Part, Question
1 1, 2 | are known ~as soon as the terms are known, which the Philosopher (
2 1, 2 | principles of demonstration, the terms of which are common things
3 1, 12 | dark ~manner']," "by the terms 'glass' and 'enigma' certain
4 1, 13 | Objection, since synonymous terms ~signify one thing under
5 1, 13 | same rule applies to other terms. Hence ~no name is predicated
6 1, 13 | intellect apprehends ~them as terms of the relations of science
7 1, 13 | versa, these two relative terms, "Lord" and "servant," are
8 1, 13 | from this reason: Univocal terms mean absolutely the same
9 1, 13 | same thing, ~but equivocal terms absolutely different; whereas
10 1, 13 | different; whereas in analogical terms a ~word taken in one signification
11 1, 14 | being" are ~convertible terms. Therefore the knowledge
12 1, 14 | reference) to one of two terms, ~but as determined to one;
13 1, 16 | and being are convertible terms?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[16] A[
14 1, 16 | being are not convertible terms. For ~the true resides properly
15 1, 16 | and being are convertible terms. Hence just as ~being is
16 1, 17 | are ~known as soon as the terms are understood, from the
17 1, 19 | from the relation of the terms, as when the ~predicate
18 1, 25 | relation in which the very terms ~stand to each other. Now
19 1, 25 | relation in which the very terms ~stand to one another, possible
20 1, 25 | imply a contradiction in terms, is numbered amongst those
21 1, 27 | Hence Scripture employs terms which ~denote generation
22 1, 27 | and diversity from ~their terms. But procession in God is
23 1, 28 | implies in reality two ~terms. Therefore the divine relations
24 1, 29 | there is contradiction of terms; since second substances
25 1, 29 | make them known. Likewise, terms expressive of ~intention
26 1, 29 | of God only in the very terms ~themselves of Scripture,
27 1, 30 | they?~(3) What the numeral terms signify in God?~(4) The
28 1, 30 | 1/1~Whether the numeral terms denote anything real in
29 1, 30 | would seem that the numeral terms denote something real in ~
30 1, 30 | creatures. But the numeral terms denote ~something real in
31 1, 30 | Further, if the numeral terms do not denote anything real
32 1, 30 | be said that the ~numeral terms denote something real in
33 1, 30 | Hence we ~see that these terms are applied to God in order
34 1, 30 | considers that the numeral ~terms do not denote anything positive
35 1, 30 | asserted that the numeral terms do not denote anything real
36 1, 30 | But we say that numeral terms predicated of God are not
37 1, 30 | Therefore the numeral terms in God signify the things
38 1, 30 | does not ~follow that these terms express this signification
39 1, 30 | natures, signified by the terms "genus" or "species." The
40 1, 31 | 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, the terms "other person" and "other
41 1, 31 | must shun the use of the terms ~diversity and difference
42 1, 31 | Hence whenever we find terms of "diversity" or "difference" ~
43 1, 31 | an authentic work, these terms of "diversity" or ~"difference"
44 1, 31 | essence be taken away, the terms "separation" ~and "division,"
45 1, 31 | similitude, we avoid the terms "alien" and ~"discrepant."
46 1, 32 | these things we use abstract terms to signify simple forms;
47 1, 32 | subsistent things we use concrete terms. Hence also we signify ~
48 1, 32 | must also be some abstract ~terms whereby we may answer that
49 1, 32 | real identity, substantive terms, whether personal or essential, ~
50 1, 33 | because the more special ~terms are, the more they determine
51 1, 33 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The terms "generation" and "paternity"
52 1, 33 | paternity" like the other terms ~properly applied to God,
53 1, 33 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Common terms taken absolutely, in the
54 1, 33 | intelligence, come before proper terms; because they are included
55 1, 33 | understanding of proper terms; but not conversely. For
56 1, 33 | conversely. But ~common terms which import relation to
57 1, 33 | creature come after proper ~terms which import personal relations;
58 1, 34 | and sight, are essential terms in God. Therefore Word is
59 1, 34 | the nature ~of personal terms in God, inasmuch as the
60 1, 36 | divine persons are relative terms, as ~Boethius says (De Trin.).
