Part, Question
1 2, 102 | allowable to give a bill of divorce, which is contrary to ~the
2 2, 105 | away, by writing a bill ~of divorce; and besides, that he could
3 2, 105 | should write a bill of divorce and send her away (Dt. 24:
4 2, 107 | him give ~her a bill of divorce. But I say to you that whosoever
5 2, 107 | excessive eagerness for ~divorce might cease through being
6 2, 107 | his wife without a bill of divorce, while the New Law forbade
7 2, 107 | while the New Law forbade divorce ~altogether; as is clearly
8 2, 108 | in themselves: namely, ~divorce of a wife, and the taking
9 2, 108 | Our ~Lord forbade a man to divorce his wife (Mt. 5:32); and
10 3, 29 | sacrament, since there was no divorce. Carnal intercourse alone ~
11 Suppl, 55| should always be dissolved by divorce?~(10) Whether the process
12 Suppl, 55| always to be annulled by ~divorce. For "what God hath joined
13 Suppl, 59| Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 5: To divorce a wife is contrary to the
14 Suppl, 59| lawful for an unbeliever to divorce his wife. Hence ~if he be
15 Suppl, 59| contrary to the natural law to divorce one's wife. ~Now there was
16 Suppl, 59| free to ~give a bill of divorce to his adulterous wife,
17 Suppl, 62| given ~his wife a bill of divorce and she has married again;
18 Suppl, 62| 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Divorce on account of fornication
19 Suppl, 62| guilty of the same ~crime, a divorce cannot be pronounced when
20 Suppl, 62| fornication, are not motives for a divorce. Since, ~however, unbelief
21 Suppl, 62| it is also a motive for divorce, yet not in the same way ~
22 Suppl, 62| take steps for procuring a divorce ~on account of one act of
23 Suppl, 62| may be taken to procure a divorce on account also of ~the
24 Suppl, 62| may privately pronounce a divorce without the ~judgment of
25 Suppl, 62| debt, which pertains to a divorce, ought to precede the judgment ~
26 Suppl, 62| Job 24:15). ~Therefore the divorce in question ought not to
27 Suppl, 62| putting away is called a divorce: and consequently ~it must
28 Suppl, 62| must be admitted that a divorce cannot be pronounced except
29 Suppl, 62| sentence at law was not only divorce but also stoning, but not
30 Suppl, 62| 1/1~Whether in a case of divorce husband and wife should
31 Suppl, 62| seem that, in a case of divorce, husband and wife ought ~
32 Suppl, 62| par with each other. For divorce under the New Law ~takes
33 Suppl, 62| takes the place of the divorce [repudium] recognized by
34 Suppl, 62| versa." Therefore neither in divorce ought they to be judged
35 Suppl, 62| Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, divorce is prescribed in order to
36 Suppl, 62| other for the purpose of divorce, ~but the husband ought
37 Suppl, 62| spared in the punishment of divorce.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[62] A[
38 Suppl, 62| answer that, In a case of divorce husband and wife are judged
39 Suppl, 62| things, since the reason for divorce is ~greater in one spouse
40 Suppl, 62| is sufficient ~reason for divorce in both. For divorce is
41 Suppl, 62| for divorce in both. For divorce is a punishment of adultery,
42 Suppl, 62| a sufficient reason for divorce. ~But as regards the good
43 Suppl, 62| is a greater reason ~for divorce in the wife than in the
44 Suppl, 62| OBJ 1: The only reason why divorce was permitted, was to avoid ~
45 Suppl, 62| away his wife by a bill of divorce, but not ~"vice versa."~
46 Suppl, 62| there is more reason for ~divorce in an adulterous wife than
47 Suppl, 62| reason it is an occasion for ~divorce, the woman sins more grievously
48 Suppl, 62| marry again after having a divorce?~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[62] A[
49 Suppl, 62| marry again after having a ~divorce. For no one is bound to
50 Suppl, 62| from both ~obligations by divorce. Therefore "she is loosed
51 Suppl, 62| marriage tie, which neither divorce nor union with ~another
52 Suppl, 62| Reply OBJ 3: Although after divorce the wife is not bound to
53 Suppl, 62| witnesses in pronouncing the ~divorce; for in that case, even
54 Suppl, 62| committed adultery after the divorce. But in this case the wife
55 Suppl, 62| be reconciled, since the divorce has been justly ~pronounced.
56 Suppl, 62| sentence of the Church, the ~divorce would seem to have been
57 Suppl, 62| reconciliation allowable ~when the divorce has been granted justly.~
58 Suppl, 62| reconciled to her ~after divorce.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[62] A[
59 Suppl, 62| repenting of her sin ~after the divorce, her husband may become
60 Suppl, 62| Church in pronouncing the divorce did ~not bind them to separate,
