Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 II, 5. 3. 7 | appropriate and adequate funding for new innovative cancer
2 II, 5. 3. 7 | and~· Arrange targeted funding for projects that need rapid
3 II, 5. 5.Int | be an important source of funding for European research on
4 II, 5. 5. 2(24)| Commission with additional funding from the Fondation Médéric
5 II, 5. 5. 2 | Alzheimer Europe received funding from DG Sanco under its
6 II, 5. 5. 2 | unanswered. Furthermore, specific funding for Alzheimer’s disease
7 II, 5. 5. 3 | countries do not have sufficient funding for guideline development.
8 II, 5. 7. 1 | considerable amount of healthcare funding in Europe is spent on treating
9 II, 5. 10. 2 | problems of food allergy, with funding from the European Union (
10 II, 5. 10. 2 | has been developed with funding from the European Commission (
11 II, 5. 15. 4 | have been selected for funding. They will serve as pilot
12 II, 5. 15. 5 | However, in establishing and funding such cooperation, we must
13 II, 7. 5 | cooperation and should ensure funding opportunities. Special attention
14 II, 9. 1. 2 | major health determinants. Funding for EUROCAT network co-ordination
15 II, 9. 1. 2 | information system – decisions on funding are short-term. Moreover,
16 II, 9. 1. 2 | Moreover, national and regional funding for registers is insufficient
17 II, 9. 2. 5 | the Commission provides funding through a dozen community
18 II, 9. 3. 3 | of the epidemic and also funding for large sexuality studies
19 II, 9. 4. 5 | goals: how to raise enough funding to secure adequate care
20 III, 10. 2. 1 | a source of sustainable funding to implement and enforce
21 III, 10. 5. 3 | EUROGIP (2004): Cost and funding of occupational diseases
22 IV, 11. 1. 1 | financing, progressiveness of funding and benefit packages. It
23 IV, 11. 1. 3 | objectives, in terms of both funding and access; these conflicts
24 IV, 11. 1. 6 | mixed payment system for funding hospital services. Many
25 IV, 11. 1. 6 | to fit within the local funding framework, or to address
26 IV, 11. 1. 6 | reflect part of healthcare funding that is not directly related
27 IV, 11. 2. 2 | has been an increase in funding only in some countries,
28 IV, 11. 2. 2 | 2007). Very low levels of funding are seen in most countries,
29 IV, 11. 6. 2 | The increase in private funding in CEE countries is almost
30 IV, 11. 6. 2 | The role of private funding can be examined more closely
31 IV, 11. 6. 2 | predominantly social insurance funding include Austria, Belgium,
32 IV, 11. 6. 2 | principle and much of the funding in seven Western European
33 IV, 11. 6. 2 | taxation remains an important funding source because the social
34 IV, 11. 6. 2 | a sizeable proportion of funding derives from PHI; here PHI
35 IV, 11. 6. 3 | 6.3. Progressiveness of funding~ ~The previous sections
36 IV, 11. 6. 3 | section considers how the funding burden is distributed within
37 IV, 11. 6. 3 | regressiveness differs across funding sources. .~ ~The extent
38 IV, 11. 6. 3 | The extent to which a funding system will redistribute
39 IV, 11. 6. 3 | study also disaggregated the funding sources to examine their
40 IV, 11. 6. 3 | countries in the 1990s, the funding system in Sweden redistributed
41 IV, 11. 6. 3 | effect of social insurance funding has been studied in greater
42 IV, 11. 6. 3 | ability to pay, private funding increases inequity because
43 IV, 11. 6. 3 | inequity because it shifts the funding burden away from such population-based
44 IV, 11. 6. 3 | progressiveness in healthcare funding reveal that healthcare systems
45 IV, 11. 6. 3 | regressive than those in which funding is predominantly public (
46 IV, 11. 6. 4 | whether different sources of funding are pooled or remain separated.
47 IV, 11. 6. 4 | local tax base) (50% of funding based on DRGs)~Poland~16
48 IV, 11. 6. 4 | variations in mandates, funding mechanisms and roles in
49 IV, 11. 6. 5 | 2005): Mental health III: Funding mental health in Europe.
50 IV, 11. 6. 5 | E, Dixon A Eds. (2002): Funding health care: options for
51 IV, 11. 6. 5 | the former Soviet Union. Funding health care: options for
52 IV, 11. 6. 5 | resource allocation and funding decisions. Funding health
53 IV, 11. 6. 5 | allocation and funding decisions. Funding health care: options for
54 IV, 12. 2 | a source of sustainable funding to implement and enforce
55 IV, 12. 5 | framework for the Commission's funding of projects relating to
56 IV, 12. 10 | of their sale and use.~ Funding is being provided for locally-based~
57 IV, 13.Acr | has been an increase in funding only in some countries,
58 IV, 13.Acr | 2004). Very low levels of funding are seen in most countries,
59 IV, 13.Acr | increasing proportion of funding allocated to public health
60 IV, 13. 7. 3 | involvement may limit the funding opportunities for top level
61 IV, 13. 7. 3 | considerably exceed the funding possibilities, which emphasizes
62 IV, 13. 7. 3 | what the appropriate future funding volume should be in order
63 IV, 13. 7. 3 | Several initiatives and funding schemes have been activated
64 IV, 13. 8 | organisation, supported by proper funding is needed.~The European
