| | 
Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2. 6 | Luxembourg, Finland, Bulgaria and Romania as well as Iceland. Between
2 I, 3. 1 | Hungary, Italy, Luxembourg, Romania, Slovenia and Sweden; nowhere
3 I, 3. 1 | Slovak Republic (2.85) and Romania (2.26). Cohorts born in
4 I, 3. 2 | Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and the Slovak Republic
5 I, 3. 2 | Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, and the Slovak Republic.
6 I, 3. 2 | expected in Bulgaria and Romania. The twelve New Member States
7 I, 3. 3 | those in Poland, Cyprus, Romania, Greece and Slovakia were
8 I, 3. 3 | Spain, Turkey, Ireland, Romania and Luxembourg have the
9 I, 3. 3 | Poland, Spain, Slovakia, and Romania have the largest changes,
10 I, 3. 3 | Cyprus, Ireland and Malta and Romania are the ‘least’ aged ones.~ ~ ~
11 II, 4. 2 | Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovenia and Slovakia)
12 II, 5. 2. 2 | countries (Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania), Northern European countries (
13 II, 5. 2. 3(4) | include: Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania.~
14 II, 5. 2. 3 | 399 deaths per 100.000 in Romania, being there almost seven
15 II, 5. 3. 2 | registry (Luxembourg, Greece, Romania, Hungary). Various bodies
16 II, 5. 3. 3 | Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia; Northern Europe:
17 II, 5. 3. 7 | POLAND~Yes~PORTUGAL~Yes~ROMANIA~No~SLOVENIA~Planning stage~
18 II, 5. 4. 3 | The median value is 18 (Romania). Relative to Type 1, other
19 II, 5. 5. 1 | Eastern European countries (Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, Hungary
20 II, 5. 5. 1 | Malta, Poland, Portugal, Romania and Iceland were not significant.
21 II, 5. 5. 2(23)| rate (Bulgaria, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Turkey and
22 II, 5. 5. 2 | Ireland, Malta, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. In Slovakia,
23 II, 5. 5. 2 | care (e.g. in Greece and Romania), there is very little state
24 II, 5. 5. 3 | Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Sweden and Turkey).
25 II, 5. 5. 3 | diversity and its determinants.~Romania~X~ ~At national level data
26 II, 5. 5. 3 | Respective programmes – e.g. Romania has initiated a focused
27 II, 5. 5. 3 | reported for Bulgaria and Romania, respectively, with a mean
28 II, 5. 5. 3 | annual incidence of 0.9 for Romania. Prevalence was 39 in Greece
29 II, 5. 5. 3 | sclerosis in Mures County, Romania. Rom J Neurol Psychiatry
30 II, 5. 7. 2 | Hungary, Latvia, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia)
31 II, 5. 7. 3 | from 321 patients pmp in Romania to 1057 patients pmp in
32 II, 5. 8. 3 | prevalence in Finland, Slovakia, Romania, Hungary (Figure 5.8.1).~ ~ ~ ~
33 II, 5. 9. 3 | of 13.14 years of age), Romania (7%), Switzerland (9.1%
34 II, 5. 9. 3 | Latvia and Hungary 17%, Romania 15%, Switzerland 14.2% in
35 II, 5. 12. 3 | in Hungary and 106.1 in Romania. Slovakia and Slovenia showed
36 II, 5. 12. 3 | European countries (Bulgaria, Romania and particularly Hungary).
37 II, 5. 12. 3 | 02 were 22.6/100,000 in Romania, followed by Hungary with
38 II, 5. 12. 3 | 000 in Hungary and 44.3 in Romania. Slovakia and Slovenia had
39 II, 5. 12. 3 | Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland and Romania) up to the mid 1990s. Subsequent
40 II, 5. 12. 3 | Eastern Europe (e.g., Hungary, Romania, Croazia, Slovakia), which
41 II, 5. 12. 4 | Eastern Europe (Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Croatia)
42 II, 6. 3. 4 | the EU expansion in 2007, Romania will be the country with
43 II, 6. 3. 5 | countries except in Poland, Romania and Bulgaria.~ ~Pertussis~ ~
44 II, 6. 3. 7 | first large outbreak in Romania in 1996, WNV infection has
45 II, 8. 2. 1 | diverse as Austria, Italy, Romania or Lithuania are surveyed (
46 II, 8. 2. 3 | which Bulgaria, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Turkey belong) (
47 II, 9. 1. 1 | in Bulgaria, Latvia and Romania. There are differences in
48 II, 9. 1. 1 | acceded in 2007 (Bulgaria and Romania).~ ~ ~ ~Foetal mortality~
