Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

  1    I,     2.  2        |       largest new Member States (Poland, Hungary and Czech Republic)
  2    I,     2.  6        |  students enrolled. In Portugal, Poland and the three Baltic States,
  3    I,     2.  6        |          foreseen for Cyprus and Poland with reductions of about
  4    I,     3.  1        |       Slovak Republic (1.25) and Poland (1.24) had the lowest. As
  5    I,     3.  1        |           2.23), Ireland (2.67), Poland (2.29), the Slovak Republic (
  6    I,     3.  2        |          Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Slovenia, the Slovak Republic
  7    I,     3.  2        |         Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and the Slovak
  8    I,     3.  2        |      Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, and the Slovak
  9    I,     3.  2        |      Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Slovakia, and a more
 10    I,     3.  2        |       France (11%), the UK (7%), Poland ( 5%), Italy (3%) and Netherlands (
 11    I,     3.  3        |       Cyprus, Ireland, Slovakia, Poland and Turkey have high shares.
 12    I,     3.  3        |        over time, while those in Poland, Cyprus, Romania, Greece
 13    I,     3.  3        |      most prominent in Slovenia, Poland, Finland, Germany and Croatia.
 14    I,     3.  3        |         change much (Figure 14). Poland, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Lithuania
 15    I,     3.  3        |          low in Turkey, Ireland, Poland, Slovakia and Cyprus, and
 16    I,     3.  3        |       period is small. Bulgaria, Poland, Spain, Slovakia, and Romania
 17    I,     3.  3        |       criterion, while Slovakia, Poland, Cyprus, Ireland and Malta
 18   II,     4.  2        |      Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovenia and Slovakia)
 19   II,     5.  2.  2    |       countries (Czech Republic, Poland, Slovakia and former GDR-Eastern
 20   II,     5.  2.  3(3) |         include: Czech Republic, Poland, Slovakia.~
 21   II,     5.  3.  3    |         Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia; Northern
 22   II,     5.  3.  6    |         Eastern Europe (Estonia, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia)
 23   II,     5.  3.  6    |         Eastern Europe (Estonia, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia)
 24   II,     5.  3.  6    |     cervical cancer was lower in Poland (48%) and higher in Sweden (
 25   II,     5.  3.  6    |         England, Estonia, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Scotland, Slovakia,
 26   II,     5.  3.  6    |       for the entire period, and Poland and Slovakia where survival
 27   II,     5.  3.  7    |           AUSTRIA~Yes (regional)~POLAND~Yes~PORTUGAL~Yes~ROMANIA~
 28   II,     5.  4.  3    |         ages between 20-79, with Poland (15%) and Denmark (12%)
 29   II,     5.  5.  1    |    countries (Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, Hungary and Croatia).~ ~
 30   II,     5.  5.  1    |         Austria, Netherlands and Poland) young people aged 15 to
 31   II,     5.  5.  1    |        Spain, Luxembourg, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Romania and Iceland
