Commission intends
  4    I,     2. 11        |       Population Fund (UNFPA) (2007): State of the world population
  5    I,     3.  1        |              millennium, no EU Member State has a TFR above 2.0. This
  6    I,     3.  2        |            Population size per Member State in 1975, 2006 and forecasts
  7   II,     5.  4.  6    |               definition of high risk state in the case of diabetes
  8   II,     5.  4.  7    |          country (typically a smaller State e.g. Malta, Cyprus etc),
  9   II,     5.  5.Int(8) |       European Commission (2004): The State of Mental Health in the
 10   II,     5.  5.  1    |           trends.~o The Report of the State of Mental Health in the
 11   II,     5.  5.  2    |        Romania), there is very little state support for people with
 12   II,     5.  5.  2    |                2006a): Who cares? The state of dementia care in Europe.
 13   II,     5.  5.  3    |           gaps.~Treatment options~The state of the art of the treatment
 14   II,     5.  5.  3    |      intervention measures.~Prodromal state and prevention~People even
 15   II,     5.  5.  3    |               in an initial prodromal state are already suffering from
 16   II,     5.  5.  3    |          according to the therapeutic state of the art, this factor
 17   II,     5.  5.  3    |              service usage per Member State in ASD as the case identification
 18   II,     5.  5.  3    |           achieve better results than state agencies (Anonymous, 2003).
 19   II,     5.  5.  3    |              present in any EU member state, have a fundamental role
 20   II,     5.  5.  3    |              present in any EU Member State, have a fundamental role
 21   II,     5. 10.  7    |          across Europe: a EuroPrevall state of the art paper. Allergy
 22   II,     5. 14.  2    |          sources used to proceed to a state analysis of trends. A critical
 23   II,     5. 14.  3    |           remarkable fact is that the state of dental health among European
 24   II,     5. 15.  4    |         therapy products.~ ~At Member State level, several countries
 25   II,     7.  2.  6    |             data from selected Member State hospitals. This data is
 26   II,     7.  4        |           times greater in the Member State with the highest injury
 27   II,     8.  1.  1    |            not equated with a disease state, but people with intellectual
 28   II,     9.  2.  1    |             for report by each Member State to the WHO Regional Committee (
 29   II,     9.  2.  2    |               in 2000 a Report on the State of Young People’s Health
 30   II,     9.  2.  2    |              compliance for EU Member State countries. Their Report
 31   II,     9.  2.  2    |            Statistics: Each EU Member State has its own statistical
 32   II,     9.  2.  2    |             Europe, and what is their state of health? Worryingly, neither
 33   II,     9.  2.  5    |        toolkit, to enable each Member State to produce a national strategy
 34   II,     9.  2.  5    |  cross-sectoral planning. Each Member State committed itself to report
 35   II,     9.  2.  7    |      Commission (2000): Report on the state of young people’s health
 36   II,     9.  3.  1    |              appears that most Member State populations have close to
 37   II,     9.  3.  1    |              in finance allocation at State level. There are several
 38   II,     9.  3.  1    |            institutes operating below State level to sign up to implementation,
 39   II,     9.  3.  1    |               Commission (2004a): The State of Mental Health in the
 40   II,     9.  3.  1    |               AK , Cash K (2003): The state of men’s health across 17
 41   II,     9.  4.  3    |                Portugal is the Member State with the highest male and
 42   II,     9.  4.  7    |       European Commission (2004): The State of Mental Health in the
 43   II,     9.  4.  7    |                2003): A report on the state of men’s health across 17
 44   II,     9.  4.  7    |        Company Foundation (2006): The State of Ageing and Health in
 45   II,     9.  5.  3    |               inflexibility and rigid state pension rules if taking
 46   II,     9.  5.  3    |               depending on the Member State (Eurostat, 2006).~ ~Patients~ ~
 47   II,     9.  5.  6    |             Klinge I, Bosch M (2005): State of the Art – Transforming
 48  III,    10.  2.  1    |              control at EU and Member State level.~Within the Treaties
 49  III,    10.  2.  1    |               policy at EU and Member State levels. The number of cigarettes
 50  III,    10.  2.  1    |             not reaching a deficiency state. Studies suggest that low
 51  III,    10.  2.  1    |    physical activity of the EU Member State populations depend on individual
 52  III,    10.  3.  1    |        recently concluded the current state of knowledge concerning