61 Suppl, 62| prejudice. Wherefore since the divorce has been granted in favor
62 Suppl, 62| committed adultery after the divorce. But according to ~equity,
63 Suppl, 62| husband sins by seeking a divorce, and ~if, after the sentence
64 Suppl, 62| if, after the sentence of divorce, his wife asks for the marriage
65 Suppl, 64| bigamy; (4) the bill of divorce; (5) illegitimate children.~
66 Suppl, 65| dispensation to ~grant a bill of divorce in order to avoid wife-murder (
67 Suppl, 67| Para. 1/1 - OF THE BILL OF DIVORCE (SEVEN ARTICLES)~We must
68 Suppl, 67| now consider the bill of divorce, under which head there
69 Suppl, 67| 6) Whether the cause of divorce was hatred of the wife?~(
70 Suppl, 67| Whether the reasons for divorce had to be written on the
71 Suppl, 67| stated above. But since divorce is more directly ~incompatible
72 Suppl, 67| receive a dispensation to divorce his wife. Neither, ~therefore,
73 Suppl, 67| Whether it was lawful to divorce a wife under the Mosaic
74 Suppl, 67| seem that it was lawful to divorce a wife under the ~Mosaic
75 Suppl, 67| 12), it would seem that divorce was at one time lawful.~
76 Suppl, 67| was not always unlawful to divorce a wife.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[
77 Suppl, 67| Moses allowed the bill of divorce. But second ~marriages are
78 Suppl, 67| under the ~Mosaic law to divorce a wife.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[
79 Suppl, 67| granted the ~Jews the bill of divorce by reason of the hardness
80 Suppl, 67| the law about the bill of divorce.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[67] A[
81 Suppl, 67| by granting the ~bill of divorce, did not indicate the justice
82 Suppl, 67| after giving them a bill of ~divorce, were not excused from sin,
83 Suppl, 67| have permitted the bill of divorce. ~Accordingly they reckon
84 Suppl, 67| in this way the bill of ~divorce was permitted in the Law,
85 Suppl, 67| the Lawgiver by permitting divorce removed the guilt ~from
86 Suppl, 67| did not forbid the bill of divorce.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[67] A[
87 Suppl, 67| from the sin." For ~though divorce remained inordinate, for
88 Suppl, 67| John Chrysostom] that "divorce was ~permitted, an evil
89 Suppl, 67| understand by this only that divorce incurred the debt of temporal ~
90 Suppl, 67| another husband. For in divorce the husband did a greater
91 Suppl, 67| custom for a wife after divorce to marry ~another husband: "
92 Suppl, 67| dispensation for a husband ~to divorce his wife, so could the wife
93 Suppl, 67| so is it in the matter of divorce.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[67] A[
94 Suppl, 67| killing ~his wife unless he divorce her; "and because he divorces
95 Suppl, 67| But for the ~husband to divorce his wife was ill done. Therefore
96 Suppl, 67| law concerning the bill of divorce two things were ~permitted,
97 Suppl, 67| namely that the bill of divorce should be written, and secondly
98 Suppl, 67| might not ~be too ready to divorce his wife if he could nowise
99 Suppl, 67| 1~Whether the reason for divorce was hatred for the wife?~
100 Suppl, 67| seem that the reason for divorce was hatred for the ~wife.
101 Suppl, 67| to have been reasons for ~divorce rather than hatred.~Aquin.:
102 Suppl, 67| a ~sufficient reason for divorce.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[67] A[
103 Suppl, 67| permission being given to divorce a wife was the avoidance
104 Suppl, 67| the ~proximate cause of divorce was hatred. But hatred proceeds,
105 Suppl, 67| Wherefore we must assign to divorce certain remote causes ~which
106 Suppl, 67| that it was not lawful to divorce a wife except ~for some
107 Suppl, 67| they are remote causes of divorce.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[67] A[
108 Suppl, 67| 1~Whether the causes of divorce had to be written in the
109 Suppl, 67| seem that the causes of divorce had to be written in the ~
110 Suppl, 67| by ~the written bill of divorce. But this would seem altogether
111 Suppl, 67| causes were alleged for a divorce. Therefore it was ~necessary
112 Suppl, 67| to show the ~causes for divorce. Therefore, if they were
113 Suppl, 67| contrary, The causes for divorce were either sufficient or
114 Suppl, 67| were insufficient, the ~divorce was proved to be unjust,
115 Suppl, 67| Therefore the causes for divorce were by no means particularized
116 Suppl, 67| answer that, The causes for divorce were not particularized
117 Suppl, 67| prove the justice of ~the divorce. According to Josephus (
118 Suppl, 67| having the written bill of divorce, might take another ~husband,
119 Suppl, 67| refrain from his purpose of ~divorce. ~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[67] A[
|