Part, Question
1 1, 7 | geometrician does not need to assume a line actually ~infinite,
2 1, 20 | man. God therefore did not assume human nature ~because He
3 1, 43 | the ~Holy Ghost did not assume any visible creature; and
4 1, 43 | the Holy Ghost did ~not assume the visible creature, in
5 1, 51 | to them?~(2) Whether they assume bodies?~(3) Whether they
6 1, 51 | Para. 1/1~Whether angels assume bodies?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
7 1, 51 | seem that angels do not assume bodies. For there is ~nothing
8 1, 51 | superfluous for the angels to ~assume bodies, because an angel
9 1, 51 | Therefore an angel does not assume a body.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
10 1, 51 | some union; because to ~assume implies a taking to oneself [
11 1, 51 | Therefore the angels do not assume bodies.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
12 1, 51 | Further, angels do not assume bodies from the earth or
13 1, 51 | Therefore the angels do not assume bodies.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
14 1, 51 | maintained that the angels never assume ~bodies, but that all that
15 1, 51 | follows that they sometimes assume bodies.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
16 1, 51 | clouds. Even so the angels assume bodies of ~air, condensing
17 1, 51 | be done if they were to ~assume true men; because the properties
18 1, 43 | the ~Holy Ghost did not assume any visible creature; and
19 1, 43 | the Holy Ghost did ~not assume the visible creature, in
20 1, 52 | to them?~(2) Whether they assume bodies?~(3) Whether they
21 1, 52 | Para. 1/1~Whether angels assume bodies?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
22 1, 52 | seem that angels do not assume bodies. For there is ~nothing
23 1, 52 | superfluous for the angels to ~assume bodies, because an angel
24 1, 52 | Therefore an angel does not assume a body.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
25 1, 52 | some union; because to ~assume implies a taking to oneself [
26 1, 52 | Therefore the angels do not assume bodies.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
27 1, 52 | Further, angels do not assume bodies from the earth or
28 1, 52 | Therefore the angels do not assume bodies.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
29 1, 52 | maintained that the angels never assume ~bodies, but that all that
30 1, 52 | follows that they sometimes assume bodies.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
31 1, 52 | clouds. Even so the angels assume bodies of ~air, condensing
32 1, 52 | be done if they were to ~assume true men; because the properties
33 1, 113 | any form and shape, and assume it so as to appear in ~it
34 2, 100 | is only in so far as they assume the nature ~of justice,
35 2, 28 | habit, in which case they assume ~the character of a virtue.~
36 2, 29 | good, then beneficence will assume a special character ~and
37 2, 97 | good ~end, so does a thing assume a divine character through
38 2, 128 | order, that any one should assume to do ~what is above his
39 2, 185 | under the guise of religion assume the characteristics of ~
40 3, 1 | the ~highest good, should assume evil. Therefore it was not
41 3, 1 | uncreated spirit should assume a body.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
42 3, 1 | could be fitting to God to assume a nature created, mutable,
43 3, 1 | it did not become Him to assume the evil of ~fault.~Aquin.:
44 3, 2 | The Word of God "did not assume human nature in general, ~
45 3, 2 | the Son of God did not ~assume human nature as it exists
46 3, 2 | whereby someone is said to assume, or the passion, whereby ~
47 3, 2 | said to unite and not to assume. So likewise the united
48 3, 3 | inquiry:~(1) Whether to assume is befitting to a Divine
49 3, 3 | from the Personality can assume?~(4) Whether one Person
50 3, 3 | Whether one Person can assume without another? ~(5) Whether
51 3, 3 | Whether each Person can assume?~(6) Whether several Persons
52 3, 3 | Whether several Persons can assume one individual nature?~(
53 3, 3 | Whether one Person can assume two individual natures?~(
54 3, 3 | Person of the Son of God to ~assume human nature than for another
55 3, 3 | befitting for a Divine Person to assume?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[1]
56 3, 3 | befitting to a Divine Person to ~assume a created nature. For a
57 3, 3 | perfect. Therefore, since ~to assume is to take to oneself, and
58 3, 3 | befitting to a ~Divine Person to assume a created nature.~Aquin.:
59 3, 3 | befitting to a Divine Person to assume, i.e. to take to Himself.~
60 3, 3 | thing constituted should assume the constituent, since the ~
61 3, 3 | befitting to a Person ~to assume a nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP
62 3, 3 | Person to take, i.e. to assume a nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP
63 3, 3 | term of the act, for to assume is to take something to ~
64 3, 3 | Hence it ~is plain that to assume a nature is most properly
65 3, 3 | Divine Person is not said to assume the Divine Nature, but to
66 3, 3 | the Divine Nature, but to assume ~the human nature.~Aquin.:
67 3, 3 | to the Divine Nature to assume?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[2]
68 3, 3 | to the Divine Nature to ~assume. Because, as was said above (
69 3, 3 | was said above (A[1]), to assume is to take to ~oneself.