 53  III,    10.  3.  1    |    restaurants where 44% of employees state to be affected almost all
 54  III,    10.  3.  2    |          Agency (EEA) report Europe’s State of the Environment – the
 55  III,    10.  3.  2    |               links (htt /) to member state competent authorities, other
 56  III,    10.  3.  2    |       collected in 2002 in the German state of North Rhine-Westfalia (
 57  III,    10.  3.  2    |               Agency (2007): Europe’s State of the Environment – the
 58  III,    10.  3.  4    |            affected, declaration of a state of emergency or call for
 59  III,    10.  3.  4    |             most severely affected. A state of emergency was declared
 60  III,    10.  3.  4    |             flood-affected areas. The State Agency for Civil Protection
 61  III,    10.  3.  4    |            regard to flooding, we can state that the situation in European
 62  III,    10.  4.  1    |              ammonia, for each member State. A proposal for a revised
 63  III,    10.  4.  2    |             identified and the Member State detecting the problem has
 64  III,    10.  4.  2    |              situation in each Member State:~ ~• viral zoonoses: calicivirus,
 65  III,    10.  4.  2    |              with the relevant Member State authorities, a plan to integrate
 66  III,    10.  4.  2    |         unaffected region of a Member State. All members need to be
 67  III,    10.  4.  2    |        affecting more than one Member State, maps showing the location
 68  III,    10.  4.  2    |               the competent EU Member State has already adopted relevant
 69  III,    10.  4.  2(34)|            the pathogen. Every Member State will have to work towards
 70  III,    10.  4.  2    |            and marketed in one Member State can be raised by another
 71  III,    10.  4.  2    |              raised by another Member State in the absence of rules
 72  III,    10.  4.  2    |       toxicology, with respect to the state of knowledge and research
 73  III,    10.  4.  2    |              by the Evaluating Member State (EMS in not necessarily
 74  III,    10.  4.  2    |        products carried out by Member State Authorities, the applicant
 75  III,    10.  4.  2    |        prepared by a reporting Member State including extensive consultation
 76  III,    10.  4.  2    | commercialised in at least one Member State before the entry into force
 77  III,    10.  4.  2    |          proceedings against a Member State or, in the case of a third
 78  III,    10.  4.  3    |            Environment Agency and the State of the Environment in Europe
 79  III,    10.  4.  3    |             The European Environment. State and outlook 2005 (SOER 2005).
 80  III,    10.  4.  5    |            Environment Agency and the State of the Environment in Europe
 81  III,    10.  4.  5    |             The European Environment. State and outlook 2005 (SOER 2005).
 82  III,    10.  4.  5    |              Agency (2007b): Europe’s State of the Environment – the
 83  III,    10.  4.  5    |               1):101-112~ ~MNR (2004) State of Environment in Northwest
 84  III,    10.  5.  2    |            some of the new EU members state. Due to these limitations,
 85  III,    10.  5.  2    |             Lopez-Abuin et al. (2005) state that in rural areas there
 86  III,    10.  5.  2    |              UK indicated that mental state of mind is worse in urban
 87  III,    10.  5.  3    |                where 44% of employees state to be affected almost all
 88  III,    10.  6.  2    |             that reviewed the current state of health inequalities and
 89   IV,    11.  1.  6    |               funds though with heavy state regulation (see Section
 90   IV,    11.  6.  1    |               belief that the welfare state was in crisis. Yet these
 91   IV,    11.  6.  2    |       otherwise be available from the state, and is available in Germany
 92   IV,    11.  6.  2    |              not fully covered by the state, including cover for co-payments
 93   IV,    11.  6.  2    |              partly subsidised by the state using tax credits or tax
 94   IV,    11.  6.  4    |        health-related needs~ ~Croatia~State treasury~State treasury~ ~ ~
 95   IV,    11.  6.  4    |                Croatia~State treasury~State treasury~ ~ ~Cyprus~Ministry
 96   IV,    11.  6.  4    |           Denmark~14 counties and the State~Each county allocates. State
 97   IV,    11.  6.  4    |          State~Each county allocates. State allocates to counties.~14
 98   IV,    11.  6.  4    |             primary care: Age~Finland~State, municipalities, and National
 99   IV,    11.  6.  4    |               municipality allocates. State allocates to municipalities.
100   IV,    11.  6.  4    |              historical spend)~Latvia~State~SCHIA allocates funds to
101   IV,    11.  6.  4    |               age structure~Lithuania~State Social Insurance Council~
