Part, Question
1 1, 2 | Therefore, it happens, as Boethius says (Hebdom., the ~title
2 1, 3 | form can be a subject", as Boethius says (De ~Trin.). Therefore
3 1, 3 | His own existence; and as Boethius ~says (Hebdom.), although
4 1, 5 | differs really from being. For Boethius ~says (De Hebdom.): "I perceive
5 1, 5 | simply. Hence the saying of Boethius (De Hebrom.), "I perceive
6 1, 6 | Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Boethius says (De Hebdom.), that "
7 1, 6 | 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, as Boethius says (De Hebdom.), all things
8 1, 8 | incorporeal things," ~as Boethius says (De Hebdom.), "are
9 1, 10 | definition of eternity given by Boethius (De ~Consol. v) is not a
10 1, 10 | predicated of God; for Boethius says (De Trin. iv) that, "
11 1, 10 | between eternity and time, as ~Boethius says (De Consol. v), arising
12 1, 10 | Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Boethius says (De Consol. iii) "Who
13 1, 12 | know God in this life. ~For Boethius says (De Consol. v) that "
14 1, 13 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, Boethius says (De Trin. ii) that "
15 1, 21 | cannot ~belong to this. For Boethius says (De Hebdom.): "Good
16 1, 22 | called providence. Whence Boethius says (De Consol. iv, 6)
17 1, 22 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, Boethius says (De Consol. iv, 6): "
18 1, 22 | unchangeableness of which Boethius ~speaks, pertain to the
19 1, 26 | beatitude ~according to Boethius (De Consol. iv) "is a state
20 1, 26 | to essence, according to Boethius (De Hebdom.). Therefore ~
21 1, 26 | and fame, according to Boethius (De Consol. iii, 10), He ~
22 1, 27 | Para. 1/2~Reply OBJ 2: As Boethius says (De Hebdom.), goodness
23 1, 28 | real relations in God. For ~Boethius says (De Trin. iv), "All
24 1, 28 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, Boethius says (De Trin. iv) that, "
25 1, 28 | to another. Nevertheless Boethius did not wish to ~exclude
26 1, 28 | generically or specifically. Thus Boethius likens the ~divine relations
27 1, 28 | Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Boethius says (De Trin.) that in
28 1, 29 | definition of person given by Boethius (De ~Duab. Nat.) is insufficient -
29 1, 29 | substance; and in this way Boethius defines person.~Aquin.:
30 1, 29 | taken in that sense. Hence Boethius says (De Duab. Nat.) that, "
31 1, 29 | subsistence," and "essence." For Boethius says (De Duab. Nat.) that "
32 1, 29 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, Boethius says (Com. Praed.) that
33 1, 29 | OBJ 4: On the contrary, Boethius says (De Duab. Nat.) that
34 1, 29 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 5: Further, Boethius says (Com. Praed.) that
35 1, 29 | 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Boethius says that genera and species
36 1, 29 | nature of matter. Hence Boethius says ~(De Trin.): "A simple
37 1, 29 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, Boethius says (De Duab. Nat.): "The
38 1, 29 | apply to God, since, as Boethius says (De Duab. Nat.), it ~
39 1, 29 | that the ~definition of Boethius, quoted above (A[1]), is
40 1, 29 | Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Boethius says (De Trin.) that "every
41 1, 30 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, Boethius says of God (De Trin. i),
42 1, 30 | they are predicated, as Boethius teaches in ~the same book.~
43 1, 31 | proportion, according to ~Boethius (Arithm. i, 23). Therefore
44 1, 36 | are relative terms, as ~Boethius says (De Trin.). But this
45 1, 39 | unity. And because, as Boethius says (De Trin. i), "relation
46 1, 40 | the same, ~according to Boethius (De Hebdom.). But the Father
47 1, 40 | Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Boethius says (De Trin.): "Relation
48 1, 40 | appears from the definition of Boethius (De Duab. Nat.) that, "person
49 1, 41 | attributed to ~the persons. For Boethius says (De Trin.): "Whatever
50 1, 42 | the divine persons; for as Boethius says (De Trin. i): ~"They
51 1, 46 | equal to God in eternity, as Boethius says (De Consol. v, 6);
52 1, 50 | and to substand; ~whence Boethius says (De Trin.) that "a
53 1, 50 | existence," and "what ~is," as Boethius says. For "what is," is
54 1, 52 | angel is not in a place. For Boethius says ~(De Hebdom.): "The
55 1, 54 | cannot ~be a subject," as Boethius states (De Trin. 1). Thus
56 1, 54 | such a form: and of such is Boethius speaking there. ~But a simple
