Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1    I,     2.  2    |           workplaces and match the efficiency and quality of market leaders –
 2    I,     2.  3    |           immigrants affecting the efficiency of care. This makes additional
 3    I,     2.  5    |           workplaces and match the efficiency and quality of market leaders –
 4    I,     2.  5    |       introduced from a management efficiency perspective; others with
 5    I,     2.  7    |          which would also increase efficiency of those trips that cannot
 6    I,     2.  8    |    European region, despite energy efficiency improvements and an increased
 7    I,     2. 10.  1|         improve nutrient/water use efficiency, resistance to biotic/abiotic
 8    I,     2. 10.  4|            healthcare supply chain efficiency and transparency.~ ~Medication
 9    I,     2. 10.  4|         crosschecked.~ ~Increasing efficiency~ ~Manual systems and processes
10    I,     2. 10.  4| standardisation would increase the efficiency throughout the supply chain
11   II,     5.  1.  2|           to define care since its efficiency is the result of a whole
12   II,     5.  3.  7|    compliance with the invitation, efficiency of referral for further
13   II,     7.  2.  3|       European roads, evaluate the efficiency of road safety measures,
14   II,     9.  1.  2|       would improve the quality or efficiency of registries: a) full coding
15   II,     9.  4.  5|        deployed in the interest of efficiency and cost effectiveness and
16   II,     9.  4.  5|        area of long term care. The efficiency of the service will be evaluated
17  III,    10.  3.  1|    dwellings and assessment of the efficiency of the remedial actions.
18  III,    10.  4.  1|            limits for industry and efficiency standards for buildings
19  III,    10.  4.  1|          IPPC for major industryEfficiency standards for buildings
20  III,    10.  4.  3|          are likely to reflect the efficiency of surveillance and reporting
21  III,    10.  4.  5|            improvement of resource efficiency.~ ~Thus, the priority waste
22  III,    10.  5.  1|          al (2007): Energy, energy efficiency, and the built environment.
23  III,    10.  5.  3|           workplaces and match the efficiency and quality of market leaders –
24  III,    10.  5.  3|       introduced from a management efficiency perspective and others with
25   IV,    11.  1.  1|          patients and on technical efficiency, including provider payment
26   IV,    11.  1.  3|            of health care; improve efficiency by holding providers more
27   IV,    11.  1.  3|   continuous efforts for improving efficiency in central and Eastern Europe
28   IV,    11.  1.  3|        persistent concerns towards efficiency and cost containment (OECD
29   IV,    11.  1.  3|          the conflicts between the efficiency and cost-containment goals
30   IV,    11.  1.  3|         containment and increasing efficiency, in large part by introducing
31   IV,    11.  1.  3|          contain costs and improve efficiency consisted of tightening
32   IV,    11.  1.  3|          of incentives to increase efficiency; and only short-term cost
33   IV,    11.  1.  3|           were expected to improve efficiency largely by: a) increasing
34   IV,    11.  1.  3|         particular, estimating the efficiency with which the resources
35   IV,    11.  1.  3| appropriateness of care, technical efficiency and the patient’s experience.~ ~
36   IV,    11.  1.  4|    consider not just health system efficiency, but also the distribution
37   IV,    11.  1.  5| containment and efforts to improve efficiency, the recent years have seen
38   IV,    11.  1.  6|                11.1.3.4. Technical efficiency~ ~There is considerable
39   IV,    11.  1.  6|          an appropriate measure of efficiency in a complex human service
40   IV,    11.  1.  6|            of the main measures of efficiency as technical efficiency,
41   IV,    11.  1.  6|            efficiency as technical efficiency, concerned with outputs
42   IV,    11.  1.  6|     outputs. It can be argued that efficiency can be broadly ascertained
43   IV,    11.  1.  6|       generate a single measure of efficiency, or productivity of the
44   IV,    11.  1.  6|             Macro level studies of efficiency have been conducted with
45   IV,    11.  1.  6|         and benefits of the NHS.~ ~Efficiency and provider payment methods~ ~
46   IV,    11.  1.  6|         provider behaviour and the efficiency, equity and quality outcomes
47   IV,    11.  1.  6|           initial cost savings and efficiency improvements. Currently,
48   IV,    11.  1.  6|    constraint aimed at encouraging efficiency in production.~ ~Case-based
49   IV,    11.  1.  6|           the incentive to improve efficiency. Both purposes require an
50   IV,    11.  1.  6|      diagnosis groups may increase efficiency and reduce data manipulation
51   IV,    11.  1.  6|            no evidence of improved efficiency or increased activity (Boyle,
52   IV,    11.  1.  6|         used to infer the level of efficiency in which the healthcare
53   IV,    11.  2    |        responsiveness of care, and efficiency. This section focuses on
54   IV,    11.  2.  1|         lower levels of equity and efficiency (Ettelt et al, 2006).~ ~
55   IV,    11.  2.  1|          aim to increase activity, efficiency and reduce waiting times;
56   IV,    11.  5.  4|     donation process has increased efficiency in the procurement of organs
57   IV,    11.  5.  5|    improving Organ Transplantation efficiency addressed in this action
58   IV,    11.  5.  5|      living donors), improving the efficiency and equity of allocation
59   IV,    11.  6.  1|           of revenue or increasing efficiency (Mossialos and Dixon, 2002).~ ~
60   IV,    11.  6.  2|         system in terms of equity, efficiency, responsiveness and quality
61   IV,    11.  6.  2|           providing incentives for efficiency (WHO 2006).~ ~Among some
62   IV,    11.  6.  2| implications both on equity and on efficiency. The increase in strategic
63   IV,    11.  6.  2|            can compete may improve efficiency. At the same time, a single
64   IV,    11.  6.  2|      providers in order to improve efficiency. All countries except Germany
65   IV,    11.  6.  2|           legislation are improved efficiency, increased innovation and
66   IV,    11.  6.  2|     sharing is expected to improve efficiency at a micro level while containing
67   IV,    11.  6.  2|          to achieving any gains in efficiency, since individuals are not
68   IV,    11.  6.  2|          status lowers allocatable efficiency (Thomson et al, 2003). A
69   IV,    11.  6.  2|          undermining any potential efficiency gains (Gemmill et al 2008).~ ~
70   IV,    11.  6.  4|            funds. Pooling enhances efficiency because it reduces incentives
71   IV,    11.  6.  4|          access and administrative efficiency. Countries that do not pool
72   IV,    11.  6.  4|        healthcare and equality and efficiency in healthcare delivery.
73   IV,    11.  6.  4|          section 11.3.4. Technical efficiency for information on provider
74   IV,    11.  6.  4|         access for equal need) and efficiency (to minimize the possibility
75   IV,    11.  6.  4|        focusing on performance and efficiency. In fact, much emphasis
76   IV,    11.  6.  4|           measured on the basis of efficiency and effectiveness, and not
77   IV,    11.  6.  5|       Cutler DM (2002): "Equality, efficiency, and market fundamentals:
78   IV,    11.  6.  5|        implications for equity and efficiency." International journal
79   IV,    11.  6.  5|            in Europe: striving for efficiency, equity and quality. E.
80   IV,    11.  6.  5|            in Europe: striving for efficiency, equity and quality. E.
81   IV,    11.  6.  5|    improving the effectiveness and efficiency of the European health care
82   IV,    11.  6.  5|          et al. (2004): "Technical efficiency in the use of health care
83   IV,    12. 10    | directorates, so as to amplify its efficiency and to ensure its consistency.
84   IV,    13.  3    |           reasons of both economic efficiency and social equity. After