102   IV,    11.  6.  4    |              Social Insurance Council~State Sickness Fund~ ~ ~Luxembourg~
103   IV,    11.  6.  4    |        reasonable by the Secretary of State for Health (Schreyögg et
104   IV,    11.  6.  4    |         Service Act, the Secretary of State for Health has a duty to
105   IV,    11.  6.  5    |             Taxation for the Enabling State. CASE Discussion Paper No.
106   IV,    11.  6.  5    |             practice' in health care? State of the art and perspectives
107   IV,    12            |         DEVELOPMENTS AT EU AND MEMBER STATE LEVEL~ ~
108   IV,    12.  1        |               function of each Member State of the European Union and
109   IV,    12.  1        |               remains mainly a Member State competence.~ ~Table 12.1.
110   IV,    12.  1        |          shall not prevent any Member State from maintaining or introducing
111   IV,    12.  1        |       Co-ordinating in another Member State,~social security for with
112   IV,    12.  1        |            received in another Member State, with or without prior~authorisation,
113   IV,    12.  2        |              a disease or a high risk state in an early stage, in order
114   IV,    12.  2        |              control at EU and Member State level. Within the Treaties
115   IV,    12.  5        |          necessary link to the Member State authorities and to relevant
116   IV,    12.  8        |     requirements that a future member state has to meet. The enlargement
117   IV,    12. 10        |              governmental and federal state institution, communal authorities,
118   IV,    12. 10        |       activities at national, federal state and communal level.~At national
119   IV,    12. 10        |               as well part of federal state’s tasks. National Anti-Drugs
120   IV,    12. 10        |         different Federal and Federal State Ministries and Agencies.
121   IV,    12. 10        |       residues by federal and federal state authorities (food-monitoring).
122   IV,    12. 10        |               Federal and the Federal State Government. Federal and
123   IV,    12. 10        |       Government. Federal and Federal State Agencies as well as communal
124   IV,    12. 10        |              from Federal and Federal State Authorities and Non-governmental
125   IV,    12. 10        |        efforts of Federal and Federal State authorities to improve information
126   IV,    12. 10        |       increasingly important.~Federal State legislation related to the
127   IV,    12. 10        |             integrated in the Federal State law on Public Health Services.
128   IV,    12. 10        |              published by the Federal State authorities. The Federal
129   IV,    12. 10        |                which is funded by the State, purchases services either
130   IV,    12. 10        |               pensioners.~o The Greek State provides free medical and
131   IV,    12. 10        |               programs are defined by state and are implemented at regional
132   IV,    12. 10        |           problems)~Agreement between State and Regions (16.03.2006):
133   IV,    12. 10        |         agreement between the central State and the regional Governments (
134   IV,    12. 10        |         agreement between the central State and the regional Governments (
135   IV,    12. 10        |      Substances and Medical Products~ State Program on drug Control
136   IV,    12. 10        |             taxes, as well as receive state subsidies. As regards specialized
137   IV,    12. 10        |               the current system. The state subsidies will continue
138   IV,    12. 10        |               the law on planning and state subsidies for social and
139   IV,    12. 10        |             of autonomy vis-à-vis the state. For them the domains of
140   IV,    12. 10        |               High~ At national level~State monitoring~Use of pesticides~
141   IV,    12. 10        |       Intermediate~ At national level~State monitoring~Food safety~High~
142   IV,    12. 10        |           Monitoring of food safetystate monitoring~Physical stressors~
143   IV,    13.  1        |               and that each EU Member State has a different pathway
144   IV,    13.  4        |              is now up to each Member State. The European Years of Equal
145   IV,    13.  4        |              is now up to each Member State. The new European Social
146   IV,    13.  6.  3    |            within Europe, each Member State has its own health system
147   IV,    13.  6.  3    |        circumstances, with or without state guarantees for the provision
148   IV,    13.  7.  2    |                  This snapshot of the state of play of innovation in
149   IV,    13.  8        |               are autonomous from the State, which is essential if they
150   IV,    13.  8        |              behalf of their national state. Thus they fulfil a public