Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1    I,     2.  1    |           and Union during the last decades of the 20th Century and
 2    I,     2.  3    |            migrants over the coming decades. Eurostat’s conservative
 3    I,     2.  3    |             the past. Over the last decades, first generation immigrants
 4    I,     2.  4    |       widened during the last three decades of the 20th century. This
 5    I,     2.  4    |            the 1980s and 1990s were decades with substantial improvements
 6    I,     2.  4    |         disability;~· over the past decades, inequalities in morbidity
 7    I,     2.  5    |             to change over the next decades. Three major trends can
 8    I,     2.  5    |             to change over the next decades. European Member States
 9    I,     3.  1    |     fertility pattern over the past decades among the various EU Member
10    I,     3.  1    |           first birth over the past decades, at least in the Netherlands (
11    I,     3.  2    |         Member States in the coming decades (Figure 3.2). Based on the
12    I,     3.  2    |            migrants over the coming decades. Eurostat’s conservative
13    I,     3.  3    |           the agenda for the coming decades. Generally the effect of
14    I,     3.  3    |          the past and in the coming decades. They clearly show that
15    I,     3.  3    |           2050.~ ~Over the past two decades, old-age dependency — the
16    I,     3.  3    |         will increase in the coming decades. Nevertheless, there is
17    I,     3.  3    |       slightly rose in the past few decades but will now start to decline.
18   II,     4.  2    |           countries during the last decades, the question raises whether
19   II,     4.  2    |            of data for the analysed decades.~ ~ ~Pattern of life expectancy
20   II,     4.  2    |           countries during the last decades, life expectancy at birth
21   II,     4.  2    |         birth during the last three decades for the EU15 average. For
22   II,     4.  2    |             elderly (65+) in recent decades, table 6 shows the average
23   II,     4.  2    |           at least three successive decades were selected.~ ~Table 4.
24   II,     4.  2    |             difference between both decades. In several Eastern EU countries
25   II,     4.  2    |             oldest ages in the last decades do not give any indication
26   II,     5.  2.  1|        increase within the next few decades, mainly due to a growth
27   II,     5.  5.  3|      treatment gaps~During the past decades, there have been significant
28   II,     5.  5.  3|         even worsened during recent decades as demonstrated in a recently
29   II,     5.  5.  3|         published in the past three decades were scrutinized, out of
30   II,     5.  5.  3|           regions in the past three decades. The clinical phenotypes
31   II,     5.  5.  3|            in Italy in the past two decades and some regions have been
32   II,     5.  5.  3|       conducted over the past three decades, reliable information on
33   II,     5.  5.  3|          research over the past two decades were the Poser Committee
34   II,     5.  7.  3|     prevalence of RRT over the past decades that is posing a still increasing
35   II,     5.  7.  3|     prevalence of RRT over the past decades that is posing a still increasing
36   II,     5.  8.  3|             generally track several decades behind smoking trends. Trends
37   II,     5.  9. FB|         life, persist over years or decades and often remit spontaneously
38   II,     5.  9. FB|      particularly in the latest two decades could be accounted to environmental
39   II,     5.  9. FB|          seen in Europe in the last decades, due to the improved hygienic
40   II,     5.  9.  3|          after having increased for decades. Data on children are more
41   II,     5.  9.  6|        interest during the last two decades. Many questionnaires have
42   II,     5. 10.  3| substantially increased in the last decades in parallel to the well
43   II,     5. 12.  1|         mortality over the last two decades has also been reported in
44   II,     5. 12.  3|               In the subsequent two decades, substantial declines in
45   II,     5. 12.  3|             as compared to only two decades earlier. The downward trends
46   II,     5. 12.  4|         Scotland) over the last two decades – which remain in any case
47   II,     5. 12.  5|            rising over the last few decades.~Since the rise of alcohol
48   II,     5. 12.  7|       infection over the past three decades in Italy. Dig Liver Dis
49   II,     5. 14.  2|     developed countries over recent decades. Also, the rate of progression
