Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

  1    I,     2.  2    |             can be seen in the rapid growth in the new Member States –
  2    I,     2.  2    |            in the world. Whereas the growth rates of international arrivals
  3    I,     2.  3    |              of migration on overall growth varies very much by country,
  4    I,     2.  3    |            of the overall population growth. In the European Union,
  5    I,     2.  4    |           have contributed to higher growth and more jobs. Still, more
  6    I,     2.  4    |            calculation of the annual growth rate of GDP per capita at
  7    I,     2.  4    |              of different sizes. The growth rate is calculated from
  8    I,     2.  4    |       movements will not inflate the growth rate. Table 2.1 provides
  9    I,     2.  4    |          provides an overview of the growth rate of real GDP over the
 10    I,     2.  4    |          fact that a steady economic growth has been experienced in
 11    I,     2.  4    |       varying downward.~ ~Table 2.1. Growth rate of real gross domestic
 12    I,     2.  5    |        organising productive work.~ ~Growth of the service sector. A
 13    I,     2.  5    |              of migration on overall growth very much varies by country,
 14    I,     2.  5    |              In other words, current growth is skill-biased in developed
 15    I,     2.  5    |     categories, recorded the highest growth of all occupations in the
 16    I,     2.  7    |             for creativity, economic growth and social conflict. In
 17    I,     2.  7    |          analyzing opportunities for growth, coming to terms with compromises
 18    I,     2.  7    |          integration and sustainable growth. The five main themes explored -
 19    I,     2.  8    |               Due to both population growth and economic growth, energy
 20    I,     2.  8    |       population growth and economic growth, energy consumption and
 21    I,     2. 10.  4|             European Customs, a 384% growth versus 2005(14). It is likely
 22    I,     3.  2    |                      3.2. Population growth and migration~ ~During the
 23    I,     3.  2    |             past, natural population growth (i.e. the number of births
 24    I,     3.  2    |        recently the share of natural growth is diminishing. Immigration
 25    I,     3.  2    |          driving force of population growth in the EU.~ ~ ~In 1960,
 26    I,     3.  2    |             overall world population growth was substantially larger
 27    I,     3.  2    |           larger than the population growth in EU27. In the foreseeable
 28    I,     3.  2    |      projections of world population growth indicate a declining share
 29    I,     3.  2    |            490 million.~ ~Population growth within the EU has different
 30    I,     3.  2    |              had positive population growth in the last few years. In
 31    I,     3.  2    |               the largest population growth was in Ireland (+11%), while
 32    I,     3.  2    |              variation in population growth in the various Member States
 33    I,     3.  2    |         Sweden will see a population growth between 10 and 15%, France,
 34    I,     3.  2    |             past, natural population growth (the number of births minus
 35    I,     3.  2    |        recently the share of natural growth has been diminishing. In
 36    I,     3.  2    |            most important population growth factor. Immigration is currently
 37    I,     3.  2    |          driving force of population growth in the EU and this has of
 38    I,     3.  2    |             show diminishing natural growth and ultimately negative
 39    I,     3.  2    |       ultimately negative population growth. The situation in the twelve
 40    I,     3.  2    |              the total EU population growth as several of the new Member
 41    I,     3.  2    |        already have negative natural growth at the moment (i.e. a higher
 42    I,     3.  2    |         Malta where positive natural growth continues together with
 43    I,     3.  2    |           low or negative population growth. The Slovak Republic still
 44    I,     3.  2    |          positive natural population growth although small, while the
 45    I,     3.  2    |          experience negative natural growth. The ‘lowest lowfertility
 46    I,     3.  2    |              decrease in population, growth is currently due to only
 47    I,     3.  2    |            of the overall population growth. In the European Union,
 48    I,     3.  3    |           slowing down of population growth in the E.U. leads to shifts
