Part, Question
1 2, 56 | rather the infection of the "fomes": whereas, inasmuch as ~
2 2, 74 | understood as referring to the "fomes," which is never completely ~
3 2, 74 | this corruption of the "fomes" does not ~hinder man from
4 2, 81 | its effect as regards the "fomes," which is the ~disorder
5 2, 89 | Jesus Christ, ~although the "fomes" of concupiscence remain.
6 2, 91 | Whether there is a law in the fomes of sin?~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[
7 2, 91 | there is no law of the "fomes" of sin. For ~Isidore says (
8 2, 91 | based on reason." But the "fomes" ~of sin is not based on
9 2, 91 | from it. Therefore the ~"fomes" has not the nature of a
10 2, 91 | the instigations of the "fomes"; but rather from his following ~
11 2, 91 | following ~them. Therefore the "fomes" has not the nature of a
12 2, 91 | Q[90], A[2]). But the "fomes" inclines us, not to the
13 2, 91 | private good. Therefore the "fomes" has not the nature of sin.~
14 2, 91 | sensuality which is called the ~"fomes," in other animals has simply
15 2, 91 | argument considers the "fomes" in itself, as an ~incentive
16 2, 91 | transgressors. But the "fomes" is not a law in this respect,
17 2, 91 | argument considers the "fomes" as to its proper ~inclination,
18 2, 91 | reason. But it is called "fomes" in so far as it strays
19 2, 93 | which is the law of the ~"fomes," suffice what we have said
20 2, 93 | For there is a law of the "fomes," as stated above (Q[91],
21 2, 93 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The "fomes" has the nature of law in
22 2, 117 | the concupiscence of the "fomes" [*Cf. FS, Q[81], A[3],
23 3, 15 | Whether there was the "fomes" of sin in Him?~(3) Whether
24 3, 15 | 1~Whether there was the "fomes" of sin in Christ?~Aquin.:
25 3, 15 | in Christ there was the "fomes" of sin. For ~the "fomes"
26 3, 15 | fomes" of sin. For ~the "fomes" of sin, and the passibility
27 3, 15 | Therefore there was also the "fomes" of sin.~Aquin.: SMT TP
28 3, 15 | pleasures. Now since the "fomes" of sin is nothing more
29 3, 15 | in Christ ~there was the "fomes" of sin.~Aquin.: SMT TP
30 3, 15 | it is by reason of the "fomes" of sin that "the flesh ~
31 3, 15 | especially seem that the "fomes" of sin ought to have been
32 3, 15 | is implied in the word "fomes." Therefore in ~Christ there
33 3, 15 | ought not to have been the "fomes" of sin.~Aquin.: SMT TP
34 3, 15 | the very nature of ~the "fomes" of sin an inclination of
35 3, 15 | any man, the weaker the "fomes" of sin becomes in him. ~
36 3, 15 | their highest degree, the ~"fomes" of sin was nowise in Him;
37 3, 15 | body; ~yet it excludes the "fomes" of sin, the nature of which
38 3, 15 | in Christ there was the "fomes" of sin, ~for this implies
39 3, 15 | assault on the ~part of the "fomes" of sin, He sustained an
40 3, 15 | in Christ excluded the "fomes" of sin, so the fulness
41 3, 15 | knowledge. Hence, even as the ~"fomes" of sin was not in Christ,
42 3, 15 | to be the same as the ~"fomes" of sin, hence the Apostle (
43 3, 15 | passions of ~sins." Now the "fomes" of sin was not in Christ,
44 3, 15 | Christ, as ~neither was the "fomes" of sin.~Aquin.: SMT TP
45 3, 18 | the ~corruption of the "fomes," which was not in Christ.~
46 3, 27 | this sanctification the fomes of sin was ~entirely taken
47 3, 27 | from the infection of the fomes?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[27] A[
48 3, 27 | from the ~infection of the fomes. For just as the fomes,
49 3, 27 | the fomes. For just as the fomes, consisting in the ~rebellion
50 3, 27 | penalties. Therefore ~the fomes was not entirely removed
51 3, 27 | refers to the weakness of the fomes, by reason of which ~he (
