Part, Question
1 1, 13| Jesus Christ, of Whom all paternity in heaven and earth is named" ~(
2 1, 28| Further, the relation of paternity is the relation of a ~principle.
3 1, 28| a logical one. Therefore paternity in ~God is not a real relation;
4 1, 28| logical relations. Therefore paternity and filiation in God, consequent ~
5 1, 28| is denominated only from paternity; and the ~Son only from
6 1, 28| filiation. Therefore, if no real paternity or filiation ~existed in
7 1, 28| from it corporeally. ~Thus paternity and filiation are real relations
8 1, 28| Augustine do not imply that paternity or any ~other relation which
9 1, 28| 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, as paternity and filiation are by name
10 1, 28| any real distinction ~of paternity and filiation.~Aquin.: SMT
11 1, 28| another. Likewise, although paternity, just ~as filiation, is
12 1, 28| only four real relations - paternity, filiation, ~spiration,
13 1, 28| only four real ~relations - paternity, filiation, spiration and
14 1, 28| Father to the Son, that of paternity, and from ~the Son to the
15 1, 28| living beings is ~called paternity; and the relation of the
16 1, 29| Godhead is God so the ~divine paternity is God the Father, Who is
17 1, 30| stated above (Q[28], A[4]), paternity, filiation, common spiration,
18 1, 30| same person. Since then paternity and filiation are opposite ~
19 1, 30| Therefore the ~subsisting paternity is the person of the Father;
20 1, 30| is generation, wherefrom paternity and filiation are derived,
21 1, 30| relative opposition either to paternity or to filiation; and consequently ~
22 1, 30| The three ~relations - paternity, filiation, and procession -
23 1, 30| it were the persons; for paternity is the ~person of the Father,
24 1, 31| abstract; for Deity is God and paternity is the Father. But the ~
25 1, 31| because the relation of paternity is found ~also in others,
26 1, 32| proper attributes, such as paternity, ~filiation, and procession,
27 1, 32| instance, we do ~not say that paternity is wise or creates; nor
28 1, 32| example, we do not say that paternity ~begets, nor that filiation
29 1, 32| kind - so when we speak of paternity in God, we mean God the
30 1, 32| names, so that we may say paternity and ~Father.~Aquin.: SMT
31 1, 32| by an abstract term, as paternity ~and filiation. Therefore
32 1, 32| Hence we cannot say that paternity ~begets, or creates, or
33 1, 32| notions; for we can say ~that paternity is eternal, or immense,
34 1, 32| notions; for we can say that paternity is God, ~and that paternity
35 1, 32| paternity is God, ~and that paternity is the Father.~Aquin.: SMT
36 1, 32| there is innascibility and paternity, and common spiration. ~
37 1, 32| so common ~spiration is paternity; which is not to be admitted.
38 1, 32| known by the notion of "paternity"; and as the Holy Ghost ~
39 1, 32| in God: "innascibility," "paternity," ~"filiation," and "procession."
40 1, 32| i.e. constituting persons, "paternity," ~"filiation," and "procession." "
41 1, 33| all other men. Now it is paternity ~which distinguishes the
42 1, 33| this name "Father," whereby paternity is signified, is the proper ~
43 1, 33| of being made, whereas ~paternity signifies the complement
44 1, 33| terms "generation" and "paternity" like the other terms ~properly
45 1, 33| Jesus Christ, ~from whom all paternity in heaven and on earth is
46 1, 33| generation, and consequently paternity, is applied to God before ~
47 1, 33| the divine generation and paternity.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[33] A[
48 1, 33| priority of predication. But paternity and filiation seem to be
49 1, 33| every creature." Therefore paternity ~taken in a personal sense
50 1, 33| has the same concept as, ~paternity taken essentially.~Aquin.:
51 1, 33| creature ~in time. Therefore paternity in God is taken in a personal
52 1, 33| that ~the perfect idea of paternity and filiation is to be found
53 1, 33| Therefore it is plain ~that "paternity" is applied to God first,
54 1, 33| Father is known both by paternity and by common spiration,
55 1, 33| a property distinct from paternity and spiration; but would ~
56 1, 40| person of the Father there is paternity and common spiration. Again,
57 1, 40| begets; ~but not that the paternity is begetting. Therefore
58 1, 40| the Father is Father by ~paternity. In the same way, the other
59 1, 40| subsisting persons themselves, as paternity is the Father Himself, ~
60 1, 40| by way of the form, as ~"paternity."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40] A[
61 1, 40| subsisting persons; as ~paternity is the Father, and filiation
62 1, 40| For as He is the Father by paternity, ~supposing He is some one
63 1, 40| supposing He is some one by paternity, it would follow that the
64 1, 40| Son, in ~Whom there is not paternity, would not be "someone."
65 1, 40| not be "someone." So when paternity is ~mentally abstracted
66 1, 40| Son, ~there would be no paternity in Him. Therefore, if paternity
67 1, 40| paternity in Him. Therefore, if paternity be removed, ~there still
68 1, 40| subsisting persons; thus paternity is the ~Father Himself.
69 1, 40| Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: By paternity the Father is not only Father,
70 1, 40| remain as unbegotten, if His paternity were removed, as if ~innascibility
71 1, 40| being is the Father. So, ~if paternity be removed, the hypostasis
72 1, 40| that generation precedes paternity in the order of intelligence.~
73 1, 40| presupposes quantity. But ~paternity is a relation founded on
74 1, 40| of generation. Therefore ~paternity presupposes generation.~
75 1, 40| active generation is to paternity as nativity is to ~filiation.
