Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1    I,     2.  7    |        city; in Europe, South-East England has the same effect. Sao
 2    I,     2. 10.  4|           the Healthcare system in England, both for manufactured products
 3   II,     5.  2.  5|           over a 20-year period in England and Wales. The authors found
 4   II,     5.  2.  7|  Population Risk Factor Changes in England and Wales, 1981-2000. Am
 5   II,     5.  3.  6| Switzerland and Spain. Denmark and England had lower survival than
 6   II,     5.  3.  6|      Switzerland survival was 80%. England, Scotland, Wales, Denmark,
 7   II,     5.  3.  6|           Czech Republic, Denmark, England, Estonia, Malta, Poland,
 8   II,     5.  4.  3|       corresponding to Austria and England. The percentage decreases
 9   II,     5.  4.  3|       between 9%(Finland) and 41% (England), with a median of 28%,
10   II,     5.  5.  3|           Russia, Slovak Republic, England, Greece, Portugal, Republic
11   II,     5.  5.  3|           Sweden, The Netherlands, England, France and Denmark. Risk
12   II,     5.  5.  3|            islands versus southern England and Wales; a markedly increased
13   II,     5.  5.  3|            at least twice those of England and Wales and, despite methodological
14   II,     5.  6.  6|       Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales. Bone 29:517-522~
15   II,     5.  7.  3|        medical databases (Ireland, England, Italy) or population surveys.
16   II,     5.  7.  3|      medical databases in Ireland, England and Italy than in population
17   II,     5.  7.  3|          Van Biesen et al, 2007) , England (Stevens et al, 2007), Iceland (
18   II,     5.  7.  3|        medical databases (Ireland, England, Italy) or population surveys.
19   II,     5.  7.  3|      medical databases in Ireland, England and Italy than in population
20   II,     5.  7.  5|    monitors quality improvement in England & Wales through the UK registry,
21   II,     5.  7.  5|         Renal Services. The NHS in England and also in Wales has published
22   II,     5.  9.  3|      several EU countries (such as England, Italy), and elsewhere (
23   II,     5. 10.  7|     systemic allergic disorders in England: analysis of national admissions
24   II,     5. 12.  2|         countries, plus separately England and Wales, and Scotland.
25   II,     5. 12.  3|            lowest ones were in the England and Wales (3.6/100,000),
26   II,     5. 12.  3|           Ireland from 3.4 to 4.8, England and Wales from 3.6 to 8.
27   II,     5. 12.  3|          men and +3% in women from England and Wales, around +9% in
28   II,     6.  3.  1|         estimates. For example, in England, from GP consultations and
29   II,     8.  2.  1|         supported accommodation in England, Emerson (2005) found significant
30   II,     8.  2.  1|          accommodation in Northern England. Journal of Intellectual
31   II,     9        |            are the Czech Republic, England, Ireland, and Lithuania.
32   II,     9.  1.  1|   singleton births in the North of England, 1982-1994. Bjog 2000;107(
33   II,     9.  1.  1|      mother's age and birthweight, England and Wales, 1976-2000. Health
34   II,     9.  1.  2|         Austria, Belgium, Croatia, England & Wales, France, Germany).
35   II,     9.  1.  2|            1 or Type 2 diabetes in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland:
36   II,     9.  2.  3|            8% for Wales, 15.3% for England, and 14.6% in Ireland, which
37   II,     9.  2.  4|            are the Czech Republic, England, Ireland, and Lithuania.
38   II,     9.  3.  1|           year in men and women in England and Wales. With a greater
39   II,     9.  3.  1|         success rate. Ministers in England have announced that a screening
40   II,     9.  3.  1|          65 will be implemented in England over the next five years.~ ~
41   II,     9.  3.  1|        observed in some countries. England and Wales, for example,
42   II,     9.  3.  2|   singleton births in the North of England, 1982-1994. Bjog 2000;107(
43   II,     9.  3.  2|      mother's age and birthweight, England and Wales, 1976-2000. Health
44   II,     9.  3.  3|  EU-sponsored series of surveys in England, Finland, France, Germany,
45   II,     9.  3.  3|            15% in Poland to 38% in England (Fig. 1) (Currie et al,
46   II,     9.  3.  3|           18% in Spain to 35.7% in England. Among girls, positive responses
47   II,     9.  3.  3|            2 in Poland to 40.4% in England. From a gender perspective,
48   II,     9.  3.  3|            had sexual intercourse (England, Finland, Germany, Scotland,
