Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

  1    -,     1            |        Croatia, Turkey, Iceland and Norway1 as well as of several Intergovernmental
  2    I,     2.  4        |            of education in Finland, Norway, Italy, Hungary, the Czech Republic
  3    I,     2.  6        |           as well as in Iceland and Norway. The share of women among
  4   II,     4.  1        |         mid-1970s, whilst trends in Norway and the Netherlands diverged
  5   II,     5.  3.  3    |         Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom;
  6   II,     5.  3.  6    |        Finland, Sweden, Iceland and Norway), Austria, France, Germany,
  7   II,     5.  3.  6    |           50% for women in Finland, Norway and Sweden and in most Western
  8   II,     5.  3.  7    |       UNITED KINGDOM~Yes~ICELAND~No~NORWAY~Yes~SWITZERLAND~Yes~Source:
  9   II,     5.  5.  2    |       within Europe and in Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and Turkey (
 10   II,     5.  5.  2    |        European Union as well as in Norway, Iceland, Switzerland and
 11   II,     5.  5.  3    |       Canada participated (Finland, Norway, Austria, Belgium (French),
 12   II,     5.  5.  3    |         Macedonia, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Slovenia,
 13   II,     5.  5.  3    |              Macedonia, Turkey) and Norway participated in the project.~ ~
 14   II,     5.  5.  3    |            United Kingdom, Germany, Norway and Denmark). Thus, data
 15   II,     5.  5.  3    |         than the value reported for Norway (0.0164). On the other hand,
 16   II,     5.  5.  3    |       hospitals between Finland and Norway. Although in some cases
 17   II,     5.  5.  3    |             Endziniene et al., 1997~Norway ~Children ~MR review and
 18   II,     5.  5.  3    |             Waaler et al., 2000 (*)~Norway ~All ages? ~MR review and
 19   II,     5.  5.  3    |            from Sweden, Finland and Norway, followed by generalized
 20   II,     5.  5.  3    |             2 years)~ activity)~ ~ ~Norway I 12 months Drugs stolen
 21   II,     5.  5.  3    |     epilepsy in children in Western Norway. Epilepsia 41:802-810.~Zielinski
 22   II,     5.  5.  3    |            prevalent MS patients in Norway (Myhr et al, 2006; www ).
 23   II,     5.  5.  3    |             western to southeastern Norway, Denmark, southern Sweden,
 24   II,     5.  5.  3    |           to what was hypothesized.~Norway has an uneven distribution
 25   II,     5.  5.  3    |         appeared to have changed in Norway over time, with increased
 26   II,     5.  5.  3    |     consistent with the findings in Norway and Sweden (Brønnum-Hansen
 27   II,     5.  5.  3    |     Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Norway, where prevalence was higher
 28   II,     5.  5.  3    |    registered in Finland, Scotland, Norway and Sardinia, insular Italy.~ ~
 29   II,     5.  5.  3    |         2006), increasing trends in Norway, Sweden, Bulgaria and in
 30   II,     5.  5.  3    |         Multiple sclerosis in Oslo, Norway: prevalence on 1 January
 31   II,     5.  5.  3    |           in Nord-Trøndelag County, Norway: a prevalence and incidence
 32   II,     5.  5.  3    |      sclerosis in Hordaland County, Norway. Neurology 66:182-186.~Grønlie
 33   II,     5.  5.  3    |         Multiple sclerosis in North Norway, and first appearance in
 34   II,     5.  6.  3    |            272e, 2007). A survey in Norway found that only 15% of 20-
 35   II,     5.  6.  4    |            longer than two weeks in Norway (Brage, 1998). It is difficult
 36   II,     5.  6.  4    |            by diagnosis and gender. Norway, 1994. (European Commission (
 37   II,     5.  6.  4    |             disability pensions. In Norway, low back disorders are
 38   II,     5.  6.  4    |            by diagnosis and gender. Norway 1997.~ ~Use of health care
 39   II,     5.  6.  6    |       long-term sickness absence in Norway. Scand J Soc Med 26:34-43~
 40   II,     5.  6.  6    |     Limitation. University of Oslo, Norway. Available at URL: htt ~ ~
 41   II,     5.  7.  2    |   Netherlands, UK) plus Iceland and Norway.~ ~ ~ ~
 42   II,     5.  7.  3    |             and on a survey made in Norway. In the USA, the incidence
 43   II,     5.  7.  3    |          data are available only in Norway. Prevalence of 1-5 CKD in
 44   II,     5.  7.  3    |            Prevalence of 1-5 CKD in Norway was 10.2% which is similar
 45   II,     5.  7.  3    |           United States compared to Norway. In a recent comparative
 46   II,     5.  7.  3    |              Spain, Italy, Iceland, Norway. The prevalence of stage
 47   II,     5.  7.  3    |          studies ranges from 3.57% (Norway) (Hallan et al, 2006) to
 48   II,     5.  7.  3    |         Viktorsdottir et al, 2005), Norway (Hallan et al, 2006; Hallan
 49   II,     5.  7.  3    |              Spain, Italy, Iceland, Norway. The prevalence of stage
 50   II,     5.  7.  5    |           The Ministry of Health in Norway has started a process to
 51   II,     5.  8.  3    |        population sample in Bergen (Norway).~ ~Among 1711 middle-aged
 52   II,     5.  8.  4    |              France, Poland, Italy, Norway, China, the Netherlands
 53   II,     5.  9.  4    |           Survey (ECRHS) in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland and Estonia
 54   II,     5.  9.  4    |            Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Norway, Spain, Swedem Netherlands,
 55   II,     5.  9.  4    |            High~High~–~Low~–~–~High~Norway~ Bergen~Low~–~Low~–~Low~
 56   II,     5. 11.  3    |             prevalence, observed in Norway, was obtained by relying
 57   II,     5. 12.  3    |            100,000), Ireland (3.4), Norway and the Netherlands (around
 58   II,     5. 12.  3    |            with the Netherlands and Norway, whose rates remained around
 59   II,     6.  1        |           three EEA/EFTA countries (Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein).
