Part, Question
1 1, 36| more fittingly signify the notional acts than the relations;
2 1, 37| the term "to speak" is a notional term as importing the ~relation
3 1, 37| person and "to love" is a notional term, as "to speak" and "
4 1, 37| which is to take love as a notional term; because He loves essentially
5 1, 37| the Holy Ghost; for no ~notional act is reflected back on
6 1, 37| to love" is taken in a notional sense. Again, the love ~
7 1, 37| term Love is taken in a notional sense it means nothing else ~
8 1, 37| essentially, but also in a notional ~sense; and in this way,
9 1, 37| begets," ~this imports only a notional act. Hence we cannot say
10 1, 37| the speaking," as by a notional act; forasmuch as "to speak"
11 1, 37| Likewise to love, taken in a notional sense, means to produce
12 1, 37| and by Love itself as a notional act.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[37]
13 1, 37| explained, to love, taken in a ~notional sense, not only imports
14 1, 39| the properties, and to the notional acts; and of the comparison
15 1, 39| the singular? ~(4) Whether notional adjectives, or verbs, or
16 1, 39| cannot by reason ~of the notional predicate, stand for person.~
17 1, 39| but by reason ~of some notional adjunct are made to stand
18 1, 39| generates," by reason of the notional act this name "God" stands
19 1, 39| in the substantive. But notional and personal ~adjectives
20 1, 39| terms, ~whether personal or notional, cannot be predicated of
21 1, 40| 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Notional participles and verbs signify
22 1, 40| participles and verbs signify the notional acts: ~and acts belong to
23 1, 40| signification is against notional participles and verbs being
24 1, 40| properties presuppose the notional acts?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40]
25 1, 40| It would seem that the notional acts are understood before
26 1, 40| understanding follow upon the notional acts, so ~that we can say,
27 1, 40| spiration, taken for the ~notional act, is attributed to the
28 1, 40| person ~originating; as the notional act of spiration precedes,
29 1, 40| intelligence it presupposes the notional act, for relation, as such,
30 1, 40| the person; ~and thus the notional act presupposes the relation,
31 1, 41| PERSONS IN REFERENCE TO THE NOTIONAL ACTS (SIX ARTICLES)~We now
32 1, 41| persons in reference to the notional acts, ~concerning which
33 1, 41| inquiry arise:~(1) Whether the notional acts are to be attributed
34 1, 41| exists a power as regards the notional acts?~(5) What this power
35 1, 41| persons can be the term of one notional act?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41]
36 1, 41| Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the notional acts are to be attributed
37 1, 41| It would seem that the notional acts are not to be attributed
38 1, 41| in addition ~to these, notional acts are not to be attributed
39 1, 41| God. Therefore neither are notional acts to ~be placed in God.~
40 1, 41| beget the Son." Therefore notional acts ~are to be placed in
41 1, 41| persons, we must attribute ~notional acts to the persons.~Aquin.:
42 1, 41| of this origin are called notional; because the notions of
43 1, 41| Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The notional acts differ from the relations
44 1, 41| Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the notional acts are voluntary?~Aquin.:
45 1, 41| It would seem that the notional acts are voluntary. For
46 1, 41| Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the notional acts proceed from something?~
47 1, 41| It would seem that the notional acts do not proceed from ~
48 1, 41| power in respect of the notional acts?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41]
49 1, 41| power in respect of the ~notional acts. For every kind of
50 1, 41| power ~in respect of the notional acts.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41]
51 1, 41| Therefore, as ~regards the notional acts, whereby the divine
52 1, 41| exist in reference to the notional acts.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41]
53 1, 41| exists in God regarding the notional acts.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41]
54 1, 41| 1~I answer that, As the notional acts exist in God, so must
55 1, 41| As a person, according to notional acts, does not proceed ~
56 1, 41| power in God as regards the notional acts has no ~reference to
57 1, 41| which He is ~principle by a notional act. But in God the distinction
58 1, 41| persons can be the term of one notional act?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41]
59 1, 41| 1: It would seem that a notional act can be directed to several ~
60 1, 41| Father, by reason of the notional term added. ~But if the
