Part, Question
1 1, 67 | gives as a reason for the omission that ~Moses was addressing
2 1, 74 | saw that it was good." The omission, therefore, of these ~words
3 1, 68 | gives as a reason for the omission that ~Moses was addressing
4 1, 73 | saw that it was good." The omission, therefore, of these ~words
5 2, 71 | reference to the ~sin of omission, about which there have
6 2, 71 | say that in every sin of omission there is some act, either
7 2, 71 | others say, that a sin of ~omission does not necessarily suppose
8 2, 71 | it. For if in the sin of omission we look merely at that in
9 2, 71 | sin consists, ~the sin of omission will be sometimes with an
10 2, 71 | however, in the sin of omission, we consider also the causes,
11 2, 71 | causes, or ~occasions of the omission, then the sin of omission
12 2, 71 | omission, then the sin of omission must of necessity ~include
13 2, 71 | For there is no sin of omission, unless we omit what we ~
14 2, 71 | either united ~with the omission or preceding it. Now if
15 2, 71 | not in man's ~power, the omission will not be sinful, as when
16 2, 71 | subject to ~the will, the omission is sinful; and such cause,
17 2, 71 | sometimes bears directly on the omission, as when ~a man wills "not
18 2, 71 | very nature, belongs to the omission, because ~the volition of
19 2, 71 | else be united with the omission, ~as when a man wills to
20 2, 71 | church - or, ~precede the omission, as when a man wills to
21 2, 71 | exterior, is accidental to the omission, since the ~omission follows
22 2, 71 | the omission, since the ~omission follows outside the intention,
23 2, 71 | evident that then the sin of omission has indeed an act united
24 2, 71 | with, ~or preceding the omission, but that this act is accidental
25 2, 71 | accidental to the sin of ~omission.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[71] A[
26 2, 71 | Reply OBJ 3: The sin of omission is contrary to an affirmative
27 2, 72 | they differ in regard to omission and commission?~(7) Whether
28 2, 72 | Whether sins of commission and omission differ specifically?~Aquin.:
29 2, 72 | that sins of commission and omission differ ~specifically. For "
30 2, 72 | offenses" here denotes sins of omission; while "sin" ~denotes sins
31 2, 72 | against which is the ~sin of omission, are different from the
32 2, 72 | against which ~is the sin of omission. Therefore sins of omission
33 2, 72 | omission. Therefore sins of omission and commission differ ~specifically.~
34 2, 72 | Para. 1/1 ~OBJ 3: Further, omission and commission differ as
35 2, 72 | iv, text. 67). ~Therefore omission and commission cannot belong
36 2, 72 | Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Omission and commission are found
37 2, 72 | give, ~which is a sin of omission. Therefore omission and
38 2, 72 | sin of omission. Therefore omission and commission do not ~differ
39 2, 72 | material species in sins of omission and commission, they differ ~
40 2, 72 | formal species of ~sins of omission and commission, they do
41 2, 72 | respect of commission and omission, is not ~according to different
42 2, 74 | neglects it by a ~kind of omission. Therefore the consent to
43 2, 76 | or do, commits a sin of omission. Wherefore ~through negligence,
44 2, 76 | the will; so in a sin of omission not only the act of the ~
45 2, 76 | will is a sin, but also the omission, in so far as it is in some
46 2, 76 | Just as in other sins of omission, man sins actually only ~
47 2, 89 | from the ~aforesaid sin of omission, unless it turns to God
48 2, 100 | dispensation, in so far ~as the omission of these precepts in certain
49 2, 100 | the precept concerning the omission of the mode of ~charity.~
50 2, 10 | peril that ensues from the omission of preaching, ~threatens
51 2, 31 | 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the omission of a Divine precept is a
52 2, 31 | Para. 4/4~Thirdly, such an omission is a venial sin, when through
53 2, 52 | 2: Further, every sin of omission seems to be due to negligence.