50   II,     5. 14.  3|         countries over the past few decades, disparities remain and
51   II,     5. 14.  3|         countries over the past few decades, disparities remain and
52   II,     6.  3.  6|          extending to years or even decades, there has been uncertainty
53   II,     6.  3.  7|      survive in the environment for decades. Anthrax is endemic in some
54   II,     8.  2.  1|           life expectancy in recent decades (WHO 2000). Despite increased
55   II,     8.  2.  1|             were conducted over two decades (1986-2005), with the majority (
56   II,     9.  1.  1|            dramatically in the past decades, but large disparities still
57   II,     9.  1.  1|           increased during the last decades and is now around 1% in
58   II,     9.  1.  2|         developments~ ~The last few decades have not seen increasing
59   II,     9.  2.  3|        grown significantly over the decades, as reported by individual
60   II,     9.  2.  3|         countries over the last two decades. Due to under–reporting,
61   II,     9.  3.  3|   non-secular social forces. Recent decades have seen large socioeconomic
62   II,     9.  3.  3|  relationships than in the previous decades.~ ~Number of partners and
63   II,     9.  3.  3|           Western Europe, after two decades of HIV, the perceived risk
64   II,     9.  4.  5|             increases over the next decades; and how to develop the
65  III,    10.  2.  1|         smoking trends two to three decades ago. The smoking attributable
66  III,    10.  2.  1|       However, trends over the past decades show that the differences
67  III,    10.  2.  1|          prevalence of two to three decades ago. That is why still more
68  III,    10.  2.  1| attributable mortality two to three decades later (Figure 10.2.1.1.6).~ ~
69  III,    10.  2.  1| Measurements taken over a number of decades indicate a significant decline
70  III,    10.  2.  1|         estimated that within a few decades, 80% of tobacco-related
71  III,    10.  2.  1|             greatly during the past decades.~ ~Overall, the availability
72  III,    10.  2.  1|         increased over the past two decades. This process has been complemented
73  III,    10.  2.  1|        problems during the last two decades, Europe now appears to be
74  III,    10.  2.  1|     substantially over the last two decades. Although general awareness
75  III,    10.  2.  1|     health promotion. Over the past decades, they have increasingly
76  III,    10.  2.  4|             changed in the last two decades from genetic disease and
77  III,    10.  2.  4|        public debate for almost two decades. International organisations
78  III,    10.  3.  1|          recover, it may be several decades before full UVR protection
79  III,    10.  3.  2|        stage can take place several decades after production and processing
80  III,    10.  3.  2|             or in human tissue even decades after their use has ceased.~ ~
81  III,    10.  3.  2|      biomonitoring.~ ~Over the last decades, increasing concentrations
82  III,    10.  4.  1|         decline during the next two decades as a result of progressive
83  III,    10.  4.  1|             problem in the last few decades (ISAAC, 2007) Asthma has
84  III,    10.  4.  2|             Introduction~ ~The past decades have seen the regulation
85  III,    10.  4.  2|       compounds during the past two decades. This is a clear indication
86  III,    10.  4.  5|            increasing during recent decades. The main cause is assumed
87  III,    10.  4.  5|         legacy stretching back many decades or centuries. As a consequence,
88  III,    10.  5.  3|             to change over the next decades. Three major trends can
89  III,    10.  5.  3|             to change over the next decades. European Member States
90  III,    10.  6.  2|       widened during the last three decades of the 20th century. This
91  III,    10.  6.  2|     countries, the 80s and 90s were decades of substantial improvements
92  III,    10.  6.  2|         disability;~· over the past decades, inequalities in morbidity
93  III,    10.  6.  2|      organizations in the past four decades, other sectors have increasingly
94   IV,    11.  2.  1|             substantially in recent decades (McKee and Healy 2002);
95   IV,    11.  3.  2|      European countries in the past decades. The pharmaceutical sector
96   IV,    11.  5.  1|           increased during the past decades. Organ transplantation is
97   IV,    11.  6.  4|           beneficiaries~ ~In recent decades there has been a trend towards
98   IV,    12.  1    |        successes. Over the past two decades, the single market for goods
99   IV,    12. 10    |      European level during the last decades, but also at national level.