61 1, 37 | loved, there are no other terms in use, which express the
62 1, 39 | immense" ~beings, if these terms are understood in an adjectival
63 1, 39 | God" agrees with singular terms as ~regards the form signified
64 1, 39 | agrees ~also with general terms so far as the form signified
65 1, 39 | the strict ~propriety of terms allows. Whence instead of
66 1, 39 | Therefore substantive personal terms can be predicated of the
67 1, 39 | predicated of the essential terms?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
68 1, 39 | general term to inferior terms, as Damascene says (De ~
69 1, 39 | 5]), although adjectival terms, ~whether personal or notional,
70 1, 39 | nevertheless substantive terms can be so predicated, owing
71 1, 39 | designates three appropriated terms. ~For he appropriates "eternity"
72 1, 39 | person. Therefore the above terms ~are not fittingly appropriated
73 1, 40 | are designated by abstract terms, ~being forms, as it were,
74 1, 41 | we designate by different terms the intellect and the act
75 1, 41 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, terms signifying the essence in
76 1, 42 | in these "it is only the terms that are relative."~Aquin.:
77 1, 45 | is considered from ~their terms. Action is therefore nobler
78 1, 46 | the ~sole habitude of the terms which are not repugnant
79 1, 46 | infinite number ~of mean terms.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[46] A[
80 1, 53 | totally in ~either of the terms while it is being moved;
81 1, 53 | for a medium between the terms, just as ~there is no medium
82 1, 53 | changes of the ~kind are terms of a continuous movement:
83 1, 58 | movement ~terminates in various terms. Therefore many things cannot
84 1, 60 | others. Dionysius used the terms "uniting" and "binding"
85 1, 62 | of vision, ~that diverse terms are fixed beforehand by
86 1, 66 | which is a contradiction in terms. Nor can it be said that
87 1, 67 | viii, text. 55, we use terms belonging to local movement
88 1, 37 | loved, there are no other terms in use, which express the
89 1, 39 | immense" ~beings, if these terms are understood in an adjectival
90 1, 39 | God" agrees with singular terms as ~regards the form signified
91 1, 39 | agrees ~also with general terms so far as the form signified
92 1, 39 | the strict ~propriety of terms allows. Whence instead of
93 1, 39 | Therefore substantive personal terms can be predicated of ~the
94 1, 39 | predicated of the essential terms?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
95 1, 39 | general term to inferior terms, as Damascene says (De ~
96 1, 39 | 5]), although adjectival terms, ~whether personal or notional,
97 1, 39 | nevertheless substantive terms can be so predicated, owing
98 1, 39 | designates three appropriated terms. ~For he appropriates "eternity"
99 1, 39 | person. Therefore the above terms ~are not fittingly appropriated
100 1, 40 | are designated by abstract terms, ~being forms, as it were,
101 1, 41 | we designate by different terms the intellect and the act
102 1, 41 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, terms signifying the essence in
103 1, 42 | in these "it is only the terms that are relative."~Aquin.:
104 1, 46 | is considered from ~their terms. Action is therefore nobler
105 1, 47 | the ~sole habitude of the terms which are not repugnant
106 1, 47 | infinite number ~of mean terms.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[46] A[
107 1, 54 | totally in ~either of the terms while it is being moved;
108 1, 54 | for a medium between the terms, just as ~there is no medium
109 1, 54 | changes of the ~kind are terms of a continuous movement:
110 1, 59 | movement ~terminates in various terms. Therefore many things cannot
111 1, 61 | others. Dionysius used the terms "uniting" and "binding"
112 1, 63 | of vision, ~that diverse terms are fixed beforehand by
113 1, 67 | which is a contradiction in terms. Nor can it be said that
114 1, 68 | viii, text. 55, we use terms belonging to local movement
115 1, 78 | be ~understood, as from terms are made propositions, and
116 1, 85 | knows composition, knows the terms of composition. But our
117 1, 107 | conclusion by many middle terms. Now it is manifest that
118 1, 107 | all the preceding middle terms not only in the ~new acquisition