70 3, 3 | to the Divine Nature to assume human ~nature.~Aquin.: SMT
71 3, 3 | to the Divine Nature to assume, it ~consequently is befitting
72 3, 3 | 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, to assume is to act. But to act befits
73 3, 3 | agent ~acts. Therefore to assume is not befitting to the
74 3, 3 | and more properly said to assume, but it may be said ~secondarily
75 3, 3 | wisdom, and the like. But to ~assume belongs to It by reason
76 3, 3 | from the Personality can assume?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[3]
77 3, 3 | mind, ~the Nature cannot assume. For it was said above (
78 3, 3 | belongs to ~the Nature to assume by reason of the Person.
79 3, 3 | abstracted, the Nature cannot assume.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[3]
80 3, 3 | the Divine Nature ~cannot assume.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[3]
81 3, 3 | the Divine Nature cannot assume.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[3]
82 3, 3 | Divine Nature can still assume.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[3]
83 3, 3 | It may be ~understood to assume human nature by reason of
84 3, 3 | Person without another can assume a created nature?~Aquin.:
85 3, 3 | seem that one Person cannot assume a created nature ~without
86 3, 3 | have one operation. Now to ~assume is an operation. Therefore
87 3, 3 | to be incarnate, and to assume by reason ~of the Person
88 3, 3 | several Divine Persons can assume one and the same individual ~
89 3, 3 | two Divine Persons cannot assume one and the ~same individual
90 3, 3 | the three Persons cannot assume one human nature.~Aquin.:
91 3, 3 | if three Persons were to assume one human ~nature, it would
92 3, 3 | the three Persons should assume one human ~nature.~Aquin.:
93 3, 3 | three Divine Persons ~should assume one human nature, but it
94 3, 3 | impossible for them to ~assume one human hypostasis or
95 3, 3 | several Persons cannot assume ~one and the same man to
96 3, 3 | hypothesis that three Persons assume one human ~nature, it would
97 3, 3 | Whether one Divine Person can assume two human natures?~Aquin.:
98 3, 3 | one Divine Person cannot assume two human ~natures. For
99 3, 3 | we suppose ~one Person to assume two human natures, there
100 3, 3 | for one Divine Person to assume two human natures.~Aquin.:
101 3, 3 | Incarnation the Father can still assume a human nature ~distinct
102 3, 3 | Incarnation the Son can assume another ~human nature distinct
103 3, 3 | nature as to be unable to assume another. For ~it would seem
104 3, 3 | nature as to be unable to assume ~another to its Personality;
105 3, 3 | which He has assumed, can assume another distinct ~human
106 3, 3 | the Divine Person were to ~assume two human natures, He would
107 3, 3 | Divine Persons ~were to assume one singular human nature,
108 3, 3 | Divine Person, nor would one assume the other. Hence it ~would
109 3, 3 | other Divine Person should assume human nature?~Aquin.: SMT
110 3, 4 | becoming that He should assume human nature ~abstracted
111 3, 4 | becoming that He should assume human nature in all ~its
112 3, 4 | becoming that He should assume human nature in any ~man
113 3, 4 | one of the men He ~did not assume, for with equal reason He
114 3, 4 | For the Son of God did not assume a man, so that there be
115 3, 4 | Word ~Incarnate did not assume a nature which exists in
116 3, 4 | the Son of God did not ~assume human nature, as it is separated
117 3, 4 | that He is understood to assume a human nature; and thus
118 3, 4 | and thus if He ~did not assume it in reality, this would
