Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

  1    I,     2.  2    |          important factors to avoid the decline of destination. Within the
  2    I,     2.  4    |               in the speed of mortality decline. While mortality declined
  3    I,     2.  4    |              socio-economic groups, the decline has been proportionally
  4    I,     2.  5    |              schemes on the other. This decline was particularly sustained
  5    I,     2.  6    |          education in EU is expected to decline from 91.8 and 91.6 millions
  6    I,     2.  6    |                 students is expected to decline from 2002 to 2050 in all
  7    I,     2.  6    |            student ratio is expected to decline by 2.4 percentage points.
  8    I,     2.  7    |          mobility will rather rise than decline, any human settlement will
  9    I,     3.  1    |                  1963- 1995). Fertility decline was less abrupt in other
 10    I,     3.  1    |           Generally speaking, fertility decline is the common trend in the
 11    I,     3.  1    |                   The overall fertility decline resulted in a more homogeneous
 12    I,     3.  1    |                where the TFR started to decline to (well) below the replacement
 13    I,     3.  1    |              Eastern European fertility decline occurred later.~ ~Determinants
 14    I,     3.  1    |             having children1 triggers a decline in (period) fertility rates.
 15    I,     3.  2    |          Denmark, Finland, and Spain. A decline of 4-10% is foreseen for
 16    I,     3.  3    |                 the effect of fertility decline on ageing trends is much
 17    I,     3.  3    |                 rather similar: after a decline at the beginning of the
 18    I,     3.  3    |           decades but will now start to decline. Spain, Turkey, Ireland,
 19   II,     4.  2    |                 in mortality rates. The decline in mortality rates has not
 20   II,     4.  2    |               Since in recent years the decline in mortality rates at old
 21   II,     4.  2    |              women during the 1970s the decline in mortality at very young
 22   II,     4.  2    |               for men was caused by the decline in mortality for age groups
 23   II,     4.  2    |               age patterns in mortality decline were visible in most EU
 24   II,     4.  2    |        countries. In all countries, the decline in mortality at the youngest
 25   II,     4.  2    |            though in most countries the decline of mortality for elderly
 26   II,     4.  2    |               most countries, mortality decline was larger for men in their
 27   II,     4.  2    |          Portugal, Greece and Italy the decline in mortality at the youngest
 28   II,     4.  2    |                even though in Spain the decline in mortality at higher ages
 29   II,     4.  2    |              youngest ages continued to decline, but had only a small impact
 30   II,     4.  2    |       expectancy was mainly caused by a decline in mortality at elderly
 31   II,     4.  2    |                In the 1970s for men the decline in mortality by respiratory
 32   II,     4.  2    |                 birth. In addition, the decline in mortality in heart disease
 33   II,     4.  2    |                 the contribution of the decline in mortality by heart and
 34   II,     4.  2    |                in the 1990s for men the decline in mortality by various
 35   II,     4.  2    |                1970s, due to the strong decline in the percentage of men
 36   II,     4.  2    |                In addition, there was a decline in mortality by cancer.
 37   II,     4.  2    |               In most EU countries, the decline in mortality by circulatory
 38   II,     4.  2    |         countries, but in the 1990s the decline in mortality by these cancers
 39   II,     4.  2    |          between 1980 and 2000 due to a decline in mortality by circulatory
 40   II,     4.  2    |               13 selected countries the decline in mortality by circulatory
 41   II,     4.  2    |                 women the effect of the decline in mortality by circulatory
 42   II,     4.  2    |               selected countries.~ ~The decline in mortality rates for the
 43   II,     4.  2    |               old ages will continue to decline or whether we will approach
 44   II,     4.  2    |           itself by a stagnation of the decline in mortality at the oldest
 45   II,     4.  2    |              all of a stagnation in the decline of mortality for the elderly.~ ~
 46   II,     5.  2.  1|               et al, 2006). Despite the decline in mortality, the annual
 47   II,     5.  2.  2|                 in coronary care to the decline in CVD mortality. Data from
 48   II,     5.  2.  3|             twentieth century, began to decline in the mid 1970s in Western
