Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     5.  2.Acr|          secondary prevention through intervention to reduce events~EUROCISS~
 2   II,     5.  2.  4|          secondary prevention through intervention to reduce events’ (EUROASPIRE)
 3   II,     5.  2.  5| best-documented examples of community intervention. In 1972, Finland had the
 4   II,     5.  2.  6|        randomized, placebo-controlled intervention trials, has shown that a
 5   II,     5.  2.  6|              the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). JAMA 256:
 6   II,     5.  3.  7|           factors that are in need of intervention, such as differences in
 7   II,     5.  4.  6|            onwards.~For T2DM, primary intervention (prevention of obesity and
 8   II,     5.  4.  6|      overweight) as well as secondary intervention (early intensive treatment)
 9   II,     5.  4.  6|         possible impact public health intervention programs may have on these
10   II,     5.  4.  6|         through appropriate lifestyle intervention. Risk factors are well known
11   II,     5.  5.  3|          implementation of policy and intervention (WHO, 2005):~· provide accurate
12   II,     5.  5.  3|               as much as school-based intervention and prevention activities
13   II,     5.  5.  3|              psycho-education, family intervention and cognitive behavioural
14   II,     5.  5.  3|              early identification and intervention with the goal of preventing
15   II,     5.  5.  3|              and to establish optimal intervention measures.~Prodromal state
16   II,     5.  5.  3|              Maurer, 2006).~Effective intervention strategies are needed for
17   II,     5.  5.  3|             seems to be evidence that intervention during this phase of the
18   II,     5.  5.  3|        concerning early detection and intervention question the validity of
19   II,     5.  5.  3|              and the benefit of early intervention, especially with regards
20   II,     5.  5.  3|            have generated most of the intervention findings to date: Personal
21   II,     5.  5.  3|        Therefore, there is a need for intervention trials that reflect every
22   II,     5.  5.  3|          compared to 13% with current intervention practice, the number of
23   II,     5.  5.  3|             early detection and early intervention in order to reduce chronic
24   II,     5.  5.  3|     integrating early recognition and intervention in Europe. World Psychiatry
25   II,     5.  5.  3|               Meta-analysis of family intervention and cognitive behaviour
26   II,     5.  5.  3|               Broek and Beghi, 2004). Intervention studies on epilepsy and
27   II,     5.  8.  4|             and cost-effectiveness of intervention (Mannino 2007).~ ~
28   II,     5.  8.  5|           After a minimal antismoking intervention, the validated smoking cessation
29   II,     5.  9. FB|      protective effect of any dietary intervention beyond 4 to 6 months of
30   II,     5.  9. FB|           health issue. If preventive intervention is to be at all effective,
31   II,     5.  9. FB|        prerequisite for any effective intervention studies.~ ~Interventions
32   II,     5.  9. FB|               German Infant Nutrition Intervention Study) reported that extensively
33   II,     5.  9.  5|              could be improved by the intervention onto the health care systems.~ ~
34   II,     5.  9.  6|              the search of healthcare intervention and the choice of appropriate
35   II,     5. 11.  6|             more elaborate controlled intervention studies.~The third priority
36   II,     7.  1    |             often exceed the costs of intervention by a factor of several times.~ ~
37   II,     8.  2.  1|             clinical health screening intervention for participants with intellectual
38   II,     8.  2.  1|              is a key target area for intervention. Considerable evidence indicates
39   II,     9        |               the use of services and intervention during pregnancy, labour,
40   II,     9        |             may be the most effective intervention to improve both short- and
41   II,     9.  1.  1|                Births without medical intervention~ ~The indicators that were
42   II,     9.  1.  2|               the use of services and intervention during pregnancy, labour,
43   II,     9.  1.  2|             may be the most effective intervention to improve both short- and
44   II,     9.  2.  3|        suicide attempts but no single intervention appears to be effective
45   II,     9.  3.  1|            selection for treatment or intervention for osteoporosis, although
46   II,     9.  3.  1|      availability of more choices for intervention and major breakthroughs
