Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1    I,     2.Acr        |       ISCED~International Standard Classification of Education~NMS~New Member
 2    I,     2. 10.  2    |          utmost importance for the classification (e.g. natural occurring
 3   II,     5.  2.Acr    |      lipoprotein~ICD~International Classification of Disease~IHD~Ischemic
 4   II,     5.  2.  6    |           in international disease classification pose new challenges for
 5   II,     5.  3.Acr    |           Cancer~ICD~International Classification of Diseases~LE~Life Expectancy~
 6   II,     5.  3.  3    |     according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD).~- Cancer
 7   II,     5.  4.  2    |          upon the standardized ICD classification) administered during the
 8   II,     5.  4.  2    |            source and the standard classification of ATC and DDDs (Defined
 9   II,     5.  4.  8    |            ISBN 92 4 159493 4 (NLM classification: WK 810) ISBN 978 92 4 159493
10   II,     5.  5.  3    |         description in the DSMR-IV classification. People with bulimia pass
11   II,     5.  5.  3    |        Foundation (2003a): DSMR-IV classification. Anorexia. Available at: htt m (
12   II,     5.  5.  3    |        Foundation (2003b): DSMR-IV classification. Bulimia. Available at: htt m (
13   II,     5.  5.  3    |           3.1.8 Acronyms~ ~DSMR-IV classification~Diagnostic and Statistical
14   II,     5.  5.  3    |          in times of international classification systems – the divergent
15   II,     5.  5.  3    |       diagnosis according to ICD10 classification (the majority of data is
16   II,     5.  5.  3    |            on different diagnostic classification levels. Data provided by
17   II,     5.  5.  3    |           the nomenclature and the classification criteria used to define
18   II,     5.  5.  3    |    applying the ILAE international classification categories (Commission,
19   II,     5.  5.  3    |  application of the ILAE syndromic classification and the limitations of this
20   II,     5.  5.  3    |            the limitations of this classification for epidemiological purposes.~ ~
21   II,     5.  5.  3    |        system was used for disease classification. Patients with and without
22   II,     5.  5.  3    |          58:570-576.~Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International
23   II,     5.  5.  3    |        1989): Proposal for revised classification of epilepsies and epileptic
24   II,     5.  5.  3    |    Koivikko MJ (1997): Prevalence, classification, and severity of epilepsy
25   II,     5.  5.  3    |           of the epilepsy syndrome classification: a prospective study. Lancet
26   II,     5.  5.  3    |           lEpilessia (1996): ILAE classification of epilepsies:its applicability
27   II,     5.  5.  3    |     Mykletun A (2000): Prevalence, classification, and severity of epilepsy
28   II,     5.  5.  3    |           For this report, the age classification was chosen based on what
29   II,     5.  5.  3    |        based on ICD (International Classification of Diseases) codes as they
30   II,     5.  5.  3    |           comprise the most common classification in such surveys. MS is diagnosed
31   II,     5.  5.  3    |          of life~ICD~International Classification of Diseases~IL~Interleukin~
32   II,     5.  6.  6    |    Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis.
33   II,     5.  6.  6    |       reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the
34   II,     5.  6.  6    |           revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.
35   II,     5.  6.  6    |           revised criteria for the classification of global functional status
36   II,     5.  7.  1    |           Table 5.7.2. Current CKD Classification Based on Severity and Therapy~ ~ ~
37   II,     5.  7.  7    |        kidney disease: evaluation, classification and stratification. Am J
38   II,     5.  8.  3(27)|       Criteria for the Spirometric Classification of COPD Severity:~Stage
39   II,     5.  8.  4    |         for patients selection and classification. Despite that, COPD is strongly
40   II,     5. 10.Acr    | Hypersensitivity~ICD~International Classification of Diseases~IgE~Immunoglobulin
41   II,     5. 10.  1    |       mechanisms.~ ~Figure 5.10.1. Classification of adverse reactions to
42   II,     5. 10.  2    |          the way the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding
43   II,     5. 10.  2    |          to have been used for the classification of allergic reactions to
44   II,     5. 12.Acr    |            virus~ICD~International Classification of Disease~WHO~World Health
45   II,     5. 12.  2    |     Revisions of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) were used (
46   II,     5. 12.  2    |      cirrhosis during this period, classification of cirrhosis deaths was
47   II,     5. 12.  3    |          changes may be due to the classification as deaths from cirrhosis
48   II,     5. 12.  7    |          WHO) (1967) International Classification of Disease: 8th revision.
49   II,     5. 12.  7    |          WHO) (1977) International Classification of Disease: 9th revision.
50   II,     5. 12.  7    |          International Statistical Classification of Disease and related Health
51   II,     5. 15.  1    |           disease in International classification systems, and, as a consequence,
52   II,     7.Acr        |          International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related
53   II,     7.  2        |         based on the International Classification of Diseases and Related
54   II,     7.  2.  1    |          International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related
55   II,     7.  2.  1    |           800-999)~- Supplementary Classification of external causes of injury
56   II,     7.  2.  1    |              ICECIInternational Classification of External Causes of Injuries~ ~
57   II,     7.  2.  1    |        been developed as a related classification with respect to the ICD-10
58   II,     7.  2.  1    |       belongs to the WHO family of classification systems The ICECI was the
59   II,     8.  1.  1    |   underlying the WHO International Classification of Functioning Disability
60   II,     8.  2.  1    |       Organisation’s International Classification of Diseases, Version 10,
61   II,     8.  2.  1    |            Retardation Definition, Classification, and System of Supports (
62   II,     8.  2.  1    |  Organisation (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability
63   II,     8.  2.  1    |           1992). The International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision.
64   II,     8.  2.  1    |            ICF~WHO’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability,
65   II,     8.  2.  2    |          International statistical classification of diseases, injuries and
66   II,     8.  2.  2    |   mortality levels (details on the classification of countries into subregions
67   II,     8.  2.  2    |   mortality levels (details on the classification of countries into subregions
68   II,     8.  2.  3    |            ICF~WHO’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability,
69   II,     9.  1.  1    |            Nordic-Baltic perinatal classification: geographical contrasts
70   II,     9.  2.  3    |             i.e. the International Classification of Functioning, Disability
71   II,     9.  2.  7    |          WHO (2002): International Classification of Functioning, Disability
72   II,     9.  3.  2    |            Nordic-Baltic perinatal classification: geographical contrasts
73  III,    10.  2.  1    |           a category in the ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural
74  III,    10.  2.  1    |          Nutrient profiling is the classification of food according to their
75  III,    10.  2.  1    |       social inequality in Europe. Classification used in paper was misleading [
76  III,    10.  2.  4    |          International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related~ ~
77  III,    10.  2.  5    |       consideration explains why a classification of old people only based
78  III,    10.  3.  2(25)|         provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling
79  III,    10.  3.  2    |     Globally harmonised system for classification and labelling (UNECE, 2003),
80  III,    10.  3.  2    |      Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals.
81  III,    10.  4.  5    |   sufficient' or 'poor'. The extra classification of 'sufficient' quality
82  III,    10.  4.  5    |         statistics are due varying classification in the EU and EECCA countries,
83   IV,    11.  1.  6    |       different systems of patient classification, there is increasing concern
84   IV,    11.  5.  5    |            system of adverse event classification and reporting~ ~
85   IV,    12. 10        |        products~S.I. 624 of 2001 - classification, packaging & labelling of
86   IV,    13.  8        |         the UN, the definition and classification of civil society actors