Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1    I,     2.  7    |          water live in houses with green roofs that look like gardens,
 2    I,     2.  7    |       galleries. The layout of the green areas has been carefully
 3   II,     5.  4.  3|           0-3.8%) for 10-14 years (Green, 2001).~Prevalence of diabetesStandardized
 4   II,     5.  5.Int|     European Commission launched a Green Paper on 'Promoting the
 5   II,     5.  5.Int|            on the responses to the Green Paper22.~ ~In the meantime,
 6   II,     5.  5.  3|         2007).~As stated in the EU Green Paper for Mental Health,
 7   II,     5.  5.  3|       after the publication of the Green paper (European Commission,
 8   II,     5.  5.  3|        consultation process on the Green Paper. Instead of further
 9   II,     5.  5.  3|            of further pursuing the Green Paper Process, plans were
10   II,     5.  5.  3|        European Commission (2005): Green Paper. Improving the mental
11   II,     5.  5.  3|     determinants/life_style/mental/green_paper/mental_gp_en.pdf;
12   II,     5.  5.  3|     determinants/life_style/mental/green_paper/consultation_en.htm;
13   II,     5.  7.  7|          GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, et al The seventh
14   II,     7.  4.  6|    European Commission published a Green Paper on Mental Health which
15   II,     7.  4.  6|            health domain, with the Green Paper on Mental Health and
16   II,     9        |   consumption of fibre-rich foods, green vegetables and fruits (European
17   II,     9.  1.  2|          choices during pregnancy (Green et al, 2004). The option
18   II,     9.  1.  2|          which can cause distress (Green et al, 2004).~ ~Public health
19   II,     9.  1.  2|       Medicine, Vol 4, pp 441-447.~Green JM, Hewison J, Bekker HL,
20   II,     9.  2.  3|           gap in this area. The EU Green Paper on Mental Health makes
21   II,     9.  2.  3|     Commission has now published a Green Paper on Mental Health.
22   II,     9.  2.  5|             framework decisions or green papers have been adopted
23   II,     9.  2.  7|       European Commission (2005b): Green Paper - Promoting healthy
24   II,     9.  2.  7|       European Commission (2006c): Green Paper - Improving the mental
25   II,     9.  4.  4|   consumption of fibre-rich foods, green vegetables and fruits (European
26  III,    10.  1    |            determinants / factors (Green and Potvin, 2004). It is
27  III,    10.  1.  1|      barriers to health behaviour (Green and Potvin, 2004).~ ~Association
28  III,    10.  1.  1|       diseases (Burke et al, 1995; Green and Potvin, 2004). Social
29  III,    10.  1.  1|    psychosocial determinants etc) (Green and Potvin, 2004; Wagner
30  III,    10.  1.  1|          influence risk behaviour (Green and Potvin, 2004) (Figure
31  III,    10.  1.  1|           barriers of alcohol use (Green and Potvin, 2004).~ ~Parental
32  III,    10.  1.  3|            Res Health 27(1):52-62.~Green LW, Potvin L (2004): Determinants
33  III,    10.  2.  1|         high-speed traffic, little green space and lack of safe places
34  III,    10.  2.  1|            travel distances, fewer green spaces and urban planning
35  III,    10.  2.  1|            of an earlier published Green Paper Promoting healthy
36  III,    10.  2.  1|        based on the results of the Green Paper on Urban Mobility (
37  III,    10.  2.  1|       European Commission (2005b): Green Paper. Promoting healthy
38  III,    10.  2.  1|       European Commission (2007b): GREEN PAPER “Towards a new culture
39  III,    10.  2.  1|          europa.eu/transport/clean/green_paper_urban_transport/doc/
40  III,    10.  2.  1|       aspects of the problem.~· EU Green paper on Promoting healthy
41  III,    10.  2.  1|       European Commission (2005b): Green Paper. Promoting healthy
42  III,    10.  2.  1|           THE CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GREEN PAPERPromoting healthy
43  III,    10.  2.  1|  determinants/life_style/nutrition/green_paper/nutrition_gp_rep_en.
44  III,    10.  2.  1|      obesity and chronic diseases. Green paper, Brussels, Belgium.~ ~
45  III,    10.  3.  1|       cost-benefit analysis.~ ~The Green Paper on Future Noise Policy (
46  III,    10.  3.  2|         applying the principles of Green Chemistry, (Global) Responsible
47  III,    10.  3.  4|     geological storage (CCS) and a Green Paper on adaptation during
48  III,    10.  5.  1|            are other implications. Green spaces are positive for
49  III,    10.  5.  1|             Recreational areas and green spaces~ ~Within human settlements,
50  III,    10.  5.  1|        public gathering places and green areas for social and recreational
51  III,    10.  5.  1|      Zaragoza, 2003). In addition, green and open spaces can help
52  III,    10.  5.  1| participating cities provide urban green areas within walking distance
53  III,    10.  5.  1|        European Commission (1996): Green Paper on future noise policy.
54  III,    10.  5.  1|         the importance of walkable green spaces. In: Journal of Epidemiology
55  III,    10.  5.  2|       noise exposure and access to green and recreational areas (
56  III,    10.  5.  2|           access to recreational / green spaces in urban and rural
57   IV,    11.  6.  5|         Organization.~ ~McGrail K, Green B et al. (2000): "Age, costs
58   IV,    12.  3    |          educational systems and a green paper on immigration and
59   IV,    13.  8    |     European Commission comprise a Green Paper on health services,