52 3, 27 | it was unfitting that the fomes ~should be entirely taken
53 3, 27 | of purification from the ~fomes: for she committed no sin,
54 3, 27 | absolutely ~cleansed from the fomes.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[27] A[
55 3, 27 | a spot in thee!" But the fomes implies a blemish, ~at any
56 3, 27 | the flesh. Therefore the fomes was not in the Blessed ~
57 3, 27 | some have ~held that the fomes was entirely taken away
58 3, 27 | first sanctification, the ~fomes remained essentially, but
59 3, 27 | must be observed that the fomes is ~nothing but a certain
60 3, 27 | Consequently it is essential to the fomes to incline to evil, or ~
61 3, 27 | Wherefore to say that the fomes was in the Blessed ~Virgin
62 3, 27 | contradiction to say that the fomes ~remained as to the corruption
63 3, 27 | and therefore, ~if the fomes were entirely taken away
64 3, 27 | to say, either that the fomes was entirely ~taken away
65 3, 27 | fettered. ~Now that the fomes was entirely taken away,
66 3, 27 | certainly did not have the fomes of sin; as also was the
67 3, 27 | flesh should be without the fomes, which is ~called "the law
68 3, 27 | Virgin was not freed from the fomes in its essence, but that
69 3, 27 | entire freedom from the fomes redounded from the Child
70 3, 27 | He did not assume the ~fomes. Consequently in order that
71 3, 27 | her grace was derived, the fomes was at ~first fettered and
72 3, 27 | flesh, that pertains to the fomes, ~is indeed to holy men
73 3, 27 | from the stain of sin or fomes, but ~rather gave her mind
74 3, 27 | purified her entirely from the fomes.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[27] A[
75 3, 27 | first sanctification the fomes remained in the ~Virgin.
76 3, 27 | Virgin. Now the motion of the fomes, even if it precede the
77 3, 27 | After her sanctification the fomes remained in the Blessed ~
78 3, 27 | would. not have had the fomes, which is contrary to what
79 3, 27 | mentioned ~fettering (of the fomes) was perfected by divine
80 3, 27 | motion to result from the fomes.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[27] A[
81 3, 27 | entirely cleansed from the ~fomes: lastly, in her glorification
82 3, 39 | there still remain ~the fomes of sin assailing us from
83 3, 66 | the concupiscence of the fomes. By reason of its ~transparency,
84 3, 70 | the concupiscence of the fomes, nor again for the ~fulfilment
85 3, 79 | But the lessening ~of the fomes, which is the law of sin,
86 3, 79 | directly to lessen ~the fomes, yet it does lessen it as
87 3, 86 | than of habits, like the "fomes" which remains after Baptism.~
88 Suppl, 12| cause of actual sin is the fomes. [*"Fomes" ~signifies literally "
89 Suppl, 12| actual sin is the fomes. [*"Fomes" ~signifies literally "fuel,"
90 Suppl, 12| But we cannot remove the "fomes" in this life. ~Therefore
91 Suppl, 12| this ~life, albeit the "fomes," which is the remote cause
92 Suppl, 72| is the ~corruption of the fomes [*Cf. FS, Q[83], A[3]; FS,
93 Suppl, 75| which is ~the flame of the fomes [*Cf. FS, Q[82], A[3]] whereby
94 Suppl, 93| with ~the corruption of the fomes [*Cf. TP, Q[27], A[3]].
95 Suppl, 93| from the inclination of the fomes on account of the ~perfection
96 Suppl, 93| the inclination of the fomes, nor can temptation from
97 Appen1, 2| except on account of the fomes. ~Wherefore in the original
98 Appen1, 2| sensuality; because the fomes will cease when the soul
99 Appen1, 2| from the corruption of the fomes, which ~will no longer be
100 Appen1, 2| from the proneness of the fomes, ~sin results in the mind;
101 Appen1, 2| wherefore even when the fomes is no more, sin ~can still
|