Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 II, 5. 1. 1| obstructive airway disease and socioeconomic group as COPD determinants.
2 II, 5. 4. 8| undiagnosed diabetes, and the socioeconomic status health gradient.
3 II, 5. 6. 3| mortality) and on society (socioeconomic)~ ~Back pain has a marked
4 II, 5. 6. 6| D and Husberg M (2000): Socioeconomic Costs of Rheumatic Diseases.
5 II, 5. 6. 6| Perocheau D, Bono I (1993): [Socioeconomic Costs of Osteoarthritis
6 II, 5. 7. 3| burden on Member States.~ ~Socioeconomic variation in incidence~ ~
7 II, 5. 7. 4| it appears likely that socioeconomic factors are also linked
8 II, 5. 7. 7| Nieto FJ, et al (2002): Socioeconomic disadvantage and change
9 II, 5. 7. 7| Thurston RC, Kawachi I (2007): Socioeconomic disparities in metabolic
10 II, 5. 8. 4| obstructive airway disease and socioeconomic group as COPD determinants.
11 II, 5. 14. 3| with poor education or low socioeconomic status; ethnic minority
12 II, 5. 14. 3| underrepresented minorities, and lower socioeconomic classes. It is therefore
13 II, 6. 3. 1| not to mention inherent socioeconomic differences. Whilst the
14 II, 6. 3. 4| demographic, political and socioeconomic changes in Europe, such
15 II, 6. 3. 5| coverage levels. Political and socioeconomic changes that followed the
16 II, 8. 1. 2| disabilities in various socioeconomic groups as well as the percentage
17 II, 8. 1. 2| disability or of certain socioeconomic characteristics among those
18 II, 8. 2. 1| 2007a). Contribution of socioeconomic position to health inequalities
19 II, 8. 2. 2| Blindness has profound human and socioeconomic consequences in all societies.
20 II, 9 | genetics”, but the study of socioeconomic differences emphasizes the
21 II, 9. 1. 1| Davey B, Stafford RS (1989): Socioeconomic differences in rates of
22 II, 9. 1. 2| there are geographic and socioeconomic inequalities in the prevalence
23 II, 9. 1. 2| It is associated to low socioeconomic status and young maternal
24 II, 9. 1. 2| genetics”, but the study of socioeconomic differences emphasizes the
25 II, 9. 1. 2| data is available about socioeconomic differences in congenital
26 II, 9. 1. 2| generally suggests a substantial socioeconomic gradient (Vrijheid et al,
27 II, 9. 1. 2| Alberman E, Scott JES (2000): “Socioeconomic Inequalities in Risk of
28 II, 9. 2. 2| culturally, according to socioeconomic opportunity, and food availability.
29 II, 9. 2. 5| the health gap between socioeconomic groups within countries
30 II, 9. 3. 1| of diabetes. However, for socioeconomic, educational and empowerment
31 II, 9. 3. 2| several key demographic and socioeconomic indicators that should be
32 II, 9. 3. 2| Davey B, Stafford RS (1989): Socioeconomic differences in rates of
33 II, 9. 3. 3| and substance abuse and socioeconomic factors. Adolescents and
34 II, 9. 3. 3| decades have seen large socioeconomic changes in poverty, education
35 II, 9. 4. 2| chronic diseases and the socioeconomic differences in their prevalence.
36 III, 10. 1 | nutrition and lifestyle, and socioeconomic factors such as poverty
37 III, 10. 2. 1| 80% and are equal among socioeconomic groups or higher among higher
38 III, 10. 2. 1| groups or higher among higher socioeconomic groups. Among women, these
39 III, 10. 2. 1| adopted by women from higher socioeconomic groups;~· In stage 3, prevalence
40 III, 10. 2. 1| Giskes K, Mackenbach JP. Socioeconomic inequalities in smoking
41 III, 10. 2. 1| Finland further suggests that socioeconomic variables act on the collective
42 III, 10. 2. 1| JP, EU Working Group on Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health (
43 III, 10. 2. 1| I, Diderichsen F (2005): Socioeconomic Differentials in the Burden
44 III, 10. 2. 1| particular, children of deprived socioeconomic status still have a high
45 III, 10. 2. 1| countries. These may relate to socioeconomic status, race or ethnicity,
46 III, 10. 2. 1| factors (such as age and socioeconomic status), psychological factors (
47 III, 10. 2. 1| differ by neighbourhood socioeconomic status? Annals of Behavioural
48 III, 10. 2. 1| J, Stunkard A J (1989): Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review
49 III, 10. 2. 1| et al, 2006). Moreover, socioeconomic differences in the validity
50 III, 10. 2. 1| Rodler et al, 2005).~ ~Socioeconomic variation~ ~An increased
51 III, 10. 2. 1| from groups with higher socioeconomic status to those with lower.
52 III, 10. 2. 1| lower rather than higher socioeconomic status.~ ~Social inequality
53 III, 10. 2. 1| preferences) as well as on socioeconomic and environmental factors (
54 III, 10. 2. 1| and safety of products). Socioeconomic and environmental factors
55 III, 10. 2. 1| G, Diderichsen F (1997): Socioeconomic differentials in misclassification
56 III, 10. 2. 1| Conde WL, Popkin BM (2004): Socioeconomic status and obesity in adult
57 III, 10. 2. 1| Sobal J, Stunkard AJ (1989): Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review
58 III, 10. 2. 1| what is the role of the socioeconomic factors? Archives of Disease
59 III, 10. 3. 4| as are the often lower socioeconomic status of elderly people
60 III, 10. 5. 3| Siegrist J & Theorell T (2006). Socioeconomic position and health: the
61 IV, 11. 2. 2| burden of the disease, its socioeconomic impact, the degree to which
62 IV, 11. 6. 4| living alone, ethnic origin, socioeconomic status (and cost variation)~
63 IV, 12. 10 | designed for helping lower socioeconomic groups, are distributed
64 IV, 12. 10 | the problems in the lower socioeconomic groups, such measures related
65 IV, 13.Acr | burden of the disease, its socioeconomic impact, the degree to which
66 IV, 13. 2. 3| born into families of lower socioeconomic status. Hypertension, unfavourable
67 IV, 13. 3 | far-reaching demographic and socioeconomic changes, highlighted in