119 3, 4 | possible for the Son of God to assume several ~human natures,
120 3, 4 | fitting for the Son of God to assume human nature in all its ~
121 3, 4 | the Son of ~God "did not assume human nature as a species,
122 3, 4 | as a species, nor did He assume all its ~hypostases."~Aquin.:
123 3, 4 | incarnate, so He should ~assume one human nature, so that
124 3, 4 | to ~the Divine Nature to assume by reason of the Person;
125 3, 4 | fitting for the Son of God to assume human nature of the ~stock
126 3, 4 | fitting for the Son of God to ~assume human nature of the stock
127 3, 4 | Hence, if He wished to assume human nature, He ought to ~
128 3, 4 | Hence, if He wished to assume human nature from ~sinners,
129 3, 4 | 18): "God was able to ~assume human nature elsewhere than
130 3, 4 | God judged it better to assume ~human nature from the vanquished
131 3, 4 | not fitting that He should assume human nature in Adam himself.~
132 3, 5 | that the Son of God did not assume a true body. For ~it is
133 3, 5 | Therefore the Son of God did not assume a true body.~Aquin.: SMT
134 3, 5 | fitting for the Son of God to ~assume human nature, He must consequently
135 3, 5 | for this ~would be to assume a body to the unity of the
136 3, 5 | Therefore it behooved Christ to ~assume such a body.~Aquin.: SMT
137 3, 5 | that the Son of God did not assume a soul. For John ~has said,
138 3, 5 | 3). Therefore He did not assume a soul.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
139 3, 5 | that the Son of God did not assume a human mind or ~intellect.
140 3, 5 | the Son of ~God did not assume a human mind.~Aquin.: SMT
141 3, 6 | that the Son of God did not assume flesh through ~the medium
142 3, 6 | the Son ~of God did not assume flesh through the medium
143 3, 6 | that the Son of God did not assume a soul through ~the medium
144 3, 6 | the Son of ~God did not assume a soul through the medium
145 3, 6 | the Son of God did not ~assume a soul through the medium
146 3, 6 | that the Son of God did not assume a soul through the medium
147 3, 9 | that the Son of God should assume, not an imperfect, but a ~
148 3, 13 | the state of sin did He assume ~the necessity of being
149 3, 13 | will which He deigned to assume in time?"~Aquin.: SMT TP
150 3, 14 | fitting for the Son of God to assume ~flesh subject to human
151 3, 14 | Incarnation that He should assume these penalties in our flesh ~
152 3, 14 | not fitting for Him to ~assume all human defects or infirmities.
153 3, 14 | not necessary for Him to assume them all, but only such
154 3, 27 | assumed them, He did not assume the ~fomes. Consequently
155 3, 28 | presumption ~in Joseph, to assume that he attempted to violate
156 3, 30 | invisible creature should assume a form in which to appear ~
157 3, 31 | becoming that He should assume flesh of matter ~derived
158 3, 31 | suitable that Christ should assume that which is perfect ~in
159 3, 31 | being of the nobler sex, to ~assume, it was becoming that the
160 3, 31 | Reply OBJ 1: Christ did not assume the flesh of the human race
161 3, 39 | appear, though He did not ~assume it into unity of person.
162 3, 46 | that Christ ought not ~to assume "dishonoring afflictions."
163 3, 50 | the Son of God intended to assume; but not ~as though the
164 3, 54 | His glory that He ~should assume anything which was not to
165 3, 73 | Fide Orth. iv), "we thereby assume the ~Godhead of the Son."~
166 Suppl, 11| say it, because he should assume that the ~intention of the
167 Suppl, 72| elemental matter were to ~assume the form of fire.~Aquin.:
168 Suppl, 72| saints in ~rising again will assume a glorified body, as evidenced
|