Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 3. 3 | States. Compared to the 2005 values, all ratios will increase
2 II, 4. 1 | maximum, minimum and range of values estimated each year at MS
3 II, 4. 1 | 1.4. Minimum and maximum values of life expectancy (LE)
4 II, 4. 1 | States in 2005. At MS level, values of life expectancy at birth
5 II, 4. 1 | women. The corresponding HLY values range respectively from
6 II, 4. 1 | at the age of 50, the HLY values range respectively from
7 II, 4. 1 | throughout all MS.~ ~Detailed values of life expectancy at birth (
8 II, 4. 1 | in their life expectancy values in the aftermath of the
9 II, 4. 1 | converge towards higher values. These are high convergence
10 II, 4. 1 | years from the highest EU27 values. These are low convergence
11 II, 4. 1 | trend of the highest EU27 values. These are divergent countries.
12 II, 4. 1 | trend of the highest EU27 values from the 1960s onwards.
13 II, 4. 1 | Table 4.1.7 presents the values of life expectancy at birth
14 II, 5. 2. 4| Table 5.2.8. Estimated mean values of total cholesterol in
15 II, 5. 2. 4| Prevalence of smoking (%), mean values of systolic blood pressure (
16 II, 5. 2. 6| The association extends to values of plasma cholesterol well
17 II, 5. 2. 6| associated to blood pressure values around 130-139/85-89, largely
18 II, 5. 2. 6| associated to blood pressure values <120/80 mmHg (Vasan R et
19 II, 5. 4. 1| normalisation of blood glucose values as well as lipid levels
20 II, 5. 4. 2| over 75 years of age, with values all over 100/1000 for EUCID
21 II, 5. 4. 3| of diabetesStandardized values reported by EUCID range
22 II, 5. 4. 3| 12%) showing the highest values. According to the above
23 II, 5. 4. 3| 11 EUCID countries report values between 10% for Ireland
24 II, 5. 4. 3| percentages above 80%. These values were lower in young people
25 II, 5. 4. 3| of 7 countries reported values above 90%. There is no clear
26 II, 5. 5. 3| some extremely different values for certain countries, which
27 II, 5. 5. 3| age group has the highest values of schizophrenia-associated
28 II, 5. 6. 3| brought to the following values:~ ~Osteoporosis: a BMD value
29 II, 5. 8. 3| Forlì and Vilnius), with values ranging from about 4% in
30 II, 5. 11. 3| populations of similar ages yield values approximately half of those
31 II, 5. 12. 3| in 2000-02 the highest values for women were 53.9/100,
32 II, 5. 12. 3| substantial variation in absolute values across countries, a limited
33 II, 7. 3. 3| EU27: Minimum and maximum values per country~ ~Accident and
34 II, 9. 3. 3| according to their lifestyles, values, and risk status are an
35 III, 10. 2. 1| based on the percentile values of BMI adjusted for age
36 III, 10. 2. 1| and 400 µg by the D-A-CH values of the German speaking countries.
37 III, 10. 2. 1| Depending on the reference values used, intakes in Europe
38 III, 10. 2. 1| DAFNE average consumption values per broad food categories (
39 III, 10. 2. 1| mass index: comparing mean values and prevalence rates from
40 III, 10. 2. 1| Nutrition Association. Reference values for nutrient intake of the
41 III, 10. 2. 2| The association extends to values of plasma cholesterol well
42 III, 10. 2. 3| associated to blood pressure values around 130-139/85-89, quite
43 III, 10. 2. 3| associated to blood pressure values <120/80 mmHg. Even an isolated
44 III, 10. 3. 1| does not give any limit values.~ ~
45 III, 10. 3. 1| establishing radon maps, reference values for dwellings and assessment
46 III, 10. 4. 1| European guidelines, target values and limit values (Table
47 III, 10. 4. 1| target values and limit values (Table 10.4.1.1).~ ~Table
48 III, 10. 4. 1| 1.1. Guidelines, target values and limit values.~ ~Long-term
49 III, 10. 4. 1| target values and limit values.~ ~Long-term average exposure
50 III, 10. 4. 1| directives set limit and target values for the listed pollutants (
51 III, 10. 4. 1| aimed at attaining the limit values within the set time frame.
52 III, 10. 4. 1| establishing limit or target values and alert thresholds for
53 III, 10. 4. 1| meeting the relevant limit values for PM10 , as this could
54 III, 10. 4. 1| local hotspots where limit values are exceeded, such as areas
55 III, 10. 4. 2| intake is below the reference values. Available experimental
56 III, 10. 4. 2| 2002 review and derived ADI values for nitrate (0-3.7 mg/kg
57 III, 10. 4. 2| toxicological reference values. – Article 41;~· annual
58 III, 10. 4. 3| water uses, functions and values.~ ~Focusing on water contaminating
59 III, 10. 4. 3| Directive specifies the values for certain parameters which
60 III, 10. 4. 3| define additional limit values on a national basis. For
61 III, 10. 4. 3| In general, safe limit values are well established. These
62 III, 10. 4. 5| litter, effect on property values, stress for lack of regulatory
63 III, 10. 6. 1| 10.6.2.5 The World Values Survey~The World Values
64 III, 10. 6. 1| Values Survey~The World Values Survey, which has been performed
65 III, 10. 6. 2| and well-being are shared values across societal sectors.
66 IV, 11. 1. 5| aligned to professional values; they should be focused
67 IV, 11. 5. 4| countries depending on cultural values.~In 2006, 56% of Europeans
68 IV, 11. 6. 3| explicit calculation of the values for each country (Wagstaff,
69 IV, 12. 10 | 2 October 2003 on limit values, measurement methods, labelling,
70 IV, 12. 10 | subject to strict limit values so as to minimise health
71 IV, 12. 10 | Act, BImSchG, htt ). Limit values for the exposure to environmental
72 IV, 13. 2. 2| 15 – 29 has the highest values of schizophrenia-associated
73 IV, 13. 5 | themselves to promote shared values of solidarity, equity and
74 IV, 13. 8 | goals: they are driven by values rather than profit, they
