Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1    I,     2.  6        |       Luxembourg, Finland, Bulgaria and Romania as well as Iceland. Between
 2    I,     3.  1        |             Hungary, Italy, Luxembourg, Romania, Slovenia and Sweden; nowhere
 3    I,     3.  1        |              Slovak Republic (2.85) and Romania (2.26). Cohorts born in
 4    I,     3.  2        |        Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and the Slovak Republic
 5    I,     3.  2        |              Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, and the Slovak Republic.
 6    I,     3.  2        |                expected in Bulgaria and Romania. The twelve New Member States
 7    I,     3.  3        |                those in Poland, Cyprus, Romania, Greece and Slovakia were
 8    I,     3.  3        |                 Spain, Turkey, Ireland, Romania and Luxembourg have the
 9    I,     3.  3        |            Poland, Spain, Slovakia, and Romania have the largest changes,
10    I,     3.  3        |           Cyprus, Ireland and Malta and Romania are the ‘least’ aged ones.~ ~ ~
11   II,     4.  2        |             Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovenia and Slovakia)
12   II,     5.  2.  2    |           countries (Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania), Northern European countries (
13   II,     5.  2.  3(4) |          include: Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania.~
14   II,     5.  2.  3    |               399 deaths per 100.000 in Romania, being there almost seven
15   II,     5.  3.  2    |           registry (Luxembourg, Greece, Romania, Hungary). Various bodies
16   II,     5.  3.  3    |        Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia; Northern Europe:
17   II,     5.  3.  7    |                 POLAND~Yes~PORTUGAL~Yes~ROMANIA~No~SLOVENIA~Planning stage~
18   II,     5.  4.  3    |                 The median value is 18 (Romania). Relative to Type 1, other
19   II,     5.  5.  1    |             Eastern European countries (Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, Hungary
20   II,     5.  5.  1    |                Malta, Poland, Portugal, Romania and Iceland were not significant.
21   II,     5.  5.  2(23)|                 rate (Bulgaria, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Turkey and
22   II,     5.  5.  2    |                 Ireland, Malta, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. In Slovakia,
23   II,     5.  5.  2    |                care (e.g. in Greece and Romania), there is very little state
24   II,     5.  5.  3    |            Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Sweden and Turkey).
25   II,     5.  5.  3    |         diversity and its determinants.~Romania~X~ ~At national level data
26   II,     5.  5.  3    |            Respective programmese.g. Romania has initiated a focused
27   II,     5.  5.  3    |               reported for Bulgaria and Romania, respectively, with a mean
28   II,     5.  5.  3    |             annual incidence of 0.9 for Romania. Prevalence was 39 in Greece
29   II,     5.  5.  3    |              sclerosis in Mures County, Romania. Rom J Neurol Psychiatry
30   II,     5.  7.  2    |                Hungary, Latvia, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia)
31   II,     5.  7.  3    |                from 321 patients pmp in Romania to 1057 patients pmp in
32   II,     5.  8.  3    |        prevalence in Finland, Slovakia, Romania, Hungary (Figure 5.8.1).~ ~ ~ ~
33   II,     5.  9.  3    |                 of 13.14 years of age), Romania (7%), Switzerland (9.1%
34   II,     5.  9.  3    |                 Latvia and Hungary 17%, Romania 15%, Switzerland 14.2% in
35   II,     5. 12.  3    |                 in Hungary and 106.1 in Romania. Slovakia and Slovenia showed
36   II,     5. 12.  3    |           European countries (Bulgaria, Romania and particularly Hungary).
37   II,     5. 12.  3    |                 02 were 22.6/100,000 in Romania, followed by Hungary with
38   II,     5. 12.  3    |              000 in Hungary and 44.3 in Romania. Slovakia and Slovenia had
39   II,     5. 12.  3    |           Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland and Romania) up to the mid 1990s. Subsequent
40   II,     5. 12.  3    |          Eastern Europe (e.g., Hungary, Romania, Croazia, Slovakia), which
41   II,     5. 12.  4    |                Eastern Europe (Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Croatia)
42   II,     6.  3.  4    |               the EU expansion in 2007, Romania will be the country with
43   II,     6.  3.  5    |             countries except in Poland, Romania and Bulgaria.~ ~Pertussis~ ~
44   II,     6.  3.  7    |                 first large outbreak in Romania in 1996, WNV infection has
45   II,     8.  2.  1    |              diverse as Austria, Italy, Romania or Lithuania are surveyed (
46   II,     8.  2.  3    |                 which Bulgaria, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Turkey belong) (