 60   II,     6.  3.  3    |             UK, Sweden, Denmark and Norway. The highest incidence rate
 61   II,     6.  3.  3    |         decline during 199697 (and Norway in 1998), but has risen
 62   II,     6.  3.  4    |          countries plus Iceland and Norway reported 59 497 TB cases
 63   II,     6.  3.  4    |          Member States, Iceland and Norway. Ninety-three new clusters
 64   II,     6.  3.  5    |           Finland, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden. A dramatic decrease
 65   II,     6.  3.  5    |            40.17 per 100 000), with Norway reporting a rate of 19.10
 66   II,     6.  3.  6    |         Sweden, the Netherlands and Norway had a very high proportion
 67   II,     6.  3.  6    |           reported by 26 countries. Norway, with 0.87 per 100 000,
 68   II,     6.  4.  2    |           Iceland, Lichtenstein and Norway) are also linked to the
 69   II,     7.  2.  4    |        EU-Member States (EU 15) and Norway. The methodology is being
 70   II,     8.  1.  2    |           Poland and Bulgaria, plus Norway. The module consisted of
 71   II,     8.  1.  2    |         plus Estonia, together with Norway. This includes the Minimum
 72   II,     9            |          similar at age 15, such as Norway and the United Kingdom.
 73   II,     9.  1.  1    |          European member states and Norway (Zeitlin et al, 2003). The
 74   II,     9.  1.  1    |         Luxembourg, Czech Republic, Norway and Finland, but over 5
 75   II,     9.  1.  1    |        Among EU15 Member States and Norway, the median rate of neonatal
 76   II,     9.  1.  1    |         Portugal, Spain, France and Norway) to 2.3 (United Kingdom).~ ~
 77   II,     9.  1.  2    |             to the EU-27 countries, Norway, Switzerland, and Croatia
 78   II,     9.  1.  2    |          from 3% (Germany) to 100% (Norway, Sweden, Finland, Malta,
 79   II,     9.  1.  2    |            this limit (Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Denmark).~ ~Table
 80   II,     9.  1.  2    |         years and older in EU15 and Norway~ ~Figure 9.T1.2b. Percent
 81   II,     9.  2.  4    |          similar at age 15, such as Norway and the United Kingdom.
 82   II,     9.  3.  3    |             Germany, Greece, Italy, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain
 83   II,     9.  3.  3    |    countries. Denmark, Ireland, and Norway did not include any sexual
 84   II,     9.  3.  3    |   difference was smaller in France, Norway and among Dutch and German
 85   II,     9.  3.  3    |             proportion was found in Norway (50%) and the lowest in
 86   II,     9.  3.  3    |           and Greece, around 15% in Norway, Portugal and Spain and
 87   II,     9.  5.  4    |       others like Denmark, Finland, Norway and Portugal are now clearly
 88   II,     9.  5.  4    |          Equality Duty (England and Norway). In Denmark, a number of
 89  III,    10.  2.  1    |       countries such as Iceland and Norway ( however, in the case of
 90  III,    10.  2.  1    |           in the European Union and Norway~ ~Cannabis is by far the
 91  III,    10.  2.  1    |          opioid users in the EU and Norway. Data from POUs estimates,
 92  III,    10.  2.  1    |             injectors in the EU and Norway today. These are predominantly
 93  III,    10.  2.  1    | drug-related deaths in the EU15 and Norway~ ~More than one drug is
 94  III,    10.  2.  1    |            the EU Member States and Norway. This represents a more
 95  III,    10.  2.  1    |                Denmark (83/74%) and Norway (86/75%). In Austria, 97 %
 96  III,    10.  2.  1    |             Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia,
 97  III,    10.  2.  1    |          covering Denmark, Estonia, Norway and Portugal~- FINBALT (
 98  III,    10.  2.  1    |  represented in the Network~ ~ ~ ~ ~Norway~Norvegian national dietary
 99  III,    10.  2.  1    |             15 EU Member States and Norway) (Trichopoulou and Lagiou,
100  III,    10.  2.  1    |           Germany, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Sweden). All consumption
101  III,    10.  3.  2    |          facilities in the EU25 and Norway (htt ). The EPER review
102  III,    10.  3.  2    |       reported from Italy, Belgium, Norway or the Netherlands for the
103  III,    10.  4.  2    |         Member States, Bulgaria and Norway. This database is accessible
104  III,    10.  4.  2    |              too (e.g. Switzerland, Norway, United Kingdom, Germany,
105  III,    10.  4.  2(38)|       Origin in the European Union, Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein,