 49    I,     3.  3    |          average, the overall annual growth of the old-age dependency
 50    I,     3.  3    |         Italy with an average annual growth of 2%, followed by Portugal (
 51    I,     3.  3    |          Germany. Whereas the annual growth varied from 0.6% to 1.0%
 52    I,     3.  3    |           the highest average annual growth rates from 2005 to 2049.
 53    I,     3.  3    |            countries with the lowest growth rates are again Sweden (
 54   II,     4.  1    |        ensuring sustainable economic growth, full employment and greater
 55   II,     4.  1    |              group of countries, the growth in life expectancy hardly
 56   II,     4.  1    |     countries. A second group, where growth in life expectancy slowed
 57   II,     4.  2    |       approach an upper limit to the growth in life expectancy. Since
 58   II,     4.  2    |       approach an upper limit to the growth in life expectancy, which
 59   II,     4.  3    |        Council: Working together for growth and jobs. A new start for
 60   II,     5.  2.  1|             decades, mainly due to a growth in the elderly population,
 61   II,     5.  7.  1|            insufficiency that affect growth as well as development.~ ~
 62   II,     9        |              pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction. Parity also
 63   II,     9.  1.  1|   stillbirths associated with foetal growth restriction (De Galan-Roosen
 64   II,     9.  1.  1|             babies born at term with growth restriction; all these groups
 65   II,     9.  1.  1|         hearing impairments and poor growth. However, even babies born
 66   II,     9.  1.  1|      pregnancy, such as intrauterine growth restriction or preterm birth–
 67   II,     9.  1.  1|              effect of plurality and growth on neonatal outcome compared
 68   II,     9.  1.  2|              pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction. Parity also
 69   II,     9.  2.  1|         development include physical growth, cognitive transitions,
 70   II,     9.  2.  1|             influences both physical growth and cognitive development.
 71   II,     9.  2.  3|             menstrual regularity and growth (Pesa 1999). There also
 72   II,     9.  2.  7|               Hales CN (2005): Fetal growth and adult diseases. Semin
 73   II,     9.  3.  1|              bone acquisition during growth or bone loss during adulthood.
 74   II,     9.  3.  2|              effect of plurality and growth on neonatal outcome compared
 75   II,     9.  4.  1|              contributed to economic growth and the public health budget
 76   II,     9.  5.  3|             on the developmental and growth environment of the next
 77   II,     9.  5.  4|             development and economic growth.~ ~Gender Equality Impact
 78  III,    10.  2.  1|            of asthma~- Impaired lung growth and increased risk of respiratory
 79  III,    10.  2.  1|            Preterm delivery~- Foetal growth restrictions and low birth weight~-
 80  III,    10.  2.  1|             complicated further by a growth of online pharmaceutical
 81  III,    10.  2.  1|         During the 1997-2004 period, growth was constrained by increased
 82  III,    10.  2.  1|             needs, continues to spur growth in developed markets. In
 83  III,    10.  2.  1|       expected to drive the sector’s growth in the medium term.~ ~
 84  III,    10.  2.  1|      impaired mental development and growth in children, lower resistance
 85  III,    10.  2.  1|            or higher needs as during growth or pregnancy. Bioavailability
 86  III,    10.  2.  1|              requiring special care. Growth induces increased requirements
 87  III,    10.  2.  1|           whereas the average annual growth rate of gross human apparent
 88  III,    10.  2.  1|              2.1.7.6. Average annual growth rate of gross human apparent
 89  III,    10.  2.  1|             Temporal trends in fetal growth and its determinants. Journal
 90  III,    10.  2.  4|             Lisbon Strategy for more growth. Biotechnology is seen as
 91  III,    10.  2.  5|               2005): Trajectories of growth among children who have
 92  III,    10.  2.  5|              DJP (2006): Patterns of growth among children who later
 93  III,    10.  3.  1|             of noise exposure is the growth in traffic and the increase
 94  III,    10.  3.  2|       without impeding on industrial growth and development.~ ~Beyond
 95  III,    10.  4.  1|             cities is the continuing growth in road transport. Although
 96  III,    10.  4.  1|         Europe, despite the economic growth, legislation on air quality,