57 1, 63 | directly they are heard" [*Boethius, De Hebdom.]. ~Taking away,
58 1, 65 | come from the angels. For ~Boethius says (De Trin. i): "From
59 1, 65 | OBJ 1: By immaterial forms Boethius understands the types of ~
60 1, 77 | treating of ~which subject Boethius employs that phrase (De
61 1, 39 | unity. And because, as Boethius says (De Trin. i), "relation
62 1, 40 | the same, ~according to Boethius (De Hebdom.). But the Father
63 1, 40 | Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Boethius says (De Trin.): "Relation
64 1, 40 | appears from the definition of Boethius (De Duab. Nat.) that, "person
65 1, 41 | attributed to ~the persons. For Boethius says (De Trin.): "Whatever
66 1, 42 | the divine persons; for as Boethius says (De Trin. i): ~"They
67 1, 47 | equal to God in eternity, as Boethius says (De Consol. v, 6);
68 1, 51 | and to substand; ~whence Boethius says (De Trin.) that "a
69 1, 51 | existence," and "what ~is," as Boethius says. For "what is," is
70 1, 53 | angel is not in a place. For Boethius says ~(De Hebdom.): "The
71 1, 55 | cannot ~be a subject," as Boethius states (De Trin. 1). Thus
72 1, 55 | such a form: and of such is Boethius speaking there. ~But a simple
73 1, 64 | directly they are heard" [*Boethius, De Hebdom.]. ~Taking away,
74 1, 66 | come from the angels. For ~Boethius says (De Trin. i): "From
75 1, 66 | OBJ 1: By immaterial forms Boethius understands the types of ~
76 1, 76 | treating of ~which subject Boethius employs that phrase (De
77 1, 78 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, Boethius says (De Consol. iv, 6),
78 1, 78 | immovable to movable. And thus Boethius compared the ~intellect
79 1, 78 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, Boethius says (De Consol. v, 4) that "
80 1, 78 | 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Boethius takes intelligence as meaning
81 1, 92 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, Boethius (De Consol. iii) says of
82 1, 92 | 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Boethius here uses the word "image"
83 1, 102 | by Thy Providence." And Boethius says (De Consol. ~iii): "
84 1, 102 | the idea of goodness, as Boethius proves (De ~Consol. iii,
85 1, 102 | the Divine government. For Boethius says (De Consol. iii) that "
86 1, 102 | Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Boethius says (De Consol. iii): "
87 1, 115 | exist cannot be defined. But Boethius (De ~Consol. iv) defines
88 1, 115 | Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Boethius says (De Consol. iv): "Fate
89 1, 115 | nature of fate. This is what Boethius says (De Consol. iv): ~"
90 1, 115 | is not unchangeable. For Boethius says (De ~Consol. iv): "
91 1, 115 | changeable things," as Boethius says (De Consol. iv). Therefore
92 1, 115 | Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Boethius says (De Consol. iv) that
93 1, 115 | will happen." Wherefore Boethius, ~having said that the chain
94 1, 115 | are subject to fate. For Boethius says ~(De Consol. iv): "
95 1, 115 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, Boethius says (De Consol. iv) that
96 1, 115 | Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Boethius says (De Consol. iv) that "
97 1, 115 | the like. And this is what Boethius says (De Consol. iv): viz.
98 2, 2 | 2: Further, according to Boethius (De Consol. iii), happiness
99 2, 2 | in spreading it. But as Boethius says (De Consol. ii), "wealth
100 2, 2 | after a fashion. ~Hence Boethius says (De Consol. ii): "You
101 2, 2 | or glory is false: for as Boethius says (De Consol. iii), "
102 2, 2 | most ~imperfect. For as Boethius says (De Consol. iii), "
103 2, 2 | Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Boethius says (De Consol. iii): "
104 2, 3 | something uncreated. For Boethius ~says (De Consol. iii): "
105 2, 3 | hand, men are happy, as Boethius says (De Consol. iii), by ~
106 2, 3 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, Boethius says (De Consol. iii) that
107 2, 3 | 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Boethius, in defining happiness,
108 2, 3 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, Boethius says (De Consol. iii) that
109 2, 4 | 2: Further, according to Boethius (De Consol. iii): happiness
110 2, 4 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, Boethius [*Seneca, Ep. 6] says that "
111 2, 10 | Para. 1/2~I answer that, As Boethius says (De Duabus Nat.) and
112 2, 18 | Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Boethius says (De Differ. Topic.
