Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 -, 1 | consumer/index_en.htm).~ ~The value of this Report largely depends
2 I, 2. 4 | defined as the produced value of all goods and services
3 I, 2. 4 | goods and services less the value of any goods or services
4 I, 2. 10. 4(17)| Creation of a Health Care Value Chain through an innovative &
5 I, 2. 10. 4 | and used for other added value developments, once standards
6 I, 2. 10. 4(20)| Integration ibn the Health Value Chain “, Dr. Alberto Sanna,
7 I, 3. 3 | with the highest dependency value (28.9), followed by Germany (
8 I, 3. 3 | 2000 to 2004. The recent value amounts to 26.8 for 2004,
9 II, 5. 3. 7 | level is a European added value for each NCP at a minimal
10 II, 5. 4. 1 | and /or a postprandial value 11.1 mmol/l. (Report WHO/
11 II, 5. 4. 2 | last 12 months showing a value >140/90~10~Percent of diabetic
12 II, 5. 4. 2 | with HbA1c tested and a value of HbA1c above 7.0%. This
13 II, 5. 4. 2 | with a different cut-off value (9.5%) that makes data less
14 II, 5. 4. 2 | months and presenting a value above 2.6 mmol/l.~Measurement
15 II, 5. 4. 2 | height available and had a value above or equal to 25/30
16 II, 5. 4. 3 | 000 per year. The median value is 18 (Romania). Relative
17 II, 5. 4. 3 | diabetics, corresponding to the value of Austria. Apart form the
18 II, 5. 4. 3 | accurate data. The median value is 31/100,000, corresponding
19 II, 5. 4. 3 | satisfactory (83%). The median value across 11 countries is 60.
20 II, 5. 4. 3 | Netherlands), with a median value of 87%.~Total cholesterol
21 II, 5. 4. 3 | population, with a median value of 42.5%. Age did not seem
22 II, 5. 4. 3 | Cyprus), with a median value of 75% (Sweden). The lowest
23 II, 5. 4. 3 | Scotland), with a median value of 59%, corresponding to
24 II, 5. 4. 3 | Netherlands), with a median value of 85% (Austria). The lowest
25 II, 5. 4. 3 | Cyprus), with a median value of 30%, corresponding to
26 II, 5. 4. 3 | Netherlands), with a median value of 80% for Denmark.~Triglycerides
27 II, 5. 4. 3 | population, with a median value of 24% for Sweden.~Microalbuminuria.
28 II, 5. 4. 3 | EUCID project measured this value over 9 countries, showing
29 II, 5. 4. 3 | for Denmark, with a median value of 21 for France. Important
30 II, 5. 4. 3 | 83% (Ireland). The median value is 80%. The percentage above
31 II, 5. 4. 4 | 25% (UK), with a median value of 14%. The problem increases
32 II, 5. 5. 3 | Disorders (DSM-IV) where the value noted for lifetime prevalence
33 II, 5. 5. 3 | a factor of 2.5 (median value). Suicide was associated
34 II, 5. 5. 3 | see Figure 5.5.3.3.2), the value reported from Finland of
35 II, 5. 5. 3 | 100 fold higher than the value reported for Norway (0.0164).
36 II, 5. 5. 3 | applicability and practical value of different diagnostic
37 II, 5. 5. 3 | are the sum of the present value of future years of lifetime
38 II, 5. 5. 3 | with the long-term added value of producing annual national
39 II, 5. 6. 3 | values:~ ~Osteoporosis: a BMD value at least 2.5 standard deviations
40 II, 5. 6. 3 | Osteopenia (low bone mass): a BMD value between 1 and 2.5 standard
41 II, 5. 7. 1 | for further testing the value of these biomarkers at population
42 II, 5. 8. 7 | pulmonary disease in France. Value Health 2004; 7: 168-174.~ ~
43 II, 5. 15. 6 | drugs and the NHS: should we value rarity? BMJ. 2005 Oct 29;
44 II, 7. 3. 1 | sector, providing added value for public health and cross-sector
45 II, 7. 5 | of prevention, the added value of public health action,
46 II, 9. 1. 2 | rare diseases. The added value of European collaboration