49   II,     9.  3.  3|           abortions, and births in England, 1994-2003, and the national
50   II,     9.  4.  3|         gradients reported in both England & Wales and Scotland, show
51   II,     9.  4.  7|           burden of the illness in England, Health Trends. vol. 25,
52   II,     9.  5.  3|           providing unpaid care in England and Wales, by sex and age,
53   II,     9.  5.  3|            partner~United Kingdom (England & Wales) b ( 2000 data )~·
54   II,     9.  5.  3|       Council of Europe, 2002). In England and Wales in the year preceding
55   II,     9.  5.  3|            costs to the victim. In England & Wales in 2004, the cost
56   II,     9.  5.  4|           men’s health strategies (England and Wales, Ireland) while
57   II,     9.  5.  4|          2007), National Screening England Chlamydia (2007) and Aortic
58   II,     9.  5.  4|              Gender Equality Duty (England and Norway). In Denmark,
59   II,     9.  5.  4|       national policy documents in England and Wales, Scotland, Ireland,
60   II,     9.  5.  6| Intervention or Metformin. The New England Journal of Medicine Volume
61  III,    10.  2.  1|     Macedonia, the United Kingdom (England, Scotland and Wales) as
62  III,    10.  2.  1|            representing separately England (Department of Health, 2006;
63  III,    10.  2.  1|            1.7.4). For example, in England (UK) the numbers increased
64  III,    10.  2.  1|        prevalence of overweight in England (UK) (Department of Health,
65  III,    10.  2.  1|         Armstrong et al, 2003). In England (UK) obesity among children
66  III,    10.  2.  1|           2006): Health Survey for England - updating of trend tables
67  III,    10.  2.  4|           for Disease Biology. New England J of Medicine, 349: 969-
68  III,    10.  4.  2|        pesticide usage on farms in England and Wales started in 1965
69  III,    10.  5.  1|          private water supplies in England and Wales. The main pathogen,
70  III,    10.  5.  1|         drinking-water supplies in England and Wales 19702000. Epidemiology
71  III,    10.  5.  2|          health care indicators in England identified rural patients
72  III,    10.  5.  2|      future. A fair deal for rural England. The Stationary Office Limited.~ ~
73  III,    10.  5.  2|          health care indicators in England. BMC Health Services Research
74  III,    10.  5.  2|       local authority districts in England and Wales 1988-1992. Thorax,
75   IV,    11.  1.  6|            Not relevant.~Salary.~ ~England~86% by blended payment (
76   IV,    11.  1.  6|         Austria, Belgium, Denmark, England, France, Finland, Germany,
77   IV,    11.  1.  6|       European countries (Denmark, England, France, Germany, Hungary,
78   IV,    11.  1.  6|     countries. For instance, while England includes all hospitals to
79   IV,    11.  1.  6|      resource consumption data. In England and France prices are established
80   IV,    11.  1.  6|   Healthcare Federation, 2006). In England the DRG-style Health Related
81   IV,    11.  2.  2|           in health can be seen in England, Sweden, and at local level
82   IV,    11.  3.  2|           Italy, Portugal, Norway, England, Wales, and the Baltic States),
83   IV,    11.  4    |          is a clear distinction in England between assessment (a scientific
84   IV,    11.  6.  2|         Denmark, Finland, Spain or England (since 1997), and there
85   IV,    11.  6.  2|          some countries such as in England where all private medical
86   IV,    11.  6.  4|          as primary care trusts in England (Thomson, Foubister and
87   IV,    11.  6.  4|           resource-poor regions in England is based on the risk adjustment
88   IV,    11.  6.  4|           systems listed above and England (where risk adjusted capitation
89   IV,    11.  6.  4|       parents (and local tax base)~England~HM Revenue and Customs (
90   IV,    11.  6.  4|            benefits can be seen in England, where all services should
91   IV,    11.  6.  5|        care-What is it? ." The New England Journal of Medicine 335(
92   IV,    11.  6.  5|              Payment by Results in England." Euro Health 13(1): 13-
93   IV,    11.  6.  5|          quality of care." The New England Journal of Medicine 335(
94   IV,    11.  6.  5|        High-Quality Care." The New England Journal of Medicine 350(
95   IV,    11.  6.  5|      quality of medical care”. New England Journal of Medicine 294:
96   IV,    12. 10    |          with Northern Ireland and England for the delivery of some
97  Key,   Ap5.  0.  0|       endocrine~endometrium~energy~england~enlargement~enteritidis~