Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1    I,     3.  1        |        above 3.0: Cyprus, Ireland, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal
 2    I,     3.  2        |       Greece, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland,
 3    I,     3.  2        |           declines. For example in Malta declines occurred in the
 4    I,     3.  2        |          the ‘newStates (Cyprus, Malta and Slovenia) have had positive
 5    I,     3.  2        |           Ireland, Luxembourg, and Malta. Sweden will see a population
 6    I,     3.  2        |     profile. Except for Cyprus and Malta where positive natural growth
 7    I,     3.  3        |       children’ over time (Cyprus, Malta, Spain, Portugal), while
 8    I,     3.  3        |           highest shares; Finland, Malta, Sweden, Estonia and Croatia
 9    I,     3.  3        |      Ireland, Slovakia, Cyprus and Malta have low shares, while Greece,
10    I,     3.  3        |        Poland, Cyprus, Ireland and Malta and Romania are the ‘least’
11   II,     5.  2.  2    |      Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Malta, Portugal). It may be interesting
12   II,     5.  2.  2    |           interesting to note that Malta population has similar characteristics
13   II,     5.  2.  2    | Mediterranean countries; therefore Malta might be considered as an
14   II,     5.  2.  2    |       Southern European countries. Malta is included among Northern
15   II,     5.  2.  2    |          be reasonable to consider Malta as an outlier in the group
16   II,     5.  2.  3(6) |     include: Greece, Spain, Italy, Malta, France, Portugal.~
17   II,     5.  3.  3    |    Southern Europe: Greece, Italy, Malta, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain;
18   II,     5.  3.  6    |          Scotland, Wales, Denmark, Malta and Portugal had 5-year
19   II,     5.  3.  6    |         Denmark, England, Estonia, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Scotland,
20   II,     5.  3.  7    |          LUXEMBOURG~No~HUNGARY~Yes~MALTA~Planning stage~NETHERLANDS~
21   II,     5.  4.  7    |     typically a smaller State e.g. Malta, Cyprus etc), but in a broad
22   II,     5.  5.  1    |     Austria, Great Britain. Spain, Malta, the Czech Republic, Slovenia
23   II,     5.  5.  1    |        observed in Cyprus, Greece, Malta and Italy (Figure 5.5.1.
24   II,     5.  5.  1    |        Ireland, Spain, Luxembourg, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Romania
25   II,     5.  5.  1    |        rates were found in Greece, Malta and Italy whereas the highest
26   II,     5.  5.  2    |      Hungary, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, Portugal, Switzerland,
27   II,     5.  5.  2    |          case for Cyprus, Ireland, Malta, Poland, Romania and Slovakia.
28   II,     5.  5.  3    |       Netherlands, Italy, Croatia, Malta, Slovenia and Ukraine).~ ~
29   II,     5.  5.  3    |    EU27countries (Estonia, Greece, Malta, and Sweden are missing).
30   II,     5.  5.  3    |             The 4-fold increase in Malta’s prevalence rate since
31   II,     5.  5.  3    |              Multiple sclerosis in Malta in 1999: an update. J Neurol
32   II,     5. 12.  3    |           were observed in Greece, Malta and Sweden, where rates
33   II,     5. 12.  3    |            000, were in Greece and Malta. Taking into consideration
34   II,     6.  3.  5    |         with 4.94 per 100 000) and Malta (2.73 per 100 000) reported
35   II,     6.  3.  5    |          2000 (nine cases) and for Malta with 0.5 per 100 000 per
36   II,     6.  3.  5    |            incidence rates were in Malta (0.25 per 100 000), followed
37   II,     6.  3.  5    |        200001, Lithuania in 1999, Malta in 2000, Portugal in 1996–
38   II,     7.  2.  6    |        Italy, Latvia, Netherlands, Malta, Portugal, Sweden and UK (
39   II,     7.  2.  6    |      Ireland, Latvia, Netherlands, Malta, UK/Wales and Swedencover