 32   II,     5.  5.  2(23)|        mortality rate (Bulgaria, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Turkey
 33   II,     5.  5.  2    |          Cyprus, Ireland, Malta, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. In
 34   II,     5.  5.  3    |         Denmark, Canada, Latvia, Poland, Belgium (Flemish), Czech Republic,
 35   II,     5.  5.  3    |         The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Sweden
 36   II,     5.  5.  3    |          general practitioners. ~Poland~ ~X~In Poland there are
 37   II,     5.  5.  3    |    practitioners. ~Poland~ ~X~In Poland there are not any reliable
 38   II,     5.  5.  3    |       Czech Republic, and 15% in Poland (Fricke and Pirck, 2004).
 39   II,     5.  5.  3    |    exclusively on schizophrenia: Poland has established the WPA
 40   II,     5.  5.  3    |       245 ~2.3 ~Krohn, 1961 (*) ~Poland~All ages ~MR review~337.
 41   II,     5.  5.  3    |          6~Olafsson et al., 1998~Poland~Insurance policies~Prevalent
 42   II,     5.  5.  3    |  prevalence was heterogeneous in Poland, with a peak rate of 110
 43   II,     5.  7.  2    |        Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia)
 44   II,     5.  7.  5    |         the last two years.~· In Poland in 2007 a programme to detect
 45   II,     5.  8.  4    |       the United States, France, Poland, Italy, Norway, China, the
 46   II,     5.  8.  5    |   interesting study performed in Poland presented a promising approach
 47   II,     5.  9.  3    |      Serbia (6%), Greece (5.6%), Poland (5.4%), Germany (2.5%),
 48   II,     5.  9.  3    |     Iceland 11%, Spain 10.6% and Poland 8.5% and Germany 3%. These
 49   II,     5. 12.  3    |      Bulgaria from 12.5 to 19.4, Poland from 13.0 to 15.9, and mainly
 50   II,     5. 12.  3    |       such as Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland and Romania) up to the mid
