Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

  1    I,     2. 10.  2    |              inclusion and exclusion criteria for defining a substance
  2    I,     2. 10.  3    |     initiatives to implement quality criteria for websites.~ ~Health Telematics.
  3   II,     4.  1        |             2005).~ ~One of the main criteria for the European Structural
  4   II,     5.  1.  1    |            measured), the diagnostic criteria adopted in risk definition (
  5   II,     5.  2.  2    |            measured), the diagnostic criteria adopted in risk definition (
  6   II,     5.  2.  4    |             and different diagnostic criteria for the definition of hypertension
  7   II,     5.  2.  4    |             or measured), diagnostic criteria adopted for risk factor
  8   II,     5.  4.  2    |         diabetes provided by WHO/ADA criteria (1998-9), is extremely variable.~
  9   II,     5.  4.  4    |             adoption of standardised criteria is absolutely necessary.
 10   II,     5.  4.  7    |             methods and standardised criteria (reports available at www. ).
 11   II,     5.  4.  7    |            in providing standardised criteria and integration in order
 12   II,     5.  5.  1    |            not fulfil the diagnostic criteria for a mental disorder either
 13   II,     5.  5.  3    |              systems – the divergent criteria used to identify persons
 14   II,     5.  5.  3    |           the validity of prediction criteria and the benefit of early
 15   II,     5.  5.  3    |            samples (strict exclusion criteria and study duration limited
 16   II,     5.  5.  3    |             the nomenclature and the criteria used to define autism have
 17   II,     5.  5.  3    |             screened, the diagnostic criteria used and the studied country.
 18   II,     5.  5.  3    |              can be due to different criteria or methods and not necessarily
 19   II,     5.  5.  3    |  nomenclature and the classification criteria used to define autism have
 20   II,     5.  5.  3    |              of different diagnostic criteria used and the inter-observer
 21   II,     5.  5.  3    |              prevention~ ~Diagnostic criteria~ ~There are no pathognomonic
 22   II,     5.  5.  3    |          diagnosis of MS. Diagnostic criteria require evidence of dissemination
 23   II,     5.  5.  3    |       evidence. The most widely used criteria in MS epidemiological research
 24   II,     5.  5.  3    |             were the Poser Committee criteria (Poser et al, 1983), consisting
 25   II,     5.  5.  3    |         populations, the Poser et al criteria still comprise the most
 26   II,     5.  5.  3    |      according to the McDonald et al criteria than to the Poser et al
 27   II,     5.  5.  3    |             when the Poser Committee criteria are used (McDonnell and
 28   II,     5.  5.  3    |              comparison of the Poser criteria and the new McDonald criteria.
 29   II,     5.  5.  3    |        criteria and the new McDonald criteria. Acta Neurol Scand 109:385-
 30   II,     5.  5.  3    |               Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis:
 31   II,     5.  5.  3    |            al (1983): New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis:
 32   II,     5.  5.  3    |              Tourtellotte WW (1976): Criteria for the clinical diagnosis
 33   II,     5.  5.  3    |            differences in diagnostic criteria.It has been shown (de Rijk
 34   II,     5.  5.  3    |             change in the diagnostic criteria may result in a decrease
 35   II,     5.  5.  3    |            Furthermore, standardized criteria would allow a more accurate
 36   II,     5.  6.  3    |        health care with OA by agreed criteria. An estimation of the incidence
 37   II,     5.  6.  3    |          measured using radiological criteria alone can lead to overestimates
 38   II,     5.  6.  3    |             Prevalence (Radiographic Criteria) in selected European Countries ~ ~
 39   II,     5.  6.  3    |              of arthritis by various criteria, with ACR as the preferred
 40   II,     5.  6.  3    |            with ACR as the preferred criteria (Arnett et al, 1988).~ ~
 41   II,     5.  6.  3    |           studies using the 1987 ACR criteria (European Commission (2003):
 42   II,     5.  6.  3    |      population study using 1987 ARA criteria and found that about two-thirds
 43   II,     5.  6.  3    |       concept by defining diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis on the
