Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1    -,     1        |     considerable difficulties and limitations associated with making such
 2    I,     2.  2    |         of tourists with activity limitations is also expected to rise.
 3    I,     2.  2    |         although there are severe limitations on the relevant surveillance
 4   II,     4.Acr    |      years with moderate activity limitations~LEwSL~The expected number
 5   II,     4.Acr    |        years with severe activity limitations~LTC~Long Term Care~MEHM~
 6   II,     4.  1    |         restrictions and activity limitations (Riley, 1990). These changes
 7   II,     4.  1    |      years with moderate activity limitations (LEwML), the expected number
 8   II,     4.  1    |        years with severe activity limitations (LEwSL) and the ratio of
 9   II,     4.  1    |         still lived with activity limitations, close to 15 years for men
10   II,     4.  1    |          5 to 6 years with severe limitations. Women live on average 6
11   II,     4.  1    |       moderate or severe activity limitations. Therefore, the HLY gender
12   II,     4.  1    |         years lived with activity limitations. Therefore, the HLY gender
13   II,     4.  1    |       expectancy free of activity limitations. At the age of 50, as well
14   II,     4.  1    |      expected years with activity limitations are quite substantial in
15   II,     4.  1    |        For both genders, activity limitations dramatically increase the
16   II,     4.  1    |           Years, Years with Minor Limitations and Years with Severe Limitations,
17   II,     4.  1    | Limitations and Years with Severe Limitations, in 2005, Men~ ~Figure 4.
18   II,     4.  1    |           Years, Years with Minor Limitations and Years with Severe Limitations,
19   II,     4.  1    | Limitations and Years with Severe Limitations, in 2005, Women.~ ~ ~The
20   II,     4.  1    |       with some reported activity limitations. Under the current conditions
21   II,     4.  1    |          years more with activity limitations, including over one year
22   II,     4.  1    |         one year more with severe limitations. Severe activity limitations
23   II,     4.  1    |      limitations. Severe activity limitations dramatically increase the
24   II,     5.  1.  4|         on any possible transport limitations should also be readily available~ ~
25   II,     5.  5.  3|   false-negative diagnoses. These limitations may be a possible explanation
26   II,     5.  5.  3|  syndromic classification and the limitations of this classification for
27   II,     5.  5.  3|            These include fear and limitations on lifestyle (Fisher, 2000),
28   II,     5.  5.  3|         al, 2000). Similar to the limitations discussed for prevalence
29   II,     5.  6.  3|          is usually associated to limitations of activities and restricted
30   II,     5.  6.  3|        spinal movement cause most limitations. Chronic vertebral osteoporosis,
31   II,     5.  6.  4|         In addition to functional limitations in everyday life, work disability
32   II,     5. 14.  3|          emphasized in most cases limitations among population groups
33   II,     5. 15.  3|       registry system has several limitations. The main one is that not
34   II,     8.  1.  1|        individual’s expression of limitations in a social context (Schalock
35   II,     8.  1.  1|           framework, the person’s limitations in functioning arise as
36   II,     8.  1.  1|      vision deficiencies or other limitations due to aging or to sequelae
37   II,     8.  1.  2|       problem or disability, work limitations (regarding the kind of work
38   II,     8.  1.  3|      Presentation~ ~Prevalence of limitations and disabilities~ ~On the
39   II,     8.  1.  3|         indicated they experience limitations in the kind or amount of
40   II,     8.  1.  3|  different attitude of women with limitations, compared with their male
41   II,     8.  1.  3|        than men with considerable limitations.~ ~Employment rates~ ~The
42   II,     8.  1.  3|           those with considerable limitations and about 62% for those
43   II,     8.  1.  3|          about 62% for those with limitations to some extent, as compared
44   II,     8.  1.  3|         with 68% in those with no limitations. Among people aged 16-24
45   II,     8.  1.  3|           16-24 with considerable limitations, such proportion was 27%,
46   II,     8.  1.  3|         of support to people with limitations in the ability to work:
47   II,     8.  1.  3|         persons with considerable limitations across the EU Member States.
48   II,     8.  1.  3|           of persons with partial limitations.~ ~Support is mainly provided
49   II,     8.  1.  3|          People with considerable limitations hold help in transfer to
50   II,     8.  1.  3|         of work, while those with limitations to some extent considered
51   II,     8.  1.  3|          people with considerable limitations were 22% lower than those
52   II,     8.  1.  3|           those of people without limitations. The wage gap between men
53   II,     8.  1.  3|       earnings of men with strong limitations are 12% lower, while those
54   II,     8.  1.  3|     people (both genders) with no limitations. Differences in earnings
55   II,     8.  1.  3|           those with considerable limitations and about 14% of those limited
56   II,     8.  2.  1|      characterized by significant limitations in both cognitive and adaptive
57   II,     8.  2.  1|      characterized by significant limitations both in intellectual functioning
58   II,     9.  1.  1|        2002). ~ ~To address these limitations, the EURO-PERISTAT project
59   II,     9.  2.  3|           scheme for categorising limitations to functioning and ability60   II,     9.  3.  1|     studies stem from a number of limitations.~ ~In North America and
61   II,     9.  4.  3|         still lived with activity limitations (i.e. about 15 years for
62   II,     9.  4.  3|          5 to 6 years with severe limitations). Longer lives do not necessarily
63  III,    10.  1.  1|    physical activity show several limitations. Diet and physical activity
64  III,    10.  1.  1|  Titchenal, 1988). Methodological limitations of accurately assessing
65  III,    10.  2.  1|        aged 20 years and above.~ ~Limitations of current prevalence data~ ~
66  III,    10.  2.  1|          have their strengths and limitations depending on aims and underlying
67  III,    10.  2.  1|       However, there are inherent limitations depending on dietary assessment
68  III,    10.  4.  2|      rather than by the selective limitations of the detector.~ ~The general
69  III,    10.  4.  5|        Despite the methodological limitations, the available scientific
70  III,    10.  4.  5|            In view of the various limitations hampering our ability to
71  III,    10.  5.  2|       members state. Due to these limitations, the health data on disease
72  III,    10.  6.  3|           is clear from the major limitations of the tables. Unfortunately,
73   IV,    11.  1.  1|     considerable difficulties and limitations associated with making such
74   IV,    11.  1.  4|         access to care. Knowledge limitations can affect some population
75   IV,    11.  1.  5|          do, however, suffer from limitations relating to difficulties
76   IV,    11.  2.  2|           exceptions to the above limitations is screening. In terms of
77   IV,    11.  5.  1|          of organs. Despite these limitations and taking into account
78   IV,    12. 10    |        drug use. ~To remedy these limitations, the~Department of Health
79   IV,    12. 10    |         2006Measures, terms and limitations for the management of hazardous
80   IV,    13.  3    |     variables represent important limitations when developing public health
81   IV,    13.  5    |   co-morbidities and experiencing limitations in performing daily life
82   IV,    13.  5    |        suffer from methodological limitations, namely lack of data comparability.