 49   II,     5.  2.  3|                European countries). The decline in IHD mortality rates has
 50   II,     5.  2.  3|            diagnosis and treatment.~The decline in mortality in the different
 51   II,     5.  2.  3|                intake). The more recent decline is also due to improvements
 52   II,     5.  2.  3|            survivors is increasing. The decline in mortality has been greater
 53   II,     5.  2.  3|        countries with higher rates. The decline would be only partly attributed
 54   II,     5.  2.  5|            mortality, two-thirds of the decline was due to the incidence
 55   II,     5.  2.  5|             recent study looking at the decline in IHD mortality over a
 56   II,     5.  2.  5|               1981 and 2000, 58% of the decline was attributable to reductions
 57   II,     5.  2.  5|          remaining 42% of the mortality decline (Unal et al, 2005).~The
 58   II,     5.  2.  5|              than half of the mortality decline; the major contribution
 59   II,     5.  2.  5|               contribution to mortality decline comes from risk factors
 60   II,     5.  2.  6|              than half of the mortality decline; the major contribution
 61   II,     5.  2.  6|               contribution to mortality decline comes from risk factors
 62   II,     5.  4.  3|         patients above 75 may reflect a decline in the quality of care,
 63   II,     5.  5.  2|               causing serious cognitive decline. There are over a hundred
 64   II,     5.  5.  2|                 avoid further cognitive decline and even depression.~ ~As
 65   II,     5.  5.  3|              recent evidence suggests a decline in prevalence (e.g. Suvisaari
 66   II,     5.  5.  3|                AJ, Lonnqvist JK (1999): Decline in the incidence of schizophrenia
 67   II,     5.  6.  3|             older age (Figure 5.6.2). A decline in the complaint of pain
 68   II,     5.  6.  3|       explanation for this could be the decline around the age of retirement
 69   II,     5.  6.  3|            about the age of 70, to then decline (Linos et al, 1980). (Table
 70   II,     5.  6.  3|               Recent studies indicate a decline in its prevalence, particularly
 71   II,     5.  6.  6|                  evidence for a secular decline. Ann Rheum Dis 52:254-257~
 72   II,     5.  8.  4|                 160%. Neither a steeper decline of FEV1 nor an increased
 73   II,     5.  8.  5|                 a return of the rate of decline of pulmonary function to
 74   II,     5.  8.  7|            somatic chronic diseases and decline in physical functioning:
 75   II,     5.  8.  7|            Survey (2005): Lung Function Decline, Chronic Bronchitis, and
 76   II,     5.  9. FB|             occurs when infection rates decline.~ ~Obesity also has been
 77   II,     5.  9.  4|                fact, is associated to a decline of lung function and, in
 78   II,     5. 12.  1|                from cirrhosis tended to decline in Southern European countries,
 79   II,     5. 12.  4|          favourable trends followed the decline of alcohol consumption observed
 80   II,     5. 12.  7|             Sarrecchia B, et al (1989): Decline in the exposure to hepatitis
 81   II,     5. 14.  3|                  Despite the widespread decline in caries prevalence and
 82   II,     5. 14.  3|                positive trend in caries decline could deter action to further
 83   II,     5. 14.  3|                  Despite the widespread decline in caries prevalence and
 84   II,     5. 14.  4|               Risk factors~ ~The caries decline observed in many developed
 85   II,     6.  3.  3|               the incidence appeared to decline during 199697 (and Norway
 86   II,     6.  3.  4|                Trends show a continuous decline, at least in the western
 87   II,     6.  3.  4|          surveillance data. The overall decline in incidence also implies
 88   II,     6.  3.  5|                 continue to show a good decline in the EU (apart from mumps
 89   II,     6.  3.  5|                there have been areas of decline in the uptake of certain
 90   II,     6.  3.  7|              returning travellers is in decline despite the ever-growing
 91   II,     7.  3.  2|                European Union is on the decline. Over the last ten years (
 92   II,     7.  3.  2|               to accelerate the overall decline of injury mortality (Figure
 93   II,     7.  6    |               the political agenda.~The decline in the number of fatalities
 94   II,     9        |               the elderly~ ~The natural decline in cardiac function can
 95   II,     9        |                her age. The gradient of decline may become so steep as to
 96   II,     9        |              and mortality. The rate of decline of a body’s biological system