106  III,    10.  4.  2(40)|       Origin in the European Union, Norway,Iceland and Liechtenstein,
107  III,    10.  4.  2    |            the EU, also Iceland and Norway.~ ~The European Union Strategy
108  III,    10.  4.  2    |             27 EU Member States and Norway (Source: EFSA, data for
109  III,    10.  4.  2    |              Source: EFSA, data for Norway communicated by Norwegian
110  III,    10.  4.  2    |     Norwegian Food Safety Authority~Norway~ ~ ~ ~The Member States’
111  III,    10.  4.  2    |       Origin in the European Union, Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein”
112  III,    10.  4.  5    |         Trade Association (Iceland, Norway,~ETC/RWM~The European Topic
113  III,    10.  4.  5(42)|         plus Iceland, Lichtenstein, Norway, Switzerland and Turkey~
114  III,    10.  5.  3    |           Romania, Croatia, Turkey, Norway and Switzerland. Among other
115  III,    10.  6.  1    |        France, Germany, Greece) and Norway. Social support was measured
116  III,    10.  6.  2    |            of education in Finland, Norway, Italy, Hungary, the Czech Republic
117   IV,    11.  1.  4    |             Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and the United
118   IV,    11.  1.  4    |           in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Norway and Denmark (for number
119   IV,    11.  1.  5    |         Sweden, the Netherlands and Norway, with lowest levels in Czech Republic,
120   IV,    11.  1.  5    |           France, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Poland and Sweden, and
121   IV,    11.  1.  6    |             and fee-for-service).~ ~Norway~Blended payment (70% of
122   IV,    11.  1.  6    |        environment. For example, in Norway, there is a combination
123   IV,    11.  2.  1    |     removals in Denmark, Sweden and Norway (along with the US and Canada)
124   IV,    11.  2.  1    |          Austria, Denmark, Hungary, Norway, Poland and Turkey there
125   IV,    11.  3.  1    |         density, is seen in Greece, Norway, Poland, Germany and Slovakia.
126   IV,    11.  3.  1    |         specific to rural practice. Norway and Sweden locate medical
127   IV,    11.  3.  1    |       underserved areas, as seen in Norway, are also used. Regulatory
128   IV,    11.  3.  1    |            particularly Ireland and Norway (over 1,500 nurses per 100,
129   IV,    11.  3.  1    |          Germany, Lithuania, Malta, Norway, Poland, the Russian Federation,
130   IV,    11.  3.  2    |             Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland and Portugal (HFA
131   IV,    11.  3.  2    |         Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, Slovakia, Slovenia, Switzerland
132   IV,    11.  3.  2    |       Netherlands, Italy, Portugal, Norway, England, Wales, and the
133   IV,    11.  3.  2    |            France, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain and the UK). Similarly,
134   IV,    11.  3.  2    |           Denmark, Finland, France, Norway, Spain, with the physician’
135   IV,    11.  5.  1    |       Denmark, Sweden, Finland, and Norway). Even among those nations
136   IV,    11.  5.  3    |             as well as in Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Turkey, with
137   IV,    11.  6.  1    |          the highest in Luxembourg, Norway and Switzerland. Per capita
138   IV,    11.  6.  2    |             Italy, Ireland, Latvia, Norway, Malta, Spain, UK and Denmark.
139   IV,    11.  6.  2    |        locally, as seen in Finland, Norway, Spain, Sweden and Italy,
140   IV,    11.  6.  2    |          Ireland~- Italy~- Latvia~- Norway~- Slovenia~- Spain~- UK~ ~
141   IV,    11.  6.  2    |            Italy~- Latvia~- Malta~- Norway~- Portugal~- Slovenia~-
142   IV,    11.  6.  2    |        Italy~- Latvia~- Lithuania~- Norway~- Portugal~- Slovenia~-
143   IV,    11.  6.  2    |        Italy~- Latvia~- Lithuania~- Norway~- Poland~ ~ ~ ~Figure 11.
144   IV,    11.  6.  4    |          and rural cost adjustment)~Norway~Norwegian Tax Administration
145   IV,    11.  6.  4    |          Pricing Boards in Finland, Norway, and Sweden, and the Pricing
146   IV,    12.  5        |         Member States plus Iceland, Norway, the United States of America
147   IV,    12.  8        |          co-operation with Iceland, Norway and Liechtenstein, who,
148   IV,    12.  8        |       selected in 2005. The EEA and Norway’s Financial Mechanism plays
149  Key,   Ap5.  0.  0    |        non-communicable~non-hodgkin~Norway~nose~nuclear~nurses~nursing~