40   II,     7.  3.  3    |         Member States, from 540 in Malta to 2 858 in Austria, which
41   II,     7.  3.  4    |         per 100 000 inhabitants in Malta to 22 in Lithuania which
42   II,     9            |           French), Ireland, Italy, Malta, Scotland and the Former
43   II,     9.  1.  1    |        Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovenia, and Slovak
44   II,     9.  1.  2    |           Norway, Sweden, Finland, Malta, Hungary). Although complete
45   II,     9.  1.  2    |        Ireland (2.4 per 1 000) and Malta (2.3 per 1 000). These are
46   II,     9.  1.  2    |         varies from 0 (Ireland and Malta) to 11.4 (France) per 1
47   II,     9.  1.  2    |         rates being in Ireland and Malta).~ ~Table 9.1.2.4. Total
48   II,     9.  1.  2    |       Sicily at 3.0 per 1 000, and Malta at 4.2 per 1 000. It is
49   II,     9.  2.  3    |           Czech Republic, Ireland, Malta, Scotland, Slovenia, Sweden
50   II,     9.  2.  3    |         disorders (WHO/HSBC 2004). Malta and Wales have among the
51   II,     9.  2.  4    |           French), Ireland, Italy, Malta, Scotland and the Former
52   II,     9.  3.  1    |          and to a lesser extent in Malta for males and the Czech Republic
53   II,     9.  3.  1    |         Austria, Germany, Hungary, Malta and the Netherlands, and
54   II,     9.  5.  3    |            other end of the scale, Malta (45.9%), followed by Ireland (
55  III,    10.  2.  1    |         times as much per adult as Malta, and even lower levels visible
56  III,    10.  2.  1    |          Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway,
57  III,    10.  2.  1    | represented in the Network~ ~ ~ ~ ~Malta~Data not available - not
58  III,    10.  2.  1(24)|           Grabauskas et al, 2007), Malta (Asciak et al, 2003), Netherlands (
59  III,    10.  2.  1    |  overweight among men was found in Malta (68.2%) (Asciak et al, 2003),
60  III,    10.  2.  1    |               Rodler at al, 2005), Malta (49.4%) (Asciak et al, 2003)
61  III,    10.  4.  2    |   Luxemburg~Food Safety Commission~Malta~Główny Inspektorat Sanitarny~
62  III,    10.  5.  2    |            Czech Republic, Greece, Malta, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain~
63  III,    10.  5.  3    |        employed. In Greece, Italy, Malta and Poland, this proportion
64   IV,    11.  1.  5    |         the ratings of people from Malta and Cyprus put their countries
65   IV,    11.  1.  6    |  Fee-for-service.~Fee-for-service.~Malta~Salary.~Salary (public);
66   IV,    11.  1.  6    |         2001; Luxembourg HiT 1999; Malta Hit 1999; Romania HiT forthcoming;
67   IV,    11.  2.  1    |       intensity seen in Cyprus and Malta. Among the Western European
68   IV,    11.  2.  1    |       hospital beds can be seen in Malta (34%), the Netherlands (
69   IV,    11.  3.  1    |        France, Germany, Lithuania, Malta, Norway, Poland, the Russian
70   IV,    11.  6.  2    |           Ireland, Latvia, Norway, Malta, Spain, UK and Denmark.
71   IV,    11.  6.  2    |  nationally, as in Greece, Latvia, Malta, Portugal, Denmark, Spain
72   IV,    11.  6.  2    |           On the contrary, Cyprus, Malta and Romania actually recorded
73   IV,    11.  6.  2    |          Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Malta, and Slovakia. Some reforms
74   IV,    11.  6.  2    |         Finland~- Italy~- Latvia~- Malta~- Portugal~- Slovenia~-
75   IV,    11.  6.  2    |         Ireland~- Italy~- Latvia~- Malta~- Norway~- Portugal~- Slovenia~-
76   IV,    11.  6.  2    |       Belgium~- Finland~- Greece~- Malta~- Portugal~- UK~ ~Cheapest
77   IV,    11.  6.  4    |         except Cyprus, Ireland and Malta), the purchasing agent does
78   IV,    11.  6.  4    |      capitation. Full risk pooling~Malta~Ministry of Finance~Ministry
79   IV,    12.  8        |      Slovakia (2004)~Greece (1981)~Malta (2004)~Sweden (1995)~Spain (
80  Key,   Ap5.  0.  0    |            malignancy~malnutrition~Malta~marburgvirus~measles~measles-mumps-rubella~