 44   II,     5.  6.  3    |              On the basis of the IOF criteria, the general prevalence
 45   II,     5.  6.  6    |                 1986) Development of criteria for the classification and
 46   II,     5.  6.  6    |           Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American
 47   II,     5.  6.  6    |             Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of
 48   II,     5.  6.  6    |            Rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification of
 49   II,     5.  6.  6    |            World Health Organization criteria for osteopenia and osteoporosis.
 50   II,     5.  6.  6    |             using idfferent clinical criteria: The Chingford Study. Arthritis
 51   II,     5.  8.  3    |             according to a 9-4% GOLD criteria27 in persistent never smokers
 52   II,     5.  8.  3    |             0% according to the GOLD criteria (Lindberg et al 2006). This
 53   II,     5.  8.  3    |              to different diagnostic criteria were frequently underlined:
 54   II,     5.  8.  3(27)|                                 GOLD Criteria for the Spirometric Classification
 55   II,     5.  9. FB    |              High quality assessment criteria must be introduced, together
 56   II,     5.  9.  5    |              High quality assessment criteria must be introduced, together
 57   II,     5.  9.  6    |      importance of adopting specific criteria permitting the integration
 58   II,     5. 10.  2    |              have used as diagnostic criteria for FA questionnaires on
 59   II,     5. 11.  3    |           are limited, as diagnostic criteria suitable for epidemiological
 60   II,     5. 11.  7    |           Working Party’s Diagnostic Criteria for atopic dermatitis. Br
 61   II,     5. 14.  2    |            complicated by diagnostic criteria that differ from study to
 62   II,     5. 14.  2    |       analysis of the methodological criteria used published for the oral
 63   II,     5. 15.  4    |       medicinal products sets up the criteria for orphan designation in
 64   II,     5. 15.  4    |      provisions for implementing the criteria for orphan designation and
 65   II,     6.  3.  6    |             well as in the reporting criteria. Reporting from most countries
 66   II,     6.  3.  6    |      reported 11 cases; however, the criteria for reporting these cases
 67   II,     6.  4.  1    |         EU-wide surveillance and the criteria for their selection. The
 68   II,     7.  4        |            priorities. The following criteria have been used to identify
 69   II,     7.  5        |              the statistical quality criteria of EUROSTAT for inclusion
 70   II,     8.  2.  2    |       selection, based on predefined criteria, of survey of visual impairment,
 71   II,     8.  2.  2    |       selection, based on predefined criteria, of survey of visual impairment,
 72   II,     9.  1.  1    |      Countries differ in their legal criteria for birth registration and
 73   II,     9.  1.  1    |  registration and in their inclusion criteria for other data collection
 74   II,     9.  1.  1    |     criterion. The absence of common criteria distorts comparisons between
 75   II,     9.  1.  1    |              inclusion and exclusion criteria used by surveys and registers.
 76   II,     9.  1.  1    |             same inclusion/exclusion criteria.~ ~Rate in Europe~The overall
 77   II,     9.  1.  1    |          perinatal health in Europe: criteria, methods and results from
 78   II,     9.  1.  2    |            be difficult to apply the criteria precisely as there is not
 79   II,     9.  1.  2    |         accessed (Dolk et al, 2004). Criteria may vary over the diagnosis
 80   II,     9.  3.  1    |       undiagnosed conditions and the criteria used by healthcare professionals
 81   II,     9.  3.  1    |            the hormonal and clinical criteria that should be used to identify
 82   II,     9.  3.  2    |             definitions or inclusion criteria. The prevalence of “severe”
 83   II,     9.  3.  2    |          perinatal health in Europe: criteria, methods and results from
 84  III,    10.  3.  1    |             and the absence of other criteria commonly used in assessing
 85  III,    10.  3.  1    |   association does not meet adequate criteria for being considered causal.
 86  III,    10.  3.  2    |      Compounds. Environmental Health Criteria 116. Available at: htt ~ ~