76 1, 40| because He is born. Therefore paternity also presupposes generation.~
77 1, 40| person of the ~Father. But paternity constitutes the person of
78 1, 40| the order of intelligence, paternity is prior to generation.~
79 1, 40| This objection avails of paternity as a relation, but not ~
80 1, 41| nativity in other words ~are paternity and filiation" (Sent. i,
81 1, 41| Q[33], AA[2]~,3) that paternity, filiation and nativity
82 1, 41| both equally. For although paternity is ~signified as the form
83 1, 41| Socrates. So neither ~can paternity be understood as that by
84 1, 41| the act of ~begetting or paternity; although there is a distinction
85 1, 41| there were more than one paternity, or more than one ~filiation.
86 1, 42| relation: for when we say that ~paternity is opposed to filiation,
87 1, 42| relation mediating ~between paternity and filiation. For in both
88 1, 42| Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, paternity is part of the Father's
89 1, 42| the Father's dignity. But paternity ~does not belong to the
90 1, 42| belongs to the very nature of paternity and filiation that the Son ~
91 1, 42| God there exist real true paternity and ~filiation. Nor can
92 1, 42| great, is he?" Therefore, paternity ~is the Father's dignity,
93 1, 42| which in the Father is paternity, in the Son is filiation,
94 1, 42| which, in the Father is paternity, in the Son is ~filiation.
95 1, 42| argue - "the Father has paternity, ~therefore the Son has
96 1, 42| therefore the Son has paternity," for there is a transition
97 1, 42| very notion ~of the divine paternity and filiation requires that
98 1, 42| As the same essence is paternity in the Father, and ~filiation
99 1, 45| even in heaven there is paternity, as the Apostle ~says (Eph.
100 1, 45| Eph. 3:15): "From whom all paternity in heaven and on earth is ~
101 1, 40| person of the Father there is paternity and common spiration. Again,
102 1, 40| begets; ~but not that the paternity is begetting. Therefore
103 1, 40| the Father is Father by ~paternity. In the same way, the other
104 1, 40| subsisting persons themselves, as paternity is the Father Himself, ~
105 1, 40| by way of the form, as ~"paternity."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40] A[
106 1, 40| subsisting persons; as ~paternity is the Father, and filiation
107 1, 40| For as He is the Father by paternity, ~supposing He is some one
108 1, 40| supposing He is some one by paternity, it would follow that the
109 1, 40| Son, in ~Whom there is not paternity, would not be "someone."
110 1, 40| not be "someone." So when paternity is ~mentally abstracted
111 1, 40| Son, ~there would be no paternity in Him. Therefore, if paternity
112 1, 40| paternity in Him. Therefore, if paternity be removed, ~there still
113 1, 40| subsisting persons; thus paternity is the ~Father Himself.
114 1, 40| Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: By paternity the Father is not only Father,
115 1, 40| remain as unbegotten, if His paternity were removed, as if ~innascibility
116 1, 40| being is the Father. So, ~if paternity be removed, the hypostasis
117 1, 40| that generation precedes paternity in the order of intelligence.~
118 1, 40| presupposes quantity. But ~paternity is a relation founded on
119 1, 40| of generation. Therefore ~paternity presupposes generation.~
120 1, 40| active generation is to paternity as nativity is to ~filiation.
121 1, 40| because He is born. Therefore paternity also presupposes generation.~
122 1, 40| person of the ~Father. But paternity constitutes the person of
123 1, 40| the order of intelligence, paternity is prior to generation.~
124 1, 40| This objection avails of paternity as a relation, but not ~
125 1, 41| nativity in other words ~are paternity and filiation" (Sent. i,
126 1, 41| Q[33], AA[2]~,3) that paternity, filiation and nativity
127 1, 41| both equally. For although paternity is ~signified as the form
128 1, 41| Socrates. So neither ~can paternity be understood as that by
129 1, 41| the act of ~begetting or paternity; although there is a distinction
130 1, 41| there were more than one paternity, or more than one ~filiation.
131 1, 42| relation: for when we say that ~paternity is opposed to filiation,
132 1, 42| relation mediating ~between paternity and filiation. For in both
133 1, 42| Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, paternity is part of the Father's
134 1, 42| the Father's dignity. But paternity ~does not belong to the
135 1, 42| belongs to the very nature of paternity and filiation that the Son ~
136 1, 42| God there exist real true paternity and ~filiation. Nor can
137 1, 42| great, is he?" Therefore, paternity ~is the Father's dignity,
138 1, 42| which in the Father is paternity, in the Son is filiation,
139 1, 42| which, in the Father is paternity, in the Son is ~filiation.
140 1, 42| argue - "the Father has paternity, ~therefore the Son has
141 1, 42| therefore the Son has paternity," for there is a transition
142 1, 42| very notion ~of the divine paternity and filiation requires that
143 1, 42| As the same essence is paternity in the Father, and ~filiation
144 1, 46| even in heaven there is paternity, as the Apostle ~says (Eph.
145 1, 46| Eph. 3:15): "From whom all paternity in heaven and on earth is ~
146 2, 2 | Christ it was not known that Paternity and ~Filiation were in the
147 3, 3 | this is threefold, viz. Paternity, Filiation and ~Procession,
148 3, 3 | without ~understanding Paternity or Filiation, which are
149 3, 20| relations, as the words 'paternity' and ~'filiation.'" Hence
150 3, 35| generation. Wherefore the ~paternity cannot differ specifically,
151 3, 35| twofold ~relation, the one of paternity, the other of motherhood,
|