Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1    -,     1            |       Report may not completely reflect the views of the original
 2    I,     2.  7        |      important opportunities to reflect on and for discussing our
 3   II,     5.  3.  3    | coverage). The estimates do not reflect the distribution of clinical
 4   II,     5.  3.  6    |   screening programmes tends to reflect the more aggressive cancers
 5   II,     5.  4.  2    |  quality indicators undoubtedly reflect the original situation of
 6   II,     5.  4.  3    |        in patients above 75 may reflect a decline in the quality
 7   II,     5.  4.  3    |      have been observed and may reflect the impact of the different
 8   II,     5.  4.  4    |          myocardial infarction, reflect and perhaps amplify the
 9   II,     5.  5.  1    | hospital discharge rates do not reflect the reality of population
10   II,     5.  5.  3    |        prescription data do not reflect the actual use in patients
11   II,     5.  5.  3    |   conditions or at least do not reflect the complex aspects of the
12   II,     5.  5.  3    |   practice does not necessarily reflect this approved strategy (
13   II,     5.  5.  3    |        intervention trials that reflect every day practice, such
14   II,     5.  5.  3    |      out if health expenditures reflect quality of care. However,
15   II,     5.  5.  3    | different health care services, reflect the practice of restrictive
16   II,     5.  5.  3    |  undetermined epilepsies, which reflect a more or less stringent
17   II,     5.  5.  3    |     Diseases) codes as they may reflect a change in the coding system
18   II,     5.  5.  3    |         2005). Direct cost only reflect a small portion of the burden,
19   II,     5.  5.  3    |       cigarette smoking, or may reflect confounding or behaviour
20   II,     5.  9.  4    |       fine PM fractions did not reflect the variation in the levels
21   II,     6.  3.  1    |    incidence figures thus often reflect activity to find asymptomatic
22   II,     6.  3.  5    |       across countries, and may reflect a variation in the vaccine
23   II,     6.  3.  6    |         the reported cases only reflect a minute proportion of all
24   II,     7.  2.  2    |   countries. These data sources reflect the country-specific way
25   II,     8.  1.  3    |         Differences in earnings reflect differences in educational
26   II,     8.  2.  1    |           Changes in definition reflect the transition from a medical
27   II,     8.  2.  1    |     health status is thought to reflect a combination of factors
28   II,     9.  1.  2    |       to congenital anomaly can reflect one or more of the following
29   II,     9.  2.  2    |      that sources do not merely reflect the status quo. For example,
30   II,     9.  3.  1    |       comparable and so fail to reflect the true situation in the
31   II,     9.  3.  2    |      Member States because they reflect different realities in the
32   II,     9.  3.  3    |         differences undoubtedly reflect fundamental cultural, social,
33   II,     9.  4.  2    |      data and reports appear to reflect the 1990s focus on healthy
34   II,     9.  4.  3    |       the incidence differences reflect true variation in risk by
35   II,     9.  5.  2    |        of data collection which reflect inequalities in health are
36  III,    10.  1.  1    |       conflicting study results reflect the complexity of health
37  III,    10.  2.  1    |       that mortality data today reflect the smoking prevalence of
38  III,    10.  2.  1    |         increase in due time to reflect the current high prevalence
39  III,    10.  2.  1    |      men. The differences found reflect the tobacco epidemic stages.~
40  III,    10.  2.  1    |        Branca et al, 2007b). To reflect the current situation in
41  III,    10.  2.  1    |       by lifestyle changes that reflect reduced physical activity
42  III,    10.  2.  1    |         individuals. These data reflect actual consumption more
43  III,    10.  2.  4    | measured prevalence data do not reflect the “realnumber of instances
44  III,    10.  2.  4    |         and surveillance do not reflect the needs of researchers
45  III,    10.  3.  1    |  younger people. This trend may reflect the first successes of primary
46  III,    10.  4.  2    |     residue levels in food also reflect our ability to detect and
47  III,    10.  4.  3    |       differences are likely to reflect the efficiency of surveillance
48  III,    10.  5.  3(44)|         country differences may reflect cultural awareness of the
49  III,    10.  6.  1    |    Scores 3-8 are considered to reflect poor social support, scores
50   IV,    11.  1.  5    |   cross-country differences may reflect, among other things, differences
51   IV,    11.  1.  6    |    costs~ ~Administrative costs reflect part of healthcare funding
52   IV,    11.  3.  1    |      numbers of physicians also reflect cost-containment measures
53   IV,    11.  4        |   national variations, that may reflect the specific policy setting
54   IV,    11.  6.  1    |         the 1990s, this may not reflect success in controlling growth
55   IV,    11.  6.  2    |       cost sharing but may also reflect increases in direct and/
56   IV,    11.  6.  4    |        insurance fund member to reflect their relative healthcare
57   IV,    12.  5        |       However if real, they may reflect different stages of health
58   IV,    12. 10        |    report’s format continues to reflect a shift away from viewing
59   IV,    13.  7.  5    |   Protection legislation should reflect this delicate balance between