Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     5.  1.  1|         obstructive airway disease and socioeconomic group as COPD determinants.
 2   II,     5.  4.  8|          undiagnosed diabetes, and the socioeconomic status health gradient.
 3   II,     5.  6.  3|             mortality) and on society (socioeconomic)~ ~Back pain has a marked
 4   II,     5.  6.  6|                D and Husberg M (2000): Socioeconomic Costs of Rheumatic Diseases.
 5   II,     5.  6.  6|           Perocheau D, Bono I (1993): [Socioeconomic Costs of Osteoarthritis
 6   II,     5.  7.  3|             burden on Member States.~ ~Socioeconomic variation in incidence~ ~
 7   II,     5.  7.  4|                 it appears likely that socioeconomic factors are also linked
 8   II,     5.  7.  7|                Nieto FJ, et al (2002): Socioeconomic disadvantage and change
 9   II,     5.  7.  7|         Thurston RC, Kawachi I (2007): Socioeconomic disparities in metabolic
10   II,     5.  8.  4|         obstructive airway disease and socioeconomic group as COPD determinants.
11   II,     5. 14.  3|             with poor education or low socioeconomic status; ethnic minority
12   II,     5. 14.  3| underrepresented minorities, and lower socioeconomic classes. It is therefore
13   II,     6.  3.  1|                not to mention inherent socioeconomic differences. Whilst the
14   II,     6.  3.  4|             demographic, political and socioeconomic changes in Europe, such
15   II,     6.  3.  5|         coverage levels. Political and socioeconomic changes that followed the
16   II,     8.  1.  2|                disabilities in various socioeconomic groups as well as the percentage
17   II,     8.  1.  2|               disability or of certain socioeconomic characteristics among those
18   II,     8.  2.  1|                2007a). Contribution of socioeconomic position to health inequalities
19   II,     8.  2.  2|       Blindness has profound human and socioeconomic consequences in all societies.
20   II,     9        |            genetics”, but the study of socioeconomic differences emphasizes the
21   II,     9.  1.  1|           Davey B, Stafford RS (1989): Socioeconomic differences in rates of
22   II,     9.  1.  2|               there are geographic and socioeconomic inequalities in the prevalence
23   II,     9.  1.  2|                It is associated to low socioeconomic status and young maternal
24   II,     9.  1.  2|            genetics”, but the study of socioeconomic differences emphasizes the
25   II,     9.  1.  2|                data is available about socioeconomic differences in congenital
26   II,     9.  1.  2|       generally suggests a substantial socioeconomic gradient (Vrijheid et al,
27   II,     9.  1.  2|         Alberman E, Scott JES (2000): “Socioeconomic Inequalities in Risk of
28   II,     9.  2.  2|               culturally, according to socioeconomic opportunity, and food availability.
29   II,     9.  2.  5|                 the health gap between socioeconomic groups within countries
30   II,     9.  3.  1|              of diabetes. However, for socioeconomic, educational and empowerment
31   II,     9.  3.  2|            several key demographic and socioeconomic indicators that should be
32   II,     9.  3.  2|           Davey B, Stafford RS (1989): Socioeconomic differences in rates of
33   II,     9.  3.  3|                and substance abuse and socioeconomic factors. Adolescents and
34   II,     9.  3.  3|                decades have seen large socioeconomic changes in poverty, education
35   II,     9.  4.  2|               chronic diseases and the socioeconomic differences in their prevalence.
36  III,    10.  1    |           nutrition and lifestyle, and socioeconomic factors such as poverty
37  III,    10.  2.  1|                80% and are equal among socioeconomic groups or higher among higher
38  III,    10.  2.  1|          groups or higher among higher socioeconomic groups. Among women, these
39  III,    10.  2.  1|           adopted by women from higher socioeconomic groups;~· In stage 3, prevalence
40  III,    10.  2.  1|               Giskes K, Mackenbach JP. Socioeconomic inequalities in smoking
41  III,    10.  2.  1|          Finland further suggests that socioeconomic variables act on the collective
42  III,    10.  2.  1|                JP, EU Working Group on Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health (
43  III,    10.  2.  1|               I, Diderichsen F (2005): Socioeconomic Differentials in the Burden
44  III,    10.  2.  1|       particular, children of deprived socioeconomic status still have a high
45  III,    10.  2.  1|         countries. These may relate to socioeconomic status, race or ethnicity,
46  III,    10.  2.  1|               factors (such as age and socioeconomic status), psychological factors (
47  III,    10.  2.  1|                differ by neighbourhood socioeconomic status? Annals of Behavioural
48  III,    10.  2.  1|                J, Stunkard A J (1989): Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review
49  III,    10.  2.  1|                et al, 2006). Moreover, socioeconomic differences in the validity
50  III,    10.  2.  1|                 Rodler et al, 2005).~ ~Socioeconomic variation~ ~An increased
51  III,    10.  2.  1|                from groups with higher socioeconomic status to those with lower.
52  III,    10.  2.  1|               lower rather than higher socioeconomic status.~ ~Social inequality
53  III,    10.  2.  1|             preferences) as well as on socioeconomic and environmental factors (
54  III,    10.  2.  1|               and safety of products). Socioeconomic and environmental factors
55  III,    10.  2.  1|               G, Diderichsen F (1997): Socioeconomic differentials in misclassification
56  III,    10.  2.  1|            Conde WL, Popkin BM (2004): Socioeconomic status and obesity in adult
57  III,    10.  2.  1|           Sobal J, Stunkard AJ (1989): Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review
58  III,    10.  2.  1|                what is the role of the socioeconomic factors? Archives of Disease
59  III,    10.  3.  4|                 as are the often lower socioeconomic status of elderly people
60  III,    10.  5.  3|        Siegrist J & Theorell T (2006). Socioeconomic position and health: the
61   IV,    11.  2.  2|             burden of the disease, its socioeconomic impact, the degree to which
62   IV,    11.  6.  4|           living alone, ethnic origin, socioeconomic status (and cost variation)~
63   IV,    12. 10    |             designed for helping lower socioeconomic groups, are distributed
64   IV,    12. 10    |              the problems in the lower socioeconomic groups, such measures related
65   IV,    13.Acr    |             burden of the disease, its socioeconomic impact, the degree to which
66   IV,    13.  2.  3|            born into families of lower socioeconomic status. Hypertension, unfavourable
67   IV,    13.  3    |           far-reaching demographic and socioeconomic changes, highlighted in