47 II, 9. 2. 2 | expression of the limited value placed on considering children
48 II, 9. 3. 1 | administrative changes which add value to their services, while
49 III, 10. 2. 1 | of the global market’s value. Europe generates 38.7%
50 III, 10. 2. 1 | of the global market's value. Supermarkets and hypermarkets
51 III, 10. 2. 1 | of the global market's value. During the 1997-2004 period,
52 III, 10. 2. 1 | speaking countries. This latter value also figures in the EURODIET
53 III, 10. 2. 1 | demonstrating its added value at European level and analysing
54 III, 10. 2. 1 | influence the nutritional value of foods.~· Food components
55 III, 10. 3. 1 | 55 dB (the WHO guideline value). Monitoring and mitigation
56 III, 10. 4. 1 | Information System~EU LV~EU Limit Value~EUROSTAT~Statistical Office
57 III, 10. 4. 1 | Europe~US~United States~VOLY~Value of Lost Years~VSL~Value
58 III, 10. 4. 1 | Value of Lost Years~VSL~Value of Statistical Life~WHO~
59 III, 10. 4. 1 | European Union (EU) limit value of 40 μg/m3 is exceeded.~
60 III, 10. 4. 1 | methodology used to assess the value of a statistical life (VSL)
61 III, 10. 4. 1 | are higher than the limit value, Member States are required
62 III, 10. 4. 2 | human health-based limit~value~ ~ ~ Monitoring~ ~ ~Richard
63 III, 10. 4. 2 | necessary to respect an absolute value (i.e. public health, consumer
64 III, 10. 4. 2 | advice on the magnitude of a value that would indicate a low
65 III, 10. 4. 2 | composition, nutritional value, metabolism, intended use
66 III, 10. 4. 2 | s quality or nutritional value, increased crop productivity,
67 III, 10. 4. 3 | recreational and economic value for many European regions.
68 III, 10. 4. 3 | Member States apply the limit value from the WHO Guidelines
69 III, 10. 5. 1 | the recommended 24-h limit value of 50 microgram/m3.~ ~Swedish
70 III, 10. 5. 3 | new daily exposure limit value of 87 dB(A).~Falls-related
71 IV, 11. 1. 5 | based on some notion of value or cost-effectiveness relative
72 IV, 11. 1. 6 | Fee-for-service is an agreed upon value for a specific service which
73 IV, 11. 3. 2 | to reward the therapeutic value of a drug and clinical gains.
74 IV, 11. 3. 2 | encouraging innovation and best value, however, is the integration
75 IV, 11. 3. 2 | possible and aim for best value for money. Recent years
76 IV, 11. 3. 2 | prescription drug market by value (2006)~ ~Europe remains
77 IV, 11. 4 | and seek to achieve best value. Despite its policy goals,
78 IV, 11. 6. 2 | the potential to ensure value for money, though in many
79 IV, 11. 6. 3 | healthcare finance. The share of value added tax as a proportion
80 IV, 11. 6. 3 | the index would take a value of 1. This method was criticized
81 IV, 11. 6. 4 | a key means of ensuring value for money (and therefore
82 IV, 11. 6. 4 | effective use of HTA to ensure value for money include a lack
83 IV, 11. 6. 5 | et al. (2007): Ensuring value for money in health care:
84 IV, 12. 1 | health-related issues).~ ~ ~The value of health has become more
85 IV, 12. 5 | information system.~ ~The added value of a comprehensive system
86 IV, 12. 10 | high quality care, better value for money and improves health
87 IV, 12. 10 | and demonstrate the added value of satellite communication
88 IV, 12. 10 | user-request, promoting the added value of SAFE and allowing potential
89 IV, 13. 4 | immigrants. Exploiting and giving value to this experience is now
90 IV, 13. 4 | immigrants. Exploiting and giving value to this experience is now
91 IV, 13. 5 | recognising the potential value of European cooperation
92 IV, 13. 7. 3 | important potential added value.~ ~Translational research~ ~