 97   II,     9        |            Smoking. The acceleration in decline caused by external factors
 98   II,     9.  1.  1|            there has been a significant decline in the rate of neonatal
 99   II,     9.  1.  2|                and previously, a strong decline in the rates of neural tube
100   II,     9.  1.  2|                1990s, a shallow further decline was experienced in the British
101   II,     9.  1.  2|                evidenced by the lack of decline in prevalence since 1992.~ ~
102   II,     9.  1.  2|                evidenced by the lack of decline in prevalence. Implementation
103   II,     9.  3.  1|               there is a progressive 1% decline of testosterone serum concentration
104   II,     9.  3.  1|                European countries. This decline is highly influenced by
105   II,     9.  3.  1|             alcohol, greatly affect the decline of testosterone towards
106   II,     9.  3.  1|         reduction of muscle strength, a decline in bone mineral density
107   II,     9.  3.  2|               000. The most significant decline has been observed in Romania,
108   II,     9.  4.  3|               aged 1564 is expected to decline and the proportion under-15
109   II,     9.  4.  4|                 elderly~ ~ ~The natural decline in cardiac function can
110   II,     9.  4.  4|                her age. The gradient of decline may become so steep as to
111   II,     9.  4.  4|              and mortality. The rate of decline of a body’s biological system
112   II,     9.  4.  4|            Smoking. The acceleration in decline caused by external factors
113   II,     9.  5.  1|                 influenced heavily by a decline in smoking in the last quarter
114  III,    10.  2.  1|            peaking or just beginning to decline, while still increasing
115  III,    10.  2.  1|            peaking or just beginning to decline, and smoking prevalence
116  III,    10.  2.  1|               also their rates start to decline;~· In stage 4, prevalence
117  III,    10.  2.  1|          decades indicate a significant decline in serum cotinine concentration
118  III,    10.  2.  1|      non-smokers during the 1990s. This decline probably reflects the decrease
119  III,    10.  2.  1|                probably associated to a decline in the withdrawal effects
120  III,    10.  2.  1|               people, seems also on the decline although this trend is very
121  III,    10.  2.  1|             late 1960s a general caries decline has been observed in all
122  III,    10.  2.  1|        different sources. Although this decline is a major public health
123  III,    10.  2.  1|            strongly correlated with the decline in the prevalence and severity
124  III,    10.  3.  2| hormone-dependent tissues. Worldwide, a decline in semen quality has been
125  III,    10.  4.  1|             pollutants are projected to decline during the next two decades
126  III,    10.  4.  2|                epidemic to a continuous decline in recent years in most
127  III,    10.  4.  5|         information doesnt explain the decline from 2003 to 2004.~ ~Many
128  III,    10.  6.  2|               in the speed of mortality decline.~ ~Figure 10.6.2.1. Educational
129  III,    10.  6.  2|               in the speed of mortality decline. While mortality has declined
130  III,    10.  6.  2|              socio-economic groups, the decline has been proportionally
131   IV,    11.  1.  5|               have experienced a faster decline in cardiac mortality compared
132   IV,    11.  1.  5|                bed hospital and a 3.95% decline in the hospital’s mortality
133   IV,    11.  1.  5|                 though some have seen a decline (e.g. in Slovakia, Hungary,
134   IV,    11.  1.  5|           remaining countries all saw a decline in satisfaction over the
135   IV,    11.  2.  1|                 there continues to be a decline in most countries (Table
136   IV,    11.  2.  1|               1996-2005 (and percentage decline)~ ~Disease management programmes -
137   IV,    11.  6.  1|             1990s explains the apparent decline in the proportion of GDP
138   IV,    11.  6.  2|            Europe, few countries show a decline in the public contribution
139   IV,    11.  6.  3|               2005, along with a slight decline in the share of direct (
140   IV,    11.  6.  3|             local income taxes led to a decline in progressiveness in the
141   IV,    13.  5    |                preventing the avoidable decline in quality of life as well
142   IV,    13.  5    |               condition of irreversible decline in cognition, functioning
143   IV,    13.  5    |                 of countries point to a decline in disability rates especially
144   IV,    13.  5    |          bracket, with a more sustained decline for men than for women (