Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2. 7 | issue is represented by the decision of the German Government
2 I, 2. 10. 5 | HTA evidence is used for decision making.~ ~ ~
3 II, 5. 1. 2 | At national level, health decision makers are also following
4 II, 5. 2. 6 | health planning and clinical decision making with correct cost-benefit
5 II, 5. 3. 7 | should be awaited before any decision is made for implementing
6 II, 5. 5.Int(21)| activities (1998 to 2002), Decision No 182/1999/EC of the European
7 II, 5. 5.Int(21)| covering the period 2002-2006, Decision N° 1513/2002/EC of the European
8 II, 5. 8. 5 | should be used to direct the decision process.~ ~Different studies
9 II, 5. 14. 6 | of these groups and the decision making process.~ ~
10 II, 5. 14. 7 | dentistry and treatment decision making is absolutely necessary.~ ~
11 II, 6. 4. 1 | Surveillance~ ~Commission Decision 2000/96/EC specifies the
12 II, 6. 4. 1 | diseases was established by Decision 2119/98/EC of the European
13 II, 6. 4. 2 | be required (Commission Decision 2000/57/EC).~ ~In order
14 II, 6. 4. 2 | linked to the system.~ ~Decision 2119/98/EC of the European
15 II, 6. 4. 2 | and of the Council, and Decision 2000/57/EC regulate the
16 II, 6. 4. 2 | an important Commission decision was taken on 19 March 2002.
17 II, 6. 4. 2 | taken on 19 March 2002. This decision 2002/253/EC lays down case
18 II, 6. 4. 5 | of communicable diseases (Decision 2119/98/EC). Such cooperation
19 II, 8. 1. 4 | of the testing phase, a decision will then be made (by the
20 II, 9. 2. 7 | Parliament and Council (2002): Decision No 1786/2002/EC adopting
21 II, 9. 2. 7 | Parliament and Council (2007): Decision No 1350/2007/EC establishing
22 II, 9. 4. 5 | the need to ensure good decision making at the interface
23 II, 9. 5. 3 | influence girls’ long-term decision to participate in physical activity
24 III, 10. 2. 4 | integrated into political decision making processes. The new
25 III, 10. 3. 4 | initiative aimed to rationalise decision making for disaster preparedness,
26 III, 10. 4. 2 | risk management phase, the decision makers need to consider
27 III, 10. 4. 2 | specific circumstances, decision makers or risk managers,
28 III, 10. 4. 2 | Networks set up by Council Decision 21 19/98/EC;~• the control
29 III, 10. 4. 2(29)| agents, amending Council decision 90/424/EEC and repealing
30 III, 10. 4. 2 | 432/EEC30; and~• Council Decision 90/424/EEC31 and coordinated
31 III, 10. 4. 2 | Networks set up by Council Decision No 2119/98/EC33. Nevertheless,
32 III, 10. 4. 2 | last amended by Commission Decision 2004/216/EC) makes it compulsory
33 III, 10. 4. 2 | of each week.~Commission Decision 2005/176/EC (repealing Decision
34 III, 10. 4. 2 | Decision 2005/176/EC (repealing Decision 2000/807/EC) lays down the
35 III, 10. 4. 2(33)| Decision No 2119/98/EC of the European
36 III, 10. 4. 2 | various acute symptoms~ ~EU decision on conditions~governing
37 III, 10. 4. 2 | third: risk managers take decision (SCPHAW).~ ~Pesticides peer
38 III, 10. 4. 2 | risk-benefit comparison).~ ~The decision to initiate a risk-benefit
39 III, 10. 4. 2(41)| Commission Decision 2004/478EC concerning the
40 III, 10. 4. 2 | European Commission (2002): Decision No. 178/2002/CE of the European
41 III, 10. 4. 2 | European Commission (2005): Decision No. 2073/2005/CE of 15 November
42 III, 10. 4. 2 | European Commission (1990): Decision No. 90/219/EEC of the Council
43 III, 10. 4. 2 | European Commission (2003): Decision No. 1946/2003 of the European
44 III, 10. 4. 2 | European Commission (2007): Decision No. 1924/2006 of the European
