Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

  1    I,     2.  7        |            are Slovenia, Slovakia, Latvia, Finland, Ireland and Greece (
  2    I,     3.  1        |        1960 only Austria, Estonia, Latvia and Sweden had over 10%
  3    I,     3.  1        |          Estonia, Finland, France, Latvia, Slovenia, Sweden, the United
  4    I,     3.  2        |  Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania,
  5    I,     3.  2        |  Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Slovakia,
  6    I,     3.  2        |     Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary and Latvia already have substantial
  7   II,     4.  2        |           Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland,
  8   II,     5.  2.  2    |         Baltic countries (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), Eastern European
  9   II,     5.  2.  3    |            0 deaths per 100.000 in Latvia, being there almost eight
 10   II,     5.  2.  3    |           000 in France and 555 in Latvia; in women 16 per 100.000
 11   II,     5.  2.  3    |           000 in France and 167 in Latvia).~ ~Table 5.2.1. Ischemic
 12   II,     5.  2.  3(1) |        countries include: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania.~
 13   II,     5.  2.  3(7) |          Europe countries include: Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia~
 14   II,     5.  3.  3    |         Finland, Iceland, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Sweden,
 15   II,     5.  3.  7    |           Yes (regional)~CYPRUS~No~LATVIA~No~LITHUANIA~Yes~LUXEMBOURG~
 16   II,     5.  4.  6    |        Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia and Slovenia experience
 17   II,     5.  5.  1    |             Lithuania, Hungary and Latvia have the highest total suicide
 18   II,     5.  5.  1    |             Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia) and some Central and Eastern
 19   II,     5.  5.  1    |          for Denmark, Slovakia and Latvia.~ ~Figure 5.5.1.3. Odds
 20   II,     5.  5.  1    |       found in Lithuania, Hungary, Latvia and Slovenia. Respectively
 21   II,     5.  5.  1    |         time periods were Estonia, Latvia and Denmark with a percentage
 22   II,     5.  5.  2(23)|            rate (Estonia, Hungary, Latvia and Lithuania). The EURO
 23   II,     5.  5.  3    |            Wales, Denmark, Canada, Latvia, Poland, Belgium (Flemish),
 24   II,     5.  7.  2    |  Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Poland, Romania, Slovakia
 25   II,     5.  9.  3    |          in the total population), Latvia (8.2%), Czech Rep.(8% of
 26   II,     5.  9.  3    |   Macedonia 20.8%, Bulgaria 18.3%, Latvia and Hungary 17%, Romania
 27   II,     5. 12.  2    |            Estonia since 1994, for Latvia since 1996, for Lithuania
 28   II,     6.  3.  2    |             Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia), but ranged from 06% in
 29   II,     6.  3.  3    |           IDU the largest group in Latvia, Lithuania and Poland (no
 30   II,     6.  3.  3    |      opposite was seen in Estonia, Latvia and Slovakia (Lithuania
 31   II,     6.  3.  3    |            Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) saw a steady
 32   II,     6.  3.  3    |          per 100 000), followed by Latvia (30.09 per 100 000) and
 33   II,     6.  3.  3    |            Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) where syphilis
 34   II,     6.  3.  3    |       rates were still recorded in Latvia (19.21 per 100 000), Lithuania (
 35   II,     6.  3.  3    |          per 100 000), followed by Latvia (7.37 per 100 000). Incidence
 36   II,     6.  3.  4    |          since 2000 in Estonia and Latvia, reaching 6.4% and 3.5%,
 37   II,     6.  3.  5    |            States (particularly in Latvia). Also some Western European
 38   II,     6.  3.  5    |           countries, in particular Latvia, have been most affected.
 39   II,     6.  3.  5    |         affected. The incidence in Latvia peaked in 1995 (15 per 100
 40   II,     6.  3.  5    |         about one tenth of that of Latvia, and have gradually decreased
 41   II,     6.  3.  5    |        sporadically. In 2005, only Latvia reported cases (20) with
 42   II,     6.  3.  5    |          in 199596 and 19992000, Latvia in 200001, Lithuania in
 43   II,     6.  3.  5    |        Poland in 1997 and 2001, in Latvia in 1996 and 2002, in Lithuania
 44   II,     6.  3.  6    |         Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Latvia and Lithuania - have reported
 45   II,     6.  3.  6    |    Slovakia (9.81 per 100 000) and Latvia (6.29 per 100 000) are the
 46   II,     6.  3.  6    |           1998, in Poland 1999, in Latvia in 2000, and in Lithuania
 47   II,     6.  3.  6    |          reported by 25 countries. Latvia (2.12 per 100 000), followed
 48   II,     7.  2.  6    |         Germany (regional), Italy, Latvia, Netherlands, Malta, Portugal,
 49   II,     7.  2.  6    |          Cyprus, Denmark, Ireland, Latvia, Netherlands, Malta, UK/
 50   II,     8.  1.  2    |           EU Member States, except Latvia, Poland and Bulgaria, plus
 51   II,     9.  1.  1    |           5 per 1 000 in Bulgaria, Latvia and Romania. There are differences
