Part, Question
1 1, 3 | are composite; and we use ~abstract nouns to signify His simplicity.
2 1, 7 | there is no lie ~in things abstract," as the Philosopher says (
3 1, 12 | is capable of receiving abstract ~intelligible things. Hence
4 1, 12 | intelligible light, enabling us to abstract from ~them intelligible
5 1, 13 | Further, every name is either abstract or concrete. But concrete ~
6 1, 13 | since He is simple, nor do abstract names ~belong to Him, forasmuch
7 1, 13 | subsisting, we ~attribute to Him abstract names to signify His simplicity,
8 1, 18 | signifies this, though in the abstract, just as the word "running" ~
9 1, 18 | denotes "to run" in the abstract.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[18] A[
10 1, 31 | concrete is predicated ~of the abstract; for Deity is God and paternity
11 1, 32 | require to presuppose any abstract notions as ~principles of
12 1, 32 | mentioned, he propounded the abstract for the concrete. For as
13 1, 32 | the use of concrete and abstract ~names in God is not in
14 1, 32 | In ~these things we use abstract terms to signify simple
15 1, 32 | things, as above stated, by abstract names, to express their ~
16 1, 32 | names be signified in the abstract and in ~the concrete, as
17 1, 32 | there must also be some abstract ~terms whereby we may answer
18 1, 32 | notions signified by an abstract term, as paternity ~and
19 1, 32 | separately signified in the abstract; and these are what we mean
20 1, 32 | idea of notions, as the ~abstract is contained in the concrete.~
21 1, 39 | essential names taken in the ~abstract?~(6) Whether the names of
22 1, 39 | Thes. Para. 1/1 ~Whether abstract essential names can stand
23 1, 39 | OBJ 1: It would seem that abstract essential names can stand
24 1, 39 | signifies the essence as an abstract form. ~Consequently, what
25 1, 39 | them: thus, for instance, abstract ~names should be explained
26 1, 39 | Nevertheless, as regards these ~abstract names a certain order should
27 1, 39 | attributes expressed in the abstract ~signify by mode of form.
28 1, 39 | especially when expressed in ~the abstract, are not to be appropriated
29 1, 40 | These are designated by abstract terms, ~being forms, as
30 1, 40 | follows that in God the ~abstract is the same as the concrete,
31 1, 40 | the persons ~because the abstract and the concrete are the
32 1, 40 | Son, because in God the ~abstract and the concrete do not
33 1, 40 | as, for instance, if we abstract the form of a circle from
34 1, 40 | it would be necessary to abstract the rationality from ~the
35 1, 44 | mentally, whereas it is not abstract in ~reality. Now, it is
36 1, 44 | our understanding. For we ~abstract universal ideas by force
37 1, 54 | can be but one; just as an abstract thing that subsists. ~Consequently
38 1, 54 | signifies the act in the abstract, and ~the other in the concrete.
39 1, 55 | the ~angelic mind can also abstract species from sensible things.
40 1, 55 | Even granted that he could abstract ~intelligible species from
41 1, 59 | tending towards good in the abstract, which appetite belongs
42 1, 76 | or ~power cannot be more abstract or more simple than the
43 1, 39 | essential names taken in the ~abstract?~(6) Whether the names of
44 1, 39 | Thes. Para. 1/1 ~Whether abstract essential names can stand
45 1, 39 | OBJ 1: It would seem that abstract essential names can stand
46 1, 39 | signifies the essence as an abstract form. ~Consequently, what
47 1, 39 | them: thus, for instance, abstract ~names should be explained
48 1, 39 | Nevertheless, as regards these ~abstract names a certain order should
49 1, 39 | attributes expressed in the abstract ~signify by mode of form.
50 1, 39 | especially when expressed in ~the abstract, are not to be appropriated
51 1, 40 | These are designated by abstract terms, ~being forms, as
52 1, 40 | follows that in God the ~abstract is the same as the concrete,
53 1, 40 | the persons ~because the abstract and the concrete are the
54 1, 40 | Son, because in God the ~abstract and the concrete do not
55 1, 40 | as, for instance, if we abstract the form of a circle from
56 1, 40 | it would be necessary to abstract the rationality from ~the
57 1, 45 | mentally, whereas it is not abstract in ~reality. Now, it is
58 1, 45 | our understanding. For we ~abstract universal ideas by force
59 1, 55 | can be but one; just as an abstract thing that subsists. ~Consequently
60 1, 55 | signifies the act in the abstract, and ~the other in the concrete.