45 III, 10. 4. 2 | European Commission. (1989): Decision No. 89/662/EEC of 11 December
46 III, 10. 4. 2 | European Commission (2004): Decision No. 852/2004 of the European
47 III, 10. 4. 2 | European Commission (2004) Decision No. 853/2004 of the European
48 III, 10. 4. 2 | European Commission (1995): Decision No. 95/69/EC of 22 December
49 III, 10. 4. 5 | avoid long delays.~ ~The decision to adopt epidemiological
50 III, 10. 4. 5 | Regardless of the final decision on the appropriateness of
51 III, 10. 5. 3 | professions and policy fields.~Decision makers and advisers in the
52 III, 10. 5. 3 | SME) and to migrants.~ ~Decision makers and advisers in the
53 IV, 11. 5. 4 | rational decision-making, each decision also depends upon the recipient’
54 IV, 11. 6. 4 | assessing outcomes. However, Decision no. 1350/2007 of 23/10/2007,
55 IV, 12. 4 | policy (2007-2013)~Council Decision of 26 June 1990 on expenditure
56 IV, 12. 5 | European Parliament and Council Decision creating the Second Programme
57 IV, 12. 5 | reconfirmed by the parliamentary decision (34/2001/EC, adopted by
58 IV, 12. 5 | on 31.July 2001). In this decision the European Union defines
59 IV, 12. 10 | for informed individual decision making. This applies in
60 IV, 12. 10 | The Common Ministerial Decision 266 is in compliance with
61 IV, 12. 10 | nutrition~High~ Ministerial Decision 30528/ (23.3.2005) concerning
62 IV, 12. 10 | Nutrition Policy.~ ~Ministerial Decision 93828 / 2006, concerning
63 IV, 12. 10 | Also, according the same Decision, the trans lipids of foods
64 IV, 12. 10 | 61~o Common Ministerial Decision 37411/1829/E 103 defining
65 IV, 12. 10 | of ozone.~o Ministerial Decision 21475/4707 (published in
66 IV, 12. 10 | Works, with its Ministerial decision number 1064 03 approves
67 IV, 12. 10 | 61.~o Common Ministerial Decision 29407/3508/2002 in compliance
68 IV, 12. 10 | E.U~o Common Ministerial Decision 50910/2727/2003 “Measures
69 IV, 12. 10 | High~o Common Ministerial Decision 8668/2007 “Acceptance of
70 IV, 12. 10 | Hazardous Waste”,~o Ministerial Decision 13588/725/2006 “Measures,
71 IV, 12. 10 | approved the Common Ministerial Decision 37591/2031/2003.~In compliance
72 IV, 12. 10 | compliance with the above Decision, hospitals have to be obtained
73 IV, 12. 10 | EFET)~o Common Ministerial Decision 487 (published in 2000)
74 IV, 12. 10 | HACCP~o Common Ministerial Decision 588 (published in 2000)
75 IV, 12. 10 | 99.~o Common Ministerial Decision 245090/11.1.2006 for determining
76 IV, 12. 10 | Ministry of Public Health Decision 1438/11/2006 to approve
77 IV, 12. 10 | and substance abuse~ High~Decision 1654/11/2006 for approval
78 IV, 12. 10 | regions, according with Decision 96/62/EC on air quality.~
79 IV, 12. 10 | stressors~ intermediate~Decision 1830/11/2007 Noise maps~
80 IV, 12. 10 | events and health~ high~Decision 1877/12/2005 National plan
81 IV, 12. 10 | Poverty~ high~Government decision 1217/09/2006 for the setting-up
82 IV, 12. 10 | health determinants~ Low~Decision 374/04/2006 on Strategy
83 IV, 13. 3 | limitation facing public health decision makers. More research is
84 IV, 13. 7. 3 | European Parliament and Council Decision , FP7 will be organised
85 IV, 13. 7. 5 | enable solid evidence-based decision making. It is necessary
86 IV, 13. 7. 5 | either by national law or by decision of the supervisory authority.~ ~
87 IV, 13. 8 | 2001)~ ~Participating in EU decision making processes~ ~The European
88 IV, 13. 8 | credible policy advice. Decision makers give priority not
89 IV, 13. 8 | NGO can participate in the decision making process at EU level.~