 87  III,    10.  3.  2    |          IPCS); Environmental Health Criteria 226: Palladium. Available
 88  III,    10.  3.  2    |          IPCS): Environmental Health Criteria 237. Principles for evaluating
 89  III,    10.  3.  4    |            the world, with different criteria, formats and purpose. These
 90  III,    10.  3.  4    |           least one of the following criteria must be fulfilled: 10 or
 91  III,    10.  4.  2    |            No 178/2002 gives further criteria for when a RASFF notification
 92  III,    10.  4.  2    |             consider microbiological criteria, applicable at the site
 93  III,    10.  4.  2    |              market; microbiological criteria are tools that can be used
 94  III,    10.  4.  2    |                   on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs, applicable
 95  III,    10.  4.  2    |          2006, lays down food safety criteria for certain important food-borne
 96  III,    10.  4.  2    |             and assessment. A set of criteria to identify a “common mechanism
 97  III,    10.  4.  2    |       acceptable levels. A number of criteria for selecting groups of
 98  III,    10.  4.  2    |          additive response including criteria to be defined when the approach
 99  III,    10.  4.  2    |              health and welfare, the criteria currently used to evaluate
100  III,    10.  4.  2    |              a number of operational criteria. They should have a sufficient
101  III,    10.  4.  2    |              2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. Official
102  III,    10.  4.  3    |          Commission, 1998a) sets out criteria for water suitable for human
103  III,    10.  5.  3    |              developed good practice criteria for a variety of organisations
104  III,    10.  5.  3    |         development of good practice criteria. The Luxembourg Declaration
105  III,    10.  5.  3    |            produced a set of quality criteria for good practice in WHP,
106   IV,    11.  1.  5    |            addition to three general criteria: impact on health, policy
107   IV,    11.  1.  5    |              guidelines are specific criteria for how and when particular
108   IV,    11.  1.  6    |     representative according to some criteria (including 23 or 22% of
109   IV,    11.  5.  1    |              Expanding the limits of criteria for older or other donors
110   IV,    11.  5.  3    |            driven by guidelines.~The criteria for cadaver organ selection
111   IV,    11.  5.  3    |             having binding selection criteria in place. For the living
112   IV,    11.  5.  3    |            13 countries have binding criteria, while other 15 have technical
113   IV,    11.  5.  3    |        Figure 11.15. Risk assessment criteria in organ transplant~ ~Most
114   IV,    11.  5.  3    |          evaluation of the different criteria in the risk assessment are
115   IV,    11.  5.  4    |              according to predefined criteria.~The new Member States face
116   IV,    11.  5.  4    |            common quality and safety criteria. This system would provide
117   IV,    11.  5.  4    |           Binding safety and quality criteria should not have as a consequence
118   IV,    11.  5.  6    |          2004Trans 1~2004Recom 19 on criteria for the authorisation of
119   IV,    11.  5.  6    |        Ministers to member states on criteria for the management of waiting
120   IV,    11.  6.  4    |          lack of transparency in the criteria for inclusion or exclusion
121   IV,    11.  6.  5    |                 Methods for deriving criteria for assessing the quality
122   IV,    11.  6.  5    |              et al. (2004): Shifting criteria for benefit decisions in
123   IV,    11.  6.  5    |           death: a call for explicit criteria.” Quality in Health Care
124   IV,    12.  5        |               conforming to a set of criteria concerning historical and
125   IV,    12. 10        | establishments (pubs) if a number of criteria have been met. Moreover
126   IV,    12. 10        |        nutrition that meet the law’s criteria see www. de~National action
127   IV,    12. 10        |  demonstration according to relevant criteria such us availability, interoperability,
128   IV,    12. 10        |             readjusted the financial criteria for its dispensation. Nowadays
129   IV,    12. 10        |           them. The act issues equal criteria for all screening programmes
130   IV,    13.  7.  3    |              has been noted that the criteria for transnational cooperation