Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1    -,     1        |           instance, definitions and measurement of key indicators and data
 2    -,     1        |         between local variations of measurement, if comparisons are to be
 3   II,     5.  4.  2|        scale, including an accurate measurement of the prevalence of the
 4   II,     5.  4.  2|      reporting of the HIS can cause measurement problems on a range of individual
 5   II,     5.  4.  2|             a tested blood pressure measurement in last 12 months~14~Percent
 6   II,     5.  4.  2|            mmol/l and <7,0 mmol/l).~Measurement of glycated haemoglobin (
 7   II,     5.  4.  2|             applicable at EU level.~Measurement of total cholesterol in
 8   II,     5.  4.  2|         cholesterol above 5 mmol/l.~Measurement of LDL cholesterol in the
 9   II,     5.  4.  2|             value above 2.6 mmol/l.~Measurement of HDL cholesterol in the
10   II,     5.  4.  2|          and 1.25 mmol/l for women.~Measurement of triglycerides in the
11   II,     5.  4.  2|             association between the measurement of blood pressure and age.~
12   II,     5.  4.  3|       approach 70 millions in 2025.~Measurement of glycated haemoglobin (
13   II,     5.  4.  3|             substantially with age.~Measurement of total cholesterol in
14   II,     5.  4.  3|             the overall percentage.~Measurement of LDL cholesterol in the
15   II,     5.  4.  3|             significant age effect.~Measurement of HDL cholesterol in the
16   II,     5.  4.  3|       consistent amongst countries.~Measurement of triglycerides in the
17   II,     5.  4.  7|             is not only a matter of measurement but also of regular measurement
18   II,     5.  4.  7|     measurement but also of regular measurement made in a sustainable way
19   II,     5.  4.  7|             of realistic and agreed measurement targetsBIRO, with the
20   II,     5.  4.  7|      structural quality, processes, measurement done, treatment, management);~·
21   II,     5.  5.  3|          changes over time. Several measurement methods survey qualitative
22   II,     5.  5.  3|    qualitative data and qualitative measurement methods do not allow representative
23   II,     5.  5.  3|              and a different use of measurement methods. Therefore, data
24   II,     5.  5.  3|          countries. ~ ~Quantitative measurement~ ~On national level, limited
25   II,     5.  6.  3|        osteoporosis on the basis of measurement of bone mineral density (
26   II,     5.  7.  5|          Mass screening through the measurement of albumin excretion has
27   II,     5.  8.  3|           al, 2005). As regards the measurement of disease severity, data
28   II,     9.  2.  2|             more important to focus measurement on health and the prevention
29   II,     9.  2.  6|          positive mental health and measurement of mental well being, harmonising
30   II,     9.  2.  6|       disability, and special needs~Measurement and impact assessment of
31   II,     9.  2.  6|         variation for children of a measurement tool based on the ability
32   II,     9.  2.  6|         improved identification and measurement of the problem.~ ~The health
33   II,     9.  3.  1|            issues pertaining to the measurement of symptoms. A number of
34   II,     9.  3.  1|             by using a non-invasive measurement of bone mineral density (
35   II,     9.  5.  4|              The identification and measurement of health-damaging cultural
36  III,    10.  1.  3|              empirical evidence and measurement. J Drug Educ 28(2):117-134.~
37  III,    10.  2.  1|           of standardization in the measurement of smoking habits in health
38  III,    10.  2.  1|       questionnaire or by objective measurement devices such as pedometers (
39  III,    10.  2.  1|  instruments currently used for the measurement of physical activity revealed
40  III,    10.  2.  1|            variations due to random measurement errors and, at the same
41  III,    10.  3.  1|             easier and cheaper, but measurement after the first six months
42  III,    10.  3.  1|           due to differences in the measurement of annoyance and definition
43  III,    10.  3.  1|      hampered by differences in the measurement and definition of annoyance.
44  III,    10.  6.  3|            survey-based comparative measurement of a large sample of the
45   IV,    11.  1.  1|           instance, definitions and measurement of key health care terms
46   IV,    11.  1.  2|             and health care quality measurement. Where possible, the information
47   IV,    11.  1.  3|             to be acknowledged that measurement remains difficult. In assessing
48   IV,    11.  1.  3|           health system performance measurement. Their findings and review
49   IV,    11.  1.  3|           pressures and performance measurement~ ~Since the 1970s, spending
50   IV,    11.  1.  3|             been concerned with the measurement of their own system’s performance
51   IV,    11.  1.  3|             projects on performance measurement show some promise in this
52   IV,    11.  1.  3|           for deploying performance measurement tools in modern health systems,
53   IV,    11.  1.  3|           to address in performance measurement based on the objectives
54   IV,    11.  1.  5|     specifications refer to quality measurement mechanisms such as data
55   IV,    11.  1.  6|            quality of care into the measurement of the output of the system (
56   IV,    12. 10    |       October 2003 on limit values, measurement methods, labelling, product
57   IV,    12. 10    | participating schools would operate measurement stations for estimating
58   IV,    13.  6.  1|                              13.6.1 Measurement of burden and effects of
59   IV,    13.  6.  2|            Health Service Quality~ ~Measurement of service quality for child