49 II, 9. 1. 1 | reported for Bulgaria (48%), Romania and Cyprus1 (40%) and Estonia (
50 II, 9. 2. 3 | data ranged from 3.0% in Romania and 3.7% in Greece to 29.
51 II, 9. 3. 1 | workplace are reported in Romania, Bulgaria and Latvia (WHO
52 II, 9. 3. 2 | decline has been observed in Romania, which had the highest ratio
53 II, 9. 3. 3 | Currie at al, 2004). In Romania (Serbanescu et al, 2001)
54 II, 9. 3. 3 | Reproductive health survey Romania, 1999, Final report. Atlanta.
55 II, 9. 4. 3 | countries, with the exception of Romania and Estonia, where adults
56 II, 9. 5. 1 | males. In Eastern Europe and Romania, this figure may be up to
57 III, 10. 2. 1 | countries, UK, Estonia, Spain, Romania, Switzerland, Lithuania,
58 III, 10. 2. 1 | Italy, Lithuania, Poland and Romania – for example, binge-drinking
59 III, 10. 2. 1 | Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, Romania, Bulgaria) and the EU15 (
60 III, 10. 2. 1(21)| Portugal (Padez et al, 2004), Romania (”Alfred Rusescu” Institute
61 III, 10. 2. 1 | Data not available~ ~ ~ ~ ~Romania~Data not available~ ~ ~ ~ ~
62 III, 10. 2. 1(24)| Statistics Netherlands, 2007), Romania (Statistical Office of the
63 III, 10. 2. 1 | Pudule et al, 2005), Romania (45.8%) (Statistical Office
64 III, 10. 4. 2 | pentru Siguranta Alimentelor~Romania~Štátna veterinárna a potravinová
65 III, 10. 4. 5 | information from Bulgaria and Romania, which account for about
66 III, 10. 4. 5 | SEE countries, Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey, share of exports
67 III, 10. 5. 2 | countries and Turkey~Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey~Rural: 58~Urban:
68 III, 10. 5. 3 | additionally in Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia, Turkey, Norway
69 III, 10. 5. 3 | whereas Estonia, Cyprus, and Romania saw increasing index figures.~
70 III, 10. 5. 3 | Poland, Sweden, Bulgaria, and Romania sees his health or safety
71 IV, 11. 1. 5 | as well as Bulgaria and Romania (then still accession countries)
72 IV, 11. 1. 6 | Salary.~ ~Fee-for-service.~ ~Romania~Blended payment: capitation (
73 IV, 11. 1. 6 | HiT 1999; Malta Hit 1999; Romania HiT forthcoming; Turkey
74 IV, 11. 2. 1 | Austria, Finland, Hungary and Romania apparently have relatively
75 IV, 11. 3. 1 | lowest density in Turkey, Romania and the UK. It is possible
76 IV, 11. 3. 2 | Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. Reference
77 IV, 11. 3. 2 | and the UK). Similarly, in Romania and Estonia, pharmacists
78 IV, 11. 5. 3 | as in Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Turkey, with the intention
79 IV, 11. 6. 1 | Estonia, Lithuania and Romania.~ ~There appears to be significant
80 IV, 11. 6. 1 | expenditure: the lowest is seen in Romania, Macedonia and Turkey, the
81 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Netherlands, Macedonia, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and
82 IV, 11. 6. 2 | in Bulgaria, Poland and Romania in 1999, for a mixture of
83 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Netherlands, Poland and Romania, or by the individual health
84 IV, 11. 6. 2 | in Hungary, Estonia and Romania difficulties enforcing collections
85 IV, 11. 6. 2 | the insurance funds (in Romania for the employed but not
86 IV, 11. 6. 2 | population. In many countries - Romania, Poland, Latvia, Hungary,
87 IV, 11. 6. 2 | contrary, Cyprus, Malta and Romania actually recorded a fall
88 IV, 11. 6. 2 | and in all countries but Romania to dental care. About half
89 IV, 11. 6. 2 | charges (e.g. Slovakia and Romania). By definition, informal
90 IV, 11. 6. 2 | dentist (Balabanova 2002). In Romania, informal payments are prevalent
91 IV, 11. 6. 4 | based on historical spend)~Romania~42 District health insurance
92 IV, 12. 8 | Denmark (1973)~Latvia (2004)~Romania (2007)~Germany (1957)~Lithuania (
93 IV, 12. 10 | radiation.~ ~ ~ ~COUNTRY: Romania~ ~ ~A) Prevention and control
94 IV, 12. 10 | list of localities within Romania regions, according with
95 Key, Ap5. 0. 0 | rhino-conjunctivitis~rhodium~risky~roma~Romania~rubella~rural areas~rural settings~
|
|
| |