61 1, 37| the term "to speak" is a notional term as importing the ~relation
62 1, 37| person and "to love" is a notional term, as "to speak" and "
63 1, 37| which is to take love as a notional term; because He loves essentially
64 1, 37| the Holy Ghost; for no ~notional act is reflected back on
65 1, 37| to love" is taken in a notional sense. Again, the love ~
66 1, 37| term Love is taken in a notional sense it means nothing else ~
67 1, 37| essentially, but also in a notional ~sense; and in this way,
68 1, 37| begets," ~this imports only a notional act. Hence we cannot say
69 1, 37| the speaking," as by a notional act; forasmuch as "to speak"
70 1, 37| Likewise to love, taken in a notional sense, means to produce
71 1, 37| and by Love itself as a notional act.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[37]
72 1, 37| explained, to love, taken in a ~notional sense, not only imports
73 1, 39| the properties, and to the notional acts; and of the comparison
74 1, 39| the singular? ~(4) Whether notional adjectives, or verbs, or
75 1, 39| cannot by reason ~of the notional predicate, stand for person.~
76 1, 39| but by reason ~of some notional adjunct are made to stand
77 1, 39| generates," by reason of the notional act this name "God" stands
78 1, 39| in the substantive. But notional and personal ~adjectives
79 1, 39| terms, ~whether personal or notional, cannot be predicated of
80 1, 40| 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Notional participles and verbs signify
81 1, 40| participles and verbs signify the notional acts: ~and acts belong to
82 1, 40| signification is against notional participles and verbs being
83 1, 40| properties presuppose the notional acts?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[40]
84 1, 40| It would seem that the notional acts are understood before
85 1, 40| understanding follow upon the notional acts, so ~that we can say,
86 1, 40| spiration, taken for the ~notional act, is attributed to the
87 1, 40| person ~originating; as the notional act of spiration precedes,
88 1, 40| intelligence it presupposes the notional act, for relation, as such,
89 1, 40| the person; ~and thus the notional act presupposes the relation,
90 1, 41| PERSONS IN REFERENCE TO THE NOTIONAL ACTS (SIX ARTICLES)~We now
91 1, 41| persons in reference to the notional acts, ~concerning which
92 1, 41| inquiry arise:~(1) Whether the notional acts are to be attributed
93 1, 41| exists a power as regards the notional acts?~(5) What this power
94 1, 41| persons can be the term of one notional act?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41]
95 1, 41| Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the notional acts are to be attributed
96 1, 41| It would seem that the notional acts are not to be attributed
97 1, 41| in addition ~to these, notional acts are not to be attributed
98 1, 41| God. Therefore neither are notional acts to ~be placed in God.~
99 1, 41| beget the Son." Therefore notional acts ~are to be placed in
100 1, 41| persons, we must attribute ~notional acts to the persons.~Aquin.:
101 1, 41| of this origin are called notional; because the notions of
102 1, 41| Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The notional acts differ from the relations
103 1, 41| Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the notional acts are voluntary?~Aquin.:
104 1, 41| It would seem that the notional acts are voluntary. For
105 1, 41| Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the notional acts proceed from something?~
106 1, 41| It would seem that the notional acts do not proceed from ~
107 1, 41| power in respect of the notional acts?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41]
108 1, 41| power in respect of the ~notional acts. For every kind of
109 1, 41| power ~in respect of the notional acts.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41]
110 1, 41| Therefore, as ~regards the notional acts, whereby the divine
111 1, 41| exist in reference to the notional acts.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41]
112 1, 41| exists in God regarding the notional acts.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41]
113 1, 41| 1~I answer that, As the notional acts exist in God, so must
114 1, 41| As a person, according to notional acts, does not proceed ~
115 1, 41| power in God as regards the notional acts has no ~reference to
116 1, 41| which He is ~principle by a notional act. But in God the distinction
117 1, 41| persons can be the term of one notional act?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41]
118 1, 41| 1: It would seem that a notional act can be directed to several ~
119 1, 41| Father, by reason of the notional term added. ~But if the
|