 52   II,     9.  1.  1    |          Cyprus, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland,
 53   II,     9.  2.  1    |       year-old girls are higher in Latvia (over 42%) and Lithuania (
 54   II,     9.  3.  1    |           in Romania, Bulgaria and Latvia (WHO HFA-DB, 2006).~ ~Mental
 55   II,     9.  3.  1    |        less than 21 deaths whereas Latvia had 169.9 deaths in the
 56   II,     9.  3.  2    |            declined, especially in Latvia and Lithuania.~ ~F ed EUGLOREH
 57   II,     9.  5.  1    |      average for females, while in Latvia it is ten years less than
 58   II,     9.  5.  3    | Netherlands (33.5 per 100 000) and Latvia (33.2) (WHO, 2002a). Overall,
 59  III,    10.  2.  1    |            Switzerland, Lithuania, Latvia and Luxembourg, recorded
 60  III,    10.  2.  1    |          UK, Ireland, Slovenia and Latvia. This contrasts with the
 61  III,    10.  2.  1    |            Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) and the EU15,
 62  III,    10.  2.  1    |        European Union. In Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, serious outbreaks
 63  III,    10.  2.  1    |    countries i.e. Lithuania (37%), Latvia (48%), Hungary (53%) and
 64  III,    10.  2.  1    |            Ireland, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, the Netherlands,
 65  III,    10.  2.  1    |     countries (Estonia since 1990, Latvia since 1998, Lithuania since
 66  III,    10.  2.  1    |        Clin. Nutr. 55 (7), 571-88.~Latvia~Data not available~ ~ ~ ~ ~
 67  III,    10.  2.  1(24)|        Italy (Gallus et al, 2006), Latvia (Pudule et al, 2005), Lithuania (
 68  III,    10.  2.  1    |               Rodler et al, 2005); Latvia (42.0%) (Pudule et al, 2005),
 69  III,    10.  4.  2    |           un veterinārais dienests~Latvia~Valstybineë maisto ir veterinarijos
 70  III,    10.  4.  5    |            some countries, such as Latvia, Estonia and Croatia, where
 71  III,    10.  4.  5    |  Luxembourg (84 % of all sources), Latvia (61 %), Italy (52 %) and
 72  III,    10.  5.  2    |          low GDP~Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia~
 73  III,    10.  5.  3    |          Whereas in Greece Poland, Latvia, and Slovenia more than
 74  III,    10.  5.  3    |      second male worker in Greece, Latvia, Poland, Sweden, Bulgaria,
 75   IV,    11.  1.  5    |          Belgium, Cyprus, Estonia, Latvia, and Poland.~ ~The effectiveness
 76   IV,    11.  1.  5    |           while Greece, Poland and Latvia have the lowest.~ ~In brief,
 77   IV,    11.  1.  6    |     patients in public hospital.~ ~Latvia~“Mixed capitation”~Fee-for-service~
 78   IV,    11.  1.  6    |          HiT 2003; Italy HiT 2001; Latvia HiT 2001; Luxembourg HiT
 79   IV,    11.  5.  1    |        Balttransplant for Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania).~In a NTO
 80   IV,    11.  6.  2    |       Bulgaria, Cyprus, Greece and Latvia). As shown in Table 11.12,
 81   IV,    11.  6.  2    |          Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Latvia, Norway, Malta, Spain, UK
 82   IV,    11.  6.  2    |            and also taxation (e.g. Latvia shifting from earmarked
 83   IV,    11.  6.  2    |          nationally, as in Greece, Latvia, Malta, Portugal, Denmark,
 84   IV,    11.  6.  2    |         Bulgaria, Estonia, France, Latvia, the Netherlands, Poland
 85   IV,    11.  6.  2    |       countries - Romania, Poland, Latvia, Hungary, Croatia, Bulgaria,
 86   IV,    11.  6.  2    |       Bulgaria, Cyprus, Greece and Latvia (Figure 11.19). Unfortunately,
 87   IV,    11.  6.  2    |          Estonia, Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania and Slovakia (
 88   IV,    11.  6.  2    |          Cyprus, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Malta, and Slovakia. Some
 89   IV,    11.  6.  2    |        Estonia~- Finland~- Italy~- Latvia~- Malta~- Portugal~- Slovenia~-
 90   IV,    11.  6.  2    |        Germany~- Ireland~- Italy~- Latvia~- Norway~- Slovenia~- Spain~-
 91   IV,    11.  6.  2    |        Hungary~- Ireland~- Italy~- Latvia~- Malta~- Norway~- Portugal~-
 92   IV,    11.  6.  2    |       Cyprus~- Estonia~- Ireland~- Latvia~- Lithuania~- Slovenia~-
 93   IV,    11.  6.  2    |         France~- Germany~- Italy~- Latvia~- Lithuania~- Norway~- Portugal~-
 94   IV,    11.  6.  2    |    Considered essential:~- Italy~- Latvia~- Lithuania~- Norway~- Poland~ ~ ~ ~
 95   IV,    11.  6.  2    |           and Haulikova, 2003). In Latvia, the Transparency International
 96   IV,    11.  6.  3    |            with the most unfair in Latvia, followed by Portugal, Greece,
 97   IV,    11.  6.  3    |            particularly poorly are Latvia, Portugal, Greece and Bulgaria
 98   IV,    11.  6.  4    |         based on historical spend)~Latvia~State~SCHIA allocates funds
 99   IV,    11.  6.  5    |            13 Applicant Countries: Latvia Country Report. Brussels,
100   IV,    12.  8        |     Portugal (1986)~Denmark (1973)~Latvia (2004)~Romania (2007)~Germany (
101   IV,    12. 10        |            in 2003.~ ~ ~ ~COUNTRY: Latvia~ ~ ~A) Prevention and control
102   IV,    12. 10        |          Public Health Strategy of Latvia (2001.-2010.)~ ~Action Programme
103  Key,   Ap5.  0.  0    |          landfill~landfills~larynx~Latvia~ldl-cholesterol~legionella~