47   II,     9.  1.  1    |                 in Bulgaria, Latvia and Romania. There are differences in
48   II,     9.  1.  1    |           acceded in 2007 (Bulgaria and Romania).~ ~ ~ ~Foetal mortality~
49   II,     9.  1.  1    |            reported for Bulgaria (48%), Romania and Cyprus1 (40%) and Estonia (
50   II,     9.  2.  3    |                data ranged from 3.0% in Romania and 3.7% in Greece to 29.
51   II,     9.  3.  1    |               workplace are reported in Romania, Bulgaria and Latvia (WHO
52   II,     9.  3.  2    |            decline has been observed in Romania, which had the highest ratio
53   II,     9.  3.  3    |                 Currie at al, 2004). In Romania (Serbanescu et al, 2001)
54   II,     9.  3.  3    |              Reproductive health survey Romania, 1999, Final report. Atlanta.
55   II,     9.  4.  3    |        countries, with the exception of Romania and Estonia, where adults
56   II,     9.  5.  1    |            males. In Eastern Europe and Romania, this figure may be up to
57  III,    10.  2.  1    |          countries, UK, Estonia, Spain, Romania, Switzerland, Lithuania,
58  III,    10.  2.  1    |            Italy, Lithuania, Poland and Romania – for example, binge-drinking
59  III,    10.  2.  1    |            Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, Romania, Bulgaria) and the EU15 (
60  III,    10.  2.  1(21)|           Portugal (Padez et al, 2004), Romania (”Alfred RusescuInstitute
61  III,    10.  2.  1    |              Data not available~ ~ ~ ~ ~Romania~Data not available~ ~ ~ ~ ~
62  III,    10.  2.  1(24)|          Statistics Netherlands, 2007), Romania (Statistical Office of the
63  III,    10.  2.  1    |                    Pudule et al, 2005), Romania (45.8%) (Statistical Office
64  III,    10.  4.  2    |            pentru Siguranta Alimentelor~Romania~Štátna veterinárna a potravinová
65  III,    10.  4.  5    |           information from Bulgaria and Romania, which account for about
66  III,    10.  4.  5    |                SEE countries, Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey, share of exports
67  III,    10.  5.  2    |          countries and Turkey~Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey~Rural: 58~Urban:
68  III,    10.  5.  3    |               additionally in Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia, Turkey, Norway
69  III,    10.  5.  3    |            whereas Estonia, Cyprus, and Romania saw increasing index figures.~
70  III,    10.  5.  3    |           Poland, Sweden, Bulgaria, and Romania sees his health or safety
71   IV,    11.  1.  5    |                 as well as Bulgaria and Romania (then still accession countries)
72   IV,    11.  1.  6    |            Salary.~ ~Fee-for-service.~ ~Romania~Blended payment: capitation (
73   IV,    11.  1.  6    |               HiT 1999; Malta Hit 1999; Romania HiT forthcoming; Turkey
74   IV,    11.  2.  1    |           Austria, Finland, Hungary and Romania apparently have relatively
75   IV,    11.  3.  1    |               lowest density in Turkey, Romania and the UK. It is possible
76   IV,    11.  3.  2    |             Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. Reference
77   IV,    11.  3.  2    |              and the UK). Similarly, in Romania and Estonia, pharmacists
78   IV,    11.  5.  3    |                 as in Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Turkey, with the intention
79   IV,    11.  6.  1    |                  Estonia, Lithuania and Romania.~ ~There appears to be significant
80   IV,    11.  6.  1    |      expenditure: the lowest is seen in Romania, Macedonia and Turkey, the
81   IV,    11.  6.  2    |         Netherlands, Macedonia, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and
82   IV,    11.  6.  2    |                 in Bulgaria, Poland and Romania in 1999, for a mixture of
83   IV,    11.  6.  2    |                 Netherlands, Poland and Romania, or by the individual health
84   IV,    11.  6.  2    |                 in Hungary, Estonia and Romania difficulties enforcing collections
85   IV,    11.  6.  2    |                 the insurance funds (in Romania for the employed but not
86   IV,    11.  6.  2    |         population. In many countries - Romania, Poland, Latvia, Hungary,
87   IV,    11.  6.  2    |             contrary, Cyprus, Malta and Romania actually recorded a fall
88   IV,    11.  6.  2    |                and in all countries but Romania to dental care. About half
89   IV,    11.  6.  2    |              charges (e.g. Slovakia and Romania). By definition, informal
90   IV,    11.  6.  2    |           dentist (Balabanova 2002). In Romania, informal payments are prevalent
91   IV,    11.  6.  4    |              based on historical spend)~Romania~42 District health insurance
92   IV,    12.  8        |            Denmark (1973)~Latvia (2004)~Romania (2007)~Germany (1957)~Lithuania (
93   IV,    12. 10        |               radiation.~ ~ ~ ~COUNTRY: Romania~ ~ ~A) Prevention and control
94   IV,    12. 10        |               list of localities within Romania regions, according with
95  Key,   Ap5.  0.  0    | rhino-conjunctivitis~rhodium~risky~roma~Romania~rubella~rural areas~rural settings~