|     Part, Question1   1, 23  |           and security would beget negligence in the predestined.~Aquin.:
  2   1, 108 |         are responsible as regards negligence for the ~evil deeds of their
  3   1, 108 |         good angels, it seems that negligence is to be ~charged to the
  4   1, 112 |            guarded redounds to the negligence of ~the guardian; hence
  5   1, 112 |          not to be imputed to the ~negligence of the angels but to the
  6   1, 112 |          have fallen through their negligence or through their own ~fault."
  7   2, 6   |         voluntary, as being due to negligence. Accordingly, if in either
  8   2, 19  |         voluntary, which is due to negligence, by reason of a man not
  9   2, 19  |        either directly, or through negligence, so that one errs about
 10   2, 19  |     circumstance, and ~without any negligence, so that it cause the act
 11   2, 40  |      security. But security begets negligence which ~hinders action. Therefore
 12   2, 40  |            security does not beget negligence, ~save in so far as it lessens
 13   2, 71  |         might be ~deemed guilty of negligence. On the other hand, others
 14   2, 76  |       omission. Wherefore ~through negligence, ignorance of what one is
 15   2, 76  |          character of sin; so that negligence, in as ~much as ignorance
 16   2, 76  |          itself, yet by ~reason of negligence in preparing oneself for
 17   2, 76  |       knowledge, ~nevertheless the negligence does not remain, by reason
 18   2, 76  |            from sin. For such like negligence ~renders the ignorance itself
 19   2, 84  |             to which pertains ~the negligence of a man who declines to
 20   2, 84  |          can cause sin, is ~due to negligence, as stated above (Q[76],
 21   2, 102 |       ignorance, and a ram for the negligence of a prince."~Aquin.: SMT
 22   2, 105 |         held responsible for ~less negligence than a depositary, who was
 23   2, 105 |          extent, on account of his negligence in ~acquiring knowledge:
 24   2, 23  |           thereto by some previous negligence, ~for which reason venial
 25   2, 33  |        drowsy and fulfil them with negligence. All ~the other five which
 26   2, 51  |           1) Of imprudence; (2) Of negligence ~which is opposed to solicitude.~
 27   2, 51  |           sin by reason of a man's negligence in striving to have prudence.~
 28   2, 51  |           while "inconstancy" and "negligence" correspond to the ~"command"
 29   2, 51  |            shrewdness, ~belong to "negligence" and "inconstancy."~Aquin.:
 30   2, 51  |      account either of a preceding negligence, or of the consequent result, ~
 31   2, 52  |            54] Out. Para. 1/1 - OF NEGLIGENCE (THREE ARTICLES)~We must
 32   2, 52  |     ARTICLES)~We must now consider negligence, under which head there
 33   2, 52  |            of inquiry:~(1) Whether negligence is a special sin?~(2) To
 34   2, 52  |            it opposed?~(3) Whether negligence is a mortal sin?~Aquin.:
 35   2, 52  |            Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether negligence is a special sin?~Aquin.:
 36   2, 52  |          OBJ 1: It would seem that negligence is not a special sin. For ~
 37   2, 52  |            not a special sin. For ~negligence is opposed to diligence.
 38   2, 52  |           every ~virtue. Therefore negligence is not a special sin.~Aquin.:
 39   2, 52  |            not a special sin. ~Now negligence is common to every sin,
 40   2, 52  |    contrite for his sin. Therefore negligence is not a special sin.~Aquin.:
 41   2, 52  |           determinate matter. But ~negligence seems to have no determinate
 42   2, 52  |           for no man is accused of negligence if he ~omit them), nor about
 43   2, 52  |            Therefore it seems that negligence is not a special ~vice.~
 44   2, 52  |             Sins committed through negligence, are distinguished ~from
 45   2, 52  |           Para. 1/1~I answer that, Negligence denotes lack of due solicitude.
 46   2, 52  |       wherefore it is evident that negligence is a sin, ~and that it must
 47   2, 52  |             A[9]), it follows that negligence, which denotes ~lack of
 48   2, 52  |            in any kind of ~sin; so negligence is a special sin on account
 49   2, 52  |    Properly speaking the matter of negligence is a good that ~one ought
 50   2, 52  |         but ~because on account of negligence it incurs a lack of goodness,
 51   2, 52  |            Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether negligence is opposed to prudence?~
 52   2, 52  |          OBJ 1: It would seem that negligence is not opposed to prudence.