47   II,     9.  3.  2|             the appropriate levels of intervention and the use of evidence
48   II,     9.  3.  3|           those which are amenable to intervention (Wellings et al, 2001).~
49   II,     9.  3.  3|          merely a generalised goal of intervention, but an explicit element
50   II,     9.  4.  6|            availability of healthcare intervention and innovations in medical
51   II,     9.  5.  3|            recommends gender-specific intervention programmes to control adolescent
52   II,     9.  5.  6|               Diabetes with Lifestyle Intervention or Metformin. The New England
53  III,    10.  1.  1|               1999). Most of exercise intervention studies only consider the
54  III,    10.  1.  3|              2006): Physical activity intervention studies. What we know and
55  III,    10.  2.  1|              not only as a first-line intervention (Foulds et al, 2006). There
56  III,    10.  2.  1|         education is not an effective intervention to reduce alcohol related
57  III,    10.  2.  1|           Kristenson et al, 2002). An intervention for heavy drinkers resulted
58  III,    10.  2.  1|             control group without the intervention at six year follow-up.~ ~
59  III,    10.  2.  1|        implementation of this type of intervention is, however, limited and
60  III,    10.  2.  1|             heterogeneous patterns of intervention need.~ ~Complicating future
61  III,    10.  2.  1|          treatment and harm reduction intervention have to be improved accordingly.
62  III,    10.  2.  1|            diseases. However, optimal intervention in relation to oral disease
63  III,    10.  2.  1|                indicating that fiscal intervention is a plausible element of
64  III,    10.  2.  1|        derives from observational and intervention studies. Epidemiological
65  III,    10.  2.  5|          supports the notion of early intervention to promote health, i.e.
66  III,    10.  2.  5|        satisfaction was higher in the intervention group, but effects on child
67  III,    10.  3.  4|               countries had emergency intervention plans, no governments had
68  III,    10.  4.  1|            onset of childhood asthma. Intervention studies clearly show the
69  III,    10.  4.  1|             is clearly exemplified by intervention studies such as the Dublin
70  III,    10.  4.  1|               hospital admissions~ ~· Intervention studies~- Dublin, Hong Kong,
71  III,    10.  4.  2|            human data, primarily from intervention studies) in circumstances
72  III,    10.  5.  1|               microgram/m3.~ ~Swedish intervention studies have shown that
73  III,    10.  5.  1|          rates in Dublin, Ireland: an intervention study. In: The Lancet. 2002
74  III,    10.  5.  3|       countries.~Common goals, common intervention strategies, common benefits~
75  III,    10.  5.  3|             origins, there are common intervention strategies for both OSH
76  III,    10.  6.  2|           condition of the pupil. The intervention contributes to reducing
77  III,    10.  6.  2|           disadvantaged families. The intervention project is carried out in
78   IV,    11.  2.  2|            inclusion of public health intervention cost effectiveness evaluation
79   IV,    11.  6.  4|            given health technology or intervention. In many countries, programmes
80   IV,    12.  2    | best-documented examples of community intervention. In 1972, Finland had the
81   IV,    12.  2    |               that are susceptible to intervention, such as differences in
82   IV,    12.  2    |               type 2 diabetes primary intervention (prevention of obesity and
83   IV,    12.  2    |      overweight) as well as secondary intervention (early intensive treatment)
84   IV,    12.  2    |              not only as a first-line intervention. There is a wide range of
85   IV,    12.  2    |         education is not an effective intervention to reduce alcohol related
86   IV,    12.  2    |           effects can be dramatic. An intervention for heavy drinkers resulted
87   IV,    12.  2    |             control group without the intervention at six year follow-up. There
88   IV,    12. 10    |              provided by BzGA)~“Early Intervention Of First Time Noticed Drug
89   IV,    12. 10    |         National Centre for early aid/intervention (“Nationales Zentrum Frühe
90   IV,    12. 10    |         Health has five main areas of intervention: planned parenthood, preconception
91   IV,    13.  2.  1|              possible through optimum intervention.~ ~
92   IV,    13.  3    |   cost-effectiveness of public health intervention. The current thinking of