 51   II,     5. 14.  2    | established recently in Hungary, Poland and Portugal.~ ~The indicators,
 52   II,     5. 14.  3    |          For example, studies in Poland showed that only 64% of
 53   II,     6.  3.  3    |         in Latvia, Lithuania and Poland (no data by transmission
 54   II,     6.  3.  3    |        central Europe (Slovakia, Poland and Hungary) gonorrhoea
 55   II,     6.  3.  3    |           Slovakia, Slovenia and Poland) syphilis incidence remained
 56   II,     6.  3.  4    |          Baltic States, Hungary, Poland and Portugal, rates have
 57   II,     6.  3.  4    |      countries (France, Germany, Poland, Spain and United Kingdom)
 58   II,     6.  3.  5    |       the EU countries except in Poland, Romania and Bulgaria.~ ~
 59   II,     6.  3.  5    |        19992000), Spain (2003), Poland (1998) and Lithuania (2002).
 60   II,     6.  3.  5    |          10-year period, notably Poland in 1998 and 2004, Estonia
 61   II,     6.  3.  5    |         observed particularly in Poland in 1997 and 2001, in Latvia
 62   II,     6.  3.  6    |      been stable over the years. Poland reported the most cases
 63   II,     6.  3.  6    |     France and Italy in 1998, in Poland 1999, in Latvia in 2000,
 64   II,     8.  1.  2    |    Member States, except Latvia, Poland and Bulgaria, plus Norway.
 65   II,     8.  2.  3    |       region (to which Bulgaria, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Turkey
 66   II,     9.  1.  1    |        Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovenia, and Slovak Republic),
 67   II,     9.  1.  2    |   elsewhere (EUROCAT, 2005b). In Poland, TOPFA is not encouraged,
 68   II,     9.  1.  2    |        Spain to 1.0 per 1 000 in Poland (Table 9.1.2.4).~ ~Orofacial
 69   II,     9.  3.  1    |          accession States except Poland and Slovenia are 2-3 times
 70   II,     9.  3.  3    |          study range from 15% in Poland to 38% in England (Fig.
 71   II,     9.  3.  3    |      responses range from 9.2 in Poland to 40.4% in England. From
 72   II,     9.  5.  3    |        prevalence in 2004 was in Poland (32.0) and the Netherlands (
 73  III,    10.  2.  1    |        France, Italy, Lithuania, Poland and Romania – for example,
 74  III,    10.  2.  1    |      central and eastern Europe (Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia,
 75  III,    10.  2.  1    |         the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain,
 76  III,    10.  2.  1(21)|      2007; Whelton et al, 2007), Poland (Szponar et al, 2003), Portugal (
 77  III,    10.  2.  1(22)|      Direction of Health, 2004), Poland (Szponar et al, 2003), Slovakia (
 78  III,    10.  2.  1(23)|      Aromaa and Koskinen, 2004), Poland (Szponar et al, 2003), Portugal (
 79  III,    10.  2.  1    |      Frequency Questionnaire~ ~ ~Poland~Household Food Consumption
 80  III,    10.  2.  1    |         Anthropometric Survey in Poland~HFCAAS~2000~4134~1-96~24-
 81  III,    10.  2.  1    |         Anthropometric Survey in Poland. Public Health Nutr., 2001,
 82  III,    10.  4.  1    |   Northern Italy and in parts in Poland and Hungary, where the average
 83  III,    10.  4.  2    |     Główny Inspektorat Sanitarny~Poland~Autoridade de Segurança
 84  III,    10.  5.  2    |           the Czech Republic and Poland, the elderly dependency
 85  III,    10.  5.  2    |      Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia~Rural: 34~Urban:
 86  III,    10.  5.  2    |  Economic Co-operation and~PHARE~Poland and Hungary: Assistance
 87  III,    10.  5.  3    |        states. Whereas in Greece Poland, Latvia, and Slovenia more
 88  III,    10.  5.  3    |        worker in Greece, Latvia, Poland, Sweden, Bulgaria, and Romania
 89  III,    10.  5.  3    |         Greece, Italy, Malta and Poland, this proportion was below
 90  III,    10.  5.  3    |         5% in Portugal, 25.7% in Poland, 33.3% in Spain).~· 19.5
 91  III,    10.  5.  3    |     unemployed (more than 10% in Poland, Slovakia, Finland and Sweden).~·
 92  III,    10.  6.  3    |         Spain, Finland, Estonia, Poland and France show remarkable
 93   IV,    11.  1.  5    |        Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Poland and Sweden, and with lower
 94   IV,    11.  1.  5    |     Cyprus, Estonia, Latvia, and Poland.~ ~The effectiveness of
 95   IV,    11.  1.  5    |         dentists), while Greece, Poland and Latvia have the lowest.~ ~
 96   IV,    11.  1.  6    |    private sector.~ ~Salary.~ ~ ~Poland~Capitation.~ ~ ~Fee-for-service.~
 97   IV,    11.  1.  6    |          Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Slovenia,
 98   IV,    11.  1.  6    |          Italy, the Netherlands, Poland and Spain) reveals two general
 99   IV,    11.  2.  1    |        Denmark, Hungary, Norway, Poland and Turkey there has been
100   IV,    11.  3.  1    |          seen in Greece, Norway, Poland, Germany and Slovakia. There
101   IV,    11.  3.  1    |        Lithuania, Malta, Norway, Poland, the Russian Federation,
102   IV,    11.  3.  2    |         the Netherlands, Norway, Poland and Portugal (HFA 2007)3.
103   IV,    11.  3.  2    |        Iceland, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal and Sweden (HFA
104   IV,    11.  3.  2    |     Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. Reference
105   IV,    11.  3.  2    |     influence in France, Greece, Poland, Spain, Hungary, Slovenia,
106   IV,    11.  3.  2    |       the physician’s consent in Poland, and only if the original
107   IV,    11.  5.  1    |      opted for a NTO-like model (Poland, Hungary), while other,
108   IV,    11.  6.  2    |          Netherlands, Macedonia, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia
109   IV,    11.  6.  2    |          the latest in Bulgaria, Poland and Romania in 1999, for
110   IV,    11.  6.  2    |         Latvia, the Netherlands, Poland and Romania, or by the individual
111   IV,    11.  6.  2    |        many countries - Romania, Poland, Latvia, Hungary, Croatia,
112   IV,    11.  6.  2    |    Latvia~- Lithuania~- Norway~- Poland~ ~ ~ ~Figure 11.19. Out-of-pocket
113   IV,    11.  6.  2    |      total health expenditure in Poland (Lewis, 2002). Survey data
114   IV,    11.  6.  4    |        of funding based on DRGs)~Poland~16 regional funds + 1 trade
115   IV,    12.  8        |     Bulgaria (2007)~Italy (1957)~Poland (2004)~Czeck Republic (2004)~
116  Key,   Ap5.  0.  0    |   pneumonia~pneumoniae~poisoning~Poland~poliomyelitis~poliovirus~