Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     5.  5.  1|            repetition of self-harm. Systematic review. Bri J Psychiatry
 2   II,     5.  5.  1|     problems in major depression: a systematic review. Am J Med 118(4):
 3   II,     5.  5.  2|   international experts conducted a systematic review of published studies
 4   II,     5.  5.  3|         satisfying data basis, is a systematic review of literature that
 5   II,     5.  5.  3|           available in the frame of systematic preventive health examinations
 6   II,     5.  5.  3|           available in the frame of systematic preventive health examinations
 7   II,     5.  5.  3|     Outcomes of Eating Disorders: A Systematic review of the Literature.
 8   II,     5.  5.  3|            Incidence~According to a systematic review (Saha et al, 2005)
 9   II,     5.  5.  3|             in a recently published systematic review. Based on population-based
10   II,     5.  5.  3|        Chant D, McGrath J (2005): A systematic review of the prevalence
11   II,     5.  5.  3|             D, McGrrath J (2007): A systematic review of mortality in schizophrenia:
12   II,     5.  5.  3|             risk factors for ASD.~A systematic review of prevalence studies
13   II,     5.  5.  3|           of epilepsy in Europe – a systematic review. Eur J Neurol 12:
14   II,     5.  5.  3|          Kessels FGH, et al (2002): Systematic review and meta-analysis
15   II,     5.  5.  3|             Sclerosis in Europe~ ~ ~Systematic surveys in the UK for more
16   II,     5.  5.  3|        wealth of data deriving from systematic epidemiological studies
17   II,     5.  5.  3|        costing data, we performed a systematic literature search in electronic
18   II,     5.  5.  3|      Perkins KS, Counsell C (2003): Systematic review of incidence studies
19   II,     5.  6.  5|             existing guidelines and systematic reviews, along with the
20   II,     5.  7.  7|       disease and mortality risk: a systematic review. J Am Soc Nephrol
21   II,     5.  8.  7|              Global burden of COPD: systematic review and meta-analysis.
22   II,     5.  8.  7|             and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health
23   II,     5. 11.  2|           to producing and updating systematic reviews of clinical trials
24   II,     5. 12.  7|      hepatitis C virus infection: a systematic review. Int J Cancer 111:
25   II,     5. 13    |          early in life. Moreover, a systematic review shows that childhood
26   II,     5. 14.  5|    attention should be given to the systematic integration of oral health
27   II,     5. 15.  3|            rare diseases subject to systematic registration has been defined
28   II,     6.  3.  7|        European public health. More systematic surveillance data are needed
29   II,     7.  1    |    responsibilities.~ ~Applying the systematic public health approach helps
30   II,     7.  4.  7|            There is a need for more systematic documentation and dissemination
31   II,     8.  2.  1|         developments~ ~More robust, systematic gathering of health information
32   II,     8.  2.  1|           have strategies to gather systematic, comparable health information
33   II,     9        |             during pregnancy is not systematic, and it is possible that
34   II,     9.  1.  2|             during pregnancy is not systematic, and it is possible that
35   II,     9.  1.  2|             investment is needed in systematic follow-up of medicinal drugs
36   II,     9.  1.  2|      pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review. HTA Assessment 2004;
37   II,     9.  1.  2|           risk of birth defects – a systematic review. Hum Reprod 2005;
38   II,     9.  3.  1| over-consumption’ of energy.~2. The systematic public and commercial developments
39   II,     9.  3.  1|           of epilepsy in Europe – a systematic review. European Journal
40   II,     9.  3.  2|          procedures for undertaking systematic reviews of deaths as for
41   II,     9.  3.  3|          surveys database, 2007).~· Systematic review conducted by REPROSTAT
42   II,     9.  3.  3|      behaviour (Kirby et al, 2006). Systematic reviews have shown school-based
43   II,     9.  3.  3|    effective (Kirby D et al, 2006). Systematic reviews have focused mainly
44   II,     9.  3.  3|             in Europe calls for the systematic use of comparative indicators
45   II,     9.  3.  3|         European Union countries: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health.
46   II,     9.  4.  5|   medications can be avoided by the systematic use of quality indicators
47  III,    10.  2.  1|         heavy drinkers than others. Systematic reviews have suggested that
48  III,    10.  2.  1|       protective effect is due to a systematic misclassification due to
49  III,    10.  2.  1|             available. Many careful systematic reviews have evaluated school
50  III,    10.  2.  1|          alcohol-impaired driving a systematic review Am J Prev Med Jun;
51  III,    10.  2.  1|   populations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 2. Art.
52  III,    10.  2.  1|            have not yet established systematic fluoridation programmes,
53  III,    10.  2.  1|           of fluoride toothpaste: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand
54  III,    10.  2.  1|          early in life. Moreover, a systematic review shows that childhood
55  III,    10.  2.  1|             et al (2005) prepared a systematic literature review of the
56  III,    10.  2.  1|      children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 20:CD001871.~ ~Surkan
57  III,    10.  2.  4| genotype-phenotype data, there is a systematic bias of under- and over-reporting,
58  III,    10.  2.  5|       adults. Despite an absence of systematic testing, many additional
59  III,    10.  3.  2|       adults. Despite an absence of systematic testing, many additional
60  III,    10.  3.  2|        Sweden, 19721997~ ~The most systematic information on human POPs
61  III,    10.  3.  2|       levels.~ ~There are much less systematic data on other POPs. Swedish
62  III,    10.  3.  4|       inadequately investigated . A systematic review of post-traumatic
63  III,    10.  4.  1|       Results from the WHO ProjectSystematic Review of Health Aspects
64  III,    10.  4.  2|             production and storage. Systematic surveys of pesticide usage
65  III,    10.  4.  5|    contamination is unknown because systematic inventories do not exist
66  III,    10.  5.  3|         work and there is not yet a systematic access for all enterprises
67  III,    10.  6.  3|            There is a need for more systematic documentation and dissemination
68   IV,    11.  1.  5|         below. The lack of a common systematic framework, or even consensus,
69   IV,    11.  1.  5|             the implementation of a systematic approach, can save both
70   IV,    11.  2.  2|          Agency.~ ~No country has a systematic procedure for making decisions
71   IV,    11.  4    |            a health technology in a systematic, transparent, unbiased,
72   IV,    11.  4    |     Population-based epidemiologySystematic review of published evidence~·
73   IV,    11.  4    |           example is the results of systematic search and review of published
74   IV,    11.  6.  4|           and attempts to develop a systematic basic package often failed.
75   IV,    11.  6.  4|      mechanisms such as independent systematic reviews, stakeholder involvement
76   IV,    11.  6.  5|            practice: results from a systematic review of the literature
77   IV,    12.  1    |        workers, early detection and systematic screening, quality of care,
78   IV,    12.  2    |             available. Many careful systematic reviews have evaluated school
79   IV,    12. 10    |          Work accidents/ diseases~ ~Systematic work environment promotion