 53   2, 52  |          opposed to prudence. For ~negligence seems to be the same as
 54   2, 52  |           Q[35], A[3]). Therefore ~negligence is not opposed to prudence.~
 55   2, 52  |        omission seems to be due to negligence. But ~sins of omission are
 56   2, 52  |          moral ~virtues. Therefore negligence is not opposed to prudence.~
 57   2, 52  |            some act of reason. But negligence ~does not imply a defect
 58   2, 52  |            inconstancy." Therefore negligence does not ~pertain to imprudence.~
 59   2, 52  |        opposite virtue. ~Therefore negligence is opposed to fear rather
 60   2, 52  |          time." Now this is due to negligence. ~Therefore negligence is
 61   2, 52  |          to negligence. ~Therefore negligence is opposed to prudence.~
 62   2, 52  |           Para. 1/1~I answer that, Negligence is directly opposed to solicitude.
 63   2, 52  |          Hence, on the other hand, negligence pertains to imprudence. ~
 64   2, 52  |     belongs to prudence. Therefore negligence pertains to ~imprudence.~
 65   2, 52  |           1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Negligence is a defect in the internal
 66   2, 52  |      justice, ~and is an effect of negligence, even as the execution of
 67   2, 52  |           3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Negligence regards the act of command,
 68   2, 52  |          Hence fear makes us avoid negligence, yet not as though ~negligence
 69   2, 52  |     negligence, yet not as though ~negligence were directly opposed to
 70   2, 52  |            Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether negligence can be a mortal sin?~Aquin.:
 71   2, 52  |          OBJ 1: It would seem that negligence cannot be a mortal sin.
 72   2, 52  |      aggravates the former," viz. ~negligence. But wherever there is mortal
 73   2, 52  |         with altogether. Therefore negligence is not a mortal sin.~Aquin.:
 74   2, 52  |          Now this would not be, if negligence were a ~mortal sin. Therefore
 75   2, 52  |           a ~mortal sin. Therefore negligence is not a mortal sin.~Aquin.:
 76   2, 52  |      sacrifice was ~prescribed for negligence. Therefore negligence is
 77   2, 52  |          for negligence. Therefore negligence is not a mortal sin.~Aquin.:
 78   2, 52  |         stated above (A[2], ad 3), negligence arises out of a ~certain
 79   2, 52  |        should command. Accordingly negligence may happen to be a mortal
 80   2, 52  |           which is omitted through negligence. ~If this be either an act
 81   2, 52  |          the ~charity of God, such negligence is a mortal sin, and this
 82   2, 52  |          is the case ~chiefly when negligence is due to contempt.~Aquin.:
 83   2, 52  |           3] Body Para. 2/2~But if negligence consists in the omission
 84   2, 52  |          venial sin, ~provided the negligence arise, not from contempt,
 85   2, 52  |       charity, and this causes the negligence that is a ~venial sin: secondly
 86   2, 52  |          love; and this causes the negligence that is a mortal sin.~Aquin.:
 87   2, 52  |        Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: When negligence consists in the omission
 88   2, 71  |            backbiter, through fear negligence, or even shame, he sins ~
 89   2, 75  |      merchant is ~hardly free from negligence, and a huckster shall not
 90   2, 79  |        what has been lost ~through negligence, or from being a bond, it
 91   2, 81  |       becoming manner, not through negligence but ~through frailty."~Aquin.:
 92   2, 85  |         also because some, through negligence, ~would disregard this precept.
 93   2, 97  |            and defile it by their ~negligence." But this is done in every
 94   2, 105 |         but that which arises from negligence. For, as Seneca observes ~(
 95   2, 105 |          either from some kind of ~negligence or from some disinclination
 96   2, 148 |          if it ~is not through his negligence, and thus we believe that
 97   2, 154 | necessarily, but through a certain negligence of the ~spirit in not resisting
 98   2, 154 |             but through a certain ~negligence on account of his not standing
 99   2, 156 |          of many vices, it fosters negligence, and incites not only the
100   2, 167 |              with simplicity, with negligence rather than nicety, not
101   2, 185 |         result of ~covetousness or negligence, and thus also it is sinful.~
102   3, 60  |         the omission may ~sin from negligence or contempt.~Aquin.: SMT
103   3, 65  |           Penance, whether through negligence or through ignorance; order,
104   3, 69  |     therein, while ~another by his negligence baffles grace.~Aquin.: SMT
105   3, 89  |           former duties with great negligence if they ~were restored to
106 Suppl, 36|           without intelligence is "negligence,"* as Cato declares ~(Rudiment.). [*"
 
 |