 97  III,    10.  4.  1|            economic recovery and the growth in transport since 2000
 98  III,    10.  4.  1|           symptoms and lung function growth in children. A study conducted
 99  III,    10.  4.  1|         suitable environment for the growth of micro-organisms (mould,
100  III,    10.  4.  2|          baseline studies, bacterial growth and survival studies, dose
101  III,    10.  4.  2|         random~sampling~ ~EC, 1996~ ~Growth promoting~substances (naturally~
102  III,    10.  4.  2|          levels of~exposure, natural growth~promoters have no effect;~
103  III,    10.  4.  2|        effects,~headache, dizziness;~growth retardation~immunosuppressive,~
104  III,    10.  4.  5|              goals and the continued growth in waste generation which
105  III,    10.  4.  5|           generation. Since economic growth is the predominant policy
106  III,    10.  4.  5|          economic activity. Economic growth has proven to be a much
107  III,    10.  4.  5|              experienced significant growth in imports and exports since
108  III,    10.  4.  5|             main drivers of economic growth in the EU-15. In the three
109  III,    10.  5.  1|            time, the development and growth of settlements has played
110  III,    10.  5.  1|              which may lead to mould growth. However, there is very
111  III,    10.  5.  1|            dampness and indoor mould growth should be avoided, and the
112  III,    10.  5.  3|          psychological exhaustion.~ ~Growth of the service sector~A
113  III,    10.  5.  3|        experiencing negative natural growth, migration represents an
114  III,    10.  5.  3|              In other words, current growth is skill-biased in developed
115  III,    10.  5.  3|     categories, recorded the highest growth of all occupations in the
116   IV,    11.  3.  1|         suggested that the level and growth rate of physician density
117   IV,    11.  3.  2|        pattern of health expenditure growth was seen in most European
118   IV,    11.  3.  2|       because of the relatively high growth rate seen since data records
119   IV,    11.  3.  2|             shown in Table 11.7, the growth in spending on pharmaceuticals
120   IV,    11.  3.  2|           slowed overall expenditure growth.~ ~In containing pharmaceutical
121   IV,    11.  3.  2|             Recent years have seen a growth in initiatives focusing
122   IV,    11.  3.  2|            181.8bn in 2006. However, growth rates of all other regions,
123   IV,    11.  5.  5|           maximize the impact in the growth of organ donation rates
124   IV,    11.  5.  7| transplantation. Since the potential growth in the supply appears to
125   IV,    11.  6.  1|              2005, outpacing the 37% growth in GDP per capita. In 1970,
126   IV,    11.  6.  1|          faced continual expenditure growth there have been no signs
127   IV,    11.  6.  1| stabilization of healthcare spending growth in many countries in the
128   IV,    11.  6.  1|       reflect success in controlling growth in health care expenditure
129   IV,    11.  6.  1|      expenditure but rather economic growth. For example, in Ireland,
130   IV,    11.  6.  1|        example, in Ireland, economic growth of 8.8% in the 1990s explains
131   IV,    11.  6.  1|               healthcare expenditure growth slowed in the 1990s as severe
132   IV,    11.  6.  1|          period of relatively little growth, many central and Eastern
133   IV,    11.  6.  1|         clearly shows the consistent growth across the region; most
134   IV,    11.  6.  1|       explanations for the continued growth in healthcare expenditure
135   IV,    11.  6.  1|            the healthcare investment growth seen in the countries that
136   IV,    11.  6.  2| accountability and contribute to the growth in corruption in many CEE
137   IV,    12.  1    |             major driver of economic growth and competitiveness frontiers.
138   IV,    13.  3    |           under the Lisbon strategy, growth has picked up and jobs are
139   IV,    13.  3    |            crisis. Moreover, healthy growth and job creation do not
140   IV,    13.  4    |       generation. The Guidelines for Growth and Jobs call for more investments
141   IV,    13.  7.  2|       considerable. Facilitating the growth of lead markets is an approach
142   IV,    13.  7.  2|          leading to higher levels of growth and employment. Given the
143   IV,    13.  7.  2|             contribution to the EU's growth and jobs strategy. To accelerate
144   IV,    13.  7.  3|       research area of knowledge for growth”. The programme has been