54 2, 52 | negligence. But ~sins of omission are not opposed to prudence,
55 2, 52 | 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Omission regards the external act,
56 2, 52 | negligence consists in the omission of an act or circumstance ~
57 2, 52 | negligence consists in the omission of that which is ~necessary
58 2, 60 | Reply OBJ 3: Whenever the omission of a circumstance is contrary
59 2, 77 | special sin?~(3) Whether omission is a special sin?~(4) Of
60 2, 77 | Of the comparison between omission and transgression.~Aquin.:
61 2, 77 | as it is distinct ~from omission which is opposed to an affirmative
62 2, 77 | stated above. The sin of omission, however, is altogether
63 2, 77 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether omission is a special sin?~Aquin.:
64 2, 77 | OBJ 1: It would seem that omission is not a special sin. For
65 2, 77 | original or actual. Now omission is not original sin, for
66 2, 77 | sins in general. Therefore omission is not a special sin.~Aquin.:
67 2, 77 | every sin is voluntary. Now omission sometimes is not ~voluntary
68 2, 77 | from ~doing so. Therefore omission is not always a sin.~Aquin.:
69 2, 77 | possible in the case of omission, since one is ~not altered
70 2, 77 | thing, no matter when the omission occurs, and ~yet the omission
71 2, 77 | omission occurs, and ~yet the omission is not always sinful. Therefore
72 2, 77 | always sinful. Therefore omission is not a ~special sin.~Aquin.:
73 2, 77 | special virtue to which omission is ~opposed, both because
74 2, 77 | above (A[1], ad 2), while ~omission may be altogether without
75 2, 77 | altogether without act. Therefore omission is not a ~special sin.~Aquin.:
76 2, 77 | Para. 1/1~I answer that, omission signifies the non-fulfilment
77 2, 77 | above (Q[58], AA[6],7), omission ~is a special sin distinct
78 2, 77 | transgression is opposed, so too is omission distinct from transgression.~
79 2, 77 | 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Omission is not original but actual
80 2, 77 | 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Omission, as stated above, is only
81 2, 77 | wherefore no man sins by omission, if he does not do what
82 2, 77 | virginity, is guilty of an ~omission, not through not having
83 2, 77 | be lacking, there is no ~omission. And in like manner, a person
84 2, 77 | he is not ~guilty of an omission, provided he does what he
85 2, 77 | avoidance of evil, so the sin of omission is ~opposed to affirmative
86 2, 77 | at ~that time the sin of omission begins. But it may happen
87 2, 77 | some say that the sin of omission begins when he ~engages
88 2, 77 | drunkenness was not an ~omission, but the cause of an omission.
89 2, 77 | omission, but the cause of an omission. Consequently, we must say
90 2, 77 | Consequently, we must say that ~the omission begins to be imputed to
91 2, 77 | of which the subsequent omission becomes voluntary.~Aquin.:
92 2, 77 | 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Omission is directly opposed to justice,
93 2, 77 | requires an act, whereas an omission does not.~Aquin.: SMT SS
94 2, 77 | Para. 1/1~Whether a sin of omission is more grievous than a
95 2, 77 | would seem that a sin of omission is more grievous than a
96 2, 77 | seemingly the same as an omission. But "delictum" denotes
97 2, 77 | 5. Therefore the sin of omission is more grievous than the
98 2, 77 | A[1], ad 3). Therefore ~omission is a graver sin than transgression.~
99 2, 77 | or mortal. ~But sins of omission seem to be always mortal,
100 2, 77 | affirmative precept. Therefore omission would seem to be a graver
101 2, 77 | inflicted for the sin of omission, is a greater ~punishment
102 2, 77 | fault. Therefore the sin of omission is ~graver than the sin
103 2, 77 | an act of virtue, while omission denotes the negation thereof:
104 2, 77 | instance it is a ~sin of omission, if one fail to give one'
105 2, 77 | transgression ~is a graver sin than omission, although a particular omission
106 2, 77 | omission, although a particular omission may be ~graver than a particular
107 2, 77 | sense denotes any kind of ~omission; but sometimes it is taken
108 2, 77 | is taken strictly for the omission of ~something concerning
109 2, 77 | doing good," ~which is an omission, and "doing evil," which
110 2, 77 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Just as omission is opposed to affirmative
111 2, 77 | mortal sin. Transgression and omission, ~however, may be taken
112 2, 77 | mutable good. In like manner ~omission deserves not only the pain
113 2, 102 | and disobedience for the ~omission of that action through any
114 2, 105 | two ways: first, by mere omission, for instance by ~failing
115 2, 152 | of a thing than ~on the omission of the right use. Wherefore
116 2, 152 | which consists in the ~mere omission of copulation with another.
117 2, 184 | while the ~transgression or omission of other things binds only
118 3, 38 | sacrament, ~not only must the omission be supplied, but the whole
119 3, 38 | only, not merely had the omission ~to be supplied by giving
120 3, 60 | part of the form, such ~an omission does not destroy the essential
121 3, 60 | For this is My Body," the omission of the word "for" does ~
122 3, 60 | perhaps he who makes the omission may ~sin from negligence
123 3, 83 | people, and therefore the omission of ~either of them causes
124 Suppl, 13| committed, the ~other for his omission, so that it does not follow
125 Suppl, 14| does not incur the guilt of omission ~through neglecting to make
126 Suppl, 14| omit an evil ~deed. But the omission of an evil deed always avoids
127 Suppl, 50| sacraments also in ~the omission either of that which is
128 Suppl, 67| He can. ~The fourth is by omission of punishment, and in this
129 Suppl, 67| greater good, and then the omission of that good becomes ~virtuous
130 Suppl, 67| grant a dispensation, ~the omission of that good is not sinful,
|