119 1, 107 | of ~the preceding middle terms he can have opinion or belief
120 2, 11 | any point between the two ~terms is a beginning and an end,
121 2, 31 | movement does not end in two terms. But one and the ~same movement,
122 2, 35 | their species from their terms or objects. Accordingly
123 2, 40 | of approach to contrary ~terms: and this contrariety alone
124 2, 66 | depends on the meaning of the terms: for as soon as we know
125 2, 66 | to being, which are the terms ~whereof indemonstrable
126 2, 72 | objects, which are the ends or terms of those acts, but also ~
127 2, 72 | Ethic. x, 4); yet even terms of movement ~specify movements,
128 2, 88 | 3~I answer that, Certain terms do not appear to be mutually
129 2, 94 | those propositions whose terms are known to all, as, "Every
130 2, 94 | understand the meaning of the terms of such propositions: thus
131 2, 103 | itself implies this in the terms employed: for it is ~written (
132 2, 107 | being directed to different terms: ~while according as one
133 2, 113 | movement is related to both terms of the movement. Now it
134 2, 9 | the genus of convertible terms, ~that which signifies "
135 2, 9 | definition," but the convertible terms which fall short of this,
136 2, 9 | and are called "proper" terms.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[9] A[2]
137 2, 10 | especially to be on very familiar terms with them, or to communicate
138 2, 10 | have been on most friendly terms, as Sylvester with Constantine, ~
139 2, 12 | takes its species from the terms. Now ~apostasy regards unbelief
140 2, 25 | Metaph. v, text. 16), the terms ~"before" and "after" are
141 2, 30 | in accordance with the terms of his commission; but if
142 2, 53 | temporal things, to which the terms "past" and "future" ~apply,
143 2, 68 | confess his doubt in doubtful terms, and that which he is certain
144 2, 68 | he is certain about, ~in terms of certainty. Owing however
145 2, 70 | much." ~Nevertheless these terms are sometimes employed one
146 2, 72 | and for this reason these terms are sometimes used one ~
147 2, 73 | to ridicule (whence the ~terms 'derision' and 'jesting'),
148 2, 88 | to swear, but to employ ~terms resembling an oath in order
149 2, 98 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 5: The terms "buying" and "selling" cover
150 2, 123 | one to adhere to these ~terms on account of the connection
151 2, 132 | and great ~are relative terms, as the Philosopher says (
152 2, 133 | and ~little are relative terms: and when we say that a
153 2, 133 | and great are ~relative terms, as stated above (A[1]).
154 2, 181 | perfect (so ~far as these terms indicate different states),
155 2, 182 | thing signified by these terms, there was always a ~difference
156 2, 182 | to distinguish even the terms, by calling the ~higher
157 3, 2 | 3), ~condemned in these terms: "If anyone after the uniting
158 3, 16 | proper acceptation of the terms. Thus the ~Manicheans say
159 3, 16 | with the reality of ~both terms, holding that Christ is
160 3, 16 | only by the truth of its terms, i.e. because ~Christ is
161 3, 17 | but another nature, since terms placed in the ~predicate
162 3, 27 | Christ in the most express ~terms. And the apostles were in
163 3, 35 | temporal mother, who are terms altogether diverse. Therefore ~
164 3, 35 | considered in respect, not of its terms, but of its cause or of
165 3, 35 | considered in respect of its terms, every man ~would of necessity
166 3, 75 | both. For the order of the terms is common to ~these three;
167 3, 75 | and that the aforesaid terms are not coexistent.~Aquin.:
168 3, 80 | himself in ~the following terms in his commentary on Matthew (
169 Suppl, 34| is realized in ~both its terms. Now the terms of the relation
170 Suppl, 34| both its terms. Now the terms of the relation of order
171 Suppl, 44| subjects is signified by the terms ~"husband" and "wife," while
172 Suppl, 47| kind is equally in both terms. Therefore if there is an
173 Suppl, 47| cannot arise in one of the terms without arising in the other,
174 Suppl, 80| corresponds to the two terms of the two bodies. It is
175 Suppl, 80| described by contact with the terms of ~the lesser body.~Aquin.:
176 Suppl, 81| whatever having two opposite terms, each of which is a positive
177 Suppl, 90| precedes all other movements, terms ~of movement, distance and
|