113 2, 25 | Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Boethius (De Consol. i) in enumerating
114 2, 29 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, Boethius says (De Consol. ii) that "
115 2, 64 | between ~contrary heresies, as Boethius states (De Duab. Natur.
116 2, 94 | self-evident. Hence it is that, as Boethius says (De Hebdom.), certain ~
117 2, 100 | precepts. But ~according to Boethius in his commentary on the
118 2, 110 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: As Boethius [*Pseudo-Bede, Sent. Phil.
119 2, 1 | with perfect things, as Boethius states (De Consol. iii).
120 2, 4 | 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, as Boethius says (In Categ. Arist. i), "
121 2, 47 | foresight]," according to Boethius (De ~Consol. v). Therefore
122 2, 89 | Polit. viii, 5), and also Boethius (De Musica, prologue). Hence ~
123 2, 115 | account of virtue. Now ~Boethius says (De Consol. ii) that "
124 2, 116 | of self-sufficiency, as Boethius says (De Consol. iii): the ~
125 2, 160 | God and ~His rule. Hence Boethius [*Cf. Cassian, de Caenob.
126 2, 180 | of ~eternal things." And Boethius says (De Consol. v, 2): "
127 2, 187 | imperfect, since ~"nature," as Boethius says (De Consol. iii, 10), "
128 3, 1 | with the more perfect, as Boethius says ~(De Consol. iii).
129 3, 2 | called the "nature." And thus Boethius defines nature (De Duab.
130 3, 2 | 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, as Boethius says (De Duab. Nat.), a
131 3, 2 | rational nature," according to Boethius. Therefore, whatever adheres
132 3, 2 | particular ~substance," as Boethius says (De Duab. Nat.). But
133 3, 2 | rational, according to ~what Boethius says (De Duab. Nat.), "a
134 3, 2 | hypostasis, as is ~plain from Boethius (De Duab. Nat.). Secondly,
135 3, 4 | person, as is plain from Boethius (De Duab. Nat.). Therefore
136 3, 16 | of rational ~nature; as Boethius says (De Duab. Nat.). Therefore
137 3, 17 | Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Boethius says (De Duab. Nat.): "Whatever
138 3, 77 | could not ~be a subject," as Boethius declares (De Trin. i). Furthermore
139 Suppl, 6 | Para. 1/2~On the contrary, Boethius says (De Consol. i): "If
140 Suppl, 48| 4: Further, according to Boethius (De Diff., Topic. ii) "a
141 Suppl, 69| souls ~after death. For as Boethius says (De Hebdom.): "Wise
142 Suppl, 70| Philosopher (De Gener. i) and Boethius ~(De Duab. Natur.) only
143 Suppl, 70| changed into one another, as ~Boethius says (De Duab. Natur.).
144 Suppl, 70| OBJ 3: The Philosopher and Boethius are speaking of the action ~
145 Suppl, 78| happiness" ~according to Boethius is "a state rendered perfect
146 Suppl, 80| matter between them: and ~Boethius proves this (De Duab. Nat.).
147 Suppl, 80| Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Boethius says (De Trin. i): "Difference
148 Suppl, 80| individuals, it follows that, as ~Boethius says (De Trin.), "we cannot
149 Suppl, 84| goods: for which reason Boethius ~says (De Consol. ii) that "
150 Suppl, 87| thing. Now ~according to Boethius (De Hebdom.) that which
151 Suppl, 92| 5: Further, according to Boethius (De Consol. iii), "beatitude
152 Suppl, 92| Para. 1/1~OBJ 7: Further, Boethius reckons five things pertaining
153 Suppl, 92| things aforesaid mentioned by Boethius are certain ~conditions
154 Suppl, 92| 7; x, 7,8). Accordingly Boethius shows that these ~five things
155 Suppl, 93| itself. Now according to Boethius (De Consol. iii), beatitude ~
|