61 1, 56 | the ~angelic mind can also abstract species from sensible things.
62 1, 56 | Even granted that he could abstract ~intelligible species from
63 1, 60 | tending towards good in the abstract, which appetite belongs
64 1, 75 | or ~power cannot be more abstract or more simple than the
65 1, 78 | since we perceive that we abstract universal ~forms from their
66 1, 81 | more simple and the more abstract a thing is, the ~nobler
67 1, 84 | the passive intellect to abstract ~the intelligible species
68 1, 84 | color; since ~light does not abstract anything from color, but
69 1, 84 | existing in such matter, is to abstract the ~form from individual
70 1, 84 | by participating things abstract, as stated above (Q[84]~,
71 1, 84 | Thus for the intellect to abstract one ~from another things
72 1, 84 | things which are not really abstract from one another, does, ~
73 1, 84 | abstraction, for the intellect to abstract things which are not ~really
74 1, 84 | things which are not ~really abstract from one another, does not
75 1, 84 | qualities; and this is to abstract them from sensible matter;
76 1, 84 | quantity; for that would be to abstract them from common ~intelligible
77 1, 84 | substance; for that is to abstract them from individual intelligible ~
78 1, 84 | abstracted by the intellect, are abstract in reality.~Aquin.: SMT
79 1, 84 | In like manner the words "abstract universal" imply two ~things,
80 1, 85 | immaterially and in the abstract, which is to know the universal.~
81 1, 86 | immaterial, but only the abstract likenesses thereof. ~Hence
82 1, 87 | we unable to understand abstract substances, ~"because it
83 1, 87 | nature of our intellect is to abstract the quiddity of material ~
84 1, 87 | however much our ~intellect abstract the quiddity of material
85 2, 35 | likeness is more immaterial and abstract. Consequently inward pain
86 2, 53 | take an ~accident in the abstract, it implies relation to
87 2, 53 | defining an ~accident in the abstract, we do not put the subject
88 2, 53 | that ~accident, not in the abstract, but in the concrete. Such
89 2, 94 | the natural law, in the abstract, can nowise be ~blotted
90 2, 95 | because lawgivers judge in the abstract and of future events; whereas ~
91 2, 99 | could not go astray in the abstract, as to the universal ~principles
92 2, 99 | of these belongs in the ~abstract to the dictates of the natural
93 2, 102 | a reason for them in the abstract, but not in regard to ~particular
94 2, 102 | figurative cause; whereas in the ~abstract they have a literal cause.~
95 2, 80 | subtle considerations about ~abstract matters are often a hindrance
96 3, 2 | considered in itself, i.e. in the abstract, is viewed as assumed; and
97 3, 3 | It would seem that if we abstract the Personality by our mind, ~
98 3, 3 | 2]). Now if we mentally ~abstract these, there still remains
99 3, 3 | Personalities. And ~hence if we abstract Personality by our intellect,
100 3, 3 | attributed to God in the abstract is ~considered in itself,
101 3, 3 | Reply OBJ 3: If we mentally abstract the Personality, it is said
102 3, 12 | species from phantasms, could abstract ~others, and others again.~
103 3, 16 | one of the other, in the abstract. For the ~Divine Nature
104 3, 16 | flesh" are taken in the abstract, even as ~Godhead and manhood;
105 3, 16 | Hence in both cases ~the abstract is not predicated of the
106 3, 16 | is not predicated of the abstract, but only the concrete of ~
107 3, 16 | if they are ~taken in the abstract. Now concrete words stand
108 3, 16 | signifying human nature in the abstract, it might be taken in this
109 3, 16 | predicated not only of ~abstract, but also of concrete things;
110 3, 17 | itself, as it is used in the ~abstract, cannot truly be predicated
111 3, 17 | predicated of Him both in the abstract and in the concrete, for
112 3, 17 | predicated of Christ in ~the abstract, but only in the concrete,
113 3, 17 | natures were predicated in the abstract of ~Christ, it would follow
114 3, 17 | predicated even in the ~abstract of the Father and Son. But
115 3, 17 | nature as ~it is in the abstract, but as it is in the concrete;
116 3, 17 | predicated, even in the abstract of the three Persons; hence
117 3, 17 | are not predicated in the abstract of Christ; ~hence it cannot
118 3, 77 | OBJ 4: Further, quantity abstract from matter seems to be
119 Suppl, 89| has a natural aptitude to abstract the quiddity from all ~intelligible
120 Suppl, 89| has a natural aptitude to abstract this quiddity, and consequently
|